No Moss 3 Landfill Online Library YouTube Archive @VADMME 2023-11-06-Solar and Storage Authority Virtual Meeting October 4, 2023

Solar and Storage Authority Virtual Meeting October 4, 2023

This is the recording of the Solar and Storage Authority Virtual Meeting that took place on October 4, 2023.

View Original: Solar and Storage Authority Virtual Meeting October 4, 2023 (Video) | Virginia Energy (Channel) | Virginia Energy (Uploader)

Download/View: Video (.mkv) | Subtitles (.vtt)

^ Back to top of page.

Video Transcript (approximately)

This transcript may contain automatically generated subtitles as generated using YouTube's automatic subtitles feature. They may not be correct. No effort has been made to correct them (so far). These transcripts, whether or not generated, are also used in the site's Search feature. Please review the Search Policy for details about the site features.

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:16.160 --> 00:00:19.750 align:start position:0%
 
and<00:00:16.359> I<00:00:16.520> have<00:00:16.720> started<00:00:17.119> the<00:00:17.279> recording<00:00:18.600> so<00:00:19.600> I'll

00:00:19.750 --> 00:00:19.760 align:start position:0%
and I have started the recording so I'll
 

00:00:19.760 --> 00:00:24.589 align:start position:0%
and I have started the recording so I'll
talk<00:00:19.920> to<00:00:20.000> you

00:00:24.589 --> 00:00:24.599 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:24.599 --> 00:00:26.790 align:start position:0%
 
later<00:00:25.599> hey<00:00:25.800> Ken<00:00:26.000> it<00:00:26.080> might<00:00:26.199> be<00:00:26.320> useful<00:00:26.560> if<00:00:26.679> you

00:00:26.790 --> 00:00:26.800 align:start position:0%
later hey Ken it might be useful if you
 

00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:28.189 align:start position:0%
later hey Ken it might be useful if you
stop<00:00:27.039> sharing<00:00:27.320> your<00:00:27.480> screen<00:00:27.800> right<00:00:27.960> now

00:00:28.189 --> 00:00:28.199 align:start position:0%
stop sharing your screen right now
 

00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:29.710 align:start position:0%
stop sharing your screen right now
because<00:00:28.400> we're<00:00:28.840> we're<00:00:29.000> just<00:00:29.119> seeing<00:00:29.320> a<00:00:29.439> mirror

00:00:29.710 --> 00:00:29.720 align:start position:0%
because we're we're just seeing a mirror
 

00:00:29.720 --> 00:00:42.190 align:start position:0%
because we're we're just seeing a mirror
of<00:00:30.039> teams<00:00:30.359> me

00:00:42.190 --> 00:00:42.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:42.200 --> 00:00:52.790 align:start position:0%
 
it<00:00:43.200> there

00:00:52.790 --> 00:00:52.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:52.800 --> 00:00:58.310 align:start position:0%
 
go<00:00:53.800> what<00:00:54.440> colen<00:00:55.440> are<00:00:55.559> we<00:00:55.719> close<00:00:55.960> to<00:00:56.079> a<00:00:56.480> quum

00:00:58.310 --> 00:00:58.320 align:start position:0%
go what colen are we close to a quum
 

00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:00.830 align:start position:0%
go what colen are we close to a quum
morning<00:00:59.320> um

00:01:00.830 --> 00:01:00.840 align:start position:0%
morning um
 

00:01:00.840 --> 00:01:06.510 align:start position:0%
morning um
one

00:01:06.510 --> 00:01:06.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:01:06.520 --> 00:01:11.310 align:start position:0%
 
two<00:01:07.560> five<00:01:08.560> six<00:01:09.479> seven<00:01:10.080> yes<00:01:10.360> we

00:01:11.310 --> 00:01:11.320 align:start position:0%
two five six seven yes we
 

00:01:11.320 --> 00:01:15.270 align:start position:0%
two five six seven yes we
are<00:01:12.720> excellent<00:01:13.720> well<00:01:13.960> without<00:01:14.320> further<00:01:14.720> Ado<00:01:15.200> I

00:01:15.270 --> 00:01:15.280 align:start position:0%
are excellent well without further Ado I
 

00:01:15.280 --> 00:01:18.030 align:start position:0%
are excellent well without further Ado I
will<00:01:15.880> call<00:01:16.080> this<00:01:16.320> me<00:01:16.720> to<00:01:17.000> order<00:01:17.520> good<00:01:17.680> morning

00:01:18.030 --> 00:01:18.040 align:start position:0%
will call this me to order good morning
 

00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:20.510 align:start position:0%
will call this me to order good morning
everyone<00:01:18.600> thank<00:01:18.759> you<00:01:18.960> for<00:01:19.520> hopping<00:01:19.960> on

00:01:20.510 --> 00:01:20.520 align:start position:0%
everyone thank you for hopping on
 

00:01:20.520 --> 00:01:23.030 align:start position:0%
everyone thank you for hopping on
virtually<00:01:21.000> with<00:01:21.200> us<00:01:21.520> we've<00:01:21.799> got<00:01:22.680> important

00:01:23.030 --> 00:01:23.040 align:start position:0%
virtually with us we've got important
 

00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:24.910 align:start position:0%
virtually with us we've got important
work<00:01:23.240> ahead<00:01:23.439> of<00:01:23.520> us<00:01:23.680> today<00:01:23.920> to<00:01:24.119> finalize<00:01:24.720> this

00:01:24.910 --> 00:01:24.920 align:start position:0%
work ahead of us today to finalize this
 

00:01:24.920 --> 00:01:27.270 align:start position:0%
work ahead of us today to finalize this
report<00:01:25.720> and<00:01:26.040> uh<00:01:26.159> ship<00:01:26.400> it<00:01:26.520> off<00:01:26.680> to<00:01:26.840> the<00:01:27.000> right

00:01:27.270 --> 00:01:27.280 align:start position:0%
report and uh ship it off to the right
 

00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:29.390 align:start position:0%
report and uh ship it off to the right
people<00:01:27.840> within<00:01:28.159> the<00:01:28.360> governor's<00:01:28.880> office<00:01:29.200> and

00:01:29.390 --> 00:01:29.400 align:start position:0%
people within the governor's office and
 

00:01:29.400 --> 00:01:31.270 align:start position:0%
people within the governor's office and
the

00:01:31.270 --> 00:01:31.280 align:start position:0%
the
 

00:01:31.280 --> 00:01:32.910 align:start position:0%
the
um<00:01:31.400> we<00:01:31.520> have<00:01:31.600> a<00:01:31.759> new<00:01:32.000> member<00:01:32.520> who<00:01:32.680> we're

00:01:32.910 --> 00:01:32.920 align:start position:0%
um we have a new member who we're
 

00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:36.190 align:start position:0%
um we have a new member who we're
excited<00:01:33.360> to<00:01:33.720> welcome<00:01:34.240> today<00:01:35.200> um<00:01:35.840> I<00:01:35.920> don't<00:01:36.079> know

00:01:36.190 --> 00:01:36.200 align:start position:0%
excited to welcome today um I don't know
 

00:01:36.200 --> 00:01:38.350 align:start position:0%
excited to welcome today um I don't know
if<00:01:36.320> we<00:01:36.439> all<00:01:36.560> want<00:01:36.640> to<00:01:36.799> go<00:01:37.000> through<00:01:37.960> Authority

00:01:38.350 --> 00:01:38.360 align:start position:0%
if we all want to go through Authority
 

00:01:38.360 --> 00:01:40.350 align:start position:0%
if we all want to go through Authority
members<00:01:38.759> and<00:01:38.960> and<00:01:39.159> provide<00:01:39.640> a<00:01:40.200> an

00:01:40.350 --> 00:01:40.360 align:start position:0%
members and and provide a an
 

00:01:40.360 --> 00:01:42.469 align:start position:0%
members and and provide a an
introduction<00:01:41.159> but<00:01:41.680> I'd<00:01:41.880> like<00:01:42.000> to<00:01:42.159> welcome

00:01:42.469 --> 00:01:42.479 align:start position:0%
introduction but I'd like to welcome
 

00:01:42.479 --> 00:01:44.630 align:start position:0%
introduction but I'd like to welcome
Robert<00:01:42.799> Bersy<00:01:43.439> of<00:01:43.640> green<00:01:43.960> front<00:01:44.240> Energy

00:01:44.630 --> 00:01:44.640 align:start position:0%
Robert Bersy of green front Energy
 

00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:47.830 align:start position:0%
Robert Bersy of green front Energy
Partners<00:01:45.320> as<00:01:45.560> a<00:01:45.880> recent<00:01:46.560> appointee<00:01:47.560> of<00:01:47.680> the

00:01:47.830 --> 00:01:47.840 align:start position:0%
Partners as a recent appointee of the
 

00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:50.069 align:start position:0%
Partners as a recent appointee of the
governor<00:01:48.200> to<00:01:48.399> the<00:01:48.600> authority<00:01:49.159> so<00:01:49.439> Robert

00:01:50.069 --> 00:01:50.079 align:start position:0%
governor to the authority so Robert
 

00:01:50.079 --> 00:01:51.870 align:start position:0%
governor to the authority so Robert
welcome<00:01:50.560> thank<00:01:50.719> you<00:01:50.799> for<00:01:51.000> joining<00:01:51.399> us<00:01:51.680> and

00:01:51.870 --> 00:01:51.880 align:start position:0%
welcome thank you for joining us and
 

00:01:51.880 --> 00:01:53.270 align:start position:0%
welcome thank you for joining us and
would<00:01:52.040> you<00:01:52.119> like<00:01:52.280> to<00:01:52.399> introduce<00:01:52.799> yourself<00:01:53.159> in

00:01:53.270 --> 00:01:53.280 align:start position:0%
would you like to introduce yourself in
 

00:01:53.280 --> 00:01:54.950 align:start position:0%
would you like to introduce yourself in
front<00:01:53.439> of<00:01:53.560> other

00:01:54.950 --> 00:01:54.960 align:start position:0%
front of other
 

00:01:54.960 --> 00:01:57.149 align:start position:0%
front of other
members<00:01:55.960> uh<00:01:56.240> Hey<00:01:56.479> thank<00:01:56.640> you<00:01:56.799> very<00:01:56.960> much

00:01:57.149 --> 00:01:57.159 align:start position:0%
members uh Hey thank you very much
 

00:01:57.159 --> 00:01:59.990 align:start position:0%
members uh Hey thank you very much
Skyler<00:01:58.119> uh<00:01:58.240> my<00:01:58.360> name<00:01:58.520> is<00:01:58.640> Robert<00:01:58.960> Berdy<00:01:59.840> I'm

00:01:59.990 --> 00:02:00.000 align:start position:0%
Skyler uh my name is Robert Berdy I'm
 

00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:01.590 align:start position:0%
Skyler uh my name is Robert Berdy I'm
one<00:02:00.119> of<00:02:00.200> the<00:02:00.320> co-founders<00:02:00.840> of<00:02:01.000> greenfront

00:02:01.590 --> 00:02:01.600 align:start position:0%
one of the co-founders of greenfront
 

00:02:01.600 --> 00:02:03.789 align:start position:0%
one of the co-founders of greenfront
Energy<00:02:02.039> Partners<00:02:02.680> we're<00:02:03.200> based<00:02:03.520> here<00:02:03.640> in

00:02:03.789 --> 00:02:03.799 align:start position:0%
Energy Partners we're based here in
 

00:02:03.799 --> 00:02:06.510 align:start position:0%
Energy Partners we're based here in
Richmond<00:02:04.640> Virginia<00:02:05.640> we're<00:02:05.840> an<00:02:06.039> investment

00:02:06.510 --> 00:02:06.520 align:start position:0%
Richmond Virginia we're an investment
 

00:02:06.520 --> 00:02:09.029 align:start position:0%
Richmond Virginia we're an investment
banking<00:02:07.000> advisory<00:02:07.520> firm<00:02:08.119> that<00:02:08.280> focuses

00:02:09.029 --> 00:02:09.039 align:start position:0%
banking advisory firm that focuses
 

00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:11.589 align:start position:0%
banking advisory firm that focuses
exclusively<00:02:10.039> on<00:02:10.560> energy

00:02:11.589 --> 00:02:11.599 align:start position:0%
exclusively on energy
 

00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:13.949 align:start position:0%
exclusively on energy
transition<00:02:12.599> uh<00:02:12.879> which<00:02:13.040> of<00:02:13.200> course<00:02:13.440> includes

00:02:13.949 --> 00:02:13.959 align:start position:0%
transition uh which of course includes
 

00:02:13.959 --> 00:02:16.509 align:start position:0%
transition uh which of course includes
traditional<00:02:14.640> wind<00:02:14.959> and<00:02:15.160> solar<00:02:15.519> and<00:02:15.800> battery

00:02:16.509 --> 00:02:16.519 align:start position:0%
traditional wind and solar and battery
 

00:02:16.519 --> 00:02:19.830 align:start position:0%
traditional wind and solar and battery
storage<00:02:17.519> uh<00:02:17.640> we<00:02:17.800> help<00:02:18.000> our<00:02:18.239> clients<00:02:18.840> to

00:02:19.830 --> 00:02:19.840 align:start position:0%
storage uh we help our clients to
 

00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:21.750 align:start position:0%
storage uh we help our clients to
conduct<00:02:20.319> m&a<00:02:20.920> where<00:02:21.120> they're<00:02:21.319> buying<00:02:21.599> and

00:02:21.750 --> 00:02:21.760 align:start position:0%
conduct m&a where they're buying and
 

00:02:21.760 --> 00:02:24.750 align:start position:0%
conduct m&a where they're buying and
selling<00:02:22.319> assets<00:02:22.720> or<00:02:23.120> companies<00:02:24.120> uh<00:02:24.280> we<00:02:24.440> also

00:02:24.750 --> 00:02:24.760 align:start position:0%
selling assets or companies uh we also
 

00:02:24.760 --> 00:02:28.070 align:start position:0%
selling assets or companies uh we also
will<00:02:25.480> organize<00:02:26.040> fundraising<00:02:26.840> for<00:02:27.720> for

00:02:28.070 --> 00:02:28.080 align:start position:0%
will organize fundraising for for
 

00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.670 align:start position:0%
will organize fundraising for for
developers<00:02:28.560> in<00:02:28.800> that<00:02:29.000> space<00:02:30.200> and<00:02:30.360> I'm<00:02:30.480> really

00:02:30.670 --> 00:02:30.680 align:start position:0%
developers in that space and I'm really
 

00:02:30.680 --> 00:02:32.470 align:start position:0%
developers in that space and I'm really
excited<00:02:31.000> to<00:02:31.080> be<00:02:31.280> here<00:02:31.560> thanks<00:02:31.760> for<00:02:32.160> thanks<00:02:32.319> for

00:02:32.470 --> 00:02:32.480 align:start position:0%
excited to be here thanks for thanks for
 

00:02:32.480 --> 00:02:35.309 align:start position:0%
excited to be here thanks for thanks for
having<00:02:32.680> me<00:02:33.200> on<00:02:34.200> excellent<00:02:34.720> welcome<00:02:35.080> again

00:02:35.309 --> 00:02:35.319 align:start position:0%
having me on excellent welcome again
 

00:02:35.319 --> 00:02:37.030 align:start position:0%
having me on excellent welcome again
Robert<00:02:35.800> and<00:02:36.120> uh<00:02:36.280> looking<00:02:36.480> forward<00:02:36.720> to<00:02:36.840> having

00:02:37.030 --> 00:02:37.040 align:start position:0%
Robert and uh looking forward to having
 

00:02:37.040 --> 00:02:39.830 align:start position:0%
Robert and uh looking forward to having
your<00:02:37.280> perspective<00:02:38.040> reflected<00:02:38.760> in<00:02:39.120> future

00:02:39.830 --> 00:02:39.840 align:start position:0%
your perspective reflected in future
 

00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:41.949 align:start position:0%
your perspective reflected in future
Authority

00:02:41.949 --> 00:02:41.959 align:start position:0%
Authority
 

00:02:41.959 --> 00:02:46.229 align:start position:0%
Authority
activities<00:02:43.120> um<00:02:44.120> moving<00:02:44.480> on<00:02:45.280> uh<00:02:45.560> entertain<00:02:46.040> a

00:02:46.229 --> 00:02:46.239 align:start position:0%
activities um moving on uh entertain a
 

00:02:46.239 --> 00:02:48.509 align:start position:0%
activities um moving on uh entertain a
motion<00:02:47.159> at<00:02:47.400> this<00:02:47.599> point<00:02:47.800> well<00:02:47.959> first<00:02:48.159> we<00:02:48.319> call

00:02:48.509 --> 00:02:48.519 align:start position:0%
motion at this point well first we call
 

00:02:48.519 --> 00:02:52.350 align:start position:0%
motion at this point well first we call
for<00:02:48.720> any<00:02:49.200> uh<00:02:49.319> edits<00:02:49.959> or<00:02:50.319> suggested<00:02:51.200> changes<00:02:51.760> to

00:02:52.350 --> 00:02:52.360 align:start position:0%
for any uh edits or suggested changes to
 

00:02:52.360 --> 00:02:53.949 align:start position:0%
for any uh edits or suggested changes to
the<00:02:52.760> September

00:02:53.949 --> 00:02:53.959 align:start position:0%
the September
 

00:02:53.959 --> 00:02:59.030 align:start position:0%
the September
13<00:02:54.959> minutes<00:02:55.879> packet<00:02:56.879> um<00:02:57.040> I<00:02:57.159> have<00:02:57.319> two<00:02:58.040> quick

00:02:59.030 --> 00:02:59.040 align:start position:0%
13 minutes packet um I have two quick
 

00:02:59.040 --> 00:03:04.630 align:start position:0%
13 minutes packet um I have two quick
notes<00:02:59.400> to<00:02:59.760> share<00:03:00.720> um<00:03:01.040> can<00:03:01.560> just<00:03:02.159> two<00:03:03.159> spelling

00:03:04.630 --> 00:03:04.640 align:start position:0%
notes to share um can just two spelling
 

00:03:04.640 --> 00:03:07.710 align:start position:0%
notes to share um can just two spelling
Corrections<00:03:05.640> in<00:03:05.760> terms<00:03:06.239> of<00:03:06.879> under<00:03:07.159> the<00:03:07.319> future

00:03:07.710 --> 00:03:07.720 align:start position:0%
Corrections in terms of under the future
 

00:03:07.720 --> 00:03:08.550 align:start position:0%
Corrections in terms of under the future
meeting

00:03:08.550 --> 00:03:08.560 align:start position:0%
meeting
 

00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:09.600 align:start position:0%
meeting
location

00:03:09.600 --> 00:03:09.610 align:start position:0%
location
 

00:03:09.610 --> 00:03:10.949 align:start position:0%
location
[Music]

00:03:10.949 --> 00:03:10.959 align:start position:0%
[Music]
 

00:03:10.959 --> 00:03:13.869 align:start position:0%
[Music]
um<00:03:11.959> I<00:03:12.120> believe<00:03:12.400> was<00:03:12.599> missing<00:03:12.879> the<00:03:13.000> word<00:03:13.319> was<00:03:13.760> it

00:03:13.869 --> 00:03:13.879 align:start position:0%
um I believe was missing the word was it
 

00:03:13.879 --> 00:03:17.110 align:start position:0%
um I believe was missing the word was it
should<00:03:14.040> be<00:03:14.239> and<00:03:14.519> was

00:03:17.110 --> 00:03:17.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:03:17.120 --> 00:03:20.830 align:start position:0%
 
told<00:03:18.120> and<00:03:18.360> then<00:03:19.280> at<00:03:19.519> the<00:03:19.879> very<00:03:20.159> end<00:03:20.560> of<00:03:20.720> the

00:03:20.830 --> 00:03:20.840 align:start position:0%
told and then at the very end of the
 

00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:22.670 align:start position:0%
told and then at the very end of the
minutes<00:03:21.400> package<00:03:22.040> we<00:03:22.200> called<00:03:22.440> for<00:03:22.560> the

00:03:22.670 --> 00:03:22.680 align:start position:0%
minutes package we called for the
 

00:03:22.680 --> 00:03:25.070 align:start position:0%
minutes package we called for the
meeting<00:03:22.920> to<00:03:23.040> be<00:03:23.239> this<00:03:23.440> October<00:03:23.920> 4th<00:03:24.319> today<00:03:24.799> not

00:03:25.070 --> 00:03:25.080 align:start position:0%
meeting to be this October 4th today not
 

00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:28.670 align:start position:0%
meeting to be this October 4th today not
November

00:03:28.670 --> 00:03:28.680 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:34.390 align:start position:0%
 
4th

00:03:34.390 --> 00:03:34.400 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:37.509 align:start position:0%
 
anyone<00:03:34.680> else<00:03:34.879> have<00:03:35.040> any<00:03:35.439> changes<00:03:36.439> to

00:03:37.509 --> 00:03:37.519 align:start position:0%
anyone else have any changes to
 

00:03:37.519 --> 00:03:40.470 align:start position:0%
anyone else have any changes to
the<00:03:38.519> minutes<00:03:39.040> packet<00:03:39.400> if<00:03:39.560> not<00:03:39.840> we'd<00:03:40.080> entertain

00:03:40.470 --> 00:03:40.480 align:start position:0%
the minutes packet if not we'd entertain
 

00:03:40.480 --> 00:03:44.229 align:start position:0%
the minutes packet if not we'd entertain
a<00:03:40.680> motion<00:03:41.040> to<00:03:41.680> uh<00:03:42.680> approve

00:03:44.229 --> 00:03:44.239 align:start position:0%
a motion to uh approve
 

00:03:44.239 --> 00:03:47.550 align:start position:0%
a motion to uh approve
them<00:03:45.239> approve

00:03:47.550 --> 00:03:47.560 align:start position:0%
them approve
 

00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:51.550 align:start position:0%
them approve
changes<00:03:48.560> excellent<00:03:49.000> it<00:03:49.159> sounded<00:03:49.959> like<00:03:50.560> a

00:03:51.550 --> 00:03:51.560 align:start position:0%
changes excellent it sounded like a
 

00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:53.470 align:start position:0%
changes excellent it sounded like a
motion<00:03:52.000> from<00:03:52.280> Greg<00:03:52.640> and<00:03:52.760> I<00:03:52.879> believe<00:03:53.159> that<00:03:53.280> was

00:03:53.470 --> 00:03:53.480 align:start position:0%
motion from Greg and I believe that was
 

00:03:53.480 --> 00:03:55.869 align:start position:0%
motion from Greg and I believe that was
Joanne<00:03:54.439> who

00:03:55.869 --> 00:03:55.879 align:start position:0%
Joanne who
 

00:03:55.879 --> 00:03:59.270 align:start position:0%
Joanne who
seconded<00:03:56.879> yes<00:03:57.720> thank<00:03:57.920> you<00:03:58.879> all<00:03:59.000> right<00:03:59.159> all

00:03:59.270 --> 00:03:59.280 align:start position:0%
seconded yes thank you all right all
 

00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:00.830 align:start position:0%
seconded yes thank you all right all
those<00:03:59.400> in<00:03:59.480> fav<00:03:59.720> favor<00:04:00.000> please<00:04:00.200> signify<00:04:00.680> by

00:04:00.830 --> 00:04:00.840 align:start position:0%
those in fav favor please signify by
 

00:04:00.840 --> 00:04:07.710 align:start position:0%
those in fav favor please signify by
saying<00:04:01.200> I<00:04:02.200> I<00:04:03.159> I<00:04:03.720> I<00:04:04.360> I<00:04:05.360> any

00:04:07.710 --> 00:04:07.720 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:04:07.720 --> 00:04:10.190 align:start position:0%
 
opposed<00:04:08.720> excellent<00:04:09.200> all<00:04:09.319> right<00:04:09.519> the<00:04:09.640> minutes

00:04:10.190 --> 00:04:10.200 align:start position:0%
opposed excellent all right the minutes
 

00:04:10.200 --> 00:04:11.509 align:start position:0%
opposed excellent all right the minutes
are

00:04:11.509 --> 00:04:11.519 align:start position:0%
are
 

00:04:11.519 --> 00:04:14.630 align:start position:0%
are
approved<00:04:12.519> uh<00:04:12.720> Ken<00:04:13.079> and<00:04:13.360> or<00:04:13.640> Aon<00:04:14.120> I'll<00:04:14.319> pass<00:04:14.480> it

00:04:14.630 --> 00:04:14.640 align:start position:0%
approved uh Ken and or Aon I'll pass it
 

00:04:14.640 --> 00:04:17.430 align:start position:0%
approved uh Ken and or Aon I'll pass it
to<00:04:14.799> you<00:04:15.040> on<00:04:15.280> the<00:04:15.599> uh<00:04:16.120> an<00:04:16.280> update<00:04:16.639> on<00:04:16.799> the<00:04:16.959> status

00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:17.440 align:start position:0%
to you on the uh an update on the status
 

00:04:17.440 --> 00:04:19.469 align:start position:0%
to you on the uh an update on the status
of<00:04:17.919> uh<00:04:18.199> The<00:04:18.320> Authority

00:04:19.469 --> 00:04:19.479 align:start position:0%
of uh The Authority
 

00:04:19.479 --> 00:04:22.189 align:start position:0%
of uh The Authority
website<00:04:20.479> yeah<00:04:20.639> let<00:04:20.759> me<00:04:21.160> uh<00:04:21.359> let<00:04:21.479> me<00:04:21.680> pull<00:04:21.959> that

00:04:22.189 --> 00:04:22.199 align:start position:0%
website yeah let me uh let me pull that
 

00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:28.590 align:start position:0%
website yeah let me uh let me pull that
page<00:04:22.479> up<00:04:22.680> here<00:04:22.800> it<00:04:22.880> might<00:04:23.080> take<00:04:23.199> me<00:04:23.320> a

00:04:28.590 --> 00:04:28.600 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:30.670 align:start position:0%
 
second<00:04:29.639> I<00:04:29.720> don't<00:04:29.840> know<00:04:29.960> if<00:04:30.120> others<00:04:30.400> are

00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:30.680 align:start position:0%
second I don't know if others are
 

00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:34.310 align:start position:0%
second I don't know if others are
experiencing<00:04:31.560> video<00:04:32.360> bandwidth<00:04:33.000> issues<00:04:33.600> with

00:04:34.310 --> 00:04:34.320 align:start position:0%
experiencing video bandwidth issues with
 

00:04:34.320 --> 00:04:36.029 align:start position:0%
experiencing video bandwidth issues with
with<00:04:34.479> Skyler<00:04:34.960> and<00:04:35.080> a<00:04:35.199> couple<00:04:35.560> others<00:04:35.840> but<00:04:35.960> I'm

00:04:36.029 --> 00:04:36.039 align:start position:0%
with Skyler and a couple others but I'm
 

00:04:36.039 --> 00:04:38.150 align:start position:0%
with Skyler and a couple others but I'm
going<00:04:36.160> to<00:04:36.280> go<00:04:36.360> ahead<00:04:36.560> and<00:04:36.720> go<00:04:37.039> off<00:04:37.400> video<00:04:38.039> I'll

00:04:38.150 --> 00:04:38.160 align:start position:0%
going to go ahead and go off video I'll
 

00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:40.710 align:start position:0%
going to go ahead and go off video I'll
turn<00:04:38.360> it<00:04:38.479> on<00:04:38.759> if<00:04:38.919> I<00:04:39.160> speak<00:04:40.080> I<00:04:40.199> just<00:04:40.320> want

00:04:40.710 --> 00:04:40.720 align:start position:0%
turn it on if I speak I just want
 

00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:42.270 align:start position:0%
turn it on if I speak I just want
everyone<00:04:40.960> to<00:04:41.120> know<00:04:41.320> that<00:04:41.479> I<00:04:41.560> am<00:04:41.840> seeing<00:04:42.160> a

00:04:42.270 --> 00:04:42.280 align:start position:0%
everyone to know that I am seeing a
 

00:04:42.280 --> 00:04:44.310 align:start position:0%
everyone to know that I am seeing a
little<00:04:42.400> bit<00:04:42.520> of<00:04:42.720> pixelation<00:04:43.360> and<00:04:43.880> voices

00:04:44.310 --> 00:04:44.320 align:start position:0%
little bit of pixelation and voices
 

00:04:44.320 --> 00:04:45.480 align:start position:0%
little bit of pixelation and voices
coming<00:04:44.560> in<00:04:44.720> and

00:04:45.480 --> 00:04:45.490 align:start position:0%
coming in and
 

00:04:45.490 --> 00:04:48.749 align:start position:0%
coming in and
[Music]

00:04:48.749 --> 00:04:48.759 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:52.469 align:start position:0%
 
out<00:04:49.759> all<00:04:49.880> right<00:04:50.120> so<00:04:50.400> so<00:04:50.880> um<00:04:51.320> as<00:04:51.479> you<00:04:51.680> all<00:04:52.199> except

00:04:52.469 --> 00:04:52.479 align:start position:0%
out all right so so um as you all except
 

00:04:52.479 --> 00:04:55.909 align:start position:0%
out all right so so um as you all except
for<00:04:52.880> our<00:04:53.000> new<00:04:53.199> member<00:04:53.600> Robert<00:04:54.440> no<00:04:55.440> uh<00:04:55.560> we<00:04:55.680> were

00:04:55.909 --> 00:04:55.919 align:start position:0%
for our new member Robert no uh we were
 

00:04:55.919 --> 00:05:00.070 align:start position:0%
for our new member Robert no uh we were
informed<00:04:56.639> that<00:04:57.320> uh<00:04:57.720> as<00:04:57.919> a<00:04:58.840> government<00:04:59.639> entity

00:05:00.070 --> 00:05:00.080 align:start position:0%
informed that uh as a government entity
 

00:05:00.080 --> 00:05:02.950 align:start position:0%
informed that uh as a government entity
we<00:05:00.240> were<00:05:00.440> not<00:05:00.639> allowed<00:05:01.080> to<00:05:01.280> have<00:05:01.400> a<00:05:01.960> website

00:05:02.950 --> 00:05:02.960 align:start position:0%
we were not allowed to have a website
 

00:05:02.960 --> 00:05:05.070 align:start position:0%
we were not allowed to have a website
off<00:05:03.160> of<00:05:03.440> on<00:05:03.600> a<00:05:03.759> commercial<00:05:04.320> platform<00:05:04.800> it<00:05:04.960> has

00:05:05.070 --> 00:05:05.080 align:start position:0%
off of on a commercial platform it has
 

00:05:05.080 --> 00:05:10.909 align:start position:0%
off of on a commercial platform it has
to<00:05:05.240> be<00:05:05.919> uh<00:05:06.440> within<00:05:06.720> the<00:05:07.280> state's<00:05:08.639> um<00:05:09.919> system

00:05:10.909 --> 00:05:10.919 align:start position:0%
to be uh within the state's um system
 

00:05:10.919 --> 00:05:15.070 align:start position:0%
to be uh within the state's um system
and<00:05:11.080> so<00:05:11.400> our<00:05:12.759> um<00:05:13.759> it<00:05:14.160> folks<00:05:14.479> have<00:05:14.639> been<00:05:14.800> working

00:05:15.070 --> 00:05:15.080 align:start position:0%
and so our um it folks have been working
 

00:05:15.080 --> 00:05:19.110 align:start position:0%
and so our um it folks have been working
on<00:05:15.320> putting<00:05:15.840> together<00:05:16.560> a<00:05:17.560> uh<00:05:18.479> kind<00:05:18.600> of<00:05:18.759> a<00:05:19.000> it's

00:05:19.110 --> 00:05:19.120 align:start position:0%
on putting together a uh kind of a it's
 

00:05:19.120 --> 00:05:21.070 align:start position:0%
on putting together a uh kind of a it's
a<00:05:19.240> straw<00:05:19.560> man<00:05:19.759> for<00:05:19.960> now<00:05:20.479> I'm<00:05:20.639> sure<00:05:20.880> there's

00:05:21.070 --> 00:05:21.080 align:start position:0%
a straw man for now I'm sure there's
 

00:05:21.080 --> 00:05:23.629 align:start position:0%
a straw man for now I'm sure there's
going<00:05:21.160> to<00:05:21.240> be<00:05:21.319> a<00:05:21.400> lot<00:05:21.520> of<00:05:21.880> input<00:05:22.880> um<00:05:23.319> but<00:05:23.520> I

00:05:23.629 --> 00:05:23.639 align:start position:0%
going to be a lot of input um but I
 

00:05:23.639 --> 00:05:25.150 align:start position:0%
going to be a lot of input um but I
think<00:05:23.720> it<00:05:23.840> looks<00:05:24.080> pretty<00:05:24.319> clean<00:05:24.759> to<00:05:24.919> begin

00:05:25.150 --> 00:05:25.160 align:start position:0%
think it looks pretty clean to begin
 

00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:26.430 align:start position:0%
think it looks pretty clean to begin
with<00:05:25.319> Let<00:05:25.440> Me<00:05:25.520> Go<00:05:25.600> a<00:05:25.720> and<00:05:25.800> share<00:05:26.000> my<00:05:26.120> screen

00:05:26.430 --> 00:05:26.440 align:start position:0%
with Let Me Go a and share my screen
 

00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:28.790 align:start position:0%
with Let Me Go a and share my screen
here<00:05:26.680> give<00:05:26.840> you<00:05:26.919> a<00:05:27.840> peek<00:05:28.080> at<00:05:28.240> what<00:05:28.360> it<00:05:28.520> looks

00:05:28.790 --> 00:05:28.800 align:start position:0%
here give you a peek at what it looks
 

00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:35.070 align:start position:0%
here give you a peek at what it looks
like

00:05:35.070 --> 00:05:35.080 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:05:35.080 --> 00:05:37.029 align:start position:0%
 
all<00:05:35.240> right<00:05:35.440> can<00:05:35.600> you<00:05:35.960> see

00:05:37.029 --> 00:05:37.039 align:start position:0%
all right can you see
 

00:05:37.039 --> 00:05:41.469 align:start position:0%
all right can you see
this<00:05:38.039> yes<00:05:38.600> um<00:05:39.280> yes<00:05:40.199> all<00:05:40.319> right<00:05:40.759> so<00:05:41.039> this<00:05:41.199> lives

00:05:41.469 --> 00:05:41.479 align:start position:0%
this yes um yes all right so this lives
 

00:05:41.479 --> 00:05:44.990 align:start position:0%
this yes um yes all right so this lives
on<00:05:41.680> our<00:05:41.960> website<00:05:42.840> on<00:05:43.120> the<00:05:43.479> uh<00:05:44.199> Commonwealth<00:05:44.720> of

00:05:44.990 --> 00:05:45.000 align:start position:0%
on our website on the uh Commonwealth of
 

00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:46.230 align:start position:0%
on our website on the uh Commonwealth of
Virginia

00:05:46.230 --> 00:05:46.240 align:start position:0%
Virginia
 

00:05:46.240 --> 00:05:49.790 align:start position:0%
Virginia
domain<00:05:47.240> um<00:05:47.680> right<00:05:47.840> now<00:05:48.000> it's<00:05:48.120> very<00:05:48.319> Bare<00:05:48.800> Bones

00:05:49.790 --> 00:05:49.800 align:start position:0%
domain um right now it's very Bare Bones
 

00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:51.790 align:start position:0%
domain um right now it's very Bare Bones
um<00:05:50.199> gives<00:05:50.400> a<00:05:50.560> brief<00:05:50.840> introduction<00:05:51.360> of<00:05:51.520> who<00:05:51.680> the

00:05:51.790 --> 00:05:51.800 align:start position:0%
um gives a brief introduction of who the
 

00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:54.670 align:start position:0%
um gives a brief introduction of who the
authority<00:05:52.319> is<00:05:53.280> lists<00:05:53.639> all<00:05:53.840> the<00:05:53.960> members

00:05:54.670 --> 00:05:54.680 align:start position:0%
authority is lists all the members
 

00:05:54.680 --> 00:05:57.790 align:start position:0%
authority is lists all the members
including<00:05:55.639> our<00:05:56.199> newest<00:05:56.639> member

00:05:57.790 --> 00:05:57.800 align:start position:0%
including our newest member
 

00:05:57.800 --> 00:06:02.189 align:start position:0%
including our newest member
Robert<00:05:58.800> um<00:05:59.039> staff<00:05:59.520> contact<00:06:00.319> up<00:06:00.919> here<00:06:01.919> uh<00:06:02.080> this

00:06:02.189 --> 00:06:02.199 align:start position:0%
Robert um staff contact up here uh this
 

00:06:02.199 --> 00:06:04.430 align:start position:0%
Robert um staff contact up here uh this
is<00:06:02.319> just<00:06:02.440> the<00:06:03.039> beginning<00:06:04.039> you<00:06:04.160> know<00:06:04.280> we're

00:06:04.430 --> 00:06:04.440 align:start position:0%
is just the beginning you know we're
 

00:06:04.440 --> 00:06:06.070 align:start position:0%
is just the beginning you know we're
going<00:06:04.520> to<00:06:04.720> have<00:06:04.960> all<00:06:05.160> the<00:06:05.319> annual<00:06:05.720> reports

00:06:06.070 --> 00:06:06.080 align:start position:0%
going to have all the annual reports
 

00:06:06.080 --> 00:06:08.150 align:start position:0%
going to have all the annual reports
that<00:06:06.199> have<00:06:06.319> been<00:06:06.440> done<00:06:06.639> today<00:06:07.120> posted<00:06:07.520> in<00:06:07.720> this

00:06:08.150 --> 00:06:08.160 align:start position:0%
that have been done today posted in this
 

00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:12.070 align:start position:0%
that have been done today posted in this
in<00:06:08.319> this<00:06:08.880> area<00:06:09.880> uh<00:06:10.160> links<00:06:10.520> to<00:06:10.759> the<00:06:11.160> uh

00:06:12.070 --> 00:06:12.080 align:start position:0%
in this area uh links to the uh
 

00:06:12.080 --> 00:06:14.589 align:start position:0%
in this area uh links to the uh
regulatory<00:06:12.680> town<00:06:13.039> hall<00:06:13.800> and<00:06:13.960> then<00:06:14.160> meeting

00:06:14.589 --> 00:06:14.599 align:start position:0%
regulatory town hall and then meeting
 

00:06:14.599 --> 00:06:18.029 align:start position:0%
regulatory town hall and then meeting
information<00:06:15.160> on<00:06:15.440> our<00:06:16.319> our<00:06:16.440> Virginia<00:06:16.880> Energy

00:06:18.029 --> 00:06:18.039 align:start position:0%
information on our our Virginia Energy
 

00:06:18.039 --> 00:06:20.629 align:start position:0%
information on our our Virginia Energy
website<00:06:19.039> um<00:06:19.240> if<00:06:19.319> you<00:06:19.440> go<00:06:19.560> to<00:06:19.720> this<00:06:20.039> learn<00:06:20.360> more

00:06:20.629 --> 00:06:20.639 align:start position:0%
website um if you go to this learn more
 

00:06:20.639 --> 00:06:23.550 align:start position:0%
website um if you go to this learn more
it<00:06:20.759> takes<00:06:20.960> you<00:06:21.080> to<00:06:21.199> a<00:06:21.319> more<00:06:21.560> detailed<00:06:22.160> dive

00:06:23.550 --> 00:06:23.560 align:start position:0%
it takes you to a more detailed dive
 

00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:25.790 align:start position:0%
it takes you to a more detailed dive
into<00:06:24.560> who<00:06:24.720> the<00:06:24.880> authority<00:06:25.280> is<00:06:25.520> what<00:06:25.639> their

00:06:25.790 --> 00:06:25.800 align:start position:0%
into who the authority is what their
 

00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:27.150 align:start position:0%
into who the authority is what their
mission

00:06:27.150 --> 00:06:27.160 align:start position:0%
mission
 

00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:30.670 align:start position:0%
mission
is<00:06:28.160> and<00:06:29.000> you<00:06:29.120> know<00:06:29.560> foresee<00:06:30.160> this<00:06:30.360> having

00:06:30.670 --> 00:06:30.680 align:start position:0%
is and you know foresee this having
 

00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:33.469 align:start position:0%
is and you know foresee this having
additional<00:06:31.080> links<00:06:31.479> off<00:06:31.639> of<00:06:31.800> it<00:06:32.199> to<00:06:33.199> take<00:06:33.360> you

00:06:33.469 --> 00:06:33.479 align:start position:0%
additional links off of it to take you
 

00:06:33.479 --> 00:06:37.230 align:start position:0%
additional links off of it to take you
to<00:06:33.639> solar<00:06:34.080> legislation<00:06:34.759> that's<00:06:35.039> passed<00:06:36.240> um

00:06:37.230 --> 00:06:37.240 align:start position:0%
to solar legislation that's passed um
 

00:06:37.240 --> 00:06:39.189 align:start position:0%
to solar legislation that's passed um
you<00:06:37.440> know<00:06:37.639> Virginia<00:06:38.280> solar<00:06:38.599> and<00:06:38.759> storage

00:06:39.189 --> 00:06:39.199 align:start position:0%
you know Virginia solar and storage
 

00:06:39.199 --> 00:06:41.350 align:start position:0%
you know Virginia solar and storage
projects<00:06:39.599> of<00:06:39.800> note<00:06:40.160> that<00:06:40.360> we<00:06:40.639> we<00:06:40.919> want<00:06:41.199> might

00:06:41.350 --> 00:06:41.360 align:start position:0%
projects of note that we we want might
 

00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:43.070 align:start position:0%
projects of note that we we want might
want<00:06:41.479> to<00:06:41.599> list<00:06:41.840> on<00:06:42.080> here<00:06:42.360> but<00:06:42.560> right<00:06:42.720> now<00:06:42.960> this

00:06:43.070 --> 00:06:43.080 align:start position:0%
want to list on here but right now this
 

00:06:43.080 --> 00:06:45.670 align:start position:0%
want to list on here but right now this
is<00:06:43.240> just<00:06:43.440> kind<00:06:43.560> of<00:06:43.680> the<00:06:43.840> skeleton<00:06:44.440> so<00:06:45.440> be

00:06:45.670 --> 00:06:45.680 align:start position:0%
is just kind of the skeleton so be
 

00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:47.230 align:start position:0%
is just kind of the skeleton so be
thinking<00:06:46.000> about<00:06:46.280> what<00:06:46.440> you<00:06:46.599> would<00:06:46.880> like<00:06:47.080> to

00:06:47.230 --> 00:06:47.240 align:start position:0%
thinking about what you would like to
 

00:06:47.240 --> 00:06:50.270 align:start position:0%
thinking about what you would like to
see<00:06:47.759> on<00:06:48.000> this<00:06:48.240> page<00:06:49.199> and<00:06:49.360> let<00:06:49.520> me<00:06:49.720> know<00:06:50.120> and

00:06:50.270 --> 00:06:50.280 align:start position:0%
see on this page and let me know and
 

00:06:50.280 --> 00:06:55.309 align:start position:0%
see on this page and let me know and
I'll<00:06:50.440> work<00:06:50.599> with<00:06:50.759> our<00:06:50.960> it<00:06:51.280> folk<00:06:51.560> to<00:06:51.759> make<00:06:51.880> it

00:06:55.309 --> 00:06:55.319 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:06:55.319 --> 00:07:04.230 align:start position:0%
 
happen<00:06:56.360> any<00:06:57.440> immediate<00:06:58.440> um<00:06:58.639> input

00:07:04.230 --> 00:07:04.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:04.240 --> 00:07:06.230 align:start position:0%
 
so<00:07:04.599> Ken<00:07:04.919> that's

00:07:06.230 --> 00:07:06.240 align:start position:0%
so Ken that's
 

00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:11.189 align:start position:0%
so Ken that's
uh<00:07:07.240> that's<00:07:07.960> in<00:07:08.160> the<00:07:08.280> Virginia<00:07:08.720> Energy<00:07:09.400> website

00:07:11.189 --> 00:07:11.199 align:start position:0%
uh that's in the Virginia Energy website
 

00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:13.670 align:start position:0%
uh that's in the Virginia Energy website
renewable-energy<00:07:12.199> solar<00:07:12.800> storage<00:07:13.240> is<00:07:13.360> that

00:07:13.670 --> 00:07:13.680 align:start position:0%
renewable-energy solar storage is that
 

00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:18.749 align:start position:0%
renewable-energy solar storage is that
the<00:07:14.479> yes

00:07:18.749 --> 00:07:18.759 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:18.759 --> 00:07:21.390 align:start position:0%
 
HT<00:07:19.759> Jen<00:07:20.000> I<00:07:20.120> think<00:07:20.240> it<00:07:20.360> might<00:07:20.479> be<00:07:20.639> helpful<00:07:21.000> to

00:07:21.390 --> 00:07:21.400 align:start position:0%
HT Jen I think it might be helpful to
 

00:07:21.400 --> 00:07:24.469 align:start position:0%
HT Jen I think it might be helpful to
separate<00:07:21.879> solar<00:07:22.879> and<00:07:23.120> storage<00:07:24.080> you<00:07:24.199> know<00:07:24.319> on

00:07:24.469 --> 00:07:24.479 align:start position:0%
separate solar and storage you know on
 

00:07:24.479 --> 00:07:27.230 align:start position:0%
separate solar and storage you know on
the<00:07:24.680> title<00:07:25.639> um<00:07:26.199> Solar<00:07:26.560> Development<00:07:27.039> and

00:07:27.230 --> 00:07:27.240 align:start position:0%
the title um Solar Development and
 

00:07:27.240 --> 00:07:31.189 align:start position:0%
the title um Solar Development and
energy<00:07:27.599> storage<00:07:28.199> potentially<00:07:28.919> to<00:07:29.520> match<00:07:30.199> the

00:07:31.189 --> 00:07:31.199 align:start position:0%
energy storage potentially to match the
 

00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:34.469 align:start position:0%
energy storage potentially to match the
title<00:07:31.520> I<00:07:31.639> might<00:07:31.840> confuse<00:07:32.240> people<00:07:32.520> just<00:07:32.639> solar

00:07:34.469 --> 00:07:34.479 align:start position:0%
title I might confuse people just solar
 

00:07:34.479 --> 00:07:37.029 align:start position:0%
title I might confuse people just solar
storage<00:07:35.479> yeah<00:07:35.759> that<00:07:36.080> that<00:07:36.280> was<00:07:36.440> on<00:07:36.560> my<00:07:36.720> list<00:07:36.879> to

00:07:37.029 --> 00:07:37.039 align:start position:0%
storage yeah that that was on my list to
 

00:07:37.039 --> 00:07:39.589 align:start position:0%
storage yeah that that was on my list to
talk<00:07:37.240> our<00:07:37.440> it<00:07:37.720> folks<00:07:38.039> about<00:07:38.360> in<00:07:38.560> fact<00:07:39.319> I<00:07:39.440> was

00:07:39.589 --> 00:07:39.599 align:start position:0%
talk our it folks about in fact I was
 

00:07:39.599 --> 00:07:41.629 align:start position:0%
talk our it folks about in fact I was
wondering<00:07:40.080> whether<00:07:40.680> the<00:07:40.840> authori<00:07:41.319> shouldn't

00:07:41.629 --> 00:07:41.639 align:start position:0%
wondering whether the authori shouldn't
 

00:07:41.639 --> 00:07:45.790 align:start position:0%
wondering whether the authori shouldn't
be<00:07:41.800> listed<00:07:42.120> up<00:07:42.360> here<00:07:42.599> instead<00:07:42.919> of<00:07:43.440> down

00:07:45.790 --> 00:07:45.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:45.800 --> 00:07:49.510 align:start position:0%
 
here<00:07:46.800> um<00:07:47.639> bigger

00:07:49.510 --> 00:07:49.520 align:start position:0%
here um bigger
 

00:07:49.520 --> 00:07:54.029 align:start position:0%
here um bigger
Boulder

00:07:54.029 --> 00:07:54.039 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:54.039 --> 00:07:56.830 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<00:07:55.039> okay<00:07:55.199> so<00:07:55.720> I'll<00:07:56.039> I'll<00:07:56.240> go<00:07:56.319> ahead<00:07:56.520> and<00:07:56.680> put

00:07:56.830 --> 00:07:56.840 align:start position:0%
yeah okay so I'll I'll go ahead and put
 

00:07:56.840 --> 00:07:59.830 align:start position:0%
yeah okay so I'll I'll go ahead and put
all<00:07:57.080> this<00:07:57.319> stuff<00:07:57.680> up<00:07:57.840> here<00:07:58.159> instead<00:07:59.159> and<00:07:59.400> and

00:07:59.830 --> 00:07:59.840 align:start position:0%
all this stuff up here instead and and
 

00:07:59.840 --> 00:08:01.350 align:start position:0%
all this stuff up here instead and and
uh<00:08:00.000> we'll<00:08:00.240> just<00:08:00.360> lead<00:08:00.639> in<00:08:00.840> with<00:08:01.000> this<00:08:01.159> little

00:08:01.350 --> 00:08:01.360 align:start position:0%
uh we'll just lead in with this little
 

00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:04.149 align:start position:0%
uh we'll just lead in with this little
blurb<00:08:01.960> and<00:08:02.120> the<00:08:02.240> members<00:08:03.120> and<00:08:03.319> then<00:08:03.639> the<00:08:03.919> the

00:08:04.149 --> 00:08:04.159 align:start position:0%
blurb and the members and then the the
 

00:08:04.159 --> 00:08:09.670 align:start position:0%
blurb and the members and then the the
stuff<00:08:04.360> on<00:08:04.560> these<00:08:04.720> two<00:08:05.000> side

00:08:09.670 --> 00:08:09.680 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:12.469 align:start position:0%
 
sidebars<00:08:10.680> that's<00:08:10.879> excellent<00:08:11.280> thank<00:08:11.400> you<00:08:11.520> Ken

00:08:12.469 --> 00:08:12.479 align:start position:0%
sidebars that's excellent thank you Ken
 

00:08:12.479 --> 00:08:14.430 align:start position:0%
sidebars that's excellent thank you Ken
um<00:08:12.879> anybody<00:08:13.240> have<00:08:13.360> any<00:08:13.599> thoughts<00:08:13.919> to<00:08:14.080> share

00:08:14.430 --> 00:08:14.440 align:start position:0%
um anybody have any thoughts to share
 

00:08:14.440 --> 00:08:17.070 align:start position:0%
um anybody have any thoughts to share
now<00:08:14.680> on<00:08:14.919> the<00:08:15.680> on<00:08:15.840> on<00:08:15.960> the<00:08:16.080> website<00:08:16.520> outline

00:08:17.070 --> 00:08:17.080 align:start position:0%
now on the on on the website outline
 

00:08:17.080 --> 00:08:28.230 align:start position:0%
now on the on on the website outline
anything<00:08:17.479> we<00:08:17.800> should<00:08:18.800> we<00:08:18.919> should<00:08:19.159> add<00:08:19.360> at<00:08:19.520> this

00:08:28.230 --> 00:08:28.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:30.550 align:start position:0%
 
point

00:08:30.550 --> 00:08:30.560 align:start position:0%
point
 

00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:33.230 align:start position:0%
point
yeah<00:08:30.840> we've<00:08:31.840> I<00:08:31.919> was<00:08:32.039> going<00:08:32.159> to<00:08:32.320> say<00:08:32.599> sorry<00:08:32.959> I

00:08:33.230 --> 00:08:33.240 align:start position:0%
yeah we've I was going to say sorry I
 

00:08:33.240 --> 00:08:36.350 align:start position:0%
yeah we've I was going to say sorry I
had<00:08:33.360> to<00:08:33.719> unmute<00:08:34.279> here

00:08:36.350 --> 00:08:36.360 align:start position:0%
had to unmute here
 

00:08:36.360 --> 00:08:38.829 align:start position:0%
had to unmute here
um<00:08:37.360> I<00:08:37.440> don't<00:08:37.560> know<00:08:37.800> how

00:08:38.829 --> 00:08:38.839 align:start position:0%
um I don't know how
 

00:08:38.839 --> 00:08:42.070 align:start position:0%
um I don't know how
appropriate<00:08:39.839> it<00:08:40.039> is<00:08:40.440> for<00:08:40.680> us<00:08:40.959> to<00:08:41.560> put<00:08:41.760> this<00:08:41.880> on

00:08:42.070 --> 00:08:42.080 align:start position:0%
appropriate it is for us to put this on
 

00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:44.550 align:start position:0%
appropriate it is for us to put this on
the<00:08:42.240> website<00:08:42.800> but<00:08:43.080> I<00:08:43.719> you<00:08:43.839> know<00:08:44.080> I<00:08:44.159> could<00:08:44.320> see

00:08:44.550 --> 00:08:44.560 align:start position:0%
the website but I you know I could see
 

00:08:44.560 --> 00:08:47.630 align:start position:0%
the website but I you know I could see
an<00:08:44.760> opportunity<00:08:45.600> for<00:08:45.880> us<00:08:46.200> to<00:08:46.480> talk<00:08:46.800> about

00:08:47.630 --> 00:08:47.640 align:start position:0%
an opportunity for us to talk about
 

00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:50.509 align:start position:0%
an opportunity for us to talk about
major<00:08:48.120> initiatives<00:08:48.880> in<00:08:49.640> the<00:08:49.800> Solar<00:08:50.399> the

00:08:50.509 --> 00:08:50.519 align:start position:0%
major initiatives in the Solar the
 

00:08:50.519 --> 00:08:53.389 align:start position:0%
major initiatives in the Solar the
energy<00:08:50.920> storage<00:08:51.560> electric<00:08:52.040> vehicle<00:08:52.760> and<00:08:53.080> and

00:08:53.389 --> 00:08:53.399 align:start position:0%
energy storage electric vehicle and and
 

00:08:53.399 --> 00:08:54.949 align:start position:0%
energy storage electric vehicle and and
you<00:08:53.480> know<00:08:53.720> other<00:08:54.080> type

00:08:54.949 --> 00:08:54.959 align:start position:0%
you know other type
 

00:08:54.959 --> 00:08:57.949 align:start position:0%
you know other type
of<00:08:55.959> uh<00:08:56.120> renewable<00:08:56.640> activities<00:08:57.040> like<00:08:57.160> wind<00:08:57.480> Etc

00:08:57.949 --> 00:08:57.959 align:start position:0%
of uh renewable activities like wind Etc
 

00:08:57.959 --> 00:08:59.790 align:start position:0%
of uh renewable activities like wind Etc
I<00:08:58.040> don't<00:08:58.160> know<00:08:58.680> Ken

00:08:59.790 --> 00:08:59.800 align:start position:0%
I don't know Ken
 

00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:02.949 align:start position:0%
I don't know Ken
Skyler<00:09:00.440> to<00:09:00.640> the<00:09:00.839> extent<00:09:01.279> that<00:09:01.519> that<00:09:01.640> would<00:09:01.959> be

00:09:02.949 --> 00:09:02.959 align:start position:0%
Skyler to the extent that that would be
 

00:09:02.959 --> 00:09:04.990 align:start position:0%
Skyler to the extent that that would be
important<00:09:03.440> or<00:09:03.640> relevant<00:09:04.120> for<00:09:04.360> this<00:09:04.519> to<00:09:04.680> break

00:09:04.990 --> 00:09:05.000 align:start position:0%
important or relevant for this to break
 

00:09:05.000 --> 00:09:07.230 align:start position:0%
important or relevant for this to break
that<00:09:05.160> out<00:09:05.440> but<00:09:05.600> I<00:09:05.720> think<00:09:06.040> if<00:09:06.200> we<00:09:06.560> if<00:09:06.680> we<00:09:06.839> had<00:09:06.959> a

00:09:07.230 --> 00:09:07.240 align:start position:0%
that out but I think if we if we had a
 

00:09:07.240 --> 00:09:11.470 align:start position:0%
that out but I think if we if we had a
way<00:09:07.480> to<00:09:07.839> maintain<00:09:09.160> that<00:09:10.160> um<00:09:10.519> it<00:09:11.079> it<00:09:11.200> could

00:09:11.470 --> 00:09:11.480 align:start position:0%
way to maintain that um it it could
 

00:09:11.480 --> 00:09:13.790 align:start position:0%
way to maintain that um it it could
actually<00:09:11.839> drive<00:09:12.279> eyeballs<00:09:13.120> and<00:09:13.440> more

00:09:13.790 --> 00:09:13.800 align:start position:0%
actually drive eyeballs and more
 

00:09:13.800 --> 00:09:17.509 align:start position:0%
actually drive eyeballs and more
importantly<00:09:15.160> discussion<00:09:16.160> uh<00:09:16.440> of<00:09:17.240> what's

00:09:17.509 --> 00:09:17.519 align:start position:0%
importantly discussion uh of what's
 

00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:19.190 align:start position:0%
importantly discussion uh of what's
working<00:09:17.920> and<00:09:18.120> what's<00:09:18.320> not<00:09:18.519> working<00:09:18.880> from

00:09:19.190 --> 00:09:19.200 align:start position:0%
working and what's not working from
 

00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:22.190 align:start position:0%
working and what's not working from
folks<00:09:20.040> I<00:09:21.040> uh<00:09:21.200> I<00:09:21.279> know<00:09:21.440> this<00:09:21.560> is<00:09:21.680> a<00:09:21.839> big

00:09:22.190 --> 00:09:22.200 align:start position:0%
folks I uh I know this is a big
 

00:09:22.200 --> 00:09:24.630 align:start position:0%
folks I uh I know this is a big
undertaking<00:09:22.920> to<00:09:23.320> keep<00:09:23.640> that<00:09:23.920> current<00:09:24.440> it's

00:09:24.630 --> 00:09:24.640 align:start position:0%
undertaking to keep that current it's
 

00:09:24.640 --> 00:09:27.590 align:start position:0%
undertaking to keep that current it's
always<00:09:25.320> you<00:09:25.440> know<00:09:25.720> static<00:09:26.160> websites<00:09:27.120> are

00:09:27.590 --> 00:09:27.600 align:start position:0%
always you know static websites are
 

00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:30.310 align:start position:0%
always you know static websites are
static<00:09:28.000> and<00:09:28.240> stale<00:09:28.920> and<00:09:29.480> and<00:09:29.680> I<00:09:29.800> don't<00:09:30.079> I<00:09:30.160> don't

00:09:30.310 --> 00:09:30.320 align:start position:0%
static and stale and and I don't I don't
 

00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:31.949 align:start position:0%
static and stale and and I don't I don't
know<00:09:30.519> what<00:09:30.720> we<00:09:30.920> really<00:09:31.120> want<00:09:31.360> as<00:09:31.480> the<00:09:31.640> overall

00:09:31.949 --> 00:09:31.959 align:start position:0%
know what we really want as the overall
 

00:09:31.959 --> 00:09:33.470 align:start position:0%
know what we really want as the overall
intent<00:09:32.360> here<00:09:32.519> so<00:09:32.680> I<00:09:32.760> would<00:09:32.920> just<00:09:33.079> offer<00:09:33.360> that

00:09:33.470 --> 00:09:33.480 align:start position:0%
intent here so I would just offer that
 

00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:36.230 align:start position:0%
intent here so I would just offer that
as<00:09:33.560> a<00:09:33.760> discussion<00:09:34.240> point<00:09:35.079> and<00:09:35.399> and<00:09:35.640> really

00:09:36.230 --> 00:09:36.240 align:start position:0%
as a discussion point and and really
 

00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:38.630 align:start position:0%
as a discussion point and and really
what<00:09:36.320> are<00:09:36.399> we<00:09:36.519> trying<00:09:36.720> to<00:09:36.880> do<00:09:37.800> so<00:09:38.399> are<00:09:38.480> you

00:09:38.630 --> 00:09:38.640 align:start position:0%
what are we trying to do so are you
 

00:09:38.640 --> 00:09:40.670 align:start position:0%
what are we trying to do so are you
talking<00:09:39.079> in<00:09:39.279> Virginia<00:09:39.800> specifically<00:09:40.399> or

00:09:40.670 --> 00:09:40.680 align:start position:0%
talking in Virginia specifically or
 

00:09:40.680 --> 00:09:46.590 align:start position:0%
talking in Virginia specifically or
nationally<00:09:41.399> or<00:09:42.160> in<00:09:42.279> Virginia<00:09:43.040> yeah<00:09:43.200> in

00:09:46.590 --> 00:09:46.600 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:47.910 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:09:47.910 --> 00:09:47.920 align:start position:0%
[Music]
 

00:09:47.920 --> 00:09:52.430 align:start position:0%
[Music]
Virginia<00:09:48.920> all<00:09:49.079> right<00:09:49.640> I'll<00:09:49.800> look<00:09:49.959> into<00:09:50.600> that<00:09:51.600> U

00:09:52.430 --> 00:09:52.440 align:start position:0%
Virginia all right I'll look into that U
 

00:09:52.440 --> 00:09:57.990 align:start position:0%
Virginia all right I'll look into that U
an<00:09:52.720> obvious<00:09:54.000> um<00:09:55.000> item<00:09:55.320> to<00:09:55.560> add<00:09:56.079> is<00:09:56.519> upcoming

00:09:57.990 --> 00:09:58.000 align:start position:0%
an obvious um item to add is upcoming
 

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:01.069 align:start position:0%
an obvious um item to add is upcoming
legislation<00:09:59.000> um<00:09:59.279> um<00:09:59.959> and<00:10:00.240> maybe<00:10:00.480> even<00:10:00.720> past

00:10:01.069 --> 00:10:01.079 align:start position:0%
legislation um um and maybe even past
 

00:10:01.079 --> 00:10:02.990 align:start position:0%
legislation um um and maybe even past
legislation<00:10:01.720> and<00:10:01.880> it<00:10:02.040> just<00:10:02.200> becomes<00:10:02.720> kind<00:10:02.800> of

00:10:02.990 --> 00:10:03.000 align:start position:0%
legislation and it just becomes kind of
 

00:10:03.000 --> 00:10:07.350 align:start position:0%
legislation and it just becomes kind of
a<00:10:03.360> a<00:10:03.519> running<00:10:04.000> Archive<00:10:04.800> of<00:10:05.680> solar<00:10:06.040> and<00:10:06.360> storage

00:10:07.350 --> 00:10:07.360 align:start position:0%
a a running Archive of solar and storage
 

00:10:07.360 --> 00:10:11.030 align:start position:0%
a a running Archive of solar and storage
uh<00:10:07.480> bills<00:10:07.880> that<00:10:08.000> have<00:10:08.120> been<00:10:08.320> introduced<00:10:09.200> and

00:10:11.030 --> 00:10:11.040 align:start position:0%
uh bills that have been introduced and
 

00:10:11.040 --> 00:10:17.750 align:start position:0%
uh bills that have been introduced and
passed<00:10:12.040> thoughts<00:10:12.320> on

00:10:17.750 --> 00:10:17.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:22.150 align:start position:0%
 
that<00:10:18.760> yeah<00:10:19.320> yeah<00:10:19.680> I<00:10:19.800> think<00:10:20.040> relevant<00:10:20.560> in<00:10:21.160> uh

00:10:22.150 --> 00:10:22.160 align:start position:0%
that yeah yeah I think relevant in uh
 

00:10:22.160 --> 00:10:25.509 align:start position:0%
that yeah yeah I think relevant in uh
legislation<00:10:23.160> as<00:10:23.279> it<00:10:23.640> has<00:10:23.959> as<00:10:24.079> it<00:10:24.360> influences

00:10:25.509 --> 00:10:25.519 align:start position:0%
legislation as it has as it influences
 

00:10:25.519 --> 00:10:30.350 align:start position:0%
legislation as it has as it influences
and<00:10:26.519> you<00:10:26.640> know<00:10:27.000> possibly<00:10:27.440> is<00:10:27.680> tied<00:10:28.079> to<00:10:28.640> some<00:10:28.800> of

00:10:30.350 --> 00:10:30.360 align:start position:0%
and you know possibly is tied to some of
 

00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:33.590 align:start position:0%
and you know possibly is tied to some of
either<00:10:30.760> recommendations<00:10:31.760> or<00:10:32.079> some<00:10:32.560> of<00:10:32.920> the

00:10:33.590 --> 00:10:33.600 align:start position:0%
either recommendations or some of the
 

00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:36.829 align:start position:0%
either recommendations or some of the
presentations<00:10:34.480> that<00:10:34.640> we've<00:10:35.200> had<00:10:36.200> uh<00:10:36.399> where<00:10:36.639> it

00:10:36.829 --> 00:10:36.839 align:start position:0%
presentations that we've had uh where it
 

00:10:36.839 --> 00:10:39.230 align:start position:0%
presentations that we've had uh where it
it<00:10:36.959> is<00:10:37.240> supportive<00:10:37.920> of<00:10:38.279> of<00:10:38.440> the<00:10:38.600> expansion<00:10:39.079> and

00:10:39.230 --> 00:10:39.240 align:start position:0%
it is supportive of of the expansion and
 

00:10:39.240 --> 00:10:42.030 align:start position:0%
it is supportive of of the expansion and
meeting<00:10:39.720> the<00:10:40.560> uh<00:10:40.760> the<00:10:40.880> governor's<00:10:41.320> goals<00:10:41.920> I

00:10:42.030 --> 00:10:42.040 align:start position:0%
meeting the uh the governor's goals I
 

00:10:42.040 --> 00:10:44.230 align:start position:0%
meeting the uh the governor's goals I
think<00:10:42.480> are<00:10:43.040> would<00:10:43.240> be<00:10:43.360> a<00:10:43.519> very<00:10:43.760> good<00:10:43.920> thing<00:10:44.079> to

00:10:44.230 --> 00:10:44.240 align:start position:0%
think are would be a very good thing to
 

00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:46.110 align:start position:0%
think are would be a very good thing to
tie<00:10:44.600> together<00:10:44.839> just<00:10:45.079> to<00:10:45.200> show<00:10:45.519> how<00:10:45.920> the

00:10:46.110 --> 00:10:46.120 align:start position:0%
tie together just to show how the
 

00:10:46.120 --> 00:10:48.509 align:start position:0%
tie together just to show how the
legislation<00:10:46.680> is<00:10:46.880> supportive<00:10:47.720> of<00:10:47.959> of<00:10:48.160> those

00:10:48.509 --> 00:10:48.519 align:start position:0%
legislation is supportive of of those
 

00:10:48.519 --> 00:10:49.910 align:start position:0%
legislation is supportive of of those
those<00:10:48.760> Concepts<00:10:49.200> so<00:10:49.360> I<00:10:49.440> think<00:10:49.600> that<00:10:49.680> could<00:10:49.800> be

00:10:49.910 --> 00:10:49.920 align:start position:0%
those Concepts so I think that could be
 

00:10:49.920 --> 00:10:53.590 align:start position:0%
those Concepts so I think that could be
a<00:10:50.079> very<00:10:50.360> positive<00:10:50.839> thing<00:10:51.839> okay<00:10:52.480> another<00:10:53.200> how

00:10:53.590 --> 00:10:53.600 align:start position:0%
a very positive thing okay another how
 

00:10:53.600 --> 00:10:56.710 align:start position:0%
a very positive thing okay another how
how<00:10:53.720> will<00:10:53.959> decisions<00:10:54.800> be<00:10:55.800> how<00:10:55.920> will<00:10:56.200> decisions

00:10:56.710 --> 00:10:56.720 align:start position:0%
how will decisions be how will decisions
 

00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:58.710 align:start position:0%
how will decisions be how will decisions
be<00:10:56.920> made<00:10:57.240> about<00:10:57.560> what<00:10:57.720> is<00:10:57.959> included<00:10:58.440> or<00:10:58.600> what

00:10:58.710 --> 00:10:58.720 align:start position:0%
be made about what is included or what
 

00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:01.470 align:start position:0%
be made about what is included or what
is<00:10:58.839> not<00:10:59.040> not<00:10:59.200> included<00:10:59.639> is<00:10:59.720> it<00:10:59.959> all

00:11:01.470 --> 00:11:01.480 align:start position:0%
is not not included is it all
 

00:11:01.480 --> 00:11:04.670 align:start position:0%
is not not included is it all
legislation<00:11:02.480> related<00:11:02.800> to<00:11:02.959> solar<00:11:03.519> or<00:11:04.000> select

00:11:04.670 --> 00:11:04.680 align:start position:0%
legislation related to solar or select
 

00:11:04.680 --> 00:11:07.670 align:start position:0%
legislation related to solar or select
and<00:11:04.880> if<00:11:05.279> so<00:11:06.279> how's<00:11:06.519> that

00:11:07.670 --> 00:11:07.680 align:start position:0%
and if so how's that
 

00:11:07.680 --> 00:11:15.470 align:start position:0%
and if so how's that
decision<00:11:08.680> that's<00:11:08.839> a<00:11:09.000> great

00:11:15.470 --> 00:11:15.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:11:15.480 --> 00:11:18.470 align:start position:0%
 
question<00:11:16.480> I<00:11:16.560> would<00:11:16.800> think<00:11:17.040> if<00:11:17.160> it's<00:11:17.519> pending

00:11:18.470 --> 00:11:18.480 align:start position:0%
question I would think if it's pending
 

00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:22.870 align:start position:0%
question I would think if it's pending
legislation<00:11:19.480> that<00:11:20.000> all<00:11:20.279> legislation<00:11:20.839> is

00:11:22.870 --> 00:11:22.880 align:start position:0%
legislation that all legislation is
 

00:11:22.880 --> 00:11:25.710 align:start position:0%
legislation that all legislation is
relevant<00:11:24.000> okay

00:11:25.710 --> 00:11:25.720 align:start position:0%
relevant okay
 

00:11:25.720 --> 00:11:33.470 align:start position:0%
relevant okay
whether<00:11:26.720> for<00:11:27.200> or<00:11:27.519> against<00:11:28.360> but<00:11:28.680> that's<00:11:29.200> my

00:11:33.470 --> 00:11:33.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:11:33.480 --> 00:11:36.470 align:start position:0%
 
opinion<00:11:34.480> uh<00:11:34.760> just<00:11:35.279> one<00:11:35.519> person's<00:11:35.920> opinion<00:11:36.320> I

00:11:36.470 --> 00:11:36.480 align:start position:0%
opinion uh just one person's opinion I
 

00:11:36.480 --> 00:11:38.870 align:start position:0%
opinion uh just one person's opinion I
probably<00:11:36.720> wouldn't<00:11:37.399> post<00:11:38.399> pending

00:11:38.870 --> 00:11:38.880 align:start position:0%
probably wouldn't post pending
 

00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:40.829 align:start position:0%
probably wouldn't post pending
legislation<00:11:39.440> is<00:11:39.600> in<00:11:39.839> just<00:11:40.040> random<00:11:40.399> bills<00:11:40.680> that

00:11:40.829 --> 00:11:40.839 align:start position:0%
legislation is in just random bills that
 

00:11:40.839 --> 00:11:43.069 align:start position:0%
legislation is in just random bills that
any<00:11:41.040> member<00:11:41.320> has<00:11:41.480> filed<00:11:41.880> that<00:11:42.000> can<00:11:42.240> get<00:11:42.959> kind

00:11:43.069 --> 00:11:43.079 align:start position:0%
any member has filed that can get kind
 

00:11:43.079 --> 00:11:45.069 align:start position:0%
any member has filed that can get kind
of<00:11:43.200> cluttery<00:11:43.720> and<00:11:43.839> it's<00:11:44.200> largely<00:11:44.600> irrelevant

00:11:45.069 --> 00:11:45.079 align:start position:0%
of cluttery and it's largely irrelevant
 

00:11:45.079 --> 00:11:47.030 align:start position:0%
of cluttery and it's largely irrelevant
till<00:11:45.240> it<00:11:45.399> advances<00:11:45.959> but<00:11:46.079> you<00:11:46.200> can<00:11:46.800> I<00:11:46.880> would

00:11:47.030 --> 00:11:47.040 align:start position:0%
till it advances but you can I would
 

00:11:47.040 --> 00:11:48.710 align:start position:0%
till it advances but you can I would
certainly<00:11:47.320> see<00:11:47.600> posting<00:11:48.240> at<00:11:48.360> the<00:11:48.440> end<00:11:48.560> of

00:11:48.710 --> 00:11:48.720 align:start position:0%
certainly see posting at the end of
 

00:11:48.720 --> 00:11:50.430 align:start position:0%
certainly see posting at the end of
every<00:11:48.920> session<00:11:49.279> new<00:11:49.480> bills<00:11:49.760> at<00:11:49.880> a<00:11:50.120> pass<00:11:50.320> that

00:11:50.430 --> 00:11:50.440 align:start position:0%
every session new bills at a pass that
 

00:11:50.440 --> 00:11:53.110 align:start position:0%
every session new bills at a pass that
are<00:11:50.800> relevant<00:11:51.800> if<00:11:51.880> you're<00:11:52.160> going<00:11:52.279> to<00:11:53.000> if

00:11:53.110 --> 00:11:53.120 align:start position:0%
are relevant if you're going to if
 

00:11:53.120 --> 00:11:54.949 align:start position:0%
are relevant if you're going to if
you're<00:11:53.240> going<00:11:53.360> to<00:11:53.519> try<00:11:53.680> to<00:11:53.839> post<00:11:54.279> everything

00:11:54.949 --> 00:11:54.959 align:start position:0%
you're going to try to post everything
 

00:11:54.959 --> 00:11:57.470 align:start position:0%
you're going to try to post everything
that's<00:11:55.200> pending<00:11:55.600> I<00:11:55.680> would<00:11:55.880> just<00:11:56.000> link<00:11:56.360> to<00:11:56.639> the

00:11:57.470 --> 00:11:57.480 align:start position:0%
that's pending I would just link to the
 

00:11:57.480 --> 00:12:01.269 align:start position:0%
that's pending I would just link to the
to<00:11:58.120> um<00:11:59.040> Lis<00:11:59.680> is<00:12:00.279> and<00:12:00.399> you<00:12:00.519> know<00:12:00.680> they<00:12:00.800> sort

00:12:01.269 --> 00:12:01.279 align:start position:0%
to um Lis is and you know they sort
 

00:12:01.279 --> 00:12:03.629 align:start position:0%
to um Lis is and you know they sort
legislation<00:12:01.880> by<00:12:02.120> subject<00:12:02.480> matter<00:12:03.279> so<00:12:03.440> I'll

00:12:03.629 --> 00:12:03.639 align:start position:0%
legislation by subject matter so I'll
 

00:12:03.639 --> 00:12:06.470 align:start position:0%
legislation by subject matter so I'll
just<00:12:03.720> link<00:12:03.959> into<00:12:04.240> their

00:12:06.470 --> 00:12:06.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:09.069 align:start position:0%
 
sort<00:12:07.480> yeah<00:12:07.680> know<00:12:07.800> that's<00:12:07.959> a<00:12:08.120> good

00:12:09.069 --> 00:12:09.079 align:start position:0%
sort yeah know that's a good
 

00:12:09.079 --> 00:12:10.990 align:start position:0%
sort yeah know that's a good
point<00:12:10.079> that<00:12:10.200> ties<00:12:10.560> right<00:12:10.720> back<00:12:10.839> to

00:12:10.990 --> 00:12:11.000 align:start position:0%
point that ties right back to
 

00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:14.629 align:start position:0%
point that ties right back to
maintenance<00:12:11.480> of<00:12:11.760> this<00:12:12.240> thing<00:12:13.240> so<00:12:14.199> yeah<00:12:14.399> maybe

00:12:14.629 --> 00:12:14.639 align:start position:0%
maintenance of this thing so yeah maybe
 

00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:22.790 align:start position:0%
maintenance of this thing so yeah maybe
we<00:12:14.760> just<00:12:16.000> include<00:12:17.000> bills<00:12:17.360> that<00:12:17.480> have

00:12:22.790 --> 00:12:22.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:22.800 --> 00:12:25.389 align:start position:0%
 
passed<00:12:23.800> yeah<00:12:24.040> thank<00:12:24.160> you<00:12:24.320> GRE<00:12:24.680> that<00:12:24.800> makes<00:12:25.120> lot

00:12:25.389 --> 00:12:25.399 align:start position:0%
passed yeah thank you GRE that makes lot
 

00:12:25.399 --> 00:12:29.230 align:start position:0%
passed yeah thank you GRE that makes lot
a<00:12:25.560> lot<00:12:25.680> of<00:12:26.040> sense<00:12:27.480> um<00:12:28.480> and<00:12:28.680> I<00:12:28.760> think<00:12:29.000> it<00:12:29.079> might

00:12:29.230 --> 00:12:29.240 align:start position:0%
a lot of sense um and I think it might
 

00:12:29.240 --> 00:12:31.350 align:start position:0%
a lot of sense um and I think it might
be<00:12:29.360> helpful<00:12:29.800> certainly<00:12:30.680> as<00:12:30.800> we<00:12:31.000> get<00:12:31.160> this

00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:31.360 align:start position:0%
be helpful certainly as we get this
 

00:12:31.360 --> 00:12:34.230 align:start position:0%
be helpful certainly as we get this
website<00:12:31.720> off<00:12:31.880> the<00:12:32.000> ground<00:12:32.320> to<00:12:32.600> have<00:12:32.920> a<00:12:33.800> agenda

00:12:34.230 --> 00:12:34.240 align:start position:0%
website off the ground to have a agenda
 

00:12:34.240 --> 00:12:36.550 align:start position:0%
website off the ground to have a agenda
item<00:12:34.639> on<00:12:34.800> the<00:12:34.920> first<00:12:35.199> couple<00:12:35.480> meetings<00:12:35.760> at

00:12:36.550 --> 00:12:36.560 align:start position:0%
item on the first couple meetings at
 

00:12:36.560 --> 00:12:39.269 align:start position:0%
item on the first couple meetings at
24<00:12:37.560> where<00:12:37.959> folks<00:12:38.320> can<00:12:38.600> bring<00:12:38.880> forward

00:12:39.269 --> 00:12:39.279 align:start position:0%
24 where folks can bring forward
 

00:12:39.279 --> 00:12:42.030 align:start position:0%
24 where folks can bring forward
suggestions

00:12:42.030 --> 00:12:42.040 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:42.040 --> 00:12:56.509 align:start position:0%
 
recommendations

00:12:56.509 --> 00:12:56.519 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:56.519 --> 00:12:58.949 align:start position:0%
 
and<00:12:57.519> and<00:12:57.680> one<00:12:57.800> of<00:12:57.920> the<00:12:58.040> things<00:12:58.279> I<00:12:58.360> was<00:12:58.519> going<00:12:58.639> to

00:12:58.949 --> 00:12:58.959 align:start position:0%
and and one of the things I was going to
 

00:12:58.959 --> 00:13:03.389 align:start position:0%
and and one of the things I was going to
offer<00:12:59.480> is<00:13:00.199> um<00:13:00.839> our<00:13:01.040> wind<00:13:01.360> Authority<00:13:02.399> recently

00:13:03.389 --> 00:13:03.399 align:start position:0%
offer is um our wind Authority recently
 

00:13:03.399 --> 00:13:06.790 align:start position:0%
offer is um our wind Authority recently
has<00:13:03.639> created<00:13:04.480> some<00:13:05.480> uh<00:13:05.680> one<00:13:05.880> in<00:13:06.079> two<00:13:06.320> member

00:13:06.790 --> 00:13:06.800 align:start position:0%
has created some uh one in two member
 

00:13:06.800 --> 00:13:09.910 align:start position:0%
has created some uh one in two member
subgroups<00:13:07.360> to<00:13:07.519> look<00:13:07.720> into<00:13:08.040> various<00:13:08.440> issues<00:13:09.279> um

00:13:09.910 --> 00:13:09.920 align:start position:0%
subgroups to look into various issues um
 

00:13:09.920 --> 00:13:13.750 align:start position:0%
subgroups to look into various issues um
like<00:13:10.639> Workforce<00:13:11.639> Development<00:13:12.639> and<00:13:13.279> and<00:13:13.480> other

00:13:13.750 --> 00:13:13.760 align:start position:0%
like Workforce Development and and other
 

00:13:13.760 --> 00:13:15.790 align:start position:0%
like Workforce Development and and other
things<00:13:14.440> and<00:13:14.600> I<00:13:14.680> was<00:13:14.880> wondering<00:13:15.199> if<00:13:15.440> that<00:13:15.639> might

00:13:15.790 --> 00:13:15.800 align:start position:0%
things and I was wondering if that might
 

00:13:15.800 --> 00:13:22.110 align:start position:0%
things and I was wondering if that might
be<00:13:16.040> help<00:13:16.639> helpful<00:13:17.440> here<00:13:18.440> excuse

00:13:22.110 --> 00:13:22.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:24.949 align:start position:0%
 
me<00:13:23.120> be<00:13:23.240> willing<00:13:23.720> in<00:13:24.199> instead<00:13:24.480> of<00:13:24.680> you<00:13:24.800> know

00:13:24.949 --> 00:13:24.959 align:start position:0%
me be willing in instead of you know
 

00:13:24.959 --> 00:13:28.350 align:start position:0%
me be willing in instead of you know
making<00:13:25.240> me<00:13:25.560> be<00:13:25.839> the<00:13:26.560> the<00:13:26.760> decider<00:13:27.560> you<00:13:27.720> know

00:13:28.350 --> 00:13:28.360 align:start position:0%
making me be the the decider you know
 

00:13:28.360 --> 00:13:33.710 align:start position:0%
making me be the the decider you know
just<00:13:28.519> a<00:13:28.839> Flo<00:13:29.240> ideas<00:13:29.639> past<00:13:29.920> me

00:13:33.710 --> 00:13:33.720 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:33.720 --> 00:13:37.350 align:start position:0%
 
and<00:13:34.720> yeah<00:13:34.959> can't<00:13:35.600> if<00:13:35.720> anyone's<00:13:36.240> interested<00:13:37.240> we

00:13:37.350 --> 00:13:37.360 align:start position:0%
and yeah can't if anyone's interested we
 

00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:39.470 align:start position:0%
and yeah can't if anyone's interested we
could

00:13:39.470 --> 00:13:39.480 align:start position:0%
could
 

00:13:39.480 --> 00:13:42.670 align:start position:0%
could
certainly<00:13:40.480> build<00:13:40.839> a<00:13:41.079> a<00:13:41.360> a<00:13:41.519> subcommittee<00:13:42.279> to<00:13:42.519> to

00:13:42.670 --> 00:13:42.680 align:start position:0%
certainly build a a a subcommittee to to
 

00:13:42.680 --> 00:13:44.550 align:start position:0%
certainly build a a a subcommittee to to
work<00:13:42.880> on<00:13:43.040> this<00:13:43.360> there<00:13:43.519> any<00:13:43.760> Authority<00:13:44.199> members

00:13:44.550 --> 00:13:44.560 align:start position:0%
work on this there any Authority members
 

00:13:44.560 --> 00:13:47.150 align:start position:0%
work on this there any Authority members
who<00:13:45.440> want<00:13:45.639> to<00:13:45.880> volunteer

00:13:47.150 --> 00:13:47.160 align:start position:0%
who want to volunteer
 

00:13:47.160 --> 00:13:49.910 align:start position:0%
who want to volunteer
on<00:13:48.160> website<00:13:48.600> brainstorming<00:13:49.399> over<00:13:49.560> the<00:13:49.720> next

00:13:49.910 --> 00:13:49.920 align:start position:0%
on website brainstorming over the next
 

00:13:49.920 --> 00:13:53.189 align:start position:0%
on website brainstorming over the next
couple

00:13:53.189 --> 00:13:53.199 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:53.199 --> 00:13:57.749 align:start position:0%
 
months

00:13:57.749 --> 00:13:57.759 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:57.759 --> 00:14:01.310 align:start position:0%
 
um

00:14:01.310 --> 00:14:01.320 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:14:01.320 --> 00:14:04.269 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<00:14:02.040> this<00:14:02.160> is<00:14:02.360> Colleen<00:14:03.120> I<00:14:03.279> I<00:14:03.399> could<00:14:04.040> I'll

00:14:04.269 --> 00:14:04.279 align:start position:0%
yeah this is Colleen I I could I'll
 

00:14:04.279 --> 00:14:06.110 align:start position:0%
yeah this is Colleen I I could I'll
volunteer<00:14:04.680> to

00:14:06.110 --> 00:14:06.120 align:start position:0%
volunteer to
 

00:14:06.120 --> 00:14:08.189 align:start position:0%
volunteer to
brainstorm<00:14:07.120> yeah<00:14:07.320> and<00:14:07.480> I<00:14:07.600> would<00:14:07.880> I<00:14:07.959> wouldn't

00:14:08.189 --> 00:14:08.199 align:start position:0%
brainstorm yeah and I would I wouldn't
 

00:14:08.199 --> 00:14:10.030 align:start position:0%
brainstorm yeah and I would I wouldn't
mind<00:14:08.440> helping<00:14:08.759> too<00:14:09.279> I<00:14:09.360> come<00:14:09.480> from<00:14:09.639> a<00:14:09.759> different

00:14:10.030 --> 00:14:10.040 align:start position:0%
mind helping too I come from a different
 

00:14:10.040 --> 00:14:11.389 align:start position:0%
mind helping too I come from a different
perspective<00:14:10.480> than<00:14:10.600> some<00:14:10.759> other<00:14:10.959> people<00:14:11.160> do

00:14:11.389 --> 00:14:11.399 align:start position:0%
perspective than some other people do
 

00:14:11.399 --> 00:14:12.870 align:start position:0%
perspective than some other people do
but<00:14:11.600> yes<00:14:11.839> i'<00:14:12.040> I'd<00:14:12.199> be<00:14:12.279> willing<00:14:12.519> to<00:14:12.720> this<00:14:12.800> is

00:14:12.870 --> 00:14:12.880 align:start position:0%
but yes i' I'd be willing to this is
 

00:14:12.880 --> 00:14:15.269 align:start position:0%
but yes i' I'd be willing to this is
Joanne

00:14:15.269 --> 00:14:15.279 align:start position:0%
Joanne
 

00:14:15.279 --> 00:14:18.389 align:start position:0%
Joanne
web<00:14:16.279> okay

00:14:18.389 --> 00:14:18.399 align:start position:0%
web okay
 

00:14:18.399 --> 00:14:21.749 align:start position:0%
web okay
great<00:14:19.399> K<00:14:19.639> I'm<00:14:19.839> happy<00:14:20.079> to<00:14:20.680> join<00:14:20.959> in<00:14:21.120> on<00:14:21.320> that

00:14:21.749 --> 00:14:21.759 align:start position:0%
great K I'm happy to join in on that
 

00:14:21.759 --> 00:14:25.110 align:start position:0%
great K I'm happy to join in on that
small<00:14:22.040> sub<00:14:22.360> committee<00:14:22.680> as<00:14:22.880> well

00:14:25.110 --> 00:14:25.120 align:start position:0%
small sub committee as well
 

00:14:25.120 --> 00:14:28.030 align:start position:0%
small sub committee as well
yeah<00:14:26.120> and<00:14:26.279> I<00:14:26.360> was<00:14:26.560> thinking<00:14:26.959> also<00:14:27.600> what<00:14:27.759> about

00:14:28.030 --> 00:14:28.040 align:start position:0%
yeah and I was thinking also what about
 

00:14:28.040 --> 00:14:31.430 align:start position:0%
yeah and I was thinking also what about
links<00:14:28.759> to<00:14:29.040> other<00:14:29.399> organizations<00:14:30.399> that<00:14:30.600> are

00:14:31.430 --> 00:14:31.440 align:start position:0%
links to other organizations that are
 

00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:33.110 align:start position:0%
links to other organizations that are
kind<00:14:31.560> of<00:14:32.120> out<00:14:32.320> there<00:14:32.480> fighting<00:14:32.800> the<00:14:32.959> good

00:14:33.110 --> 00:14:33.120 align:start position:0%
kind of out there fighting the good
 

00:14:33.120 --> 00:14:35.790 align:start position:0%
kind of out there fighting the good
fight<00:14:33.440> including<00:14:33.880> in<00:14:34.079> Virginia<00:14:34.680> Aaron<00:14:35.440> um

00:14:35.790 --> 00:14:35.800 align:start position:0%
fight including in Virginia Aaron um
 

00:14:35.800 --> 00:14:39.230 align:start position:0%
fight including in Virginia Aaron um
does<00:14:36.279> UVA<00:14:36.920> or<00:14:37.240> Tech<00:14:37.639> have<00:14:37.800> any<00:14:38.720> particular

00:14:39.230 --> 00:14:39.240 align:start position:0%
does UVA or Tech have any particular
 

00:14:39.240 --> 00:14:43.430 align:start position:0%
does UVA or Tech have any particular
sites<00:14:40.040> up<00:14:40.800> that<00:14:41.240> are<00:14:41.440> dealing<00:14:41.759> with<00:14:41.920> solar

00:14:43.430 --> 00:14:43.440 align:start position:0%
sites up that are dealing with solar
 

00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:46.150 align:start position:0%
sites up that are dealing with solar
issues<00:14:44.440> or<00:14:44.560> is<00:14:44.639> it<00:14:44.839> just<00:14:45.160> doing<00:14:45.519> reports<00:14:45.959> and

00:14:46.150 --> 00:14:46.160 align:start position:0%
issues or is it just doing reports and
 

00:14:46.160 --> 00:14:47.910 align:start position:0%
issues or is it just doing reports and
stuff<00:14:46.440> like

00:14:47.910 --> 00:14:47.920 align:start position:0%
stuff like
 

00:14:47.920 --> 00:14:50.710 align:start position:0%
stuff like
that<00:14:48.920> they<00:14:49.120> have<00:14:49.279> some<00:14:49.560> websites<00:14:50.240> just<00:14:50.440> with

00:14:50.710 --> 00:14:50.720 align:start position:0%
that they have some websites just with
 

00:14:50.720 --> 00:14:54.230 align:start position:0%
that they have some websites just with
their<00:14:52.040> resources<00:14:53.040> that<00:14:53.240> could<00:14:53.360> be<00:14:53.560> relevant<00:14:54.160> I

00:14:54.230 --> 00:14:54.240 align:start position:0%
their resources that could be relevant I
 

00:14:54.240 --> 00:14:56.069 align:start position:0%
their resources that could be relevant I
think<00:14:54.360> we<00:14:54.480> do<00:14:54.680> already<00:14:55.120> link<00:14:55.399> to<00:14:55.560> them<00:14:55.759> on<00:14:55.920> some

00:14:56.069 --> 00:14:56.079 align:start position:0%
think we do already link to them on some
 

00:14:56.079 --> 00:14:58.990 align:start position:0%
think we do already link to them on some
of<00:14:56.240> our<00:14:56.959> other<00:14:57.199> solar<00:14:57.639> pages<00:14:57.920> on<00:14:58.040> our<00:14:58.240> website

00:14:58.990 --> 00:14:59.000 align:start position:0%
of our other solar pages on our website
 

00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:02.230 align:start position:0%
of our other solar pages on our website
but<00:15:00.000> couldn't<00:15:00.279> be<00:15:00.480> excluded<00:15:00.959> here<00:15:01.240> either

00:15:02.230 --> 00:15:02.240 align:start position:0%
but couldn't be excluded here either
 

00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:03.829 align:start position:0%
but couldn't be excluded here either
okay<00:15:02.440> you<00:15:02.519> and<00:15:02.680> I<00:15:02.839> can<00:15:03.120> maybe<00:15:03.399> get<00:15:03.639> together

00:15:03.829 --> 00:15:03.839 align:start position:0%
okay you and I can maybe get together
 

00:15:03.839 --> 00:15:05.629 align:start position:0%
okay you and I can maybe get together
and<00:15:04.000> talk<00:15:04.199> about<00:15:04.440> what's<00:15:04.639> out<00:15:04.920> there<00:15:05.279> and<00:15:05.440> what

00:15:05.629 --> 00:15:05.639 align:start position:0%
and talk about what's out there and what
 

00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:07.829 align:start position:0%
and talk about what's out there and what
might<00:15:05.839> be<00:15:06.199> you<00:15:06.320> know<00:15:06.480> good<00:15:06.680> to<00:15:06.839> have<00:15:07.040> here<00:15:07.720> it

00:15:07.829 --> 00:15:07.839 align:start position:0%
might be you know good to have here it
 

00:15:07.839 --> 00:15:09.310 align:start position:0%
might be you know good to have here it
never<00:15:08.040> hurts<00:15:08.320> to<00:15:08.480> have<00:15:08.639> things<00:15:08.839> in<00:15:09.000> more<00:15:09.160> than

00:15:09.310 --> 00:15:09.320 align:start position:0%
never hurts to have things in more than
 

00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:11.150 align:start position:0%
never hurts to have things in more than
one

00:15:11.150 --> 00:15:11.160 align:start position:0%
one
 

00:15:11.160 --> 00:15:14.030 align:start position:0%
one
place<00:15:12.160> so<00:15:12.480> again<00:15:12.800> I<00:15:13.000> I<00:15:13.079> would<00:15:13.440> ask<00:15:13.639> the<00:15:13.800> same

00:15:14.030 --> 00:15:14.040 align:start position:0%
place so again I I would ask the same
 

00:15:14.040 --> 00:15:16.150 align:start position:0%
place so again I I would ask the same
question<00:15:14.320> who<00:15:14.639> decides<00:15:15.320> what<00:15:15.480> gets<00:15:15.759> posted

00:15:16.150 --> 00:15:16.160 align:start position:0%
question who decides what gets posted
 

00:15:16.160 --> 00:15:18.910 align:start position:0%
question who decides what gets posted
and<00:15:16.320> what<00:15:16.480> doesn't<00:15:17.040> and<00:15:17.800> I<00:15:17.880> would<00:15:18.199> caution<00:15:18.639> The

00:15:18.910 --> 00:15:18.920 align:start position:0%
and what doesn't and I would caution The
 

00:15:18.920 --> 00:15:21.829 align:start position:0%
and what doesn't and I would caution The
Authority<00:15:19.920> about<00:15:20.680> including<00:15:21.199> anything<00:15:21.639> that

00:15:21.829 --> 00:15:21.839 align:start position:0%
Authority about including anything that
 

00:15:21.839 --> 00:15:25.670 align:start position:0%
Authority about including anything that
might<00:15:22.199> come<00:15:22.399> across<00:15:22.759> as

00:15:25.670 --> 00:15:25.680 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:15:25.680 --> 00:15:28.309 align:start position:0%
 
endorsement<00:15:26.680> well<00:15:27.639> Catherine<00:15:28.000> if<00:15:28.120> I'm

00:15:28.309 --> 00:15:28.319 align:start position:0%
endorsement well Catherine if I'm
 

00:15:28.319 --> 00:15:31.230 align:start position:0%
endorsement well Catherine if I'm
reading<00:15:28.839> the<00:15:29.800> if<00:15:29.920> it<00:15:30.079> involves<00:15:30.560> you<00:15:30.680> know<00:15:31.079> if

00:15:31.230 --> 00:15:31.240 align:start position:0%
reading the if it involves you know if
 

00:15:31.240 --> 00:15:33.670 align:start position:0%
reading the if it involves you know if
it<00:15:31.680> you<00:15:31.839> if<00:15:31.920> it<00:15:32.120> involves<00:15:32.639> like<00:15:33.199> particular

00:15:33.670 --> 00:15:33.680 align:start position:0%
it you if it involves like particular
 

00:15:33.680 --> 00:15:36.550 align:start position:0%
it you if it involves like particular
companies<00:15:34.199> or<00:15:34.399> anything<00:15:34.720> along<00:15:35.079> those<00:15:35.560> lines

00:15:36.550 --> 00:15:36.560 align:start position:0%
companies or anything along those lines
 

00:15:36.560 --> 00:15:39.509 align:start position:0%
companies or anything along those lines
right<00:15:36.759> no<00:15:37.040> I<00:15:37.319> I'm<00:15:37.519> talking<00:15:38.360> you<00:15:38.519> know<00:15:39.240> other

00:15:39.509 --> 00:15:39.519 align:start position:0%
right no I I'm talking you know other
 

00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:44.829 align:start position:0%
right no I I'm talking you know other
university<00:15:40.240> sites<00:15:41.079> NOS<00:15:42.079> um<00:15:42.440> stuff<00:15:42.720> like

00:15:44.829 --> 00:15:44.839 align:start position:0%
university sites NOS um stuff like
 

00:15:44.839 --> 00:15:49.269 align:start position:0%
university sites NOS um stuff like
that<00:15:45.839> like<00:15:46.319> linking<00:15:46.639> to<00:15:46.800> the<00:15:46.959> IRA<00:15:47.519> website<00:15:48.360> to

00:15:49.269 --> 00:15:49.279 align:start position:0%
that like linking to the IRA website to
 

00:15:49.279 --> 00:15:57.590 align:start position:0%
that like linking to the IRA website to
um<00:15:50.000> maybe<00:15:50.360> see<00:15:51.279> C<00:15:51.480> it<00:15:51.639> does<00:15:51.920> do<00:15:52.160> advocacy<00:15:53.079> but

00:15:57.590 --> 00:15:57.600 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:00.629 align:start position:0%
 
um<00:15:59.040> I'm<00:15:59.199> just<00:15:59.319> looking<00:15:59.560> for<00:15:59.800> visual<00:16:00.160> interest

00:16:00.629 --> 00:16:00.639 align:start position:0%
um I'm just looking for visual interest
 

00:16:00.639 --> 00:16:02.670 align:start position:0%
um I'm just looking for visual interest
trying<00:16:00.839> to<00:16:01.839> because<00:16:02.040> right<00:16:02.160> now<00:16:02.360> this<00:16:02.480> is

00:16:02.670 --> 00:16:02.680 align:start position:0%
trying to because right now this is
 

00:16:02.680 --> 00:16:06.189 align:start position:0%
trying to because right now this is
really<00:16:02.959> pretty<00:16:03.279> boring<00:16:04.680> but<00:16:05.680> at<00:16:05.839> some<00:16:06.040> point

00:16:06.189 --> 00:16:06.199 align:start position:0%
really pretty boring but at some point
 

00:16:06.199 --> 00:16:07.509 align:start position:0%
really pretty boring but at some point
if<00:16:06.319> I<00:16:06.440> can<00:16:06.560> figure<00:16:06.800> out<00:16:06.920> how<00:16:07.000> to<00:16:07.120> work<00:16:07.319> some

00:16:07.509 --> 00:16:07.519 align:start position:0%
if I can figure out how to work some
 

00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:09.430 align:start position:0%
if I can figure out how to work some
pictures<00:16:07.839> in<00:16:08.000> a<00:16:08.160> Virginia<00:16:08.639> projects<00:16:09.160> I<00:16:09.240> think

00:16:09.430 --> 00:16:09.440 align:start position:0%
pictures in a Virginia projects I think
 

00:16:09.440 --> 00:16:11.269 align:start position:0%
pictures in a Virginia projects I think
that<00:16:09.880> might

00:16:11.269 --> 00:16:11.279 align:start position:0%
that might
 

00:16:11.279 --> 00:16:14.749 align:start position:0%
that might
uh<00:16:12.279> blash<00:16:12.600> it<00:16:12.759> up<00:16:12.880> a<00:16:12.959> little

00:16:14.749 --> 00:16:14.759 align:start position:0%
uh blash it up a little
 

00:16:14.759 --> 00:16:18.949 align:start position:0%
uh blash it up a little
bit<00:16:15.759> yeah<00:16:16.000> and<00:16:16.240> I<00:16:16.360> think<00:16:16.920> I<00:16:17.040> agree<00:16:17.480> and<00:16:17.839> also<00:16:18.839> I

00:16:18.949 --> 00:16:18.959 align:start position:0%
bit yeah and I think I agree and also I
 

00:16:18.959 --> 00:16:20.629 align:start position:0%
bit yeah and I think I agree and also I
think<00:16:19.160> we<00:16:19.279> should<00:16:19.560> think<00:16:19.800> about<00:16:20.079> what<00:16:20.319> people

00:16:20.629 --> 00:16:20.639 align:start position:0%
think we should think about what people
 

00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:22.910 align:start position:0%
think we should think about what people
coming<00:16:20.920> to<00:16:21.120> this<00:16:21.319> website<00:16:21.759> will<00:16:22.000> want<00:16:22.240> to<00:16:22.560> know

00:16:22.910 --> 00:16:22.920 align:start position:0%
coming to this website will want to know
 

00:16:22.920 --> 00:16:25.590 align:start position:0%
coming to this website will want to know
about<00:16:23.920> and<00:16:24.240> and<00:16:24.399> CA<00:16:24.880> might<00:16:25.040> be<00:16:25.199> a<00:16:25.360> good

00:16:25.590 --> 00:16:25.600 align:start position:0%
about and and CA might be a good
 

00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:29.350 align:start position:0%
about and and CA might be a good
resource<00:16:26.399> and<00:16:26.560> there's<00:16:27.360> definitely<00:16:27.920> others

00:16:29.350 --> 00:16:29.360 align:start position:0%
resource and there's definitely others
 

00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:31.870 align:start position:0%
resource and there's definitely others
um<00:16:30.000> but<00:16:30.519> yeah<00:16:30.720> I<00:16:30.839> think<00:16:31.120> that's<00:16:31.360> some<00:16:31.720> a

00:16:31.870 --> 00:16:31.880 align:start position:0%
um but yeah I think that's some a
 

00:16:31.880 --> 00:16:34.710 align:start position:0%
um but yeah I think that's some a
question<00:16:32.199> we<00:16:32.319> could<00:16:32.519> take<00:16:32.759> up<00:16:33.360> maybe<00:16:33.680> in

00:16:34.710 --> 00:16:34.720 align:start position:0%
question we could take up maybe in
 

00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:36.470 align:start position:0%
question we could take up maybe in
brainstorming

00:16:36.470 --> 00:16:36.480 align:start position:0%
brainstorming
 

00:16:36.480 --> 00:16:39.110 align:start position:0%
brainstorming
um<00:16:37.480> and<00:16:37.600> then<00:16:37.880> maybe<00:16:38.120> we<00:16:38.240> could<00:16:38.440> also<00:16:38.839> figure

00:16:39.110 --> 00:16:39.120 align:start position:0%
um and then maybe we could also figure
 

00:16:39.120 --> 00:16:41.509 align:start position:0%
um and then maybe we could also figure
out<00:16:39.279> a<00:16:39.560> process<00:16:40.040> by<00:16:40.199> which<00:16:40.399> we<00:16:40.600> agree<00:16:40.959> on<00:16:41.240> what

00:16:41.509 --> 00:16:41.519 align:start position:0%
out a process by which we agree on what
 

00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:44.150 align:start position:0%
out a process by which we agree on what
content<00:16:42.000> to

00:16:44.150 --> 00:16:44.160 align:start position:0%
content to
 

00:16:44.160 --> 00:16:48.030 align:start position:0%
content to
post<00:16:45.160> whether<00:16:45.480> that's<00:16:45.759> like<00:16:46.680> voting<00:16:47.560> at<00:16:47.839> the

00:16:48.030 --> 00:16:48.040 align:start position:0%
post whether that's like voting at the
 

00:16:48.040 --> 00:16:52.710 align:start position:0%
post whether that's like voting at the
next<00:16:48.240> meeting<00:16:49.319> or<00:16:50.319> having<00:16:51.000> you<00:16:51.120> know<00:16:52.079> a<00:16:52.279> subset

00:16:52.710 --> 00:16:52.720 align:start position:0%
next meeting or having you know a subset
 

00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:55.790 align:start position:0%
next meeting or having you know a subset
of<00:16:52.839> people

00:16:55.790 --> 00:16:55.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:16:55.800 --> 00:16:58.509 align:start position:0%
 
decide<00:16:56.800> I<00:16:57.079> I<00:16:57.199> think<00:16:57.399> that<00:16:57.519> might<00:16:57.680> be<00:16:57.800> a<00:16:57.959> good

00:16:58.509 --> 00:16:58.519 align:start position:0%
decide I I think that might be a good
 

00:16:58.519 --> 00:17:02.309 align:start position:0%
decide I I think that might be a good
approach<00:16:58.920> is<00:16:59.360> for<00:16:59.759> the<00:17:00.160> subgroup<00:17:01.000> to<00:17:01.959> come<00:17:02.160> up

00:17:02.309 --> 00:17:02.319 align:start position:0%
approach is for the subgroup to come up
 

00:17:02.319 --> 00:17:04.750 align:start position:0%
approach is for the subgroup to come up
with<00:17:02.440> the<00:17:02.600> ideas<00:17:03.120> of<00:17:03.319> who<00:17:03.519> and<00:17:03.759> what<00:17:04.160> to<00:17:04.360> put<00:17:04.559> up

00:17:04.750 --> 00:17:04.760 align:start position:0%
with the ideas of who and what to put up
 

00:17:04.760 --> 00:17:06.870 align:start position:0%
with the ideas of who and what to put up
here<00:17:05.079> and<00:17:05.199> then<00:17:05.360> at<00:17:05.480> a<00:17:05.600> future<00:17:05.959> meeting<00:17:06.679> bring

00:17:06.870 --> 00:17:06.880 align:start position:0%
here and then at a future meeting bring
 

00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:10.909 align:start position:0%
here and then at a future meeting bring
it<00:17:07.039> before<00:17:07.319> the<00:17:07.400> full

00:17:10.909 --> 00:17:10.919 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:17:10.919 --> 00:17:14.110 align:start position:0%
 
group<00:17:12.240> perfect<00:17:13.240> that<00:17:13.360> sounds<00:17:13.640> good<00:17:13.760> to<00:17:13.880> me

00:17:14.110 --> 00:17:14.120 align:start position:0%
group perfect that sounds good to me
 

00:17:14.120 --> 00:17:16.870 align:start position:0%
group perfect that sounds good to me
thank<00:17:14.280> you<00:17:14.480> Ken<00:17:15.000> thank<00:17:15.160> you<00:17:15.360> col<00:17:15.839> and<00:17:16.000> Jan<00:17:16.439> for

00:17:16.870 --> 00:17:16.880 align:start position:0%
thank you Ken thank you col and Jan for
 

00:17:16.880 --> 00:17:19.510 align:start position:0%
thank you Ken thank you col and Jan for
stepping<00:17:17.280> up<00:17:17.400> to<00:17:17.600> help<00:17:18.079> and<00:17:18.480> uh<00:17:19.079> we'll<00:17:19.280> try<00:17:19.439> to

00:17:19.510 --> 00:17:19.520 align:start position:0%
stepping up to help and uh we'll try to
 

00:17:19.520 --> 00:17:22.429 align:start position:0%
stepping up to help and uh we'll try to
get<00:17:19.679> a<00:17:19.799> couple<00:17:20.559> website<00:17:21.120> sub<00:17:21.439> committee

00:17:22.429 --> 00:17:22.439 align:start position:0%
get a couple website sub committee
 

00:17:22.439 --> 00:17:23.590 align:start position:0%
get a couple website sub committee
meetings<00:17:22.760> on<00:17:22.919> the

00:17:23.590 --> 00:17:23.600 align:start position:0%
meetings on the
 

00:17:23.600 --> 00:17:27.390 align:start position:0%
meetings on the
books<00:17:24.600> uh<00:17:24.760> prior<00:17:25.039> to<00:17:25.160> our<00:17:25.319> January

00:17:27.390 --> 00:17:27.400 align:start position:0%
books uh prior to our January
 

00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:30.110 align:start position:0%
books uh prior to our January
meeting

00:17:30.110 --> 00:17:30.120 align:start position:0%
meeting
 

00:17:30.120 --> 00:17:32.310 align:start position:0%
meeting
um<00:17:30.440> K<00:17:30.679> I'm<00:17:31.120> going<00:17:31.400> a<00:17:31.520> little<00:17:31.679> bit<00:17:31.840> out<00:17:31.960> of<00:17:32.039> order

00:17:32.310 --> 00:17:32.320 align:start position:0%
um K I'm going a little bit out of order
 

00:17:32.320 --> 00:17:33.669 align:start position:0%
um K I'm going a little bit out of order
should<00:17:32.480> have<00:17:32.600> done<00:17:32.760> this<00:17:32.919> from<00:17:33.080> the<00:17:33.200> outset

00:17:33.669 --> 00:17:33.679 align:start position:0%
should have done this from the outset
 

00:17:33.679 --> 00:17:36.470 align:start position:0%
should have done this from the outset
but<00:17:33.799> I<00:17:33.880> see<00:17:34.160> several<00:17:34.520> more<00:17:34.840> folks<00:17:35.200> have<00:17:35.480> joined

00:17:36.470 --> 00:17:36.480 align:start position:0%
but I see several more folks have joined
 

00:17:36.480 --> 00:17:38.830 align:start position:0%
but I see several more folks have joined
can<00:17:36.679> could<00:17:36.799> we<00:17:36.919> do<00:17:37.080> a<00:17:37.200> roll<00:17:37.640> call<00:17:38.200> of<00:17:38.679> uh

00:17:38.830 --> 00:17:38.840 align:start position:0%
can could we do a roll call of uh
 

00:17:38.840 --> 00:17:40.750 align:start position:0%
can could we do a roll call of uh
Authority<00:17:39.240> member<00:17:39.559> attendance<00:17:40.559> and

00:17:40.750 --> 00:17:40.760 align:start position:0%
Authority member attendance and
 

00:17:40.760 --> 00:17:42.750 align:start position:0%
Authority member attendance and
attendees<00:17:41.400> so<00:17:41.559> we<00:17:41.679> know<00:17:42.039> who's<00:17:42.360> here<00:17:42.559> and

00:17:42.750 --> 00:17:42.760 align:start position:0%
attendees so we know who's here and
 

00:17:42.760 --> 00:17:46.070 align:start position:0%
attendees so we know who's here and
who's<00:17:43.080> not<00:17:43.880> I<00:17:44.000> see<00:17:44.440> a<00:17:44.520> meeting<00:17:45.039> guest<00:17:45.679> and<00:17:45.840> then

00:17:46.070 --> 00:17:46.080 align:start position:0%
who's not I see a meeting guest and then
 

00:17:46.080 --> 00:17:46.710 align:start position:0%
who's not I see a meeting guest and then
I

00:17:46.710 --> 00:17:46.720 align:start position:0%
I
 

00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:48.390 align:start position:0%
I
know

00:17:48.390 --> 00:17:48.400 align:start position:0%
know
 

00:17:48.400 --> 00:17:51.510 align:start position:0%
know
um<00:17:49.400> one<00:17:49.640> member<00:17:49.960> was<00:17:50.120> planning<00:17:50.480> to<00:17:50.679> join<00:17:51.200> via

00:17:51.510 --> 00:17:51.520 align:start position:0%
um one member was planning to join via
 

00:17:51.520 --> 00:17:53.669 align:start position:0%
um one member was planning to join via
cell<00:17:51.840> phone<00:17:52.720> I<00:17:52.840> was<00:17:53.000> not<00:17:53.120> sure<00:17:53.320> if<00:17:53.440> he<00:17:53.559> was

00:17:53.669 --> 00:17:53.679 align:start position:0%
cell phone I was not sure if he was
 

00:17:53.679 --> 00:17:56.149 align:start position:0%
cell phone I was not sure if he was
going<00:17:53.799> to<00:17:53.919> be<00:17:54.080> able<00:17:54.360> to<00:17:54.760> join<00:17:55.360> could<00:17:55.559> we<00:17:55.960> go

00:17:56.149 --> 00:17:56.159 align:start position:0%
going to be able to join could we go
 

00:17:56.159 --> 00:17:57.390 align:start position:0%
going to be able to join could we go
through<00:17:56.320> the<00:17:56.480> Roll

00:17:57.390 --> 00:17:57.400 align:start position:0%
through the Roll
 

00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:09.710 align:start position:0%
through the Roll
Call

00:18:09.710 --> 00:18:09.720 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:18:09.720 --> 00:18:12.669 align:start position:0%
 
hey<00:18:09.919> Ken<00:18:10.080> we're<00:18:10.200> not<00:18:10.360> hearing

00:18:12.669 --> 00:18:12.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:18:12.679 --> 00:18:17.830 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:18:13.679> sorry<00:18:14.039> I<00:18:14.159> was<00:18:14.480> uh<00:18:15.360> I<00:18:15.480> was<00:18:15.679> muted<00:18:16.679> um<00:18:17.679> yeah

00:18:17.830 --> 00:18:17.840 align:start position:0%
you sorry I was uh I was muted um yeah
 

00:18:17.840 --> 00:18:19.430 align:start position:0%
you sorry I was uh I was muted um yeah
hold<00:18:18.000> on<00:18:18.120> a<00:18:18.280> sec<00:18:18.520> let<00:18:18.600> me

00:18:19.430 --> 00:18:19.440 align:start position:0%
hold on a sec let me
 

00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:25.270 align:start position:0%
hold on a sec let me
uh<00:18:20.640> the<00:18:21.640> members

00:18:25.270 --> 00:18:25.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:18:25.280 --> 00:18:28.630 align:start position:0%
 
list<00:18:26.280> all<00:18:26.440> right<00:18:26.960> Paul<00:18:27.240> Duncan<00:18:27.760> is<00:18:28.039> here

00:18:28.630 --> 00:18:28.640 align:start position:0%
list all right Paul Duncan is here
 

00:18:28.640 --> 00:18:30.549 align:start position:0%
list all right Paul Duncan is here
Skyler<00:18:29.200> is

00:18:30.549 --> 00:18:30.559 align:start position:0%
Skyler is
 

00:18:30.559 --> 00:18:36.669 align:start position:0%
Skyler is
here<00:18:31.559> Joanne<00:18:32.039> is<00:18:32.600> here<00:18:33.600> Colleen<00:18:34.240> I<00:18:34.559> yes<00:18:34.840> here

00:18:36.669 --> 00:18:36.679 align:start position:0%
here Joanne is here Colleen I yes here
 

00:18:36.679 --> 00:18:40.070 align:start position:0%
here Joanne is here Colleen I yes here
yes<00:18:37.679> uh<00:18:37.960> I<00:18:38.080> saw<00:18:38.400> Michael<00:18:38.720> Walsh<00:18:39.159> earlier<00:18:39.760> is<00:18:39.919> he

00:18:40.070 --> 00:18:40.080 align:start position:0%
yes uh I saw Michael Walsh earlier is he
 

00:18:40.080 --> 00:18:45.070 align:start position:0%
yes uh I saw Michael Walsh earlier is he
still<00:18:40.280> on<00:18:41.200> I'm<00:18:41.440> here<00:18:41.760> thanks<00:18:42.760> okay<00:18:43.480> Robert

00:18:45.070 --> 00:18:45.080 align:start position:0%
still on I'm here thanks okay Robert
 

00:18:45.080 --> 00:18:48.630 align:start position:0%
still on I'm here thanks okay Robert
bdy<00:18:46.080> um<00:18:46.480> Harry

00:18:48.630 --> 00:18:48.640 align:start position:0%
bdy um Harry
 

00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:54.789 align:start position:0%
bdy um Harry
Godfrey<00:18:50.039> no<00:18:51.039> roomy

00:18:54.789 --> 00:18:54.799 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:18:54.799 --> 00:18:57.310 align:start position:0%
 
Mota<00:18:55.799> Greg<00:18:56.120> khabib<00:18:56.559> is

00:18:57.310 --> 00:18:57.320 align:start position:0%
Mota Greg khabib is
 

00:18:57.320 --> 00:19:00.990 align:start position:0%
Mota Greg khabib is
here<00:18:58.320> Katherine<00:18:58.640> bond<00:18:58.960> is<00:18:59.200> here<00:19:00.200> Michael

00:19:00.990 --> 00:19:01.000 align:start position:0%
here Katherine bond is here Michael
 

00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:03.669 align:start position:0%
here Katherine bond is here Michael
Herbert<00:19:02.000> you<00:19:02.159> out

00:19:03.669 --> 00:19:03.679 align:start position:0%
Herbert you out
 

00:19:03.679 --> 00:19:05.710 align:start position:0%
Herbert you out
there<00:19:04.679> all<00:19:04.799> right<00:19:04.919> so<00:19:05.080> we've<00:19:05.240> got<00:19:05.400> everyone

00:19:05.710 --> 00:19:05.720 align:start position:0%
there all right so we've got everyone
 

00:19:05.720 --> 00:19:06.789 align:start position:0%
there all right so we've got everyone
but

00:19:06.789 --> 00:19:06.799 align:start position:0%
but
 

00:19:06.799 --> 00:19:11.310 align:start position:0%
but
Michael<00:19:07.799> um<00:19:08.240> Harry<00:19:08.559> Godfrey<00:19:09.240> and<00:19:09.559> Ry<00:19:10.320> Mota

00:19:11.310 --> 00:19:11.320 align:start position:0%
Michael um Harry Godfrey and Ry Mota
 

00:19:11.320 --> 00:19:15.270 align:start position:0%
Michael um Harry Godfrey and Ry Mota
excellent<00:19:12.280> thank<00:19:12.480> you<00:19:13.240> Kim<00:19:13.799> appreciate<00:19:14.360> that

00:19:15.270 --> 00:19:15.280 align:start position:0%
excellent thank you Kim appreciate that
 

00:19:15.280 --> 00:19:16.990 align:start position:0%
excellent thank you Kim appreciate that
well<00:19:15.440> that<00:19:15.559> brings<00:19:15.799> us<00:19:15.960> to<00:19:16.159> the<00:19:16.440> uh<00:19:16.600> important

00:19:16.990 --> 00:19:17.000 align:start position:0%
well that brings us to the uh important
 

00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:21.350 align:start position:0%
well that brings us to the uh important
part<00:19:17.240> of<00:19:17.440> today's<00:19:17.960> meeting<00:19:18.960> um<00:19:19.520> the<00:19:20.039> review<00:19:20.919> of

00:19:21.350 --> 00:19:21.360 align:start position:0%
part of today's meeting um the review of
 

00:19:21.360 --> 00:19:26.190 align:start position:0%
part of today's meeting um the review of
the<00:19:21.720> authorities<00:19:22.559> 2023<00:19:23.840> report<00:19:24.840> um<00:19:25.280> hope<00:19:25.559> to

00:19:26.190 --> 00:19:26.200 align:start position:0%
the authorities 2023 report um hope to
 

00:19:26.200 --> 00:19:29.029 align:start position:0%
the authorities 2023 report um hope to
get<00:19:26.480> consensus<00:19:27.159> wherever<00:19:27.720> possible<00:19:28.360> on<00:19:28.559> this

00:19:29.029 --> 00:19:29.039 align:start position:0%
get consensus wherever possible on this
 

00:19:29.039 --> 00:19:33.149 align:start position:0%
get consensus wherever possible on this
report<00:19:30.039> um<00:19:30.240> certainly<00:19:30.679> in<00:19:30.960> the<00:19:31.400> U<00:19:32.200> overview<00:19:32.799> of

00:19:33.149 --> 00:19:33.159 align:start position:0%
report um certainly in the U overview of
 

00:19:33.159 --> 00:19:35.950 align:start position:0%
report um certainly in the U overview of
the<00:19:33.600> activities<00:19:34.320> summarizing<00:19:35.080> the<00:19:35.360> past<00:19:35.640> four

00:19:35.950 --> 00:19:35.960 align:start position:0%
the activities summarizing the past four
 

00:19:35.960 --> 00:19:39.110 align:start position:0%
the activities summarizing the past four
meetings<00:19:36.440> that<00:19:36.600> we<00:19:36.760> held<00:19:37.120> in<00:19:37.720> 2023<00:19:38.720> what<00:19:38.919> was

00:19:39.110 --> 00:19:39.120 align:start position:0%
meetings that we held in 2023 what was
 

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:43.669 align:start position:0%
meetings that we held in 2023 what was
said<00:19:39.640> and<00:19:40.000> what<00:19:40.360> was<00:19:41.280> uh<00:19:41.480> discussed<00:19:42.320> and<00:19:42.679> then

00:19:43.669 --> 00:19:43.679 align:start position:0%
said and what was uh discussed and then
 

00:19:43.679 --> 00:19:45.950 align:start position:0%
said and what was uh discussed and then
once<00:19:43.960> we<00:19:44.280> have<00:19:44.679> agreement<00:19:45.120> there<00:19:45.280> would<00:19:45.480> like

00:19:45.950 --> 00:19:45.960 align:start position:0%
once we have agreement there would like
 

00:19:45.960 --> 00:19:50.310 align:start position:0%
once we have agreement there would like
to<00:19:46.960> move<00:19:47.280> down<00:19:47.559> to<00:19:48.679> recommendations<00:19:49.679> um<00:19:50.000> hope

00:19:50.310 --> 00:19:50.320 align:start position:0%
to move down to recommendations um hope
 

00:19:50.320 --> 00:19:53.190 align:start position:0%
to move down to recommendations um hope
again<00:19:50.520> to<00:19:50.720> have<00:19:51.240> consensus<00:19:52.240> uh<00:19:52.520> wherever

00:19:53.190 --> 00:19:53.200 align:start position:0%
again to have consensus uh wherever
 

00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:55.789 align:start position:0%
again to have consensus uh wherever
possible<00:19:53.679> here<00:19:54.280> but<00:19:54.440> if<00:19:54.640> there<00:19:54.919> is<00:19:55.280> not

00:19:55.789 --> 00:19:55.799 align:start position:0%
possible here but if there is not
 

00:19:55.799 --> 00:19:59.470 align:start position:0%
possible here but if there is not
consensus<00:19:56.799> we<00:19:56.960> will<00:19:57.720> um<00:19:58.320> vote<00:19:58.840> on<00:19:59.200> each

00:19:59.470 --> 00:19:59.480 align:start position:0%
consensus we will um vote on each
 

00:19:59.480 --> 00:20:03.149 align:start position:0%
consensus we will um vote on each
element<00:20:00.280> of<00:20:00.799> the<00:20:01.480> recommendations<00:20:02.480> and<00:20:03.039> uh

00:20:03.149 --> 00:20:03.159 align:start position:0%
element of the recommendations and uh
 

00:20:03.159 --> 00:20:05.190 align:start position:0%
element of the recommendations and uh
the<00:20:03.280> authority<00:20:03.600> will<00:20:03.760> move<00:20:04.000> forward<00:20:04.400> with<00:20:04.679> a

00:20:05.190 --> 00:20:05.200 align:start position:0%
the authority will move forward with a
 

00:20:05.200 --> 00:20:09.110 align:start position:0%
the authority will move forward with a
majority<00:20:06.120> vote<00:20:07.120> uh<00:20:07.440> as<00:20:08.000> described<00:20:08.559> in<00:20:08.679> our

00:20:09.110 --> 00:20:09.120 align:start position:0%
majority vote uh as described in our
 

00:20:09.120 --> 00:20:11.510 align:start position:0%
majority vote uh as described in our
bylaws<00:20:09.760> so<00:20:10.000> Ken<00:20:10.280> thank<00:20:10.440> you<00:20:10.559> for<00:20:10.840> sharing<00:20:11.320> the

00:20:11.510 --> 00:20:11.520 align:start position:0%
bylaws so Ken thank you for sharing the
 

00:20:11.520 --> 00:20:13.870 align:start position:0%
bylaws so Ken thank you for sharing the
screen<00:20:12.360> I'll<00:20:12.559> open<00:20:12.760> it<00:20:12.880> to<00:20:13.039> Authority<00:20:13.400> members

00:20:13.870 --> 00:20:13.880 align:start position:0%
screen I'll open it to Authority members
 

00:20:13.880 --> 00:20:18.190 align:start position:0%
screen I'll open it to Authority members
to<00:20:14.360> point<00:20:14.679> out<00:20:15.600> uh<00:20:15.880> changes<00:20:16.760> anything<00:20:17.320> to

00:20:18.190 --> 00:20:18.200 align:start position:0%
to point out uh changes anything to
 

00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:19.909 align:start position:0%
to point out uh changes anything to
finalize<00:20:18.799> and<00:20:18.960> and<00:20:19.080> make<00:20:19.320> different<00:20:19.760> right

00:20:19.909 --> 00:20:19.919 align:start position:0%
finalize and and make different right
 

00:20:19.919 --> 00:20:22.789 align:start position:0%
finalize and and make different right
now<00:20:20.320> and<00:20:21.320> uh<00:20:21.559> just<00:20:21.840> thank<00:20:22.240> the<00:20:22.440> several

00:20:22.789 --> 00:20:22.799 align:start position:0%
now and uh just thank the several
 

00:20:22.799 --> 00:20:25.029 align:start position:0%
now and uh just thank the several
members<00:20:23.240> who<00:20:23.559> have<00:20:23.919> taken<00:20:24.320> time<00:20:24.520> out<00:20:24.679> of<00:20:24.840> their

00:20:25.029 --> 00:20:25.039 align:start position:0%
members who have taken time out of their
 

00:20:25.039 --> 00:20:27.470 align:start position:0%
members who have taken time out of their
days<00:20:25.280> over<00:20:25.480> the<00:20:25.640> past<00:20:26.000> few<00:20:26.280> weeks<00:20:26.640> to<00:20:27.159> make

00:20:27.470 --> 00:20:27.480 align:start position:0%
days over the past few weeks to make
 

00:20:27.480 --> 00:20:30.149 align:start position:0%
days over the past few weeks to make
substantial<00:20:27.919> Chang<00:20:28.400> es<00:20:28.640> to<00:20:29.240> make<00:20:29.480> formatting

00:20:30.149 --> 00:20:30.159 align:start position:0%
substantial Chang es to make formatting
 

00:20:30.159 --> 00:20:32.510 align:start position:0%
substantial Chang es to make formatting
changes<00:20:30.559> to<00:20:31.480> brainstorm<00:20:32.000> and<00:20:32.159> think<00:20:32.320> of

00:20:32.510 --> 00:20:32.520 align:start position:0%
changes to brainstorm and think of
 

00:20:32.520 --> 00:20:35.549 align:start position:0%
changes to brainstorm and think of
recommendations<00:20:33.200> that<00:20:33.320> we<00:20:33.480> can<00:20:33.720> make<00:20:34.559> as<00:20:34.840> our

00:20:35.549 --> 00:20:35.559 align:start position:0%
recommendations that we can make as our
 

00:20:35.559 --> 00:20:38.669 align:start position:0%
recommendations that we can make as our
enabling<00:20:36.200> legislation<00:20:37.200> requires<00:20:37.679> us<00:20:37.880> to<00:20:38.360> so

00:20:38.669 --> 00:20:38.679 align:start position:0%
enabling legislation requires us to so
 

00:20:38.679 --> 00:20:40.430 align:start position:0%
enabling legislation requires us to so
really<00:20:38.919> appreciate<00:20:39.520> everybody's<00:20:40.039> time<00:20:40.280> over

00:20:40.430 --> 00:20:40.440 align:start position:0%
really appreciate everybody's time over
 

00:20:40.440 --> 00:20:42.669 align:start position:0%
really appreciate everybody's time over
the<00:20:40.600> past<00:20:40.840> couple<00:20:41.120> weeks<00:20:41.559> but<00:20:42.240> like<00:20:42.400> to<00:20:42.559> just

00:20:42.669 --> 00:20:42.679 align:start position:0%
the past couple weeks but like to just
 

00:20:42.679 --> 00:20:46.310 align:start position:0%
the past couple weeks but like to just
open<00:20:42.919> this<00:20:43.159> up<00:20:43.600> for<00:20:44.600> discussion<00:20:45.520> and<00:20:45.960> move

00:20:46.310 --> 00:20:46.320 align:start position:0%
open this up for discussion and move
 

00:20:46.320 --> 00:20:47.870 align:start position:0%
open this up for discussion and move
this

00:20:47.870 --> 00:20:47.880 align:start position:0%
this
 

00:20:47.880 --> 00:20:51.669 align:start position:0%
this
forward<00:20:48.880> one<00:20:49.080> thing<00:20:49.240> I'll<00:20:49.559> add<00:20:50.280> um<00:20:50.640> is<00:20:51.280> the<00:20:51.440> one

00:20:51.669 --> 00:20:51.679 align:start position:0%
forward one thing I'll add um is the one
 

00:20:51.679 --> 00:20:54.070 align:start position:0%
forward one thing I'll add um is the one
item<00:20:52.039> that<00:20:52.320> I've<00:20:52.559> not<00:20:52.880> included<00:20:53.360> in<00:20:53.600> here<00:20:53.840> yet

00:20:54.070 --> 00:20:54.080 align:start position:0%
item that I've not included in here yet
 

00:20:54.080 --> 00:20:56.310 align:start position:0%
item that I've not included in here yet
and<00:20:54.320> I<00:20:54.520> I<00:20:54.600> don't<00:20:54.760> know<00:20:54.919> whether<00:20:55.120> we<00:20:55.240> need<00:20:55.440> to<00:20:56.159> in

00:20:56.310 --> 00:20:56.320 align:start position:0%
and I I don't know whether we need to in
 

00:20:56.320 --> 00:20:58.630 align:start position:0%
and I I don't know whether we need to in
terms<00:20:56.520> of<00:20:56.799> presentations<00:20:57.799> was

00:20:58.630 --> 00:20:58.640 align:start position:0%
terms of presentations was
 

00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:00.870 align:start position:0%
terms of presentations was
uh<00:20:59.240> Aaron's<00:20:59.760> presentation<00:21:00.280> at<00:21:00.480> the<00:21:00.640> last

00:21:00.870 --> 00:21:00.880 align:start position:0%
uh Aaron's presentation at the last
 

00:21:00.880 --> 00:21:04.190 align:start position:0%
uh Aaron's presentation at the last
minute<00:21:01.880> in<00:21:02.080> the<00:21:02.240> last

00:21:04.190 --> 00:21:04.200 align:start position:0%
minute in the last
 

00:21:04.200 --> 00:21:06.390 align:start position:0%
minute in the last
meeting<00:21:05.200> comparison<00:21:05.640> of<00:21:05.760> States<00:21:06.120> but<00:21:06.240> I've

00:21:06.390 --> 00:21:06.400 align:start position:0%
meeting comparison of States but I've
 

00:21:06.400 --> 00:21:09.070 align:start position:0%
meeting comparison of States but I've
got<00:21:06.760> something<00:21:07.080> ready<00:21:07.400> to<00:21:07.600> drop<00:21:07.919> in<00:21:08.799> I<00:21:08.919> was

00:21:09.070 --> 00:21:09.080 align:start position:0%
got something ready to drop in I was
 

00:21:09.080 --> 00:21:10.909 align:start position:0%
got something ready to drop in I was
just<00:21:09.400> you<00:21:09.520> know<00:21:09.679> at<00:21:09.799> the<00:21:09.960> last<00:21:10.120> minute<00:21:10.400> I<00:21:10.520> was

00:21:10.909 --> 00:21:10.919 align:start position:0%
just you know at the last minute I was
 

00:21:10.919 --> 00:21:13.830 align:start position:0%
just you know at the last minute I was
uh<00:21:11.320> being<00:21:11.600> mindful<00:21:12.039> of<00:21:12.200> page<00:21:12.480> limits<00:21:13.279> for<00:21:13.640> the

00:21:13.830 --> 00:21:13.840 align:start position:0%
uh being mindful of page limits for the
 

00:21:13.840 --> 00:21:15.870 align:start position:0%
uh being mindful of page limits for the
new<00:21:14.200> guidelines

00:21:15.870 --> 00:21:15.880 align:start position:0%
new guidelines
 

00:21:15.880 --> 00:21:18.470 align:start position:0%
new guidelines
but<00:21:16.880> if<00:21:17.360> you<00:21:17.520> think<00:21:17.679> it's<00:21:17.880> important<00:21:18.279> enough

00:21:18.470 --> 00:21:18.480 align:start position:0%
but if you think it's important enough
 

00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:20.430 align:start position:0%
but if you think it's important enough
that<00:21:18.600> we<00:21:18.720> drop<00:21:19.000> that<00:21:19.159> in<00:21:19.360> I'll<00:21:19.919> I'll<00:21:20.120> take<00:21:20.320> care

00:21:20.430 --> 00:21:20.440 align:start position:0%
that we drop that in I'll I'll take care
 

00:21:20.440 --> 00:21:24.990 align:start position:0%
that we drop that in I'll I'll take care
of<00:21:20.600> that<00:21:20.760> and<00:21:20.840> then

00:21:24.990 --> 00:21:25.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:21:25.000 --> 00:21:27.230 align:start position:0%
 
recirculate<00:21:26.000> yeah<00:21:26.279> Ken<00:21:26.720> I<00:21:26.799> think<00:21:27.000> that<00:21:27.120> would

00:21:27.230 --> 00:21:27.240 align:start position:0%
recirculate yeah Ken I think that would
 

00:21:27.240 --> 00:21:30.029 align:start position:0%
recirculate yeah Ken I think that would
be<00:21:27.440> helpful<00:21:27.760> to<00:21:28.159> put<00:21:28.320> in<00:21:28.880> I<00:21:29.039> like<00:21:29.360> the<00:21:29.720> small

00:21:30.029 --> 00:21:30.039 align:start position:0%
be helpful to put in I like the small
 

00:21:30.039 --> 00:21:31.710 align:start position:0%
be helpful to put in I like the small
blurb<00:21:30.440> that<00:21:30.559> was<00:21:30.679> in<00:21:30.799> our<00:21:31.000> minutes

00:21:31.710 --> 00:21:31.720 align:start position:0%
blurb that was in our minutes
 

00:21:31.720 --> 00:21:33.750 align:start position:0%
blurb that was in our minutes
summarizing

00:21:33.750 --> 00:21:33.760 align:start position:0%
summarizing
 

00:21:33.760 --> 00:21:36.549 align:start position:0%
summarizing
aon's<00:21:34.760> presentation<00:21:35.600> I<00:21:35.760> I<00:21:35.840> think<00:21:36.120> that's

00:21:36.549 --> 00:21:36.559 align:start position:0%
aon's presentation I I think that's
 

00:21:36.559 --> 00:21:39.029 align:start position:0%
aon's presentation I I think that's
that's<00:21:36.840> pertinent<00:21:37.200> I<00:21:37.279> mean<00:21:37.400> we<00:21:37.559> included<00:21:38.039> Mr

00:21:39.029 --> 00:21:39.039 align:start position:0%
that's pertinent I mean we included Mr
 

00:21:39.039 --> 00:21:41.710 align:start position:0%
that's pertinent I mean we included Mr
Meyer's<00:21:40.039> presentation<00:21:40.520> on<00:21:40.760> energy<00:21:41.080> storage

00:21:41.710 --> 00:21:41.720 align:start position:0%
Meyer's presentation on energy storage
 

00:21:41.720 --> 00:21:44.190 align:start position:0%
Meyer's presentation on energy storage
so<00:21:42.440> we'd<00:21:42.640> love<00:21:42.840> to<00:21:43.240> include

00:21:44.190 --> 00:21:44.200 align:start position:0%
so we'd love to include
 

00:21:44.200 --> 00:21:46.710 align:start position:0%
so we'd love to include
Erin's<00:21:45.200> presentation<00:21:45.799> as

00:21:46.710 --> 00:21:46.720 align:start position:0%
Erin's presentation as
 

00:21:46.720 --> 00:21:50.110 align:start position:0%
Erin's presentation as
well<00:21:47.720> I'll<00:21:47.880> do<00:21:48.039> that<00:21:48.240> I've<00:21:48.360> got<00:21:48.480> it<00:21:48.559> ready<00:21:48.760> to

00:21:50.110 --> 00:21:50.120 align:start position:0%
well I'll do that I've got it ready to
 

00:21:50.120 --> 00:21:54.269 align:start position:0%
well I'll do that I've got it ready to
go<00:21:51.120> okay<00:21:52.120> and<00:21:52.320> other<00:21:52.559> than<00:21:53.120> um<00:21:53.440> sort<00:21:53.640> of<00:21:53.799> the

00:21:54.269 --> 00:21:54.279 align:start position:0%
go okay and other than um sort of the
 

00:21:54.279 --> 00:21:58.070 align:start position:0%
go okay and other than um sort of the
formatting<00:21:55.279> the<00:21:55.799> changes<00:21:56.799> associated<00:21:57.559> with

00:21:58.070 --> 00:21:58.080 align:start position:0%
formatting the changes associated with
 

00:21:58.080 --> 00:22:00.789 align:start position:0%
formatting the changes associated with
updates<00:21:58.559> to<00:21:58.720> the<00:21:59.360> presentations<00:22:00.360> were<00:22:00.600> there

00:22:00.789 --> 00:22:00.799 align:start position:0%
updates to the presentations were there
 

00:22:00.799 --> 00:22:02.070 align:start position:0%
updates to the presentations were there
any<00:22:01.039> other

00:22:02.070 --> 00:22:02.080 align:start position:0%
any other
 

00:22:02.080 --> 00:22:04.549 align:start position:0%
any other
substantive<00:22:03.080> changes<00:22:03.679> that<00:22:03.799> were<00:22:04.000> made<00:22:04.279> since

00:22:04.549 --> 00:22:04.559 align:start position:0%
substantive changes that were made since
 

00:22:04.559 --> 00:22:05.830 align:start position:0%
substantive changes that were made since
the<00:22:04.760> last

00:22:05.830 --> 00:22:05.840 align:start position:0%
the last
 

00:22:05.840 --> 00:22:10.350 align:start position:0%
the last
version<00:22:06.840> we<00:22:07.080> discussed<00:22:07.679> the<00:22:07.840> previous

00:22:10.350 --> 00:22:10.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:22:10.360 --> 00:22:14.149 align:start position:0%
 
meeting<00:22:11.360> yes<00:22:12.240> um<00:22:12.799> Katherine<00:22:13.320> on<00:22:13.559> at<00:22:13.679> least<00:22:13.880> two

00:22:14.149 --> 00:22:14.159 align:start position:0%
meeting yes um Katherine on at least two
 

00:22:14.159 --> 00:22:18.070 align:start position:0%
meeting yes um Katherine on at least two
occasions<00:22:14.679> since<00:22:15.080> then<00:22:15.799> Ken<00:22:16.360> has<00:22:17.000> circulated

00:22:18.070 --> 00:22:18.080 align:start position:0%
occasions since then Ken has circulated
 

00:22:18.080 --> 00:22:20.669 align:start position:0%
occasions since then Ken has circulated
updates<00:22:19.080> um<00:22:19.360> some<00:22:19.559> of<00:22:19.760> which<00:22:20.120> were<00:22:20.440> were

00:22:20.669 --> 00:22:20.679 align:start position:0%
updates um some of which were were
 

00:22:20.679 --> 00:22:22.430 align:start position:0%
updates um some of which were were
comments<00:22:21.039> from<00:22:21.279> you<00:22:21.520> and<00:22:21.840> your<00:22:22.080> colleague

00:22:22.430 --> 00:22:22.440 align:start position:0%
comments from you and your colleague
 

00:22:22.440 --> 00:22:26.909 align:start position:0%
comments from you and your colleague
Miss<00:22:23.200> Cosby<00:22:24.200> um<00:22:24.679> I<00:22:24.960> took<00:22:25.200> some<00:22:25.440> time<00:22:25.640> to<00:22:25.919> update

00:22:26.909 --> 00:22:26.919 align:start position:0%
Miss Cosby um I took some time to update
 

00:22:26.919 --> 00:22:28.549 align:start position:0%
Miss Cosby um I took some time to update
and<00:22:27.120> make<00:22:27.279> some<00:22:27.480> corrections

00:22:28.549 --> 00:22:28.559 align:start position:0%
and make some corrections
 

00:22:28.559 --> 00:22:30.110 align:start position:0%
and make some corrections
the<00:22:28.720> local<00:22:29.039> permitting

00:22:30.110 --> 00:22:30.120 align:start position:0%
the local permitting
 

00:22:30.120 --> 00:22:34.190 align:start position:0%
the local permitting
report<00:22:31.400> um<00:22:32.400> so<00:22:32.880> yes<00:22:33.080> this<00:22:33.279> has<00:22:33.520> substantially

00:22:34.190 --> 00:22:34.200 align:start position:0%
report um so yes this has substantially
 

00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:35.630 align:start position:0%
report um so yes this has substantially
changed

00:22:35.630 --> 00:22:35.640 align:start position:0%
changed
 

00:22:35.640 --> 00:22:38.669 align:start position:0%
changed
since<00:22:36.640> the<00:22:36.919> September<00:22:37.400> 13<00:22:37.880> meeting<00:22:38.320> making

00:22:38.669 --> 00:22:38.679 align:start position:0%
since the September 13 meeting making
 

00:22:38.679 --> 00:22:40.830 align:start position:0%
since the September 13 meeting making
updates<00:22:39.200> expanding<00:22:39.720> a<00:22:39.840> little<00:22:40.039> bit<00:22:40.400> and

00:22:40.830 --> 00:22:40.840 align:start position:0%
updates expanding a little bit and
 

00:22:40.840 --> 00:22:45.669 align:start position:0%
updates expanding a little bit and
adding<00:22:41.120> a<00:22:41.240> lot<00:22:41.400> more<00:22:41.559> meat<00:22:41.840> to<00:22:42.120> the<00:22:42.480> to<00:22:42.720> the

00:22:45.669 --> 00:22:45.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:22:45.679 --> 00:22:49.149 align:start position:0%
 
report<00:22:46.679> I'm<00:22:46.799> just<00:22:46.960> asking<00:22:47.480> and<00:22:47.640> I<00:22:47.840> I<00:22:47.960> did<00:22:48.440> see

00:22:49.149 --> 00:22:49.159 align:start position:0%
report I'm just asking and I I did see
 

00:22:49.159 --> 00:22:50.830 align:start position:0%
report I'm just asking and I I did see
this<00:22:49.279> morning<00:22:49.640> that<00:22:49.760> there<00:22:49.880> was<00:22:50.039> a<00:22:50.240> new<00:22:50.440> draft

00:22:50.830 --> 00:22:50.840 align:start position:0%
this morning that there was a new draft
 

00:22:50.840 --> 00:22:52.669 align:start position:0%
this morning that there was a new draft
circulated<00:22:51.400> recently<00:22:51.880> I'm<00:22:52.039> just<00:22:52.240> asking<00:22:52.480> for

00:22:52.669 --> 00:22:52.679 align:start position:0%
circulated recently I'm just asking for
 

00:22:52.679 --> 00:22:55.190 align:start position:0%
circulated recently I'm just asking for
a<00:22:52.919> synopsis<00:22:53.480> of<00:22:53.640> what<00:22:53.760> the<00:22:53.880> substance<00:22:54.279> of

00:22:55.190 --> 00:22:55.200 align:start position:0%
a synopsis of what the substance of
 

00:22:55.200 --> 00:22:59.549 align:start position:0%
a synopsis of what the substance of
changes<00:22:56.200> were<00:22:56.600> again<00:22:56.960> not<00:22:58.080> not<00:22:58.279> so<00:22:58.480> much<00:22:58.760> the

00:22:59.549 --> 00:22:59.559 align:start position:0%
changes were again not not so much the
 

00:22:59.559 --> 00:23:02.390 align:start position:0%
changes were again not not so much the
formatting<00:23:00.440> type<00:23:00.840> you<00:23:00.880> know<00:23:01.760> typographical

00:23:02.390 --> 00:23:02.400 align:start position:0%
formatting type you know typographical
 

00:23:02.400 --> 00:23:09.990 align:start position:0%
formatting type you know typographical
or<00:23:02.600> grammatical<00:23:03.200> changes<00:23:03.880> but<00:23:04.240> substantive

00:23:09.990 --> 00:23:10.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:10.000 --> 00:23:11.630 align:start position:0%
 
changes

00:23:11.630 --> 00:23:11.640 align:start position:0%
changes
 

00:23:11.640 --> 00:23:13.990 align:start position:0%
changes
um<00:23:12.640> can<00:23:13.000> I'm<00:23:13.120> not<00:23:13.200> sure<00:23:13.360> if<00:23:13.480> you<00:23:13.559> want<00:23:13.640> to<00:23:13.760> take

00:23:13.990 --> 00:23:14.000 align:start position:0%
um can I'm not sure if you want to take
 

00:23:14.000 --> 00:23:16.310 align:start position:0%
um can I'm not sure if you want to take
a<00:23:14.279> a<00:23:14.400> shot<00:23:14.679> of<00:23:14.919> that

00:23:16.310 --> 00:23:16.320 align:start position:0%
a a shot of that
 

00:23:16.320 --> 00:23:18.950 align:start position:0%
a a shot of that
but<00:23:17.320> um<00:23:17.480> all<00:23:17.640> of<00:23:17.799> these<00:23:17.960> changes<00:23:18.440> were<00:23:18.679> were

00:23:18.950 --> 00:23:18.960 align:start position:0%
but um all of these changes were were
 

00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:21.390 align:start position:0%
but um all of these changes were were
tracked

00:23:21.390 --> 00:23:21.400 align:start position:0%
tracked
 

00:23:21.400 --> 00:23:23.870 align:start position:0%
tracked
um<00:23:22.400> K<00:23:22.559> do<00:23:22.600> you<00:23:22.720> want<00:23:22.799> to<00:23:22.880> take<00:23:23.000> a<00:23:23.080> stab<00:23:23.279> of<00:23:23.440> that

00:23:23.870 --> 00:23:23.880 align:start position:0%
um K do you want to take a stab of that
 

00:23:23.880 --> 00:23:26.190 align:start position:0%
um K do you want to take a stab of that
question<00:23:24.880> well<00:23:25.080> I<00:23:25.159> think<00:23:25.279> a<00:23:25.400> lot<00:23:25.520> of<00:23:25.720> the<00:23:26.039> the

00:23:26.190 --> 00:23:26.200 align:start position:0%
question well I think a lot of the the
 

00:23:26.200 --> 00:23:28.310 align:start position:0%
question well I think a lot of the the
substantive<00:23:26.880> changes<00:23:27.480> were<00:23:27.720> the<00:23:28.000> ones<00:23:28.200> that

00:23:28.310 --> 00:23:28.320 align:start position:0%
substantive changes were the ones that
 

00:23:28.320 --> 00:23:29.750 align:start position:0%
substantive changes were the ones that
you<00:23:28.480> made<00:23:28.760> yesterday<00:23:29.200> and<00:23:29.320> I'm<00:23:29.440> going<00:23:29.520> to<00:23:29.679> go

00:23:29.750 --> 00:23:29.760 align:start position:0%
you made yesterday and I'm going to go
 

00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:38.909 align:start position:0%
you made yesterday and I'm going to go
ahead<00:23:30.000> and<00:23:30.440> uh<00:23:31.200> put<00:23:31.360> all<00:23:31.520> the<00:23:31.640> mark<00:23:31.919> up<00:23:32.120> on

00:23:38.909 --> 00:23:38.919 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:38.919 --> 00:23:42.350 align:start position:0%
 
here<00:23:39.919> all<00:23:40.159> right<00:23:40.760> let's<00:23:41.080> see<00:23:41.679> I'll<00:23:41.840> go<00:23:42.000> down<00:23:42.159> to

00:23:42.350 --> 00:23:42.360 align:start position:0%
here all right let's see I'll go down to
 

00:23:42.360 --> 00:23:44.830 align:start position:0%
here all right let's see I'll go down to
the<00:23:42.520> stuff<00:23:42.960> you<00:23:43.320> okay<00:23:43.440> so<00:23:43.640> all<00:23:43.840> of<00:23:44.080> this<00:23:44.679> uh

00:23:44.830 --> 00:23:44.840 align:start position:0%
the stuff you okay so all of this uh
 

00:23:44.840 --> 00:23:47.590 align:start position:0%
the stuff you okay so all of this uh
blue<00:23:45.200> stuff<00:23:45.559> was<00:23:45.799> added<00:23:46.240> yesterday<00:23:47.240> it's<00:23:47.400> blue

00:23:47.590 --> 00:23:47.600 align:start position:0%
blue stuff was added yesterday it's blue
 

00:23:47.600 --> 00:23:52.110 align:start position:0%
blue stuff was added yesterday it's blue
on<00:23:47.720> my<00:23:47.880> screen<00:23:48.320> but<00:23:48.600> all<00:23:48.760> the<00:23:48.880> stuff<00:23:49.080> from

00:23:52.110 --> 00:23:52.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:23:52.120 --> 00:23:56.870 align:start position:0%
 
Skyler<00:23:53.120> give<00:23:53.240> you<00:23:53.360> a<00:23:54.080> minute<00:23:54.279> to<00:23:54.440> read<00:23:54.679> through

00:23:56.870 --> 00:23:56.880 align:start position:0%
Skyler give you a minute to read through
 

00:23:56.880 --> 00:24:07.669 align:start position:0%
Skyler give you a minute to read through
that

00:24:07.669 --> 00:24:07.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:07.679 --> 00:24:09.430 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:24:07.799> think<00:24:07.919> it<00:24:08.000> was<00:24:08.120> mostly<00:24:08.520> just<00:24:08.640> putting<00:24:08.919> more

00:24:09.430 --> 00:24:09.440 align:start position:0%
I think it was mostly just putting more
 

00:24:09.440 --> 00:24:11.630 align:start position:0%
I think it was mostly just putting more
flesh<00:24:09.760> on<00:24:09.919> the<00:24:10.080> bones<00:24:10.480> of<00:24:10.960> uh<00:24:11.120> what<00:24:11.320> I<00:24:11.480> had

00:24:11.630 --> 00:24:11.640 align:start position:0%
flesh on the bones of uh what I had
 

00:24:11.640 --> 00:24:15.029 align:start position:0%
flesh on the bones of uh what I had
started<00:24:12.159> with<00:24:12.799> give<00:24:13.159> to<00:24:13.360> give<00:24:13.600> the<00:24:13.840> uh<00:24:14.640> subject

00:24:15.029 --> 00:24:15.039 align:start position:0%
started with give to give the uh subject
 

00:24:15.039 --> 00:24:16.110 align:start position:0%
started with give to give the uh subject
a<00:24:15.120> little<00:24:15.279> more

00:24:16.110 --> 00:24:16.120 align:start position:0%
a little more
 

00:24:16.120 --> 00:24:18.230 align:start position:0%
a little more
context<00:24:17.120> is<00:24:17.279> this<00:24:17.480> the<00:24:17.600> same<00:24:17.840> version<00:24:18.120> you

00:24:18.230 --> 00:24:18.240 align:start position:0%
context is this the same version you
 

00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:19.630 align:start position:0%
context is this the same version you
sent<00:24:18.480> out<00:24:18.720> last

00:24:19.630 --> 00:24:19.640 align:start position:0%
sent out last
 

00:24:19.640 --> 00:24:23.110 align:start position:0%
sent out last
night<00:24:20.640> okay<00:24:20.880> yes<00:24:21.480> okay<00:24:21.600> so<00:24:21.720> no<00:24:21.960> changes<00:24:22.679> in<00:24:22.919> in

00:24:23.110 --> 00:24:23.120 align:start position:0%
night okay yes okay so no changes in in
 

00:24:23.120 --> 00:24:25.149 align:start position:0%
night okay yes okay so no changes in in
that<00:24:23.320> right<00:24:23.480> now<00:24:23.760> right<00:24:24.440> correct<00:24:24.840> now<00:24:25.000> I've

00:24:25.149 --> 00:24:25.159 align:start position:0%
that right now right correct now I've
 

00:24:25.159 --> 00:24:27.789 align:start position:0%
that right now right correct now I've
made<00:24:25.399> one<00:24:26.320> couple<00:24:26.520> of<00:24:26.679> Min<00:24:27.080> minor<00:24:27.360> typo

00:24:27.789 --> 00:24:27.799 align:start position:0%
made one couple of Min minor typo
 

00:24:27.799 --> 00:24:29.430 align:start position:0%
made one couple of Min minor typo
changes<00:24:28.240> this<00:24:28.360> morning<00:24:28.679> and<00:24:28.840> I<00:24:28.960> still<00:24:29.159> have<00:24:29.279> to

00:24:29.430 --> 00:24:29.440 align:start position:0%
changes this morning and I still have to
 

00:24:29.440 --> 00:24:32.070 align:start position:0%
changes this morning and I still have to
go<00:24:29.640> through<00:24:29.880> and<00:24:30.640> finalize<00:24:31.120> all<00:24:31.240> the<00:24:31.399> format

00:24:32.070 --> 00:24:32.080 align:start position:0%
go through and finalize all the format
 

00:24:32.080 --> 00:24:34.269 align:start position:0%
go through and finalize all the format
formatting<00:24:32.679> the<00:24:32.799> lines<00:24:33.080> and<00:24:33.320> Par<00:24:33.840> paragraph

00:24:34.269 --> 00:24:34.279 align:start position:0%
formatting the lines and Par paragraph
 

00:24:34.279 --> 00:24:36.630 align:start position:0%
formatting the lines and Par paragraph
spacing<00:24:34.600> and<00:24:34.760> stuff<00:24:35.000> like<00:24:35.200> that<00:24:36.200> but<00:24:36.360> we<00:24:36.480> don't

00:24:36.630 --> 00:24:36.640 align:start position:0%
spacing and stuff like that but we don't
 

00:24:36.640 --> 00:24:38.789 align:start position:0%
spacing and stuff like that but we don't
need<00:24:36.799> to<00:24:36.919> worry<00:24:37.120> about

00:24:38.789 --> 00:24:38.799 align:start position:0%
need to worry about
 

00:24:38.799 --> 00:24:42.070 align:start position:0%
need to worry about
that<00:24:39.799> just<00:24:40.320> roll<00:24:40.799> down<00:24:41.120> here<00:24:41.520> more<00:24:41.880> more

00:24:42.070 --> 00:24:42.080 align:start position:0%
that just roll down here more more
 

00:24:42.080 --> 00:24:48.510 align:start position:0%
that just roll down here more more
Skyler

00:24:48.510 --> 00:24:48.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:48.520 --> 00:24:51.950 align:start position:0%
 
stuff<00:24:49.520> yeah<00:24:49.679> I<00:24:49.760> read<00:24:50.000> through<00:24:50.279> it<00:24:51.279> late<00:24:51.640> last

00:24:51.950 --> 00:24:51.960 align:start position:0%
stuff yeah I read through it late last
 

00:24:51.960 --> 00:24:56.750 align:start position:0%
stuff yeah I read through it late last
night<00:24:52.200> and<00:24:52.559> I<00:24:52.640> didn't<00:24:52.880> see

00:24:56.750 --> 00:24:56.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:56.760 --> 00:25:03.310 align:start position:0%
 
anything

00:25:03.310 --> 00:25:03.320 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:25:03.320 --> 00:25:06.230 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:25:03.440> think<00:25:03.600> some<00:25:03.720> of<00:25:03.880> these<00:25:04.080> details<00:25:04.679> do<00:25:05.000> add<00:25:05.600> um

00:25:06.230 --> 00:25:06.240 align:start position:0%
I think some of these details do add um
 

00:25:06.240 --> 00:25:09.110 align:start position:0%
I think some of these details do add um
a<00:25:06.360> lot<00:25:06.559> of<00:25:07.080> um<00:25:07.559> importance<00:25:08.039> to<00:25:08.240> this<00:25:08.440> issue<00:25:08.880> yes

00:25:09.110 --> 00:25:09.120 align:start position:0%
a lot of um importance to this issue yes
 

00:25:09.120 --> 00:25:11.669 align:start position:0%
a lot of um importance to this issue yes
it<00:25:09.320> it<00:25:09.720> adds<00:25:10.039> more<00:25:10.399> details<00:25:10.960> that<00:25:11.200> really<00:25:11.399> talk

00:25:11.669 --> 00:25:11.679 align:start position:0%
it it adds more details that really talk
 

00:25:11.679 --> 00:25:13.750 align:start position:0%
it it adds more details that really talk
about<00:25:12.039> individual<00:25:12.520> counties<00:25:12.840> and<00:25:13.000> it<00:25:13.120> does<00:25:13.640> it

00:25:13.750 --> 00:25:13.760 align:start position:0%
about individual counties and it does it
 

00:25:13.760 --> 00:25:15.789 align:start position:0%
about individual counties and it does it
does<00:25:14.000> add<00:25:14.200> a<00:25:14.559> a<00:25:14.760> depth<00:25:14.960> of<00:25:15.440> understanding<00:25:15.679> I

00:25:15.789 --> 00:25:15.799 align:start position:0%
does add a a depth of understanding I
 

00:25:15.799 --> 00:25:16.870 align:start position:0%
does add a a depth of understanding I
think<00:25:15.960> about<00:25:16.159> some<00:25:16.279> of<00:25:16.399> these<00:25:16.520> issues<00:25:16.760> that

00:25:16.870 --> 00:25:16.880 align:start position:0%
think about some of these issues that
 

00:25:16.880 --> 00:25:18.350 align:start position:0%
think about some of these issues that
are<00:25:17.000> happening<00:25:17.440> in<00:25:17.520> rural

00:25:18.350 --> 00:25:18.360 align:start position:0%
are happening in rural
 

00:25:18.360 --> 00:25:21.669 align:start position:0%
are happening in rural
areas<00:25:19.360> yeah<00:25:19.480> I<00:25:19.559> think<00:25:19.720> that<00:25:19.799> was<00:25:19.919> a<00:25:20.520> good<00:25:21.520> I

00:25:21.669 --> 00:25:21.679 align:start position:0%
areas yeah I think that was a good I
 

00:25:21.679 --> 00:25:24.470 align:start position:0%
areas yeah I think that was a good I
agree<00:25:22.360> yeah<00:25:22.760> and<00:25:23.520> this<00:25:23.640> is<00:25:23.760> the<00:25:23.880> only<00:25:24.080> change<00:25:24.320> I

00:25:24.470 --> 00:25:24.480 align:start position:0%
agree yeah and this is the only change I
 

00:25:24.480 --> 00:25:27.029 align:start position:0%
agree yeah and this is the only change I
made<00:25:24.720> this<00:25:24.840> morning<00:25:25.200> spelling<00:25:25.600> out<00:25:25.880> the<00:25:26.600> solar

00:25:27.029 --> 00:25:27.039 align:start position:0%
made this morning spelling out the solar
 

00:25:27.039 --> 00:25:31.269 align:start position:0%
made this morning spelling out the solar
Alliance<00:25:28.159> the<00:25:28.399> first

00:25:31.269 --> 00:25:31.279 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:25:31.279 --> 00:25:35.230 align:start position:0%
 
time<00:25:32.279> see<00:25:32.600> what

00:25:35.230 --> 00:25:35.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:25:35.240 --> 00:25:38.350 align:start position:0%
 
else<00:25:36.240> Skyler<00:25:36.679> added<00:25:36.960> the<00:25:37.240> uh<00:25:37.480> manufactured<00:25:38.200> in

00:25:38.350 --> 00:25:38.360 align:start position:0%
else Skyler added the uh manufactured in
 

00:25:38.360 --> 00:25:40.789 align:start position:0%
else Skyler added the uh manufactured in
China<00:25:38.880> I<00:25:39.000> thought<00:25:39.200> that<00:25:39.320> was<00:25:39.440> an<00:25:39.799> important

00:25:40.789 --> 00:25:40.799 align:start position:0%
China I thought that was an important
 

00:25:40.799 --> 00:25:50.510 align:start position:0%
China I thought that was an important
thing<00:25:41.000> to

00:25:50.510 --> 00:25:50.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:25:50.520 --> 00:25:55.350 align:start position:0%
 
add<00:25:51.520> I<00:25:51.720> did<00:25:51.919> this<00:25:52.120> yesterday<00:25:52.600> I<00:25:52.799> guess

00:25:55.350 --> 00:25:55.360 align:start position:0%
add I did this yesterday I guess
 

00:25:55.360 --> 00:25:59.549 align:start position:0%
add I did this yesterday I guess
um<00:25:56.360> and<00:25:56.520> that's<00:25:56.760> really<00:25:57.120> about<00:25:57.840> it<00:25:58.480> uh<00:25:59.000> Skyler

00:25:59.549 --> 00:25:59.559 align:start position:0%
um and that's really about it uh Skyler
 

00:25:59.559 --> 00:26:03.230 align:start position:0%
um and that's really about it uh Skyler
did<00:25:59.760> you<00:26:00.720> well<00:26:01.200> we<00:26:01.320> got<00:26:01.520> these<00:26:01.760> here<00:26:02.279> okay<00:26:03.080> the

00:26:03.230 --> 00:26:03.240 align:start position:0%
did you well we got these here okay the
 

00:26:03.240 --> 00:26:05.909 align:start position:0%
did you well we got these here okay the
recommendations<00:26:04.240> the<00:26:04.399> did<00:26:04.520> you<00:26:04.640> add<00:26:04.880> these

00:26:05.909 --> 00:26:05.919 align:start position:0%
recommendations the did you add these
 

00:26:05.919 --> 00:26:09.950 align:start position:0%
recommendations the did you add these
yesterday<00:26:06.919> um<00:26:07.360> Monday<00:26:07.960> reflected<00:26:08.600> here<00:26:09.600> Ken

00:26:09.950 --> 00:26:09.960 align:start position:0%
yesterday um Monday reflected here Ken
 

00:26:09.960 --> 00:26:13.190 align:start position:0%
yesterday um Monday reflected here Ken
is<00:26:10.159> I<00:26:10.440> reformatted<00:26:11.440> one<00:26:11.960> and<00:26:12.159> then<00:26:12.360> included

00:26:13.190 --> 00:26:13.200 align:start position:0%
is I reformatted one and then included
 

00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:17.230 align:start position:0%
is I reformatted one and then included
the<00:26:14.000> r<00:26:14.399> step<00:26:14.799> program<00:26:15.520> and<00:26:15.720> the<00:26:15.919> educational

00:26:17.230 --> 00:26:17.240 align:start position:0%
the r step program and the educational
 

00:26:17.240 --> 00:26:19.190 align:start position:0%
the r step program and the educational
recommendation<00:26:18.240> based<00:26:18.480> on<00:26:18.679> Aaron's

00:26:19.190 --> 00:26:19.200 align:start position:0%
recommendation based on Aaron's
 

00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:21.710 align:start position:0%
recommendation based on Aaron's
presentation<00:26:19.840> last<00:26:20.080> meeting<00:26:20.640> right<00:26:20.799> there

00:26:21.710 --> 00:26:21.720 align:start position:0%
presentation last meeting right there
 

00:26:21.720 --> 00:26:26.269 align:start position:0%
presentation last meeting right there
okay

00:26:26.269 --> 00:26:26.279 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:26:26.279 --> 00:26:28.590 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<00:26:27.279> can<00:26:27.440> can<00:26:27.520> you<00:26:27.760> just<00:26:27.840> scroll<00:26:28.120> back<00:26:28.240> up<00:26:28.360> to

00:26:28.590 --> 00:26:28.600 align:start position:0%
yeah can can you just scroll back up to
 

00:26:28.600 --> 00:26:29.950 align:start position:0%
yeah can can you just scroll back up to
those<00:26:28.760> changes<00:26:29.279> just<00:26:29.399> the<00:26:29.520> recommend<00:26:29.880> the

00:26:29.950 --> 00:26:29.960 align:start position:0%
those changes just the recommend the
 

00:26:29.960 --> 00:26:31.750 align:start position:0%
those changes just the recommend the
second<00:26:30.240> last

00:26:31.750 --> 00:26:31.760 align:start position:0%
second last
 

00:26:31.760 --> 00:26:34.549 align:start position:0%
second last
recommendation<00:26:32.760> you<00:26:32.919> are

00:26:34.549 --> 00:26:34.559 align:start position:0%
recommendation you are
 

00:26:34.559 --> 00:26:36.269 align:start position:0%
recommendation you are
step

00:26:36.269 --> 00:26:36.279 align:start position:0%
step
 

00:26:36.279 --> 00:26:45.870 align:start position:0%
step
yes<00:26:37.279> well<00:26:37.720> the<00:26:38.000> last

00:26:45.870 --> 00:26:45.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:26:45.880 --> 00:26:50.070 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<00:26:46.880> thank

00:26:50.070 --> 00:26:50.080 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:26:50.080 --> 00:26:53.389 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:26:51.080> just<00:26:51.240> a<00:26:51.440> comment<00:26:51.799> there<00:26:51.919> it<00:26:52.039> should<00:26:52.399> be

00:26:53.389 --> 00:26:53.399 align:start position:0%
you just a comment there it should be
 

00:26:53.399 --> 00:26:56.590 align:start position:0%
you just a comment there it should be
the<00:26:53.840> US<00:26:54.200> Department<00:26:54.559> of<00:26:54.679> energy<00:26:55.039> instead<00:26:55.279> of

00:26:56.590 --> 00:26:56.600 align:start position:0%
the US Department of energy instead of
 

00:26:56.600 --> 00:26:59.029 align:start position:0%
the US Department of energy instead of
EPA

00:26:59.029 --> 00:26:59.039 align:start position:0%
EPA
 

00:26:59.039 --> 00:27:10.830 align:start position:0%
EPA
thank<00:26:59.200> you

00:27:10.830 --> 00:27:10.840 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:27:10.840 --> 00:27:14.430 align:start position:0%
 
Aon<00:27:11.840> where<00:27:12.159> are<00:27:12.320> you<00:27:12.960> looking<00:27:13.960> right<00:27:14.080> at<00:27:14.240> the

00:27:14.430 --> 00:27:14.440 align:start position:0%
Aon where are you looking right at the
 

00:27:14.440 --> 00:27:15.230 align:start position:0%
Aon where are you looking right at the
page

00:27:15.230 --> 00:27:15.240 align:start position:0%
page
 

00:27:15.240 --> 00:27:17.909 align:start position:0%
page
break<00:27:16.240> um<00:27:16.520> I<00:27:16.679> messed<00:27:16.960> with<00:27:17.240> made<00:27:17.399> a<00:27:17.559> mistake

00:27:17.909 --> 00:27:17.919 align:start position:0%
break um I messed with made a mistake
 

00:27:17.919 --> 00:27:20.149 align:start position:0%
break um I messed with made a mistake
it's<00:27:18.080> instead<00:27:18.360> of<00:27:18.480> EPA<00:27:19.080> it's<00:27:19.399> the<00:27:19.799> US

00:27:20.149 --> 00:27:20.159 align:start position:0%
it's instead of EPA it's the US
 

00:27:20.159 --> 00:27:23.789 align:start position:0%
it's instead of EPA it's the US
Department<00:27:20.520> of<00:27:21.039> energy<00:27:22.039> administering<00:27:22.640> the

00:27:23.789 --> 00:27:23.799 align:start position:0%
Department of energy administering the
 

00:27:23.799 --> 00:27:27.029 align:start position:0%
Department of energy administering the
program<00:27:24.799> okay<00:27:25.640> right<00:27:25.880> before<00:27:26.240> our<00:27:26.640> step

00:27:27.029 --> 00:27:27.039 align:start position:0%
program okay right before our step
 

00:27:27.039 --> 00:27:29.590 align:start position:0%
program okay right before our step
program<00:27:27.919> which<00:27:28.039> is<00:27:28.240> the<00:27:28.399> first<00:27:28.720> line<00:27:29.240> on<00:27:29.399> the

00:27:29.590 --> 00:27:29.600 align:start position:0%
program which is the first line on the
 

00:27:29.600 --> 00:27:33.590 align:start position:0%
program which is the first line on the
next

00:27:33.590 --> 00:27:33.600 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:27:33.600 --> 00:27:36.510 align:start position:0%
 
page<00:27:34.600> oh<00:27:34.880> oh<00:27:35.080> oh<00:27:35.480> yeah

00:27:36.510 --> 00:27:36.520 align:start position:0%
page oh oh oh yeah
 

00:27:36.520 --> 00:27:40.389 align:start position:0%
page oh oh oh yeah
okay<00:27:37.520> okay<00:27:38.200> okay<00:27:39.200> EPA<00:27:39.600> is<00:27:39.679> running<00:27:39.919> the<00:27:40.080> Sol

00:27:40.389 --> 00:27:40.399 align:start position:0%
okay okay okay EPA is running the Sol
 

00:27:40.399 --> 00:27:41.789 align:start position:0%
okay okay okay EPA is running the Sol
for<00:27:40.519> all<00:27:40.919> quick<00:27:41.039> question<00:27:41.240> on<00:27:41.440> just<00:27:41.559> the

00:27:41.789 --> 00:27:41.799 align:start position:0%
for all quick question on just the
 

00:27:41.799 --> 00:27:45.070 align:start position:0%
for all quick question on just the
phrase<00:27:42.799> yeah<00:27:43.440> quick<00:27:43.760> question<00:27:44.000> on<00:27:44.120> the<00:27:44.320> phrase

00:27:45.070 --> 00:27:45.080 align:start position:0%
phrase yeah quick question on the phrase
 

00:27:45.080 --> 00:27:46.710 align:start position:0%
phrase yeah quick question on the phrase
the<00:27:45.320> and<00:27:45.519> the<00:27:45.640> general<00:27:46.039> assembly<00:27:46.440> should

00:27:46.710 --> 00:27:46.720 align:start position:0%
the and the general assembly should
 

00:27:46.720 --> 00:27:48.430 align:start position:0%
the and the general assembly should
support<00:27:47.200> these

00:27:48.430 --> 00:27:48.440 align:start position:0%
support these
 

00:27:48.440 --> 00:27:52.590 align:start position:0%
support these
efforts<00:27:49.440> is<00:27:49.600> that<00:27:49.880> appropriate<00:27:50.360> language<00:27:51.360> in

00:27:52.590 --> 00:27:52.600 align:start position:0%
efforts is that appropriate language in
 

00:27:52.600 --> 00:27:56.509 align:start position:0%
efforts is that appropriate language in
a<00:27:53.600> report<00:27:54.000> such<00:27:54.159> as<00:27:54.360> this<00:27:54.519> from<00:27:54.840> these

00:27:56.509 --> 00:27:56.519 align:start position:0%
a report such as this from these
 

00:27:56.519 --> 00:27:59.509 align:start position:0%
a report such as this from these
author

00:27:59.509 --> 00:27:59.519 align:start position:0%
author
 

00:27:59.519 --> 00:28:03.070 align:start position:0%
author
well<00:28:00.519> Katherine<00:28:00.919> this<00:28:01.039> is<00:28:01.600> a<00:28:02.600> I<00:28:02.679> mean<00:28:02.840> we<00:28:02.960> are

00:28:03.070 --> 00:28:03.080 align:start position:0%
well Katherine this is a I mean we are
 

00:28:03.080 --> 00:28:04.750 align:start position:0%
well Katherine this is a I mean we are
making<00:28:03.360> recommendations<00:28:04.039> on<00:28:04.320> what<00:28:04.640> they

00:28:04.750 --> 00:28:04.760 align:start position:0%
making recommendations on what they
 

00:28:04.760 --> 00:28:07.110 align:start position:0%
making recommendations on what they
should<00:28:05.000> and<00:28:05.159> shouldn't<00:28:05.640> do<00:28:06.559> um<00:28:06.720> this<00:28:06.840> is<00:28:06.960> a

00:28:07.110 --> 00:28:07.120 align:start position:0%
should and shouldn't do um this is a
 

00:28:07.120 --> 00:28:09.110 align:start position:0%
should and shouldn't do um this is a
grand<00:28:07.480> opportunity<00:28:08.120> and<00:28:08.279> I<00:28:08.360> think<00:28:08.640> support

00:28:09.110 --> 00:28:09.120 align:start position:0%
grand opportunity and I think support
 

00:28:09.120 --> 00:28:12.870 align:start position:0%
grand opportunity and I think support
would<00:28:09.840> come<00:28:10.039> in<00:28:10.200> the<00:28:10.360> form<00:28:10.679> of<00:28:11.159> a<00:28:12.159> a<00:28:12.320> letter<00:28:12.640> of

00:28:12.870 --> 00:28:12.880 align:start position:0%
would come in the form of a a letter of
 

00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:14.549 align:start position:0%
would come in the form of a a letter of
support<00:28:13.480> very<00:28:13.640> similar<00:28:13.919> to<00:28:14.080> the<00:28:14.159> one<00:28:14.279> we<00:28:14.399> did

00:28:14.549 --> 00:28:14.559 align:start position:0%
support very similar to the one we did
 

00:28:14.559 --> 00:28:17.070 align:start position:0%
support very similar to the one we did
for<00:28:14.679> the<00:28:14.760> stolar<00:28:15.159> for<00:28:15.320> all<00:28:15.559> at<00:28:15.679> the<00:28:15.880> last

00:28:17.070 --> 00:28:17.080 align:start position:0%
for the stolar for all at the last
 

00:28:17.080 --> 00:28:19.350 align:start position:0%
for the stolar for all at the last
meeting<00:28:18.080> um<00:28:18.320> just<00:28:18.799> I'm<00:28:18.880> not<00:28:19.080> I'm<00:28:19.159> not

00:28:19.350 --> 00:28:19.360 align:start position:0%
meeting um just I'm not I'm not
 

00:28:19.360 --> 00:28:21.549 align:start position:0%
meeting um just I'm not I'm not
suggesting<00:28:19.960> that<00:28:20.240> it's<00:28:20.640> I'm<00:28:20.880> yeah<00:28:21.000> I'm<00:28:21.120> not

00:28:21.549 --> 00:28:21.559 align:start position:0%
suggesting that it's I'm yeah I'm not
 

00:28:21.559 --> 00:28:23.070 align:start position:0%
suggesting that it's I'm yeah I'm not
I'm<00:28:21.679> not<00:28:21.960> suggesting<00:28:22.320> it's<00:28:22.440> inappropriate

00:28:23.070 --> 00:28:23.080 align:start position:0%
I'm not suggesting it's inappropriate
 

00:28:23.080 --> 00:28:25.149 align:start position:0%
I'm not suggesting it's inappropriate
for<00:28:23.360> entities<00:28:23.799> to<00:28:23.960> show<00:28:24.279> support<00:28:24.880> I'm

00:28:25.149 --> 00:28:25.159 align:start position:0%
for entities to show support I'm
 

00:28:25.159 --> 00:28:28.389 align:start position:0%
for entities to show support I'm
questioning<00:28:25.600> whether<00:28:25.880> in<00:28:26.080> a<00:28:26.720> in<00:28:27.000> a

00:28:28.389 --> 00:28:28.399 align:start position:0%
questioning whether in a in a
 

00:28:28.399 --> 00:28:30.909 align:start position:0%
questioning whether in a in a
report<00:28:28.840> such<00:28:29.039> as<00:28:29.279> this<00:28:29.480> that<00:28:29.640> is<00:28:29.799> phrased<00:28:30.360> we

00:28:30.909 --> 00:28:30.919 align:start position:0%
report such as this that is phrased we
 

00:28:30.919 --> 00:28:33.269 align:start position:0%
report such as this that is phrased we
recommend<00:28:31.919> and<00:28:32.039> it<00:28:32.200> is<00:28:32.399> focus<00:28:32.840> and<00:28:32.919> it<00:28:33.120> has

00:28:33.269 --> 00:28:33.279 align:start position:0%
recommend and it is focus and it has
 

00:28:33.279 --> 00:28:34.509 align:start position:0%
recommend and it is focus and it has
something<00:28:33.559> along<00:28:33.760> the<00:28:33.880> lines<00:28:34.039> of<00:28:34.200> general

00:28:34.509 --> 00:28:34.519 align:start position:0%
something along the lines of general
 

00:28:34.519 --> 00:28:36.070 align:start position:0%
something along the lines of general
assembly<00:28:34.919> should

00:28:36.070 --> 00:28:36.080 align:start position:0%
assembly should
 

00:28:36.080 --> 00:28:38.950 align:start position:0%
assembly should
support<00:28:37.080> is<00:28:37.320> that<00:28:37.840> are<00:28:38.000> we<00:28:38.240> lob<00:28:38.559> I<00:28:38.640> mean<00:28:38.760> is

00:28:38.950 --> 00:28:38.960 align:start position:0%
support is that are we lob I mean is
 

00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:41.590 align:start position:0%
support is that are we lob I mean is
that<00:28:39.159> trigger<00:28:40.000> I<00:28:40.080> would<00:28:40.919> I<00:28:41.039> would<00:28:41.159> yeld<00:28:41.399> to

00:28:41.590 --> 00:28:41.600 align:start position:0%
that trigger I would I would yeld to
 

00:28:41.600 --> 00:28:43.110 align:start position:0%
that trigger I would I would yeld to
Greg<00:28:41.919> on<00:28:42.159> this

00:28:43.110 --> 00:28:43.120 align:start position:0%
Greg on this
 

00:28:43.120 --> 00:28:46.590 align:start position:0%
Greg on this
but<00:28:44.120> does<00:28:44.279> that<00:28:44.440> trigger<00:28:45.200> lobbying<00:28:46.039> or<00:28:46.320> is

00:28:46.590 --> 00:28:46.600 align:start position:0%
but does that trigger lobbying or is
 

00:28:46.600 --> 00:28:50.110 align:start position:0%
but does that trigger lobbying or is
that<00:28:47.600> because<00:28:47.760> it's<00:28:48.240> it's<00:28:48.519> phrased<00:28:48.919> as<00:28:49.159> we<00:28:49.760> and

00:28:50.110 --> 00:28:50.120 align:start position:0%
that because it's it's phrased as we and
 

00:28:50.120 --> 00:28:52.430 align:start position:0%
that because it's it's phrased as we and
we<00:28:50.279> are<00:28:50.519> the<00:28:50.919> members<00:28:51.279> of<00:28:51.559> the

00:28:52.430 --> 00:28:52.440 align:start position:0%
we are the members of the
 

00:28:52.440 --> 00:28:55.590 align:start position:0%
we are the members of the
authority<00:28:53.440> and<00:28:53.559> so<00:28:53.880> again<00:28:54.440> I'm<00:28:54.919> no<00:28:55.159> objection

00:28:55.590 --> 00:28:55.600 align:start position:0%
authority and so again I'm no objection
 

00:28:55.600 --> 00:28:58.590 align:start position:0%
authority and so again I'm no objection
to<00:28:55.799> trying<00:28:56.080> to<00:28:56.679> get<00:28:57.000> support<00:28:57.840> but<00:28:58.159> naming<00:28:58.480> the

00:28:58.590 --> 00:28:58.600 align:start position:0%
to trying to get support but naming the
 

00:28:58.600 --> 00:29:00.269 align:start position:0%
to trying to get support but naming the
general<00:28:58.960> assembly<00:28:59.480> specifically<00:29:00.039> in<00:29:00.120> a

00:29:00.269 --> 00:29:00.279 align:start position:0%
general assembly specifically in a
 

00:29:00.279 --> 00:29:03.070 align:start position:0%
general assembly specifically in a
sentence<00:29:00.559> that<00:29:00.679> says<00:29:00.960> we

00:29:03.070 --> 00:29:03.080 align:start position:0%
sentence that says we
 

00:29:03.080 --> 00:29:06.430 align:start position:0%
sentence that says we
Rec<00:29:04.279> yeah<00:29:05.279> I<00:29:05.399> mean<00:29:05.640> so<00:29:05.799> we<00:29:05.919> talked<00:29:06.159> about<00:29:06.320> this

00:29:06.430 --> 00:29:06.440 align:start position:0%
Rec yeah I mean so we talked about this
 

00:29:06.440 --> 00:29:08.350 align:start position:0%
Rec yeah I mean so we talked about this
sort<00:29:06.640> of<00:29:06.880> philosophically<00:29:07.880> last<00:29:08.080> time<00:29:08.279> a

00:29:08.350 --> 00:29:08.360 align:start position:0%
sort of philosophically last time a
 

00:29:08.360 --> 00:29:09.630 align:start position:0%
sort of philosophically last time a
little<00:29:08.519> bit<00:29:08.640> of<00:29:08.799> should<00:29:09.000> we<00:29:09.120> be<00:29:09.279> making

00:29:09.630 --> 00:29:09.640 align:start position:0%
little bit of should we be making
 

00:29:09.640 --> 00:29:11.350 align:start position:0%
little bit of should we be making
recommendations<00:29:10.200> to<00:29:10.279> the<00:29:10.399> administration

00:29:11.350 --> 00:29:11.360 align:start position:0%
recommendations to the administration
 

00:29:11.360 --> 00:29:13.590 align:start position:0%
recommendations to the administration
and<00:29:11.679> to<00:29:11.840> the<00:29:12.000> legislature<00:29:12.600> about<00:29:13.159> policies

00:29:13.590 --> 00:29:13.600 align:start position:0%
and to the legislature about policies
 

00:29:13.600 --> 00:29:14.789 align:start position:0%
and to the legislature about policies
they<00:29:13.679> should<00:29:13.799> be<00:29:13.919> advancing<00:29:14.320> the<00:29:14.440> steps<00:29:14.679> they

00:29:14.789 --> 00:29:14.799 align:start position:0%
they should be advancing the steps they
 

00:29:14.799 --> 00:29:16.470 align:start position:0%
they should be advancing the steps they
should<00:29:14.960> be<00:29:15.120> taking<00:29:15.919> I<00:29:16.000> don't<00:29:16.159> know<00:29:16.320> that<00:29:16.399> it

00:29:16.470 --> 00:29:16.480 align:start position:0%
should be taking I don't know that it
 

00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:17.909 align:start position:0%
should be taking I don't know that it
was<00:29:16.640> unanimous<00:29:17.159> but<00:29:17.279> there<00:29:17.399> certainly<00:29:17.679> seemed

00:29:17.909 --> 00:29:17.919 align:start position:0%
was unanimous but there certainly seemed
 

00:29:17.919 --> 00:29:19.549 align:start position:0%
was unanimous but there certainly seemed
to<00:29:18.000> be<00:29:18.159> some<00:29:18.399> consensus<00:29:18.880> around<00:29:19.120> the<00:29:19.279> idea

00:29:19.549 --> 00:29:19.559 align:start position:0%
to be some consensus around the idea
 

00:29:19.559 --> 00:29:22.110 align:start position:0%
to be some consensus around the idea
that<00:29:19.679> we<00:29:19.799> should<00:29:20.080> actually<00:29:20.360> be<00:29:20.960> advocating<00:29:21.960> um

00:29:22.110 --> 00:29:22.120 align:start position:0%
that we should actually be advocating um
 

00:29:22.120 --> 00:29:23.630 align:start position:0%
that we should actually be advocating um
and<00:29:22.279> taking<00:29:22.840> positions<00:29:23.240> I<00:29:23.320> don't<00:29:23.440> think<00:29:23.559> it

00:29:23.630 --> 00:29:23.640 align:start position:0%
and taking positions I don't think it
 

00:29:23.640 --> 00:29:25.909 align:start position:0%
and taking positions I don't think it
triggers<00:29:24.000> any<00:29:24.240> kind<00:29:24.360> of<00:29:25.080> lobbying<00:29:25.559> we<00:29:25.760> not

00:29:25.909 --> 00:29:25.919 align:start position:0%
triggers any kind of lobbying we not
 

00:29:25.919 --> 00:29:27.549 align:start position:0%
triggers any kind of lobbying we not
being<00:29:26.200> paid<00:29:26.480> by<00:29:26.600> any<00:29:26.760> enti<00:29:27.039> and<00:29:27.159> that<00:29:27.399> kind<00:29:27.519> of

00:29:27.549 --> 00:29:27.559 align:start position:0%
being paid by any enti and that kind of
 

00:29:27.559 --> 00:29:29.590 align:start position:0%
being paid by any enti and that kind of
stuff<00:29:27.720> we<00:29:27.880> a<00:29:28.039> state<00:29:28.360> Authority<00:29:28.880> that<00:29:29.440> that

00:29:29.590 --> 00:29:29.600 align:start position:0%
stuff we a state Authority that that
 

00:29:29.600 --> 00:29:31.110 align:start position:0%
stuff we a state Authority that that
wouldn't<00:29:29.840> have<00:29:29.960> any<00:29:30.120> problem<00:29:30.360> doing<00:29:30.600> that<00:29:30.960> if

00:29:31.110 --> 00:29:31.120 align:start position:0%
wouldn't have any problem doing that if
 

00:29:31.120 --> 00:29:33.789 align:start position:0%
wouldn't have any problem doing that if
the<00:29:31.279> issue<00:29:31.559> is<00:29:31.760> the<00:29:31.880> word<00:29:32.200> we<00:29:33.000> because<00:29:33.240> it's<00:29:33.480> we

00:29:33.789 --> 00:29:33.799 align:start position:0%
the issue is the word we because it's we
 

00:29:33.799 --> 00:29:36.590 align:start position:0%
the issue is the word we because it's we
represent<00:29:34.360> reflects<00:29:34.799> members<00:29:35.440> as<00:29:35.600> opposed<00:29:35.960> to

00:29:36.590 --> 00:29:36.600 align:start position:0%
represent reflects members as opposed to
 

00:29:36.600 --> 00:29:39.190 align:start position:0%
represent reflects members as opposed to
the<00:29:36.760> authority<00:29:37.200> itself<00:29:37.799> I<00:29:38.000> I<00:29:38.080> don't<00:29:39.000> I<00:29:39.080> don't

00:29:39.190 --> 00:29:39.200 align:start position:0%
the authority itself I I don't I don't
 

00:29:39.200 --> 00:29:41.509 align:start position:0%
the authority itself I I don't I don't
see<00:29:39.440> a<00:29:39.600> problem<00:29:39.880> either<00:29:40.159> way<00:29:40.559> with<00:29:40.760> that<00:29:40.960> one

00:29:41.509 --> 00:29:41.519 align:start position:0%
see a problem either way with that one
 

00:29:41.519 --> 00:29:43.430 align:start position:0%
see a problem either way with that one
but<00:29:41.679> if<00:29:41.840> that<00:29:41.960> made<00:29:42.279> people<00:29:42.480> more<00:29:42.760> comfortable

00:29:43.430 --> 00:29:43.440 align:start position:0%
but if that made people more comfortable
 

00:29:43.440 --> 00:29:45.549 align:start position:0%
but if that made people more comfortable
but<00:29:43.559> no<00:29:43.799> I<00:29:44.000> I<00:29:44.159> think<00:29:44.760> I<00:29:44.799> mean<00:29:45.000> I<00:29:45.120> certainly

00:29:45.549 --> 00:29:45.559 align:start position:0%
but no I I think I mean I certainly
 

00:29:45.559 --> 00:29:47.950 align:start position:0%
but no I I think I mean I certainly
believe<00:29:46.000> that<00:29:46.559> this<00:29:46.760> Authority<00:29:47.240> should<00:29:47.480> be

00:29:47.950 --> 00:29:47.960 align:start position:0%
believe that this Authority should be
 

00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:49.509 align:start position:0%
believe that this Authority should be
making<00:29:48.279> recommendations<00:29:48.840> to<00:29:49.000> the<00:29:49.120> governor

00:29:49.509 --> 00:29:49.519 align:start position:0%
making recommendations to the governor
 

00:29:49.519 --> 00:29:51.389 align:start position:0%
making recommendations to the governor
and<00:29:49.679> should<00:29:49.919> be<00:29:50.320> making<00:29:50.640> recommendations<00:29:51.200> to

00:29:51.389 --> 00:29:51.399 align:start position:0%
and should be making recommendations to
 

00:29:51.399 --> 00:29:53.870 align:start position:0%
and should be making recommendations to
the<00:29:51.519> legislature<00:29:52.320> to<00:29:52.559> take<00:29:53.360> executive<00:29:53.760> or

00:29:53.870 --> 00:29:53.880 align:start position:0%
the legislature to take executive or
 

00:29:53.880 --> 00:29:55.110 align:start position:0%
the legislature to take executive or
legislative

00:29:55.110 --> 00:29:55.120 align:start position:0%
legislative
 

00:29:55.120 --> 00:29:57.269 align:start position:0%
legislative
action<00:29:56.120> um<00:29:56.440> which<00:29:56.600> would<00:29:56.760> this<00:29:56.840> would<00:29:56.960> be<00:29:57.080> cons

00:29:57.269 --> 00:29:57.279 align:start position:0%
action um which would this would be cons
 

00:29:57.279 --> 00:30:04.110 align:start position:0%
action um which would this would be cons
consistent<00:29:57.640> with

00:30:04.110 --> 00:30:04.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:30:04.120 --> 00:30:07.110 align:start position:0%
 
that<00:30:05.120> maybe<00:30:05.440> where<00:30:06.320> in<00:30:06.480> this<00:30:06.679> section<00:30:07.000> where

00:30:07.110 --> 00:30:07.120 align:start position:0%
that maybe where in this section where
 

00:30:07.120 --> 00:30:09.590 align:start position:0%
that maybe where in this section where
it<00:30:07.240> says<00:30:07.559> we<00:30:08.159> it<00:30:08.279> should<00:30:08.519> be<00:30:08.679> worded<00:30:09.279> members

00:30:09.590 --> 00:30:09.600 align:start position:0%
it says we it should be worded members
 

00:30:09.600 --> 00:30:12.710 align:start position:0%
it says we it should be worded members
of<00:30:09.840> The<00:30:10.039> Authority<00:30:11.000> instead<00:30:11.320> of<00:30:11.480> we<00:30:11.960> I<00:30:12.120> think<00:30:12.640> I

00:30:12.710 --> 00:30:12.720 align:start position:0%
of The Authority instead of we I think I
 

00:30:12.720 --> 00:30:14.590 align:start position:0%
of The Authority instead of we I think I
think<00:30:12.919> that's<00:30:13.039> a<00:30:13.279> good<00:30:13.519> point<00:30:14.039> I<00:30:14.120> think<00:30:14.279> it

00:30:14.590 --> 00:30:14.600 align:start position:0%
think that's a good point I think it
 

00:30:14.600 --> 00:30:17.389 align:start position:0%
think that's a good point I think it
defines<00:30:15.039> who<00:30:15.240> we<00:30:15.480> is<00:30:15.760> better<00:30:16.080> I<00:30:16.200> think<00:30:16.440> I

00:30:17.389 --> 00:30:17.399 align:start position:0%
defines who we is better I think I
 

00:30:17.399 --> 00:30:19.310 align:start position:0%
defines who we is better I think I
agree<00:30:18.399> I<00:30:18.440> mean<00:30:18.600> if<00:30:18.679> you're<00:30:18.840> gonna<00:30:19.120> if<00:30:19.200> you're

00:30:19.310 --> 00:30:19.320 align:start position:0%
agree I mean if you're gonna if you're
 

00:30:19.320 --> 00:30:21.310 align:start position:0%
agree I mean if you're gonna if you're
gonna<00:30:19.519> do<00:30:19.679> that<00:30:19.919> which<00:30:20.159> I<00:30:20.480> I<00:30:20.600> have<00:30:20.799> no<00:30:21.000> problem

00:30:21.310 --> 00:30:21.320 align:start position:0%
gonna do that which I I have no problem
 

00:30:21.320 --> 00:30:22.830 align:start position:0%
gonna do that which I I have no problem
with<00:30:21.519> I<00:30:21.600> would<00:30:21.760> just<00:30:21.880> change<00:30:22.159> the<00:30:22.279> word<00:30:22.440> we<00:30:22.640> to

00:30:22.830 --> 00:30:22.840 align:start position:0%
with I would just change the word we to
 

00:30:22.840 --> 00:30:25.110 align:start position:0%
with I would just change the word we to
the<00:30:22.960> authority<00:30:23.399> recommends<00:30:24.039> instead<00:30:24.279> of<00:30:24.399> we

00:30:25.110 --> 00:30:25.120 align:start position:0%
the authority recommends instead of we
 

00:30:25.120 --> 00:30:28.990 align:start position:0%
the authority recommends instead of we
recommend<00:30:26.120> exactly<00:30:27.039> yeah

00:30:28.990 --> 00:30:29.000 align:start position:0%
recommend exactly yeah
 

00:30:29.000 --> 00:30:30.710 align:start position:0%
recommend exactly yeah
that

00:30:30.710 --> 00:30:30.720 align:start position:0%
that
 

00:30:30.720 --> 00:30:35.110 align:start position:0%
that
Mak<00:30:31.720> so<00:30:32.039> that<00:30:32.360> goes<00:30:32.600> for<00:30:32.799> all<00:30:32.919> of<00:30:33.080> these

00:30:35.110 --> 00:30:35.120 align:start position:0%
Mak so that goes for all of these
 

00:30:35.120 --> 00:30:38.789 align:start position:0%
Mak so that goes for all of these
correct<00:30:36.120> yeah<00:30:37.039> I<00:30:37.120> think<00:30:38.000> that<00:30:38.159> makes<00:30:38.360> sense

00:30:38.789 --> 00:30:38.799 align:start position:0%
correct yeah I think that makes sense
 

00:30:38.799 --> 00:30:40.669 align:start position:0%
correct yeah I think that makes sense
okay<00:30:39.159> I<00:30:39.279> think<00:30:39.519> that's<00:30:39.799> corre<00:30:40.120> I<00:30:40.200> think<00:30:40.399> that's

00:30:40.669 --> 00:30:40.679 align:start position:0%
okay I think that's corre I think that's
 

00:30:40.679 --> 00:30:42.230 align:start position:0%
okay I think that's corre I think that's
correct<00:30:41.080> because<00:30:41.279> the<00:30:41.399> authority<00:30:41.799> can<00:30:41.960> make<00:30:42.080> a

00:30:42.230 --> 00:30:42.240 align:start position:0%
correct because the authority can make a
 

00:30:42.240 --> 00:30:45.190 align:start position:0%
correct because the authority can make a
recommendation<00:30:43.000> even<00:30:43.360> if<00:30:43.679> the<00:30:44.559> a<00:30:44.720> few<00:30:44.960> of<00:30:45.080> the

00:30:45.190 --> 00:30:45.200 align:start position:0%
recommendation even if the a few of the
 

00:30:45.200 --> 00:30:48.269 align:start position:0%
recommendation even if the a few of the
members<00:30:45.519> either<00:30:45.799> abstain<00:30:46.159> or<00:30:46.360> don't<00:30:46.640> vote<00:30:47.039> or

00:30:48.269 --> 00:30:48.279 align:start position:0%
members either abstain or don't vote or
 

00:30:48.279 --> 00:30:51.789 align:start position:0%
members either abstain or don't vote or
frankly<00:30:49.440> don't<00:30:50.440> you<00:30:50.559> know<00:30:51.159> we<00:30:51.360> don't<00:30:51.559> want<00:30:51.679> us

00:30:51.789 --> 00:30:51.799 align:start position:0%
frankly don't you know we don't want us
 

00:30:51.799 --> 00:30:53.110 align:start position:0%
frankly don't you know we don't want us
to<00:30:51.960> necessarily<00:30:52.279> put<00:30:52.440> anybody<00:30:52.679> in<00:30:52.880> position

00:30:53.110 --> 00:30:53.120 align:start position:0%
to necessarily put anybody in position
 

00:30:53.120 --> 00:30:56.230 align:start position:0%
to necessarily put anybody in position
where<00:30:53.279> they<00:30:53.480> have<00:30:53.640> to<00:30:54.080> S<00:30:54.279> of<00:30:54.600> vote<00:30:55.600> for<00:30:55.840> each

00:30:56.230 --> 00:30:56.240 align:start position:0%
where they have to S of vote for each
 

00:30:56.240 --> 00:30:59.389 align:start position:0%
where they have to S of vote for each
recommendation<00:30:57.360> because<00:30:58.360> if<00:30:58.480> you<00:30:58.600> word<00:30:58.880> it<00:30:59.080> as

00:30:59.389 --> 00:30:59.399 align:start position:0%
recommendation because if you word it as
 

00:30:59.399 --> 00:31:04.870 align:start position:0%
recommendation because if you word it as
the<00:30:59.559> authority<00:31:00.039> members<00:31:00.679> or<00:31:00.960> the<00:31:01.159> authority

00:31:04.870 --> 00:31:04.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:31:04.880 --> 00:31:09.669 align:start position:0%
 
itself<00:31:05.880> it<00:31:06.120> might<00:31:06.480> and<00:31:06.720> it<00:31:08.000> yeah<00:31:09.000> and<00:31:09.200> isn't<00:31:09.440> it

00:31:09.669 --> 00:31:09.679 align:start position:0%
itself it might and it yeah and isn't it
 

00:31:09.679 --> 00:31:11.310 align:start position:0%
itself it might and it yeah and isn't it
sufficient<00:31:10.200> just<00:31:10.320> to<00:31:10.440> say<00:31:10.760> the<00:31:10.880> authority

00:31:11.310 --> 00:31:11.320 align:start position:0%
sufficient just to say the authority
 

00:31:11.320 --> 00:31:14.029 align:start position:0%
sufficient just to say the authority
recommends<00:31:12.080> in<00:31:12.240> the<00:31:12.440> heading<00:31:13.440> and<00:31:13.600> then<00:31:13.799> just

00:31:14.029 --> 00:31:14.039 align:start position:0%
recommends in the heading and then just
 

00:31:14.039 --> 00:31:15.669 align:start position:0%
recommends in the heading and then just
list<00:31:14.480> what<00:31:14.600> the<00:31:14.720> recommendations<00:31:15.399> are

00:31:15.669 --> 00:31:15.679 align:start position:0%
list what the recommendations are
 

00:31:15.679 --> 00:31:17.669 align:start position:0%
list what the recommendations are
instead<00:31:15.960> of<00:31:16.440> going<00:31:16.679> over<00:31:17.080> the<00:31:17.240> authority

00:31:17.669 --> 00:31:17.679 align:start position:0%
instead of going over the authority
 

00:31:17.679 --> 00:31:19.990 align:start position:0%
instead of going over the authority
recommends<00:31:18.399> five<00:31:18.639> times<00:31:19.480> yeah<00:31:19.720> okay<00:31:19.840> I'll

00:31:19.990 --> 00:31:20.000 align:start position:0%
recommends five times yeah okay I'll
 

00:31:20.000 --> 00:31:23.190 align:start position:0%
recommends five times yeah okay I'll
make<00:31:20.240> those

00:31:23.190 --> 00:31:23.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:31:23.200 --> 00:31:25.710 align:start position:0%
 
changes<00:31:24.200> hey<00:31:24.399> if<00:31:24.480> you'll<00:31:24.840> excuse<00:31:25.320> the<00:31:25.600> the

00:31:25.710 --> 00:31:25.720 align:start position:0%
changes hey if you'll excuse the the
 

00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:28.110 align:start position:0%
changes hey if you'll excuse the the
rookie<00:31:26.159> question<00:31:26.559> here<00:31:27.279> would<00:31:27.639> could<00:31:27.840> someone

00:31:28.110 --> 00:31:28.120 align:start position:0%
rookie question here would could someone
 

00:31:28.120 --> 00:31:31.389 align:start position:0%
rookie question here would could someone
give<00:31:28.240> me<00:31:28.399> a<00:31:28.559> quick<00:31:28.799> Cliff<00:31:29.080> Notes<00:31:29.559> on<00:31:30.559> how<00:31:31.159> these

00:31:31.389 --> 00:31:31.399 align:start position:0%
give me a quick Cliff Notes on how these
 

00:31:31.399 --> 00:31:34.350 align:start position:0%
give me a quick Cliff Notes on how these
recommendations<00:31:32.200> were<00:31:33.000> originated<00:31:34.000> and<00:31:34.159> then

00:31:34.350 --> 00:31:34.360 align:start position:0%
recommendations were originated and then
 

00:31:34.360 --> 00:31:35.750 align:start position:0%
recommendations were originated and then
whether<00:31:34.519> or<00:31:34.639> not<00:31:34.840> there<00:31:34.960> was<00:31:35.279> was<00:31:35.440> there<00:31:35.639> like

00:31:35.750 --> 00:31:35.760 align:start position:0%
whether or not there was was there like
 

00:31:35.760 --> 00:31:37.750 align:start position:0%
whether or not there was was there like
a<00:31:35.919> session<00:31:36.279> where<00:31:36.519> robust<00:31:37.039> debate<00:31:37.399> takes

00:31:37.750 --> 00:31:37.760 align:start position:0%
a session where robust debate takes
 

00:31:37.760 --> 00:31:39.750 align:start position:0%
a session where robust debate takes
place<00:31:38.080> and<00:31:38.720> there's<00:31:38.919> a<00:31:39.039> lot<00:31:39.159> of<00:31:39.320> discussion

00:31:39.750 --> 00:31:39.760 align:start position:0%
place and there's a lot of discussion
 

00:31:39.760 --> 00:31:41.310 align:start position:0%
place and there's a lot of discussion
around<00:31:40.039> these<00:31:40.240> things<00:31:40.519> I'm<00:31:40.679> just<00:31:40.919> curious

00:31:41.310 --> 00:31:41.320 align:start position:0%
around these things I'm just curious
 

00:31:41.320 --> 00:31:43.950 align:start position:0%
around these things I'm just curious
about<00:31:41.559> the<00:31:41.720> background

00:31:43.950 --> 00:31:43.960 align:start position:0%
about the background
 

00:31:43.960 --> 00:31:48.070 align:start position:0%
about the background
there<00:31:44.960> yeah<00:31:45.279> so<00:31:46.279> Robert<00:31:47.039> I'll<00:31:47.279> I'll<00:31:47.480> give<00:31:47.960> give

00:31:48.070 --> 00:31:48.080 align:start position:0%
there yeah so Robert I'll I'll give give
 

00:31:48.080 --> 00:31:52.470 align:start position:0%
there yeah so Robert I'll I'll give give
it<00:31:48.240> a<00:31:48.399> shot<00:31:48.679> and<00:31:48.880> then<00:31:49.440> K<00:31:49.919> can<00:31:50.919> chime<00:31:51.360> in<00:31:51.840> if

00:31:52.470 --> 00:31:52.480 align:start position:0%
it a shot and then K can chime in if
 

00:31:52.480 --> 00:31:55.389 align:start position:0%
it a shot and then K can chime in if
needed<00:31:53.480> um<00:31:53.960> in<00:31:54.159> years<00:31:54.519> past<00:31:54.760> the<00:31:54.880> authority

00:31:55.389 --> 00:31:55.399 align:start position:0%
needed um in years past the authority
 

00:31:55.399 --> 00:32:01.990 align:start position:0%
needed um in years past the authority
has<00:31:55.559> not<00:31:55.760> taken<00:31:56.039> any<00:31:56.279> important<00:31:56.679> step<00:31:56.919> for

00:32:01.990 --> 00:32:02.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:05.590 align:start position:0%
 
making<00:32:03.000> in<00:32:03.120> our<00:32:03.840> enabling<00:32:04.440> legislation<00:32:05.440> it

00:32:05.590 --> 00:32:05.600 align:start position:0%
making in our enabling legislation it
 

00:32:05.600 --> 00:32:08.710 align:start position:0%
making in our enabling legislation it
gives<00:32:05.799> us<00:32:06.080> two<00:32:06.360> instructions<00:32:07.320> for<00:32:07.919> the<00:32:08.120> report

00:32:08.710 --> 00:32:08.720 align:start position:0%
gives us two instructions for the report
 

00:32:08.720 --> 00:32:10.990 align:start position:0%
gives us two instructions for the report
to<00:32:09.080> summarize<00:32:09.880> activities<00:32:10.320> of<00:32:10.480> the<00:32:10.600> authority

00:32:10.990 --> 00:32:11.000 align:start position:0%
to summarize activities of the authority
 

00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:13.549 align:start position:0%
to summarize activities of the authority
and<00:32:11.200> make<00:32:11.760> recommendations<00:32:12.760> to<00:32:12.960> the<00:32:13.200> governor

00:32:13.549 --> 00:32:13.559 align:start position:0%
and make recommendations to the governor
 

00:32:13.559 --> 00:32:15.590 align:start position:0%
and make recommendations to the governor
and<00:32:13.720> then<00:32:14.399> specific<00:32:14.760> chairs<00:32:15.200> within<00:32:15.440> the

00:32:15.590 --> 00:32:15.600 align:start position:0%
and then specific chairs within the
 

00:32:15.600 --> 00:32:19.230 align:start position:0%
and then specific chairs within the
general<00:32:16.399> assembly<00:32:17.399> um<00:32:17.639> at<00:32:17.760> the<00:32:17.919> last<00:32:18.240> session

00:32:19.230 --> 00:32:19.240 align:start position:0%
general assembly um at the last session
 

00:32:19.240 --> 00:32:23.549 align:start position:0%
general assembly um at the last session
uh<00:32:19.399> in<00:32:20.440> September<00:32:21.559> 13<00:32:22.559> we<00:32:22.760> brainstormed<00:32:23.440> some

00:32:23.549 --> 00:32:23.559 align:start position:0%
uh in September 13 we brainstormed some
 

00:32:23.559 --> 00:32:26.110 align:start position:0%
uh in September 13 we brainstormed some
of<00:32:23.720> these<00:32:23.880> and<00:32:24.159> discussed<00:32:24.840> them<00:32:25.399> and<00:32:25.639> then

00:32:26.110 --> 00:32:26.120 align:start position:0%
of these and discussed them and then
 

00:32:26.120 --> 00:32:28.070 align:start position:0%
of these and discussed them and then
went<00:32:26.320> through<00:32:26.480> an<00:32:26.600> inter<00:32:27.200> process<00:32:27.639> over<00:32:27.880> the

00:32:28.070 --> 00:32:28.080 align:start position:0%
went through an inter process over the
 

00:32:28.080 --> 00:32:30.990 align:start position:0%
went through an inter process over the
past<00:32:28.320> 3<00:32:28.559> weeks<00:32:29.360> uh<00:32:29.480> sharing<00:32:29.880> drafts<00:32:30.279> of<00:32:30.519> these

00:32:30.990 --> 00:32:31.000 align:start position:0%
past 3 weeks uh sharing drafts of these
 

00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:34.110 align:start position:0%
past 3 weeks uh sharing drafts of these
with<00:32:31.200> authority<00:32:31.679> members<00:32:32.639> asking<00:32:33.080> for<00:32:33.799> folks

00:32:34.110 --> 00:32:34.120 align:start position:0%
with authority members asking for folks
 

00:32:34.120 --> 00:32:36.470 align:start position:0%
with authority members asking for folks
to<00:32:34.320> contribute<00:32:34.919> make<00:32:35.320> recommendations<00:32:36.320> and

00:32:36.470 --> 00:32:36.480 align:start position:0%
to contribute make recommendations and
 

00:32:36.480 --> 00:32:38.430 align:start position:0%
to contribute make recommendations and
then<00:32:36.760> Ken<00:32:37.159> has<00:32:37.320> been

00:32:38.430 --> 00:32:38.440 align:start position:0%
then Ken has been
 

00:32:38.440 --> 00:32:40.549 align:start position:0%
then Ken has been
compiling

00:32:40.549 --> 00:32:40.559 align:start position:0%
compiling
 

00:32:40.559 --> 00:32:43.470 align:start position:0%
compiling
um<00:32:41.559> many<00:32:41.799> of<00:32:42.000> these<00:32:42.200> changes<00:32:42.760> over<00:32:43.080> the<00:32:43.240> past

00:32:43.470 --> 00:32:43.480 align:start position:0%
um many of these changes over the past
 

00:32:43.480 --> 00:32:46.549 align:start position:0%
um many of these changes over the past
few<00:32:43.720> weeks<00:32:44.200> so<00:32:44.559> that's<00:32:45.480> the<00:32:45.760> the<00:32:45.960> discussion

00:32:46.549 --> 00:32:46.559 align:start position:0%
few weeks so that's the the discussion
 

00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:50.190 align:start position:0%
few weeks so that's the the discussion
and<00:32:46.880> the<00:32:47.279> um<00:32:48.279> debate<00:32:49.000> happened<00:32:49.519> over<00:32:49.760> the<00:32:49.960> past

00:32:50.190 --> 00:32:50.200 align:start position:0%
and the um debate happened over the past
 

00:32:50.200 --> 00:32:51.710 align:start position:0%
and the um debate happened over the past
three<00:32:50.480> weeks<00:32:50.679> but<00:32:50.799> it's<00:32:51.039> happening<00:32:51.399> now<00:32:51.639> as

00:32:51.710 --> 00:32:51.720 align:start position:0%
three weeks but it's happening now as
 

00:32:51.720 --> 00:32:54.230 align:start position:0%
three weeks but it's happening now as
you<00:32:51.880> see<00:32:52.399> and<00:32:52.600> just<00:32:52.760> trying<00:32:53.039> to<00:32:53.559> build<00:32:53.840> as<00:32:54.000> much

00:32:54.230 --> 00:32:54.240 align:start position:0%
you see and just trying to build as much
 

00:32:54.240 --> 00:33:00.029 align:start position:0%
you see and just trying to build as much
consensus<00:32:54.880> as<00:32:55.120> we<00:32:55.480> we<00:32:55.639> can<00:32:56.039> around<00:32:57.159> the<00:32:57.279> entire

00:33:00.029 --> 00:33:00.039 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:33:00.039 --> 00:33:04.669 align:start position:0%
 
report<00:33:01.039> thank

00:33:04.669 --> 00:33:04.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:33:04.679 --> 00:33:07.590 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:33:05.679> I<00:33:05.760> mean<00:33:06.120> I<00:33:06.360> I<00:33:06.480> think<00:33:06.679> along<00:33:07.000> those<00:33:07.200> lines

00:33:07.590 --> 00:33:07.600 align:start position:0%
you I mean I I think along those lines
 

00:33:07.600 --> 00:33:10.509 align:start position:0%
you I mean I I think along those lines
some<00:33:07.760> of<00:33:07.919> these<00:33:08.200> recommendations<00:33:09.440> are

00:33:10.509 --> 00:33:10.519 align:start position:0%
some of these recommendations are
 

00:33:10.519 --> 00:33:14.389 align:start position:0%
some of these recommendations are
incredibly<00:33:11.600> detailed<00:33:12.600> and<00:33:13.039> don't

00:33:14.389 --> 00:33:14.399 align:start position:0%
incredibly detailed and don't
 

00:33:14.399 --> 00:33:16.950 align:start position:0%
incredibly detailed and don't
necessarily<00:33:15.399> include<00:33:16.320> everything<00:33:16.799> that

00:33:16.950 --> 00:33:16.960 align:start position:0%
necessarily include everything that
 

00:33:16.960 --> 00:33:20.710 align:start position:0%
necessarily include everything that
needs<00:33:17.279> to<00:33:17.880> be<00:33:18.880> considered<00:33:19.600> for<00:33:19.840> example<00:33:20.639> I

00:33:20.710 --> 00:33:20.720 align:start position:0%
needs to be considered for example I
 

00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:21.950 align:start position:0%
needs to be considered for example I
don't

00:33:21.950 --> 00:33:21.960 align:start position:0%
don't
 

00:33:21.960 --> 00:33:25.430 align:start position:0%
don't
know<00:33:22.960> that<00:33:23.200> this<00:33:23.440> Authority<00:33:24.159> has<00:33:24.559> the

00:33:25.430 --> 00:33:25.440 align:start position:0%
know that this Authority has the
 

00:33:25.440 --> 00:33:27.669 align:start position:0%
know that this Authority has the
expertise<00:33:26.000> and<00:33:26.159> certainly<00:33:26.600> hasn't<00:33:27.080> done<00:33:27.200> the

00:33:27.669 --> 00:33:27.679 align:start position:0%
expertise and certainly hasn't done the
 

00:33:27.679 --> 00:33:30.549 align:start position:0%
expertise and certainly hasn't done the
analysis<00:33:28.679> to<00:33:28.919> say<00:33:29.240> how<00:33:29.440> grid<00:33:29.840> capacity<00:33:30.360> should

00:33:30.549 --> 00:33:30.559 align:start position:0%
analysis to say how grid capacity should
 

00:33:30.559 --> 00:33:32.789 align:start position:0%
analysis to say how grid capacity should
be<00:33:30.840> Al<00:33:31.440> uh<00:33:31.559> can<00:33:31.639> you<00:33:31.760> scroll<00:33:32.080> up<00:33:32.200> just<00:33:32.320> a<00:33:32.480> bit

00:33:32.789 --> 00:33:32.799 align:start position:0%
be Al uh can you scroll up just a bit
 

00:33:32.799 --> 00:33:37.149 align:start position:0%
be Al uh can you scroll up just a bit
can<00:33:33.039> to<00:33:33.639> just<00:33:34.039> the<00:33:34.200> top<00:33:34.360> of<00:33:34.480> this<00:33:35.039> the<00:33:35.200> grid

00:33:37.149 --> 00:33:37.159 align:start position:0%
can to just the top of this the grid
 

00:33:37.159 --> 00:33:41.350 align:start position:0%
can to just the top of this the grid
Authority<00:33:38.159> um<00:33:38.799> you<00:33:39.799> the<00:33:40.000> grid<00:33:40.880> like<00:33:41.120> this

00:33:41.350 --> 00:33:41.360 align:start position:0%
Authority um you the grid like this
 

00:33:41.360 --> 00:33:43.789 align:start position:0%
Authority um you the grid like this
Authority<00:33:42.360> declaring<00:33:43.120> that<00:33:43.279> there<00:33:43.440> are

00:33:43.789 --> 00:33:43.799 align:start position:0%
Authority declaring that there are
 

00:33:43.799 --> 00:33:45.350 align:start position:0%
Authority declaring that there are
bottlenecks<00:33:44.360> in<00:33:44.480> the<00:33:44.639> current<00:33:44.919> pjm

00:33:45.350 --> 00:33:45.360 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the current pjm
 

00:33:45.360 --> 00:33:46.830 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the current pjm
interconnection

00:33:46.830 --> 00:33:46.840 align:start position:0%
interconnection
 

00:33:46.840 --> 00:33:51.629 align:start position:0%
interconnection
cues<00:33:47.840> um<00:33:48.720> and<00:33:49.360> suggesting<00:33:50.240> that<00:33:51.120> Virginia

00:33:51.629 --> 00:33:51.639 align:start position:0%
cues um and suggesting that Virginia
 

00:33:51.639 --> 00:33:54.470 align:start position:0%
cues um and suggesting that Virginia
Utilities<00:33:52.240> use<00:33:52.600> the<00:33:52.799> existing<00:33:53.200> grid<00:33:53.559> capacity

00:33:54.470 --> 00:33:54.480 align:start position:0%
Utilities use the existing grid capacity
 

00:33:54.480 --> 00:33:58.549 align:start position:0%
Utilities use the existing grid capacity
wisely<00:33:55.480> I<00:33:55.960> mean

00:33:58.549 --> 00:33:58.559 align:start position:0%
wisely I mean
 

00:33:58.559 --> 00:34:00.070 align:start position:0%
wisely I mean
I<00:33:58.639> don't<00:33:58.840> think<00:33:59.039> there's<00:33:59.320> any<00:33:59.559> debate<00:33:59.919> that

00:34:00.070 --> 00:34:00.080 align:start position:0%
I don't think there's any debate that
 

00:34:00.080 --> 00:34:01.149 align:start position:0%
I don't think there's any debate that
there<00:34:00.159> are<00:34:00.440> bottlenecks<00:34:00.960> and

00:34:01.149 --> 00:34:01.159 align:start position:0%
there are bottlenecks and
 

00:34:01.159 --> 00:34:04.710 align:start position:0%
there are bottlenecks and
interconnection<00:34:01.960> cues<00:34:02.519> though<00:34:03.519> I<00:34:03.600> mean<00:34:04.519> the

00:34:04.710 --> 00:34:04.720 align:start position:0%
interconnection cues though I mean the
 

00:34:04.720 --> 00:34:08.790 align:start position:0%
interconnection cues though I mean the
pjm<00:34:05.200> interconnection<00:34:06.000> Q<00:34:06.360> is<00:34:06.720> frozen<00:34:07.279> until

00:34:08.790 --> 00:34:08.800 align:start position:0%
pjm interconnection Q is frozen until
 

00:34:08.800 --> 00:34:12.710 align:start position:0%
pjm interconnection Q is frozen until
2026<00:34:09.800> it's<00:34:10.240> it's<00:34:10.720> one<00:34:10.879> of<00:34:11.079> the<00:34:11.359> top<00:34:11.760> topics<00:34:12.639> I

00:34:12.710 --> 00:34:12.720 align:start position:0%
2026 it's it's one of the top topics I
 

00:34:12.720 --> 00:34:15.030 align:start position:0%
2026 it's it's one of the top topics I
think<00:34:13.320> I<00:34:13.440> think<00:34:13.599> the<00:34:13.720> phrasing<00:34:14.240> is<00:34:14.560> is<00:34:14.679> really

00:34:15.030 --> 00:34:15.040 align:start position:0%
think I think the phrasing is is really
 

00:34:15.040 --> 00:34:16.669 align:start position:0%
think I think the phrasing is is really
I<00:34:15.079> mean<00:34:15.240> so<00:34:15.480> given<00:34:15.679> the<00:34:15.800> bottleneck<00:34:16.320> it<00:34:16.480> could

00:34:16.669 --> 00:34:16.679 align:start position:0%
I mean so given the bottleneck it could
 

00:34:16.679 --> 00:34:18.069 align:start position:0%
I mean so given the bottleneck it could
you<00:34:16.800> could<00:34:16.960> say<00:34:17.240> that<00:34:17.399> given<00:34:17.639> the<00:34:17.720> current

00:34:18.069 --> 00:34:18.079 align:start position:0%
you could say that given the current
 

00:34:18.079 --> 00:34:19.389 align:start position:0%
you could say that given the current
status<00:34:18.359> or<00:34:18.520> the<00:34:18.639> number<00:34:18.800> of<00:34:19.000> projects

00:34:19.389 --> 00:34:19.399 align:start position:0%
status or the number of projects
 

00:34:19.399 --> 00:34:21.349 align:start position:0%
status or the number of projects
awaiting<00:34:19.760> review<00:34:20.079> in<00:34:20.240> the<00:34:20.359> PJ<00:34:21.000> connection

00:34:21.349 --> 00:34:21.359 align:start position:0%
awaiting review in the PJ connection
 

00:34:21.359 --> 00:34:23.950 align:start position:0%
awaiting review in the PJ connection
queue<00:34:22.079> is<00:34:22.399> much<00:34:22.639> different<00:34:22.919> than<00:34:23.159> what<00:34:23.800> this

00:34:23.950 --> 00:34:23.960 align:start position:0%
queue is much different than what this
 

00:34:23.960 --> 00:34:27.510 align:start position:0%
queue is much different than what this
says<00:34:24.359> right<00:34:24.560> now<00:34:25.480> and<00:34:25.839> I<00:34:25.960> think<00:34:26.359> grid

00:34:27.510 --> 00:34:27.520 align:start position:0%
says right now and I think grid
 

00:34:27.520 --> 00:34:31.149 align:start position:0%
says right now and I think grid
capacity<00:34:28.520> and<00:34:28.720> the<00:34:28.839> things<00:34:29.040> that<00:34:29.159> need<00:34:29.280> to<00:34:29.440> be

00:34:31.149 --> 00:34:31.159 align:start position:0%
capacity and the things that need to be
 

00:34:31.159 --> 00:34:33.750 align:start position:0%
capacity and the things that need to be
considered<00:34:32.159> are<00:34:32.440> it's<00:34:32.560> a<00:34:32.760> lot<00:34:33.040> there's<00:34:33.200> a<00:34:33.399> long

00:34:33.750 --> 00:34:33.760 align:start position:0%
considered are it's a lot there's a long
 

00:34:33.760 --> 00:34:35.550 align:start position:0%
considered are it's a lot there's a long
list<00:34:34.240> like

00:34:35.550 --> 00:34:35.560 align:start position:0%
list like
 

00:34:35.560 --> 00:34:38.710 align:start position:0%
list like
reliability<00:34:36.560> Economic<00:34:37.520> Development<00:34:38.520> there's

00:34:38.710 --> 00:34:38.720 align:start position:0%
reliability Economic Development there's
 

00:34:38.720 --> 00:34:41.550 align:start position:0%
reliability Economic Development there's
a<00:34:38.839> lot<00:34:38.960> of<00:34:39.119> other<00:34:39.359> things<00:34:39.639> that<00:34:39.800> should<00:34:40.399> be<00:34:41.399> you

00:34:41.550 --> 00:34:41.560 align:start position:0%
a lot of other things that should be you
 

00:34:41.560 --> 00:34:43.430 align:start position:0%
a lot of other things that should be you
know<00:34:41.919> considered

00:34:43.430 --> 00:34:43.440 align:start position:0%
know considered
 

00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:46.230 align:start position:0%
know considered
so<00:34:44.440> anyhow

00:34:46.230 --> 00:34:46.240 align:start position:0%
so anyhow
 

00:34:46.240 --> 00:34:48.950 align:start position:0%
so anyhow
I<00:34:47.240> I<00:34:47.359> think<00:34:47.560> the<00:34:47.800> recommendation<00:34:48.599> though<00:34:48.800> is

00:34:48.950 --> 00:34:48.960 align:start position:0%
I I think the recommendation though is
 

00:34:48.960 --> 00:34:51.790 align:start position:0%
I I think the recommendation though is
saying<00:34:49.520> consider<00:34:50.240> right<00:34:50.599> consider<00:34:51.240> replacing

00:34:51.790 --> 00:34:51.800 align:start position:0%
saying consider right consider replacing
 

00:34:51.800 --> 00:34:53.869 align:start position:0%
saying consider right consider replacing
near<00:34:52.079> retirement<00:34:52.639> fossil<00:34:53.079> assets<00:34:53.399> with<00:34:53.599> solar

00:34:53.869 --> 00:34:53.879 align:start position:0%
near retirement fossil assets with solar
 

00:34:53.879 --> 00:34:57.710 align:start position:0%
near retirement fossil assets with solar
and<00:34:54.040> energy<00:34:54.639> storage<00:34:55.639> so<00:34:55.839> we're<00:34:56.119> asking

00:34:57.710 --> 00:34:57.720 align:start position:0%
and energy storage so we're asking
 

00:34:57.720 --> 00:35:02.630 align:start position:0%
and energy storage so we're asking
Utilities<00:34:58.560> in<00:34:58.760> Virginia<00:34:59.359> to<00:35:00.359> consider<00:35:01.160> these

00:35:02.630 --> 00:35:02.640 align:start position:0%
Utilities in Virginia to consider these
 

00:35:02.640 --> 00:35:04.390 align:start position:0%
Utilities in Virginia to consider these
recommendations<00:35:03.640> can<00:35:03.800> can<00:35:03.880> you<00:35:03.960> scroll<00:35:04.240> down

00:35:04.390 --> 00:35:04.400 align:start position:0%
recommendations can can you scroll down
 

00:35:04.400 --> 00:35:06.870 align:start position:0%
recommendations can can you scroll down
just<00:35:04.480> a<00:35:04.599> little<00:35:04.839> bit<00:35:05.040> too<00:35:05.400> and<00:35:05.760> I<00:35:05.880> think<00:35:06.720> when

00:35:06.870 --> 00:35:06.880 align:start position:0%
just a little bit too and I think when
 

00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:08.990 align:start position:0%
just a little bit too and I think when
we<00:35:07.040> say<00:35:07.280> we<00:35:07.480> support<00:35:07.839> the<00:35:07.960> SEC<00:35:08.480> The<00:35:08.599> Authority

00:35:08.990 --> 00:35:09.000 align:start position:0%
we say we support the SEC The Authority
 

00:35:09.000 --> 00:35:10.910 align:start position:0%
we say we support the SEC The Authority
supports<00:35:09.359> the<00:35:09.480> SEC<00:35:09.960> in<00:35:10.119> requiring<00:35:10.520> Virginia

00:35:10.910 --> 00:35:10.920 align:start position:0%
supports the SEC in requiring Virginia
 

00:35:10.920 --> 00:35:12.190 align:start position:0%
supports the SEC in requiring Virginia
Utilities<00:35:11.320> to<00:35:11.440> streamline<00:35:11.839> distribution

00:35:12.190 --> 00:35:12.200 align:start position:0%
Utilities to streamline distribution
 

00:35:12.200 --> 00:35:13.910 align:start position:0%
Utilities to streamline distribution
intercon<00:35:12.640> process<00:35:12.880> and<00:35:13.000> revoke<00:35:13.400> unnecessary

00:35:13.910 --> 00:35:13.920 align:start position:0%
intercon process and revoke unnecessary
 

00:35:13.920 --> 00:35:15.470 align:start position:0%
intercon process and revoke unnecessary
burdensome<00:35:14.400> rules<00:35:14.680> that<00:35:14.800> make<00:35:15.040> distribution

00:35:15.470 --> 00:35:15.480 align:start position:0%
burdensome rules that make distribution
 

00:35:15.480 --> 00:35:20.069 align:start position:0%
burdensome rules that make distribution
level<00:35:16.240> projects<00:35:17.240> um<00:35:17.440> cost<00:35:18.119> prohibitive<00:35:19.119> so

00:35:20.069 --> 00:35:20.079 align:start position:0%
level projects um cost prohibitive so
 

00:35:20.079 --> 00:35:24.030 align:start position:0%
level projects um cost prohibitive so
again<00:35:20.440> there's<00:35:20.920> no<00:35:21.520> contemplation<00:35:22.800> of<00:35:23.800> while

00:35:24.030 --> 00:35:24.040 align:start position:0%
again there's no contemplation of while
 

00:35:24.040 --> 00:35:26.230 align:start position:0%
again there's no contemplation of while
maintaining<00:35:24.480> a<00:35:24.680> focus<00:35:24.960> on<00:35:25.240> reliability<00:35:25.920> and

00:35:26.230 --> 00:35:26.240 align:start position:0%
maintaining a focus on reliability and
 

00:35:26.240 --> 00:35:28.310 align:start position:0%
maintaining a focus on reliability and
safety<00:35:26.880> or<00:35:27.079> anything<00:35:27.400> along<00:35:27.760> those<00:35:27.960> lines<00:35:28.280> I

00:35:28.310 --> 00:35:28.320 align:start position:0%
safety or anything along those lines I
 

00:35:28.320 --> 00:35:32.310 align:start position:0%
safety or anything along those lines I
mean<00:35:28.760> in<00:35:28.960> its<00:35:29.240> current<00:35:29.760> form<00:35:30.760> I<00:35:31.079> you

00:35:32.310 --> 00:35:32.320 align:start position:0%
mean in its current form I you
 

00:35:32.320 --> 00:35:37.270 align:start position:0%
mean in its current form I you
know<00:35:33.320> many<00:35:33.560> of<00:35:34.280> these<00:35:35.280> as<00:35:35.599> worded<00:35:36.599> I

00:35:37.270 --> 00:35:37.280 align:start position:0%
know many of these as worded I
 

00:35:37.280 --> 00:35:40.150 align:start position:0%
know many of these as worded I
think<00:35:38.280> uh

00:35:40.150 --> 00:35:40.160 align:start position:0%
think uh
 

00:35:40.160 --> 00:35:42.510 align:start position:0%
think uh
are<00:35:41.160> such

00:35:42.510 --> 00:35:42.520 align:start position:0%
are such
 

00:35:42.520 --> 00:35:44.630 align:start position:0%
are such
that<00:35:43.520> there<00:35:43.640> are<00:35:43.880> things<00:35:44.119> that<00:35:44.240> should<00:35:44.400> be

00:35:44.630 --> 00:35:44.640 align:start position:0%
that there are things that should be
 

00:35:44.640 --> 00:35:46.390 align:start position:0%
that there are things that should be
considered<00:35:45.320> if<00:35:45.440> we're<00:35:45.680> recommending<00:35:46.200> these

00:35:46.390 --> 00:35:46.400 align:start position:0%
considered if we're recommending these
 

00:35:46.400 --> 00:35:50.109 align:start position:0%
considered if we're recommending these
things<00:35:46.599> that<00:35:46.720> are<00:35:46.920> not<00:35:47.320> included<00:35:48.079> so

00:35:50.109 --> 00:35:50.119 align:start position:0%
things that are not included so
 

00:35:50.119 --> 00:35:52.390 align:start position:0%
things that are not included so
again<00:35:51.119> understand<00:35:51.400> that<00:35:51.599> there<00:35:51.760> are<00:35:52.000> are<00:35:52.200> many

00:35:52.390 --> 00:35:52.400 align:start position:0%
again understand that there are are many
 

00:35:52.400 --> 00:35:54.430 align:start position:0%
again understand that there are are many
things<00:35:52.640> here<00:35:53.160> very<00:35:53.400> good<00:35:53.560> points<00:35:53.880> raised<00:35:54.240> on

00:35:54.430 --> 00:35:54.440 align:start position:0%
things here very good points raised on
 

00:35:54.440 --> 00:35:56.790 align:start position:0%
things here very good points raised on
many<00:35:54.640> of<00:35:54.839> these<00:35:55.240> but<00:35:55.680> some<00:35:55.880> of<00:35:56.079> what's<00:35:56.400> here

00:35:56.790 --> 00:35:56.800 align:start position:0%
many of these but some of what's here
 

00:35:56.800 --> 00:35:59.030 align:start position:0%
many of these but some of what's here
the<00:35:56.960> declarative<00:35:57.520> statements

00:35:59.030 --> 00:35:59.040 align:start position:0%
the declarative statements
 

00:35:59.040 --> 00:36:03.390 align:start position:0%
the declarative statements
and<00:36:00.040> some<00:36:00.240> of<00:36:00.319> the<00:36:00.480> recommendations<00:36:01.200> I<00:36:01.319> think

00:36:03.390 --> 00:36:03.400 align:start position:0%
and some of the recommendations I think
 

00:36:03.400 --> 00:36:08.710 align:start position:0%
and some of the recommendations I think
are<00:36:04.400> less

00:36:08.710 --> 00:36:08.720 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:36:08.720 --> 00:36:12.710 align:start position:0%
 
than<00:36:09.720> yeah<00:36:10.079> I<00:36:10.160> think<00:36:10.520> the<00:36:11.400> to<00:36:11.560> me<00:36:11.800> the<00:36:12.000> question

00:36:12.710 --> 00:36:12.720 align:start position:0%
than yeah I think the to me the question
 

00:36:12.720 --> 00:36:16.069 align:start position:0%
than yeah I think the to me the question
is<00:36:13.720> and<00:36:14.119> and<00:36:14.400> and<00:36:14.520> I<00:36:14.680> and<00:36:14.839> I<00:36:15.160> I<00:36:15.280> don't<00:36:15.640> disagree

00:36:16.069 --> 00:36:16.079 align:start position:0%
is and and and I and I I don't disagree
 

00:36:16.079 --> 00:36:17.670 align:start position:0%
is and and and I and I I don't disagree
with<00:36:16.240> any<00:36:16.880> the<00:36:17.000> way<00:36:17.119> that<00:36:17.319> Katherine<00:36:17.560> just

00:36:17.670 --> 00:36:17.680 align:start position:0%
with any the way that Katherine just
 

00:36:17.680 --> 00:36:19.910 align:start position:0%
with any the way that Katherine just
phrased<00:36:18.040> at<00:36:18.119> all<00:36:18.359> but<00:36:18.599> the<00:36:18.760> question<00:36:18.960> would<00:36:19.160> be

00:36:19.910 --> 00:36:19.920 align:start position:0%
phrased at all but the question would be
 

00:36:19.920 --> 00:36:21.430 align:start position:0%
phrased at all but the question would be
is<00:36:20.079> there<00:36:20.200> a<00:36:20.319> recommendation<00:36:20.880> that's<00:36:21.119> not

00:36:21.430 --> 00:36:21.440 align:start position:0%
is there a recommendation that's not
 

00:36:21.440 --> 00:36:23.390 align:start position:0%
is there a recommendation that's not
appropriate<00:36:21.920> for<00:36:22.079> this<00:36:22.240> authority<00:36:22.640> to<00:36:22.800> make

00:36:23.390 --> 00:36:23.400 align:start position:0%
appropriate for this authority to make
 

00:36:23.400 --> 00:36:24.870 align:start position:0%
appropriate for this authority to make
or<00:36:23.560> is<00:36:23.640> there<00:36:23.800> simply<00:36:24.040> a<00:36:24.119> recommendation<00:36:24.720> that

00:36:24.870 --> 00:36:24.880 align:start position:0%
or is there simply a recommendation that
 

00:36:24.880 --> 00:36:26.069 align:start position:0%
or is there simply a recommendation that
some<00:36:25.040> members<00:36:25.319> will<00:36:25.480> agree<00:36:25.720> with<00:36:25.839> and<00:36:25.960> some

00:36:26.069 --> 00:36:26.079 align:start position:0%
some members will agree with and some
 

00:36:26.079 --> 00:36:29.069 align:start position:0%
some members will agree with and some
members<00:36:26.440> won't<00:36:26.800> agree<00:36:27.079> with<00:36:27.880> um<00:36:28.480> and<00:36:28.640> if<00:36:28.800> it's

00:36:29.069 --> 00:36:29.079 align:start position:0%
members won't agree with um and if it's
 

00:36:29.079 --> 00:36:31.710 align:start position:0%
members won't agree with um and if it's
the<00:36:29.400> latter<00:36:30.400> then<00:36:30.640> that's<00:36:31.240> I<00:36:31.400> think<00:36:31.520> we'll

00:36:31.710 --> 00:36:31.720 align:start position:0%
the latter then that's I think we'll
 

00:36:31.720 --> 00:36:32.990 align:start position:0%
the latter then that's I think we'll
take<00:36:31.839> a<00:36:31.920> vote<00:36:32.119> and<00:36:32.240> we<00:36:32.400> decide<00:36:32.640> on<00:36:32.760> that<00:36:32.880> kind

00:36:32.990 --> 00:36:33.000 align:start position:0%
take a vote and we decide on that kind
 

00:36:33.000 --> 00:36:35.150 align:start position:0%
take a vote and we decide on that kind
of<00:36:33.160> stuff<00:36:33.599> if<00:36:33.720> it's<00:36:33.960> wordsmithing<00:36:34.760> to<00:36:34.960> get

00:36:35.150 --> 00:36:35.160 align:start position:0%
of stuff if it's wordsmithing to get
 

00:36:35.160 --> 00:36:36.309 align:start position:0%
of stuff if it's wordsmithing to get
members<00:36:35.520> to

00:36:36.309 --> 00:36:36.319 align:start position:0%
members to
 

00:36:36.319 --> 00:36:42.109 align:start position:0%
members to
agree<00:36:37.319> um<00:36:37.760> like<00:36:38.000> for<00:36:38.520> example<00:36:39.720> if<00:36:40.720> uh

00:36:42.109 --> 00:36:42.119 align:start position:0%
agree um like for example if uh
 

00:36:42.119 --> 00:36:46.230 align:start position:0%
agree um like for example if uh
if<00:36:43.119> if<00:36:43.480> Catherine<00:36:44.119> was<00:36:44.480> okay<00:36:44.920> with<00:36:45.400> if<00:36:45.560> it<00:36:45.720> said

00:36:46.230 --> 00:36:46.240 align:start position:0%
if if Catherine was okay with if it said
 

00:36:46.240 --> 00:36:49.790 align:start position:0%
if if Catherine was okay with if it said
require<00:36:47.240> in<00:36:47.480> addition<00:36:47.920> to<00:36:48.280> other<00:36:48.800> Solutions

00:36:49.790 --> 00:36:49.800 align:start position:0%
require in addition to other Solutions
 

00:36:49.800 --> 00:36:51.309 align:start position:0%
require in addition to other Solutions
utilities<00:36:50.280> to<00:36:50.400> consider<00:36:50.720> grid<00:36:50.920> enhancing

00:36:51.309 --> 00:36:51.319 align:start position:0%
utilities to consider grid enhancing
 

00:36:51.319 --> 00:36:53.589 align:start position:0%
utilities to consider grid enhancing
technology<00:36:51.960> if<00:36:52.079> it<00:36:52.160> was<00:36:52.359> word<00:36:52.720> smithing<00:36:53.520> I

00:36:53.589 --> 00:36:53.599 align:start position:0%
technology if it was word smithing I
 

00:36:53.599 --> 00:36:55.550 align:start position:0%
technology if it was word smithing I
think<00:36:53.720> it's<00:36:53.880> worth<00:36:54.119> the<00:36:54.240> effort<00:36:54.520> to<00:36:54.680> Wordsmith

00:36:55.550 --> 00:36:55.560 align:start position:0%
think it's worth the effort to Wordsmith
 

00:36:55.560 --> 00:36:57.550 align:start position:0%
think it's worth the effort to Wordsmith
to<00:36:55.760> get<00:36:55.880> as<00:36:56.079> close<00:36:56.280> to<00:36:56.400> un<00:36:56.640> unimi<00:36:57.040> as<00:36:57.200> we<00:36:57.319> can

00:36:57.550 --> 00:36:57.560 align:start position:0%
to get as close to un unimi as we can
 

00:36:57.560 --> 00:37:00.030 align:start position:0%
to get as close to un unimi as we can
get<00:36:58.480> if<00:36:58.599> we<00:36:58.760> can't<00:36:59.000> get<00:36:59.200> there<00:36:59.599> some<00:36:59.800> people

00:37:00.030 --> 00:37:00.040 align:start position:0%
get if we can't get there some people
 

00:37:00.040 --> 00:37:01.430 align:start position:0%
get if we can't get there some people
just<00:37:00.359> agree<00:37:00.599> and<00:37:00.680> some<00:37:00.800> people<00:37:01.000> disagree<00:37:01.359> and

00:37:01.430 --> 00:37:01.440 align:start position:0%
just agree and some people disagree and
 

00:37:01.440 --> 00:37:02.550 align:start position:0%
just agree and some people disagree and
we<00:37:01.520> would<00:37:01.640> vote<00:37:01.839> on<00:37:01.960> it<00:37:02.119> and<00:37:02.200> then<00:37:02.280> if<00:37:02.359> there's

00:37:02.550 --> 00:37:02.560 align:start position:0%
we would vote on it and then if there's
 

00:37:02.560 --> 00:37:05.589 align:start position:0%
we would vote on it and then if there's
something<00:37:02.880> where<00:37:03.079> we've<00:37:03.400> like<00:37:04.040> left<00:37:04.599> our

00:37:05.589 --> 00:37:05.599 align:start position:0%
something where we've like left our
 

00:37:05.599 --> 00:37:07.150 align:start position:0%
something where we've like left our
scope<00:37:06.000> where<00:37:06.160> it's<00:37:06.400> appropriate<00:37:06.839> for<00:37:06.960> us<00:37:07.079> to

00:37:07.150 --> 00:37:07.160 align:start position:0%
scope where it's appropriate for us to
 

00:37:07.160 --> 00:37:09.030 align:start position:0%
scope where it's appropriate for us to
have<00:37:07.280> an<00:37:07.440> opinion<00:37:07.720> on<00:37:07.920> if<00:37:08.079> we<00:37:08.599> we<00:37:08.760> start

00:37:09.030 --> 00:37:09.040 align:start position:0%
have an opinion on if we we start
 

00:37:09.040 --> 00:37:11.309 align:start position:0%
have an opinion on if we we start
offering<00:37:09.440> opinions<00:37:09.760> on<00:37:10.280> you<00:37:10.440> know<00:37:10.800> K12

00:37:11.309 --> 00:37:11.319 align:start position:0%
offering opinions on you know K12
 

00:37:11.319 --> 00:37:13.270 align:start position:0%
offering opinions on you know K12
education<00:37:11.760> or<00:37:11.920> something<00:37:12.160> like<00:37:12.359> that<00:37:12.640> or<00:37:13.000> or

00:37:13.270 --> 00:37:13.280 align:start position:0%
education or something like that or or
 

00:37:13.280 --> 00:37:15.550 align:start position:0%
education or something like that or or
crime<00:37:14.280> um<00:37:14.480> then<00:37:14.599> that<00:37:14.760> would<00:37:14.920> be<00:37:15.200> then<00:37:15.319> I<00:37:15.440> think

00:37:15.550 --> 00:37:15.560 align:start position:0%
crime um then that would be then I think
 

00:37:15.560 --> 00:37:16.670 align:start position:0%
crime um then that would be then I think
the<00:37:15.640> question<00:37:15.839> would<00:37:15.960> be<00:37:16.119> is<00:37:16.200> it<00:37:16.319> appropriate

00:37:16.670 --> 00:37:16.680 align:start position:0%
the question would be is it appropriate
 

00:37:16.680 --> 00:37:19.990 align:start position:0%
the question would be is it appropriate
to<00:37:17.280> include<00:37:18.280> um<00:37:18.520> I<00:37:18.720> I<00:37:18.800> would<00:37:19.119> as<00:37:19.240> I<00:37:19.359> read<00:37:19.680> these

00:37:19.990 --> 00:37:20.000 align:start position:0%
to include um I I would as I read these
 

00:37:20.000 --> 00:37:23.069 align:start position:0%
to include um I I would as I read these
I<00:37:20.079> think<00:37:20.319> they<00:37:20.440> are<00:37:20.960> good<00:37:21.119> points<00:37:21.560> did<00:37:21.800> I<00:37:22.160> yeah

00:37:23.069 --> 00:37:23.079 align:start position:0%
I think they are good points did I yeah
 

00:37:23.079 --> 00:37:24.670 align:start position:0%
I think they are good points did I yeah
yeah<00:37:23.200> so<00:37:23.440> I<00:37:23.520> was<00:37:24.040> say<00:37:24.240> I<00:37:24.319> think<00:37:24.440> they're

00:37:24.670 --> 00:37:24.680 align:start position:0%
yeah so I was say I think they're
 

00:37:24.680 --> 00:37:27.309 align:start position:0%
yeah so I was say I think they're
probably<00:37:25.040> appropriate<00:37:25.520> to<00:37:25.720> include<00:37:26.880> I

00:37:27.309 --> 00:37:27.319 align:start position:0%
probably appropriate to include I
 

00:37:27.319 --> 00:37:28.309 align:start position:0%
probably appropriate to include I
understand<00:37:27.599> especially<00:37:27.920> the<00:37:28.000> ones<00:37:28.160> that

00:37:28.309 --> 00:37:28.319 align:start position:0%
understand especially the ones that
 

00:37:28.319 --> 00:37:30.150 align:start position:0%
understand especially the ones that
reference<00:37:28.720> the<00:37:28.839> utilities<00:37:29.480> why<00:37:29.640> the<00:37:29.760> utility

00:37:30.150 --> 00:37:30.160 align:start position:0%
reference the utilities why the utility
 

00:37:30.160 --> 00:37:32.349 align:start position:0%
reference the utilities why the utility
would<00:37:30.319> want<00:37:30.440> to<00:37:30.680> have<00:37:31.200> specific<00:37:31.839> comments<00:37:32.160> on

00:37:32.349 --> 00:37:32.359 align:start position:0%
would want to have specific comments on
 

00:37:32.359 --> 00:37:35.630 align:start position:0%
would want to have specific comments on
that<00:37:32.520> and<00:37:32.680> they<00:37:33.119> should<00:37:34.119> um<00:37:34.920> and<00:37:35.240> I<00:37:35.359> think<00:37:35.520> if

00:37:35.630 --> 00:37:35.640 align:start position:0%
that and they should um and I think if
 

00:37:35.640 --> 00:37:37.309 align:start position:0%
that and they should um and I think if
there's<00:37:36.000> ways<00:37:36.240> to<00:37:36.400> get<00:37:36.520> to<00:37:36.680> unanimity<00:37:37.200> with

00:37:37.309 --> 00:37:37.319 align:start position:0%
there's ways to get to unanimity with
 

00:37:37.319 --> 00:37:38.950 align:start position:0%
there's ways to get to unanimity with
words<00:37:37.599> smithing<00:37:38.040> I<00:37:38.119> think<00:37:38.359> that's<00:37:38.560> worth<00:37:38.800> the

00:37:38.950 --> 00:37:38.960 align:start position:0%
words smithing I think that's worth the
 

00:37:38.960 --> 00:37:41.430 align:start position:0%
words smithing I think that's worth the
effort<00:37:39.800> and<00:37:39.920> if<00:37:40.079> there's<00:37:40.319> not<00:37:40.680> then<00:37:41.119> we<00:37:41.240> should

00:37:41.430 --> 00:37:41.440 align:start position:0%
effort and if there's not then we should
 

00:37:41.440 --> 00:37:42.670 align:start position:0%
effort and if there's not then we should
go<00:37:41.599> through<00:37:41.760> the<00:37:41.880> effort<00:37:42.119> and<00:37:42.240> then<00:37:42.359> see<00:37:42.520> where

00:37:42.670 --> 00:37:42.680 align:start position:0%
go through the effort and then see where
 

00:37:42.680 --> 00:37:43.950 align:start position:0%
go through the effort and then see where
we

00:37:43.950 --> 00:37:43.960 align:start position:0%
we
 

00:37:43.960 --> 00:37:46.230 align:start position:0%
we
land<00:37:44.960> and<00:37:45.079> I'm<00:37:45.240> not<00:37:45.440> I<00:37:45.520> don't<00:37:45.599> want<00:37:45.720> to<00:37:45.800> slow<00:37:46.079> up

00:37:46.230 --> 00:37:46.240 align:start position:0%
land and I'm not I don't want to slow up
 

00:37:46.240 --> 00:37:49.349 align:start position:0%
land and I'm not I don't want to slow up
the<00:37:46.520> process<00:37:47.040> here<00:37:47.839> um<00:37:48.280> but<00:37:48.599> I<00:37:48.680> mean<00:37:49.200> there

00:37:49.349 --> 00:37:49.359 align:start position:0%
the process here um but I mean there
 

00:37:49.359 --> 00:37:51.829 align:start position:0%
the process here um but I mean there
have<00:37:49.520> been<00:37:49.880> multiple<00:37:50.680> simultaneous<00:37:51.400> edits

00:37:51.829 --> 00:37:51.839 align:start position:0%
have been multiple simultaneous edits
 

00:37:51.839 --> 00:37:53.270 align:start position:0%
have been multiple simultaneous edits
Ken<00:37:52.119> that<00:37:52.240> you've<00:37:52.440> had<00:37:52.560> to<00:37:52.720> manage<00:37:53.119> you've

00:37:53.270 --> 00:37:53.280 align:start position:0%
Ken that you've had to manage you've
 

00:37:53.280 --> 00:37:55.670 align:start position:0%
Ken that you've had to manage you've
done<00:37:53.400> a<00:37:53.640> great<00:37:53.960> job<00:37:54.160> at<00:37:54.400> that<00:37:55.040> but<00:37:55.200> if<00:37:55.359> we<00:37:55.480> are

00:37:55.670 --> 00:37:55.680 align:start position:0%
done a great job at that but if we are
 

00:37:55.680 --> 00:37:57.109 align:start position:0%
done a great job at that but if we are
being<00:37:55.960> asked<00:37:56.200> today

00:37:57.109 --> 00:37:57.119 align:start position:0%
being asked today
 

00:37:57.119 --> 00:37:58.510 align:start position:0%
being asked today
and<00:37:57.240> I<00:37:57.319> don't<00:37:57.480> know<00:37:57.599> if<00:37:57.760> we<00:37:57.880> are<00:37:58.119> but<00:37:58.240> if<00:37:58.359> we're

00:37:58.510 --> 00:37:58.520 align:start position:0%
and I don't know if we are but if we're
 

00:37:58.520 --> 00:38:00.109 align:start position:0%
and I don't know if we are but if we're
being<00:37:58.760> asked<00:37:59.000> today<00:37:59.240> to<00:37:59.560> discuss<00:37:59.960> the

00:38:00.109 --> 00:38:00.119 align:start position:0%
being asked today to discuss the
 

00:38:00.119 --> 00:38:01.950 align:start position:0%
being asked today to discuss the
recommendations<00:38:00.920> I'm<00:38:01.079> totally<00:38:01.480> fine<00:38:01.760> with

00:38:01.950 --> 00:38:01.960 align:start position:0%
recommendations I'm totally fine with
 

00:38:01.960 --> 00:38:04.230 align:start position:0%
recommendations I'm totally fine with
that<00:38:02.560> I<00:38:02.640> don't<00:38:02.839> feel<00:38:03.040> like<00:38:03.200> I'm<00:38:03.319> in<00:38:03.400> a<00:38:03.640> position

00:38:04.230 --> 00:38:04.240 align:start position:0%
that I don't feel like I'm in a position
 

00:38:04.240 --> 00:38:05.870 align:start position:0%
that I don't feel like I'm in a position
or<00:38:04.480> frankly<00:38:04.800> any<00:38:04.960> of<00:38:05.040> us<00:38:05.160> are<00:38:05.280> in<00:38:05.400> a<00:38:05.520> position

00:38:05.870 --> 00:38:05.880 align:start position:0%
or frankly any of us are in a position
 

00:38:05.880 --> 00:38:08.069 align:start position:0%
or frankly any of us are in a position
without<00:38:06.200> having<00:38:06.640> discussed<00:38:07.640> and<00:38:07.760> sort<00:38:07.960> of

00:38:08.069 --> 00:38:08.079 align:start position:0%
without having discussed and sort of
 

00:38:08.079 --> 00:38:10.390 align:start position:0%
without having discussed and sort of
voted<00:38:08.359> on<00:38:08.560> each<00:38:08.720> of<00:38:08.839> the<00:38:09.000> recommendations<00:38:09.800> and

00:38:10.390 --> 00:38:10.400 align:start position:0%
voted on each of the recommendations and
 

00:38:10.400 --> 00:38:13.230 align:start position:0%
voted on each of the recommendations and
and<00:38:10.599> and<00:38:10.720> seen<00:38:11.040> them<00:38:11.160> in<00:38:11.440> their<00:38:11.640> final<00:38:12.000> form<00:38:12.880> to

00:38:13.230 --> 00:38:13.240 align:start position:0%
and and seen them in their final form to
 

00:38:13.240 --> 00:38:15.990 align:start position:0%
and and seen them in their final form to
know<00:38:14.240> again<00:38:15.000> I<00:38:15.119> might<00:38:15.280> not<00:38:15.440> necessarily<00:38:15.839> have

00:38:15.990 --> 00:38:16.000 align:start position:0%
know again I might not necessarily have
 

00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:17.349 align:start position:0%
know again I might not necessarily have
objections<00:38:16.440> to<00:38:16.599> some<00:38:16.720> of<00:38:16.839> what's<00:38:17.000> here<00:38:17.119> I<00:38:17.240> just

00:38:17.349 --> 00:38:17.359 align:start position:0%
objections to some of what's here I just
 

00:38:17.359 --> 00:38:20.109 align:start position:0%
objections to some of what's here I just
like<00:38:17.480> to<00:38:17.640> know<00:38:18.280> what<00:38:19.040> what<00:38:19.200> it<00:38:19.720> what<00:38:19.960> the

00:38:20.109 --> 00:38:20.119 align:start position:0%
like to know what what it what the
 

00:38:20.119 --> 00:38:21.990 align:start position:0%
like to know what what it what the
meaning<00:38:20.760> behind<00:38:21.040> some<00:38:21.160> of<00:38:21.319> this<00:38:21.480> and<00:38:21.680> what<00:38:21.839> the

00:38:21.990 --> 00:38:22.000 align:start position:0%
meaning behind some of this and what the
 

00:38:22.000 --> 00:38:24.270 align:start position:0%
meaning behind some of this and what the
what<00:38:22.119> the<00:38:22.280> needs<00:38:22.800> are<00:38:23.680> and<00:38:23.800> it<00:38:23.880> would<00:38:24.000> be<00:38:24.119> good

00:38:24.270 --> 00:38:24.280 align:start position:0%
what the needs are and it would be good
 

00:38:24.280 --> 00:38:26.069 align:start position:0%
what the needs are and it would be good
to<00:38:24.400> have<00:38:24.560> that<00:38:24.800> discussion<00:38:25.359> in<00:38:25.560> advance<00:38:25.920> of

00:38:26.069 --> 00:38:26.079 align:start position:0%
to have that discussion in advance of
 

00:38:26.079 --> 00:38:29.270 align:start position:0%
to have that discussion in advance of
having<00:38:26.280> a<00:38:26.640> vote<00:38:27.640> um<00:38:28.119> Circ<00:38:28.720> circulating

00:38:29.270 --> 00:38:29.280 align:start position:0%
having a vote um Circ circulating
 

00:38:29.280 --> 00:38:31.870 align:start position:0%
having a vote um Circ circulating
multiple<00:38:29.680> versions<00:38:29.960> of<00:38:30.079> a<00:38:30.200> Redline<00:38:30.880> document

00:38:31.870 --> 00:38:31.880 align:start position:0%
multiple versions of a Redline document
 

00:38:31.880 --> 00:38:33.630 align:start position:0%
multiple versions of a Redline document
where<00:38:32.319> you<00:38:32.440> know<00:38:32.640> changes<00:38:33.000> are<00:38:33.160> still<00:38:33.400> being

00:38:33.630 --> 00:38:33.640 align:start position:0%
where you know changes are still being
 

00:38:33.640 --> 00:38:35.430 align:start position:0%
where you know changes are still being
made<00:38:33.960> up<00:38:34.119> until<00:38:34.400> just<00:38:34.640> you<00:38:34.720> know<00:38:34.920> 12<00:38:35.160> hours

00:38:35.430 --> 00:38:35.440 align:start position:0%
made up until just you know 12 hours
 

00:38:35.440 --> 00:38:38.950 align:start position:0%
made up until just you know 12 hours
before<00:38:35.640> a<00:38:35.760> meeting<00:38:36.640> is<00:38:37.400> is<00:38:37.599> to<00:38:37.800> me<00:38:38.400> it's<00:38:38.839> I'm

00:38:38.950 --> 00:38:38.960 align:start position:0%
before a meeting is is to me it's I'm
 

00:38:38.960 --> 00:38:40.190 align:start position:0%
before a meeting is is to me it's I'm
not<00:38:39.079> going<00:38:39.200> to<00:38:39.280> be<00:38:39.359> in<00:38:39.440> a<00:38:39.560> position<00:38:39.800> to<00:38:39.920> vote<00:38:40.079> on

00:38:40.190 --> 00:38:40.200 align:start position:0%
not going to be in a position to vote on
 

00:38:40.200 --> 00:38:42.270 align:start position:0%
not going to be in a position to vote on
it<00:38:40.359> only<00:38:40.640> because<00:38:40.920> I<00:38:41.040> haven't<00:38:41.839> had<00:38:42.000> a<00:38:42.079> chance

00:38:42.270 --> 00:38:42.280 align:start position:0%
it only because I haven't had a chance
 

00:38:42.280 --> 00:38:44.069 align:start position:0%
it only because I haven't had a chance
to<00:38:42.400> fully<00:38:43.000> understand<00:38:43.319> the<00:38:43.440> recommendations

00:38:44.069 --> 00:38:44.079 align:start position:0%
to fully understand the recommendations
 

00:38:44.079 --> 00:38:47.109 align:start position:0%
to fully understand the recommendations
we're<00:38:44.280> being<00:38:44.720> asked<00:38:45.000> to<00:38:45.440> to

00:38:47.109 --> 00:38:47.119 align:start position:0%
we're being asked to to
 

00:38:47.119 --> 00:38:49.670 align:start position:0%
we're being asked to to
approve<00:38:48.119> hey<00:38:48.359> Katherine<00:38:48.760> just<00:38:48.960> remember<00:38:49.440> this

00:38:49.670 --> 00:38:49.680 align:start position:0%
approve hey Katherine just remember this
 

00:38:49.680 --> 00:38:51.510 align:start position:0%
approve hey Katherine just remember this
when<00:38:49.839> we're<00:38:50.000> getting<00:38:50.200> ready<00:38:50.359> to<00:38:50.480> walk<00:38:50.720> into

00:38:51.510 --> 00:38:51.520 align:start position:0%
when we're getting ready to walk into
 

00:38:51.520 --> 00:38:53.630 align:start position:0%
when we're getting ready to walk into
Commerce<00:38:51.839> and<00:38:51.960> labor<00:38:52.240> in<00:38:52.319> a<00:38:52.440> few<00:38:52.599> months<00:38:53.520> and

00:38:53.630 --> 00:38:53.640 align:start position:0%
Commerce and labor in a few months and
 

00:38:53.640 --> 00:38:56.030 align:start position:0%
Commerce and labor in a few months and
yall<00:38:53.960> hand<00:38:54.119> us<00:38:54.280> a<00:38:54.400> new<00:38:54.560> version<00:38:54.800> of<00:38:54.920> a<00:38:55.079> bill

00:38:56.030 --> 00:38:56.040 align:start position:0%
yall hand us a new version of a bill
 

00:38:56.040 --> 00:38:58.030 align:start position:0%
yall hand us a new version of a bill
okay

00:38:58.030 --> 00:38:58.040 align:start position:0%
okay
 

00:38:58.040 --> 00:38:59.550 align:start position:0%
okay
and<00:38:58.400> we're<00:38:58.599> not<00:38:58.720> in<00:38:58.839> the<00:38:58.960> same<00:38:59.160> room<00:38:59.319> so<00:38:59.480> you

00:38:59.550 --> 00:38:59.560 align:start position:0%
and we're not in the same room so you
 

00:38:59.560 --> 00:39:00.950 align:start position:0%
and we're not in the same room so you
can't<00:38:59.720> see<00:38:59.920> that<00:39:00.040> I'm<00:39:00.200> kind<00:39:00.319> of<00:39:00.440> laughing<00:39:00.839> I'm

00:39:00.950 --> 00:39:00.960 align:start position:0%
can't see that I'm kind of laughing I'm
 

00:39:00.960 --> 00:39:03.390 align:start position:0%
can't see that I'm kind of laughing I'm
just<00:39:01.119> joking

00:39:03.390 --> 00:39:03.400 align:start position:0%
just joking
 

00:39:03.400 --> 00:39:05.309 align:start position:0%
just joking
but

00:39:05.309 --> 00:39:05.319 align:start position:0%
but
 

00:39:05.319 --> 00:39:08.109 align:start position:0%
but
um<00:39:06.319> very<00:39:06.520> much<00:39:06.720> appreciate<00:39:07.160> the<00:39:07.359> discussion

00:39:08.109 --> 00:39:08.119 align:start position:0%
um very much appreciate the discussion
 

00:39:08.119 --> 00:39:10.910 align:start position:0%
um very much appreciate the discussion
uh<00:39:08.240> to<00:39:08.440> give<00:39:08.640> credit<00:39:08.920> where<00:39:09.079> it's<00:39:09.319> due<00:39:10.119> um

00:39:10.910 --> 00:39:10.920 align:start position:0%
uh to give credit where it's due um
 

00:39:10.920 --> 00:39:12.790 align:start position:0%
uh to give credit where it's due um
these

00:39:12.790 --> 00:39:12.800 align:start position:0%
these
 

00:39:12.800 --> 00:39:15.589 align:start position:0%
these
specific<00:39:13.800> uh<00:39:14.000> recommendations<00:39:14.920> Colleen<00:39:15.440> was

00:39:15.589 --> 00:39:15.599 align:start position:0%
specific uh recommendations Colleen was
 

00:39:15.599 --> 00:39:17.710 align:start position:0%
specific uh recommendations Colleen was
able<00:39:15.760> to<00:39:15.960> put<00:39:16.280> together<00:39:16.640> and<00:39:16.800> did<00:39:17.000> so<00:39:17.319> over<00:39:17.520> two

00:39:17.710 --> 00:39:17.720 align:start position:0%
able to put together and did so over two
 

00:39:17.720 --> 00:39:21.470 align:start position:0%
able to put together and did so over two
weeks<00:39:18.000> ago<00:39:18.720> and<00:39:18.839> so<00:39:19.079> every<00:39:19.359> draft<00:39:19.880> since<00:39:20.480> the

00:39:21.470 --> 00:39:21.480 align:start position:0%
weeks ago and so every draft since the
 

00:39:21.480 --> 00:39:23.390 align:start position:0%
weeks ago and so every draft since the
um<00:39:21.680> you<00:39:21.800> know<00:39:21.960> original<00:39:22.400> draft<00:39:22.680> on<00:39:22.800> the<00:39:22.920> 13th

00:39:23.390 --> 00:39:23.400 align:start position:0%
um you know original draft on the 13th
 

00:39:23.400 --> 00:39:25.430 align:start position:0%
um you know original draft on the 13th
has<00:39:23.599> included<00:39:24.119> these<00:39:24.480> and<00:39:25.040> I<00:39:25.200> really

00:39:25.430 --> 00:39:25.440 align:start position:0%
has included these and I really
 

00:39:25.440 --> 00:39:28.150 align:start position:0%
has included these and I really
appreciate<00:39:25.960> the<00:39:26.079> folks<00:39:26.560> to<00:39:27.560> uh<00:39:27.720> been<00:39:27.839> able<00:39:28.040> to

00:39:28.150 --> 00:39:28.160 align:start position:0%
appreciate the folks to uh been able to
 

00:39:28.160 --> 00:39:30.109 align:start position:0%
appreciate the folks to uh been able to
dig<00:39:28.359> into<00:39:28.640> these<00:39:28.920> take<00:39:29.119> some<00:39:29.400> time<00:39:29.680> and<00:39:29.800> do<00:39:29.960> the

00:39:30.109 --> 00:39:30.119 align:start position:0%
dig into these take some time and do the
 

00:39:30.119 --> 00:39:33.030 align:start position:0%
dig into these take some time and do the
word<00:39:30.800> smithing<00:39:31.760> that<00:39:31.960> they<00:39:32.119> felt<00:39:32.480> necessary

00:39:33.030 --> 00:39:33.040 align:start position:0%
word smithing that they felt necessary
 

00:39:33.040 --> 00:39:36.150 align:start position:0%
word smithing that they felt necessary
prior<00:39:33.319> to<00:39:33.520> this<00:39:33.920> meeting<00:39:34.920> uh<00:39:35.040> we<00:39:35.160> do<00:39:35.560> we<00:39:35.680> are

00:39:36.150 --> 00:39:36.160 align:start position:0%
prior to this meeting uh we do we are
 

00:39:36.160 --> 00:39:39.150 align:start position:0%
prior to this meeting uh we do we are
really<00:39:36.560> pressed<00:39:36.920> for<00:39:37.200> time<00:39:37.880> and<00:39:38.359> have<00:39:38.560> to<00:39:38.800> get

00:39:39.150 --> 00:39:39.160 align:start position:0%
really pressed for time and have to get
 

00:39:39.160 --> 00:39:43.309 align:start position:0%
really pressed for time and have to get
this<00:39:40.160> um<00:39:41.119> solidified<00:39:41.800> for<00:39:42.160> Ken<00:39:42.440> to<00:39:42.520> share<00:39:42.920> with

00:39:43.309 --> 00:39:43.319 align:start position:0%
this um solidified for Ken to share with
 

00:39:43.319 --> 00:39:44.309 align:start position:0%
this um solidified for Ken to share with
then<00:39:43.520> I

00:39:44.309 --> 00:39:44.319 align:start position:0%
then I
 

00:39:44.319 --> 00:39:47.710 align:start position:0%
then I
believe<00:39:45.319> Secretary<00:39:45.800> of<00:39:45.920> Commerce<00:39:46.240> and<00:39:46.720> trade

00:39:47.710 --> 00:39:47.720 align:start position:0%
believe Secretary of Commerce and trade
 

00:39:47.720 --> 00:39:49.109 align:start position:0%
believe Secretary of Commerce and trade
prior<00:39:48.040> to

00:39:49.109 --> 00:39:49.119 align:start position:0%
prior to
 

00:39:49.119 --> 00:39:51.710 align:start position:0%
prior to
subid<00:39:50.119> it'll<00:39:50.440> probably<00:39:50.680> go<00:39:50.839> up<00:39:51.040> through<00:39:51.359> our

00:39:51.710 --> 00:39:51.720 align:start position:0%
subid it'll probably go up through our
 

00:39:51.720 --> 00:39:55.230 align:start position:0%
subid it'll probably go up through our
internal<00:39:52.200> chain<00:39:52.680> before<00:39:52.920> it<00:39:53.280> goes<00:39:53.599> to<00:39:54.359> uh<00:39:54.480> the

00:39:55.230 --> 00:39:55.240 align:start position:0%
internal chain before it goes to uh the
 

00:39:55.240 --> 00:39:57.950 align:start position:0%
internal chain before it goes to uh the
secretary<00:39:56.240> yeah

00:39:57.950 --> 00:39:57.960 align:start position:0%
secretary yeah
 

00:39:57.960 --> 00:39:59.670 align:start position:0%
secretary yeah
and<00:39:58.160> again<00:39:58.480> none<00:39:58.599> of<00:39:58.760> my<00:39:58.920> comments<00:39:59.359> can<00:39:59.520> are

00:39:59.670 --> 00:39:59.680 align:start position:0%
and again none of my comments can are
 

00:39:59.680 --> 00:40:00.950 align:start position:0%
and again none of my comments can are
directed<00:40:00.000> you've<00:40:00.160> done<00:40:00.280> a<00:40:00.400> great<00:40:00.599> job<00:40:00.800> trying

00:40:00.950 --> 00:40:00.960 align:start position:0%
directed you've done a great job trying
 

00:40:00.960 --> 00:40:03.390 align:start position:0%
directed you've done a great job trying
to<00:40:01.119> manage<00:40:01.560> the<00:40:02.319> input<00:40:02.599> coming<00:40:02.800> from<00:40:03.000> multiple

00:40:03.390 --> 00:40:03.400 align:start position:0%
to manage the input coming from multiple
 

00:40:03.400 --> 00:40:06.470 align:start position:0%
to manage the input coming from multiple
directions<00:40:04.000> so<00:40:04.839> appreciate<00:40:05.480> your<00:40:05.760> hard<00:40:06.040> work

00:40:06.470 --> 00:40:06.480 align:start position:0%
directions so appreciate your hard work
 

00:40:06.480 --> 00:40:09.030 align:start position:0%
directions so appreciate your hard work
and<00:40:06.720> getting<00:40:07.000> that<00:40:07.200> done<00:40:08.160> again<00:40:08.599> it's<00:40:08.720> just<00:40:08.839> a

00:40:09.030 --> 00:40:09.040 align:start position:0%
and getting that done again it's just a
 

00:40:09.040 --> 00:40:10.990 align:start position:0%
and getting that done again it's just a
matter<00:40:09.319> of<00:40:09.880> changes<00:40:10.319> coming<00:40:10.560> from<00:40:10.800> all

00:40:10.990 --> 00:40:11.000 align:start position:0%
matter of changes coming from all
 

00:40:11.000 --> 00:40:12.950 align:start position:0%
matter of changes coming from all
different<00:40:11.319> directions<00:40:11.880> and<00:40:12.119> not<00:40:12.400> necessarily

00:40:12.950 --> 00:40:12.960 align:start position:0%
different directions and not necessarily
 

00:40:12.960 --> 00:40:14.829 align:start position:0%
different directions and not necessarily
knowing<00:40:13.480> what<00:40:14.119> what<00:40:14.240> we're<00:40:14.480> going<00:40:14.599> to<00:40:14.680> be

00:40:14.829 --> 00:40:14.839 align:start position:0%
knowing what what we're going to be
 

00:40:14.839 --> 00:40:19.230 align:start position:0%
knowing what what we're going to be
voting<00:40:15.160> on<00:40:15.720> until<00:40:16.520> and<00:40:16.720> now

00:40:19.230 --> 00:40:19.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:40:19.240 --> 00:40:22.870 align:start position:0%
 
so<00:40:20.240> and<00:40:20.560> and<00:40:20.800> Skylar<00:40:21.280> I<00:40:21.400> appreciate<00:40:22.160> you<00:40:22.280> know

00:40:22.870 --> 00:40:22.880 align:start position:0%
so and and Skylar I appreciate you know
 

00:40:22.880 --> 00:40:25.910 align:start position:0%
so and and Skylar I appreciate you know
um<00:40:23.480> I<00:40:24.000> was<00:40:24.240> the<00:40:24.400> author<00:40:24.720> on<00:40:25.280> many<00:40:25.520> of<00:40:25.680> these

00:40:25.910 --> 00:40:25.920 align:start position:0%
um I was the author on many of these
 

00:40:25.920 --> 00:40:29.109 align:start position:0%
um I was the author on many of these
recommend<00:40:26.839> and<00:40:26.960> I'm<00:40:27.240> happy<00:40:27.640> to<00:40:28.560> go<00:40:28.800> into

00:40:29.109 --> 00:40:29.119 align:start position:0%
recommend and I'm happy to go into
 

00:40:29.119 --> 00:40:32.349 align:start position:0%
recommend and I'm happy to go into
detail<00:40:29.560> about<00:40:30.119> why<00:40:30.520> based<00:40:30.839> on<00:40:31.520> the<00:40:31.680> authori

00:40:32.349 --> 00:40:32.359 align:start position:0%
detail about why based on the authori
 

00:40:32.359 --> 00:40:34.710 align:start position:0%
detail about why based on the authori
activities<00:40:33.040> this<00:40:33.240> year<00:40:33.680> each<00:40:33.880> of<00:40:34.040> them<00:40:34.359> stood

00:40:34.710 --> 00:40:34.720 align:start position:0%
activities this year each of them stood
 

00:40:34.720 --> 00:40:37.349 align:start position:0%
activities this year each of them stood
out<00:40:35.240> as<00:40:35.839> recommendations<00:40:36.839> that<00:40:37.040> we<00:40:37.160> would

00:40:37.349 --> 00:40:37.359 align:start position:0%
out as recommendations that we would
 

00:40:37.359 --> 00:40:38.829 align:start position:0%
out as recommendations that we would
want<00:40:37.480> to<00:40:37.720> give<00:40:37.920> to<00:40:38.079> the<00:40:38.240> governor<00:40:38.599> of<00:40:38.760> the

00:40:38.829 --> 00:40:38.839 align:start position:0%
want to give to the governor of the
 

00:40:38.839 --> 00:40:40.430 align:start position:0%
want to give to the governor of the
general

00:40:40.430 --> 00:40:40.440 align:start position:0%
general
 

00:40:40.440 --> 00:40:43.430 align:start position:0%
general
assembly

00:40:43.430 --> 00:40:43.440 align:start position:0%
assembly
 

00:40:43.440 --> 00:40:47.349 align:start position:0%
assembly
yeah<00:40:44.440> so<00:40:45.240> all<00:40:45.440> of<00:40:45.640> all<00:40:45.760> of<00:40:46.040> these<00:40:46.800> were<00:40:47.079> put

00:40:47.349 --> 00:40:47.359 align:start position:0%
yeah so all of all of these were put
 

00:40:47.359 --> 00:40:49.190 align:start position:0%
yeah so all of all of these were put
together<00:40:47.599> by<00:40:47.800> Colleen<00:40:48.440> and<00:40:48.640> all<00:40:48.839> the<00:40:48.960> things

00:40:49.190 --> 00:40:49.200 align:start position:0%
together by Colleen and all the things
 

00:40:49.200 --> 00:40:52.910 align:start position:0%
together by Colleen and all the things
in<00:40:49.400> blue<00:40:49.760> above<00:40:50.000> it<00:40:50.280> were<00:40:50.960> put<00:40:51.280> together<00:40:52.000> by

00:40:52.910 --> 00:40:52.920 align:start position:0%
in blue above it were put together by
 

00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:55.390 align:start position:0%
in blue above it were put together by
Skyler<00:40:53.920> they<00:40:54.079> just<00:40:54.200> show<00:40:54.440> up<00:40:54.800> with<00:40:54.960> my<00:40:55.119> name

00:40:55.390 --> 00:40:55.400 align:start position:0%
Skyler they just show up with my name
 

00:40:55.400 --> 00:40:57.190 align:start position:0%
Skyler they just show up with my name
because<00:40:55.520> I<00:40:55.599> was<00:40:55.680> the<00:40:55.760> one<00:40:55.839> who<00:40:56.000> pasted<00:40:56.359> them<00:40:56.560> in

00:40:57.190 --> 00:40:57.200 align:start position:0%
because I was the one who pasted them in
 

00:40:57.200 --> 00:40:59.670 align:start position:0%
because I was the one who pasted them in
or

00:40:59.670 --> 00:40:59.680 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:40:59.680 --> 00:41:02.309 align:start position:0%
 
her<00:41:00.680> so<00:41:00.920> moving<00:41:01.280> past<00:41:01.520> the<00:41:01.680> housekeeping

00:41:02.309 --> 00:41:02.319 align:start position:0%
her so moving past the housekeeping
 

00:41:02.319 --> 00:41:04.910 align:start position:0%
her so moving past the housekeeping
items<00:41:03.160> uh<00:41:03.280> about<00:41:03.520> how<00:41:03.640> we've<00:41:03.880> gotten<00:41:04.160> here<00:41:04.640> and

00:41:04.910 --> 00:41:04.920 align:start position:0%
items uh about how we've gotten here and
 

00:41:04.920 --> 00:41:07.270 align:start position:0%
items uh about how we've gotten here and
the<00:41:05.280> iterative<00:41:05.880> process<00:41:06.359> that<00:41:06.520> has<00:41:06.800> resulted

00:41:07.270 --> 00:41:07.280 align:start position:0%
the iterative process that has resulted
 

00:41:07.280 --> 00:41:11.390 align:start position:0%
the iterative process that has resulted
in<00:41:07.440> this<00:41:07.640> report<00:41:08.119> do<00:41:08.800> do<00:41:09.119> members<00:41:10.000> have<00:41:10.760> word

00:41:11.390 --> 00:41:11.400 align:start position:0%
in this report do do members have word
 

00:41:11.400 --> 00:41:14.550 align:start position:0%
in this report do do members have word
smithing<00:41:12.400> contributions<00:41:13.359> to<00:41:13.640> make

00:41:14.550 --> 00:41:14.560 align:start position:0%
smithing contributions to make
 

00:41:14.560 --> 00:41:19.589 align:start position:0%
smithing contributions to make
to<00:41:15.560> any<00:41:15.800> of<00:41:16.000> these

00:41:19.589 --> 00:41:19.599 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:41:19.599 --> 00:41:21.630 align:start position:0%
 
elements<00:41:20.599> yes<00:41:20.760> and<00:41:20.839> I'm<00:41:21.000> happy<00:41:21.200> to<00:41:21.319> get<00:41:21.480> those

00:41:21.630 --> 00:41:21.640 align:start position:0%
elements yes and I'm happy to get those
 

00:41:21.640 --> 00:41:24.349 align:start position:0%
elements yes and I'm happy to get those
to<00:41:21.839> Ken<00:41:22.079> if<00:41:22.160> you'd<00:41:22.400> like<00:41:22.520> me<00:41:22.599> to<00:41:22.760> do<00:41:23.079> that<00:41:24.079> using

00:41:24.349 --> 00:41:24.359 align:start position:0%
to Ken if you'd like me to do that using
 

00:41:24.359 --> 00:41:27.270 align:start position:0%
to Ken if you'd like me to do that using
the<00:41:24.520> latest<00:41:25.240> version

00:41:27.270 --> 00:41:27.280 align:start position:0%
the latest version
 

00:41:27.280 --> 00:41:30.030 align:start position:0%
the latest version
so<00:41:28.079> we're<00:41:28.400> we're<00:41:28.560> going<00:41:28.760> to<00:41:28.920> be<00:41:29.160> voting<00:41:29.720> as<00:41:29.839> an

00:41:30.030 --> 00:41:30.040 align:start position:0%
so we're we're going to be voting as an
 

00:41:30.040 --> 00:41:32.069 align:start position:0%
so we're we're going to be voting as an
authority<00:41:30.480> on<00:41:30.760> these<00:41:30.960> elements<00:41:31.520> today

00:41:32.069 --> 00:41:32.079 align:start position:0%
authority on these elements today
 

00:41:32.079 --> 00:41:36.910 align:start position:0%
authority on these elements today
Catherine<00:41:32.960> and<00:41:34.200> um<00:41:35.200> we<00:41:36.079> respectfully<00:41:36.720> will

00:41:36.910 --> 00:41:36.920 align:start position:0%
Catherine and um we respectfully will
 

00:41:36.920 --> 00:41:39.510 align:start position:0%
Catherine and um we respectfully will
not<00:41:37.400> reconvene<00:41:38.400> The

00:41:39.510 --> 00:41:39.520 align:start position:0%
not reconvene The
 

00:41:39.520 --> 00:41:43.750 align:start position:0%
not reconvene The
Authority<00:41:40.520> uh<00:41:40.720> to<00:41:41.480> consider<00:41:42.480> uh<00:41:42.720> one<00:41:42.960> member's

00:41:43.750 --> 00:41:43.760 align:start position:0%
Authority uh to consider uh one member's
 

00:41:43.760 --> 00:41:45.270 align:start position:0%
Authority uh to consider uh one member's
word<00:41:44.160> SMI<00:41:44.480> things<00:41:44.760> we're<00:41:44.880> going<00:41:44.960> to<00:41:45.160> we're

00:41:45.270 --> 00:41:45.280 align:start position:0%
word SMI things we're going to we're
 

00:41:45.280 --> 00:41:47.870 align:start position:0%
word SMI things we're going to we're
going<00:41:45.359> to<00:41:45.520> vote<00:41:45.720> on<00:41:45.880> these<00:41:46.079> elements<00:41:46.880> today

00:41:47.870 --> 00:41:47.880 align:start position:0%
going to vote on these elements today
 

00:41:47.880 --> 00:41:51.069 align:start position:0%
going to vote on these elements today
and<00:41:48.480> get<00:41:48.760> them<00:41:49.040> through<00:41:49.240> the<00:41:49.440> proper<00:41:50.079> channels

00:41:51.069 --> 00:41:51.079 align:start position:0%
and get them through the proper channels
 

00:41:51.079 --> 00:41:55.230 align:start position:0%
and get them through the proper channels
by<00:41:51.319> our<00:41:51.920> by<00:41:52.119> our

00:41:55.230 --> 00:41:55.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:41:55.240 --> 00:42:00.829 align:start position:0%
 
deadline

00:42:00.829 --> 00:42:00.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:42:00.839 --> 00:42:03.069 align:start position:0%
 
and<00:42:01.040> if<00:42:01.200> there<00:42:01.359> were<00:42:02.240> was<00:42:02.400> a<00:42:02.599> decision<00:42:02.920> to

00:42:03.069 --> 00:42:03.079 align:start position:0%
and if there were was a decision to
 

00:42:03.079 --> 00:42:05.829 align:start position:0%
and if there were was a decision to
reconvene<00:42:03.760> it<00:42:03.839> would<00:42:04.000> have<00:42:04.200> to<00:42:04.280> be<00:42:04.440> in

00:42:05.829 --> 00:42:05.839 align:start position:0%
reconvene it would have to be in
 

00:42:05.839 --> 00:42:14.670 align:start position:0%
reconvene it would have to be in
person<00:42:06.839> okay

00:42:14.670 --> 00:42:14.680 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:42:14.680 --> 00:42:16.950 align:start position:0%
 
um<00:42:15.680> so<00:42:15.960> Katherine<00:42:16.280> is<00:42:16.400> there<00:42:16.520> any<00:42:16.680> word

00:42:16.950 --> 00:42:16.960 align:start position:0%
um so Katherine is there any word
 

00:42:16.960 --> 00:42:19.950 align:start position:0%
um so Katherine is there any word
smithing<00:42:17.359> in<00:42:17.720> here<00:42:18.720> that<00:42:19.160> you<00:42:19.319> can<00:42:19.520> think<00:42:19.720> of

00:42:19.950 --> 00:42:19.960 align:start position:0%
smithing in here that you can think of
 

00:42:19.960 --> 00:42:25.030 align:start position:0%
smithing in here that you can think of
right<00:42:20.119> now<00:42:20.800> that<00:42:21.280> might<00:42:21.559> help<00:42:21.800> a<00:42:21.920> little

00:42:25.030 --> 00:42:25.040 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:42:25.040 --> 00:42:28.030 align:start position:0%
 
bit<00:42:26.040> okay<00:42:26.359> can<00:42:26.440> I<00:42:26.559> make<00:42:26.720> a<00:42:26.880> comment<00:42:27.319> on<00:42:27.800> on<00:42:27.960> the

00:42:28.030 --> 00:42:28.040 align:start position:0%
bit okay can I make a comment on on the
 

00:42:28.040 --> 00:42:29.349 align:start position:0%
bit okay can I make a comment on on the
authority<00:42:28.359> Believers<00:42:28.760> adopting<00:42:29.119> these

00:42:29.349 --> 00:42:29.359 align:start position:0%
authority Believers adopting these
 

00:42:29.359 --> 00:42:31.710 align:start position:0%
authority Believers adopting these
recommendations<00:42:29.880> is<00:42:29.960> a<00:42:30.119> key<00:42:30.319> to<00:42:30.599> enabling<00:42:31.119> a

00:42:31.710 --> 00:42:31.720 align:start position:0%
recommendations is a key to enabling a
 

00:42:31.720 --> 00:42:34.750 align:start position:0%
recommendations is a key to enabling a
just<00:42:32.720> clean<00:42:33.440> I<00:42:33.559> like<00:42:33.760> the<00:42:33.880> word<00:42:34.200> just<00:42:34.480> but<00:42:34.640> I

00:42:34.750 --> 00:42:34.760 align:start position:0%
just clean I like the word just but I
 

00:42:34.760 --> 00:42:36.549 align:start position:0%
just clean I like the word just but I
think<00:42:34.960> it<00:42:35.240> comes<00:42:35.480> into<00:42:35.880> I<00:42:35.960> think<00:42:36.079> it<00:42:36.200> adds<00:42:36.400> a

00:42:36.549 --> 00:42:36.559 align:start position:0%
think it comes into I think it adds a
 

00:42:36.559 --> 00:42:39.990 align:start position:0%
think it comes into I think it adds a
different<00:42:37.559> um<00:42:38.319> issue<00:42:38.680> that<00:42:38.839> may<00:42:39.000> not<00:42:39.280> be<00:42:39.680> clear

00:42:39.990 --> 00:42:40.000 align:start position:0%
different um issue that may not be clear
 

00:42:40.000 --> 00:42:40.710 align:start position:0%
different um issue that may not be clear
to

00:42:40.710 --> 00:42:40.720 align:start position:0%
to
 

00:42:40.720 --> 00:42:43.190 align:start position:0%
to
everyone<00:42:41.720> we<00:42:41.880> may<00:42:42.040> think<00:42:42.280> it's<00:42:42.480> just<00:42:42.880> I'm<00:42:43.000> not

00:42:43.190 --> 00:42:43.200 align:start position:0%
everyone we may think it's just I'm not
 

00:42:43.200 --> 00:42:44.790 align:start position:0%
everyone we may think it's just I'm not
sure<00:42:43.599> that's<00:42:43.839> a<00:42:44.000> word<00:42:44.160> that<00:42:44.280> sort<00:42:44.400> of<00:42:44.520> bothers

00:42:44.790 --> 00:42:44.800 align:start position:0%
sure that's a word that sort of bothers
 

00:42:44.800 --> 00:42:47.870 align:start position:0%
sure that's a word that sort of bothers
me<00:42:44.960> a<00:42:45.079> little<00:42:45.240> bit<00:42:45.640> the<00:42:45.880> just<00:42:46.800> enabling<00:42:47.240> a<00:42:47.520> just

00:42:47.870 --> 00:42:47.880 align:start position:0%
me a little bit the just enabling a just
 

00:42:47.880 --> 00:42:50.589 align:start position:0%
me a little bit the just enabling a just
clean<00:42:48.240> and<00:42:48.440> energy<00:42:48.880> the<00:42:49.040> just<00:42:50.000> um<00:42:50.200> sticks<00:42:50.440> out

00:42:50.589 --> 00:42:50.599 align:start position:0%
clean and energy the just um sticks out
 

00:42:50.599 --> 00:42:53.150 align:start position:0%
clean and energy the just um sticks out
to<00:42:50.760> me<00:42:50.960> but<00:42:51.119> that<00:42:51.240> may<00:42:51.359> be<00:42:51.480> a<00:42:51.640> very<00:42:52.079> very<00:42:52.480> mute

00:42:53.150 --> 00:42:53.160 align:start position:0%
to me but that may be a very very mute
 

00:42:53.160 --> 00:42:57.349 align:start position:0%
to me but that may be a very very mute
very<00:42:53.359> small<00:42:53.720> and<00:42:54.160> insignificant<00:42:55.160> point

00:42:57.349 --> 00:42:57.359 align:start position:0%
very small and insignificant point
 

00:42:57.359 --> 00:43:01.230 align:start position:0%
very small and insignificant point
I<00:42:57.720> I<00:42:57.880> so<00:42:58.240> I<00:42:58.400> put<00:42:58.680> that<00:42:58.880> in<00:42:59.520> as<00:43:00.119> I<00:43:00.200> mean<00:43:00.640> a<00:43:00.920> Just

00:43:01.230 --> 00:43:01.240 align:start position:0%
I I so I put that in as I mean a Just
 

00:43:01.240 --> 00:43:04.710 align:start position:0%
I I so I put that in as I mean a Just
Energy<00:43:01.760> transition<00:43:02.760> in<00:43:02.920> a<00:43:03.599> energy<00:43:04.119> Justice<00:43:04.680> I

00:43:04.710 --> 00:43:04.720 align:start position:0%
Energy transition in a energy Justice I
 

00:43:04.720 --> 00:43:07.549 align:start position:0%
Energy transition in a energy Justice I
mean<00:43:05.160> means<00:43:05.559> to<00:43:05.720> me<00:43:06.079> that<00:43:06.960> historically

00:43:07.549 --> 00:43:07.559 align:start position:0%
mean means to me that historically
 

00:43:07.559 --> 00:43:09.870 align:start position:0%
mean means to me that historically
disadvantaged<00:43:08.440> communities<00:43:09.200> get<00:43:09.359> to<00:43:09.599> come

00:43:09.870 --> 00:43:09.880 align:start position:0%
disadvantaged communities get to come
 

00:43:09.880 --> 00:43:12.950 align:start position:0%
disadvantaged communities get to come
along<00:43:10.440> in<00:43:10.640> this<00:43:10.880> transition<00:43:11.720> and<00:43:12.160> benefit<00:43:12.839> in

00:43:12.950 --> 00:43:12.960 align:start position:0%
along in this transition and benefit in
 

00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:14.950 align:start position:0%
along in this transition and benefit in
a<00:43:13.160> way<00:43:13.480> that

00:43:14.950 --> 00:43:14.960 align:start position:0%
a way that
 

00:43:14.960 --> 00:43:17.950 align:start position:0%
a way that
traditionally<00:43:15.960> you<00:43:16.119> know<00:43:16.960> we're<00:43:17.359> actually

00:43:17.950 --> 00:43:17.960 align:start position:0%
traditionally you know we're actually
 

00:43:17.960 --> 00:43:20.589 align:start position:0%
traditionally you know we're actually
receiving<00:43:18.400> the<00:43:18.800> E<00:43:19.079> you<00:43:19.200> know<00:43:19.599> externalities

00:43:20.589 --> 00:43:20.599 align:start position:0%
receiving the E you know externalities
 

00:43:20.599 --> 00:43:23.430 align:start position:0%
receiving the E you know externalities
that<00:43:20.839> hurt<00:43:21.240> those<00:43:21.640> communities<00:43:22.640> meaning

00:43:23.430 --> 00:43:23.440 align:start position:0%
that hurt those communities meaning
 

00:43:23.440 --> 00:43:25.790 align:start position:0%
that hurt those communities meaning
they're<00:43:23.680> the<00:43:23.839> communities<00:43:24.400> that<00:43:24.839> CO<00:43:25.240> as<00:43:25.599> is

00:43:25.790 --> 00:43:25.800 align:start position:0%
they're the communities that CO as is
 

00:43:25.800 --> 00:43:27.910 align:start position:0%
they're the communities that CO as is
being<00:43:26.400> like<00:43:26.720> piped<00:43:27.119> into<00:43:27.520> and<00:43:27.640> they're<00:43:27.800> the

00:43:27.910 --> 00:43:27.920 align:start position:0%
being like piped into and they're the
 

00:43:27.920 --> 00:43:29.950 align:start position:0%
being like piped into and they're the
communities<00:43:28.359> that<00:43:28.440> are<00:43:28.599> being<00:43:28.839> hurt<00:43:29.400> by<00:43:29.720> the

00:43:29.950 --> 00:43:29.960 align:start position:0%
communities that are being hurt by the
 

00:43:29.960 --> 00:43:33.589 align:start position:0%
communities that are being hurt by the
emissions<00:43:30.640> from<00:43:31.640> um<00:43:32.520> uh<00:43:32.720> combusting<00:43:33.280> fossil

00:43:33.589 --> 00:43:33.599 align:start position:0%
emissions from um uh combusting fossil
 

00:43:33.599 --> 00:43:36.630 align:start position:0%
emissions from um uh combusting fossil
fuels<00:43:34.119> whereas<00:43:34.559> a<00:43:34.800> Just<00:43:35.040> Energy<00:43:35.640> transition

00:43:36.630 --> 00:43:36.640 align:start position:0%
fuels whereas a Just Energy transition
 

00:43:36.640 --> 00:43:39.109 align:start position:0%
fuels whereas a Just Energy transition
it<00:43:36.880> is<00:43:37.040> using<00:43:37.760> solar<00:43:38.200> it's<00:43:38.359> using<00:43:38.680> storage

00:43:39.109 --> 00:43:39.119 align:start position:0%
it is using solar it's using storage
 

00:43:39.119 --> 00:43:40.910 align:start position:0%
it is using solar it's using storage
it's<00:43:39.280> using<00:43:39.599> wind<00:43:40.079> there's<00:43:40.480> there's<00:43:40.680> no

00:43:40.910 --> 00:43:40.920 align:start position:0%
it's using wind there's there's no
 

00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:45.589 align:start position:0%
it's using wind there's there's no
emissions<00:43:41.920> that<00:43:42.720> that's<00:43:43.040> the<00:43:43.839> idea<00:43:44.160> behind<00:43:44.599> it

00:43:45.589 --> 00:43:45.599 align:start position:0%
emissions that that's the idea behind it
 

00:43:45.599 --> 00:43:48.069 align:start position:0%
emissions that that's the idea behind it
well<00:43:46.200> the<00:43:46.280> whole<00:43:46.480> purpose<00:43:47.079> solar<00:43:47.559> solar<00:43:47.880> for

00:43:48.069 --> 00:43:48.079 align:start position:0%
well the whole purpose solar solar for
 

00:43:48.079 --> 00:43:49.309 align:start position:0%
well the whole purpose solar solar for
all

00:43:49.309 --> 00:43:49.319 align:start position:0%
all
 

00:43:49.319 --> 00:43:51.430 align:start position:0%
all
initiative<00:43:50.319> okay<00:43:50.480> well<00:43:50.640> I<00:43:50.760> like<00:43:50.960> the<00:43:51.119> word<00:43:51.359> I

00:43:51.430 --> 00:43:51.440 align:start position:0%
initiative okay well I like the word I
 

00:43:51.440 --> 00:43:52.990 align:start position:0%
initiative okay well I like the word I
just<00:43:51.559> thought<00:43:51.720> it<00:43:51.920> might<00:43:52.400> cause<00:43:52.680> somebody

00:43:52.990 --> 00:43:53.000 align:start position:0%
just thought it might cause somebody
 

00:43:53.000 --> 00:43:54.670 align:start position:0%
just thought it might cause somebody
else<00:43:53.200> to<00:43:53.359> have<00:43:53.480> some<00:43:53.720> angst<00:43:54.160> about<00:43:54.400> this<00:43:54.559> that

00:43:54.670 --> 00:43:54.680 align:start position:0%
else to have some angst about this that
 

00:43:54.680 --> 00:43:56.470 align:start position:0%
else to have some angst about this that
was<00:43:54.839> my<00:43:55.040> comment<00:43:55.400> I<00:43:55.559> I<00:43:55.640> do<00:43:55.800> like<00:43:56.079> the<00:43:56.200> word

00:43:56.470 --> 00:43:56.480 align:start position:0%
was my comment I I do like the word
 

00:43:56.480 --> 00:43:58.109 align:start position:0%
was my comment I I do like the word
there<00:43:56.640> but<00:43:56.760> I<00:43:56.880> just<00:43:57.000> thought<00:43:57.200> it<00:43:57.359> might<00:43:57.920> be

00:43:58.109 --> 00:43:58.119 align:start position:0%
there but I just thought it might be
 

00:43:58.119 --> 00:43:59.470 align:start position:0%
there but I just thought it might be
viewed<00:43:58.440> differently<00:43:58.800> by<00:43:58.960> other<00:43:59.160> people

00:43:59.470 --> 00:43:59.480 align:start position:0%
viewed differently by other people
 

00:43:59.480 --> 00:44:02.030 align:start position:0%
viewed differently by other people
reading

00:44:02.030 --> 00:44:02.040 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:44:02.040 --> 00:44:04.470 align:start position:0%
 
this<00:44:03.040> but<00:44:03.200> I<00:44:03.559> understand<00:44:03.920> and<00:44:04.079> thank<00:44:04.200> you<00:44:04.319> for

00:44:04.470 --> 00:44:04.480 align:start position:0%
this but I understand and thank you for
 

00:44:04.480 --> 00:44:06.390 align:start position:0%
this but I understand and thank you for
those<00:44:04.760> comment<00:44:05.160> thank

00:44:06.390 --> 00:44:06.400 align:start position:0%
those comment thank
 

00:44:06.400 --> 00:44:08.630 align:start position:0%
those comment thank
you<00:44:07.400> I<00:44:07.520> would<00:44:07.800> say<00:44:08.040> that<00:44:08.240> from<00:44:08.359> a<00:44:08.440> word

00:44:08.630 --> 00:44:08.640 align:start position:0%
you I would say that from a word
 

00:44:08.640 --> 00:44:10.230 align:start position:0%
you I would say that from a word
smithing<00:44:09.079> standpoint<00:44:09.760> that<00:44:09.960> where<00:44:10.119> the

00:44:10.230 --> 00:44:10.240 align:start position:0%
smithing standpoint that where the
 

00:44:10.240 --> 00:44:12.470 align:start position:0%
smithing standpoint that where the
authority<00:44:10.640> recommends<00:44:11.040> the<00:44:11.160> filing<00:44:11.559> of<00:44:11.680> for

00:44:12.470 --> 00:44:12.480 align:start position:0%
authority recommends the filing of for
 

00:44:12.480 --> 00:44:15.270 align:start position:0%
authority recommends the filing of for
unblocking<00:44:13.480> I<00:44:13.599> would<00:44:13.800> reword<00:44:14.640> that<00:44:14.960> from<00:44:15.119> a

00:44:15.270 --> 00:44:15.280 align:start position:0%
unblocking I would reword that from a
 

00:44:15.280 --> 00:44:17.950 align:start position:0%
unblocking I would reword that from a
wordsmithing<00:44:16.040> standpoint<00:44:16.559> to<00:44:16.800> say<00:44:17.559> um<00:44:17.800> The

00:44:17.950 --> 00:44:17.960 align:start position:0%
wordsmithing standpoint to say um The
 

00:44:17.960 --> 00:44:20.109 align:start position:0%
wordsmithing standpoint to say um The
Authority

00:44:20.109 --> 00:44:20.119 align:start position:0%
Authority
 

00:44:20.119 --> 00:44:22.150 align:start position:0%
Authority
recommends

00:44:22.150 --> 00:44:22.160 align:start position:0%
recommends
 

00:44:22.160 --> 00:44:27.750 align:start position:0%
recommends
addressing<00:44:23.400> concerns<00:44:24.400> associated<00:44:25.280> with

00:44:27.750 --> 00:44:27.760 align:start position:0%
addressing concerns associated with
 

00:44:27.760 --> 00:44:29.589 align:start position:0%
addressing concerns associated with
solar<00:44:28.160> and<00:44:28.319> energy<00:44:28.640> storage<00:44:29.160> at<00:44:29.359> the

00:44:29.589 --> 00:44:29.599 align:start position:0%
solar and energy storage at the
 

00:44:29.599 --> 00:44:33.190 align:start position:0%
solar and energy storage at the
distribution

00:44:33.190 --> 00:44:33.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:44:33.200 --> 00:44:36.790 align:start position:0%
 
level<00:44:34.200> and<00:44:35.079> in<00:44:35.240> doing<00:44:35.720> this<00:44:35.839> is<00:44:36.040> the<00:44:36.160> one<00:44:36.359> below

00:44:36.790 --> 00:44:36.800 align:start position:0%
level and in doing this is the one below
 

00:44:36.800 --> 00:44:39.109 align:start position:0%
level and in doing this is the one below
that<00:44:37.319> um<00:44:37.640> and<00:44:37.960> and<00:44:38.160> that<00:44:38.440> if<00:44:38.720> that<00:44:38.839> is<00:44:38.960> a

00:44:39.109 --> 00:44:39.119 align:start position:0%
that um and and that if that is a
 

00:44:39.119 --> 00:44:41.109 align:start position:0%
that um and and that if that is a
recommendation<00:44:39.640> that<00:44:39.760> is<00:44:39.880> to<00:44:40.040> be<00:44:40.200> made<00:44:41.000> that

00:44:41.109 --> 00:44:41.119 align:start position:0%
recommendation that is to be made that
 

00:44:41.119 --> 00:44:42.670 align:start position:0%
recommendation that is to be made that
it<00:44:41.240> needs<00:44:41.440> to<00:44:41.559> be<00:44:41.680> done<00:44:41.839> in<00:44:42.040> such<00:44:42.200> a<00:44:42.319> way<00:44:42.520> that

00:44:42.670 --> 00:44:42.680 align:start position:0%
it needs to be done in such a way that
 

00:44:42.680 --> 00:44:43.510 align:start position:0%
it needs to be done in such a way that
does

00:44:43.510 --> 00:44:43.520 align:start position:0%
does
 

00:44:43.520 --> 00:44:46.870 align:start position:0%
does
not<00:44:44.520> that<00:44:44.720> also<00:44:45.000> bears<00:44:45.319> in<00:44:45.480> mind

00:44:46.870 --> 00:44:46.880 align:start position:0%
not that also bears in mind
 

00:44:46.880 --> 00:44:48.710 align:start position:0%
not that also bears in mind
reliability<00:44:47.880> affordability<00:44:48.559> to

00:44:48.710 --> 00:44:48.720 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability to
 

00:44:48.720 --> 00:44:54.950 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability to
non-participating<00:44:49.599> customers<00:44:50.839> and

00:44:54.950 --> 00:44:54.960 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:44:54.960 --> 00:44:56.750 align:start position:0%
 
safety

00:44:56.750 --> 00:44:56.760 align:start position:0%
safety
 

00:44:56.760 --> 00:44:59.069 align:start position:0%
safety
can<00:44:56.920> I<00:44:57.240> can<00:44:57.400> I<00:44:57.720> build<00:44:58.040> on<00:44:58.319> that<00:44:58.520> and<00:44:58.680> make<00:44:58.880> the

00:44:59.069 --> 00:44:59.079 align:start position:0%
can I can I build on that and make the
 

00:44:59.079 --> 00:45:00.990 align:start position:0%
can I can I build on that and make the
recommendation<00:44:59.960> that<00:45:00.160> we<00:45:00.319> could<00:45:00.559> replace

00:45:00.990 --> 00:45:01.000 align:start position:0%
recommendation that we could replace
 

00:45:01.000 --> 00:45:03.910 align:start position:0%
recommendation that we could replace
unblocking<00:45:01.839> with<00:45:02.079> promoting<00:45:03.000> since<00:45:03.520> that's

00:45:03.910 --> 00:45:03.920 align:start position:0%
unblocking with promoting since that's
 

00:45:03.920 --> 00:45:08.230 align:start position:0%
unblocking with promoting since that's
in<00:45:04.040> our<00:45:04.440> authorities

00:45:08.230 --> 00:45:08.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:45:08.240 --> 00:45:11.390 align:start position:0%
 
mandate<00:45:09.240> would<00:45:09.520> that<00:45:09.760> be

00:45:11.390 --> 00:45:11.400 align:start position:0%
mandate would that be
 

00:45:11.400 --> 00:45:13.630 align:start position:0%
mandate would that be
makesense<00:45:12.400> sure<00:45:12.839> I<00:45:12.920> think<00:45:13.119> that<00:45:13.280> makes<00:45:13.559> I

00:45:13.630 --> 00:45:13.640 align:start position:0%
makesense sure I think that makes I
 

00:45:13.640 --> 00:45:15.710 align:start position:0%
makesense sure I think that makes I
think<00:45:13.800> that<00:45:14.000> does<00:45:14.680> I<00:45:14.760> think<00:45:14.920> that<00:45:15.079> makes<00:45:15.359> sense

00:45:15.710 --> 00:45:15.720 align:start position:0%
think that does I think that makes sense
 

00:45:15.720 --> 00:45:16.589 align:start position:0%
think that does I think that makes sense
I

00:45:16.589 --> 00:45:16.599 align:start position:0%
I
 

00:45:16.599 --> 00:45:19.150 align:start position:0%
I
think<00:45:17.599> the<00:45:17.760> authority

00:45:19.150 --> 00:45:19.160 align:start position:0%
think the authority
 

00:45:19.160 --> 00:45:21.589 align:start position:0%
think the authority
recommends<00:45:20.160> promoting<00:45:20.559> the<00:45:20.720> development<00:45:21.319> of

00:45:21.589 --> 00:45:21.599 align:start position:0%
recommends promoting the development of
 

00:45:21.599 --> 00:45:23.349 align:start position:0%
recommends promoting the development of
at<00:45:21.720> the<00:45:21.839> distribution<00:45:22.440> level<00:45:22.839> provided<00:45:23.240> it

00:45:23.349 --> 00:45:23.359 align:start position:0%
at the distribution level provided it
 

00:45:23.359 --> 00:45:26.470 align:start position:0%
at the distribution level provided it
can<00:45:23.480> be<00:45:23.599> done<00:45:23.760> in<00:45:23.920> such<00:45:24.079> a<00:45:24.520> manner<00:45:25.520> or<00:45:26.119> in<00:45:26.319> such

00:45:26.470 --> 00:45:26.480 align:start position:0%
can be done in such a manner or in such
 

00:45:26.480 --> 00:45:29.829 align:start position:0%
can be done in such a manner or in such
a

00:45:29.829 --> 00:45:29.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:45:29.839 --> 00:45:32.309 align:start position:0%
 
manner<00:45:30.839> it<00:45:31.000> does<00:45:31.160> not<00:45:31.440> compromise<00:45:31.960> safety

00:45:32.309 --> 00:45:32.319 align:start position:0%
manner it does not compromise safety
 

00:45:32.319 --> 00:45:35.270 align:start position:0%
manner it does not compromise safety
affordability<00:45:32.920> and

00:45:35.270 --> 00:45:35.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:45:35.280 --> 00:45:38.270 align:start position:0%
 
reli<00:45:36.280> yeah<00:45:36.680> I<00:45:36.760> don't<00:45:37.079> have<00:45:37.240> any<00:45:37.520> objection<00:45:37.920> to

00:45:38.270 --> 00:45:38.280 align:start position:0%
reli yeah I don't have any objection to
 

00:45:38.280 --> 00:45:39.990 align:start position:0%
reli yeah I don't have any objection to
safety<00:45:38.680> affordability<00:45:39.200> and<00:45:39.319> reliability

00:45:39.990 --> 00:45:40.000 align:start position:0%
safety affordability and reliability
 

00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:43.030 align:start position:0%
safety affordability and reliability
being<00:45:40.839> put<00:45:41.040> in<00:45:41.359> as<00:45:41.960> Concepts<00:45:42.440> I<00:45:42.520> don't<00:45:42.839> know

00:45:43.030 --> 00:45:43.040 align:start position:0%
being put in as Concepts I don't know
 

00:45:43.040 --> 00:45:45.349 align:start position:0%
being put in as Concepts I don't know
that<00:45:43.319> others<00:45:43.920> have<00:45:44.119> thoughts<00:45:44.359> on<00:45:44.599> that<00:45:44.880> but<00:45:45.319> I

00:45:45.349 --> 00:45:45.359 align:start position:0%
that others have thoughts on that but I
 

00:45:45.359 --> 00:45:46.990 align:start position:0%
that others have thoughts on that but I
mean<00:45:45.839> safety<00:45:46.240> reliability<00:45:46.720> and

00:45:46.990 --> 00:45:47.000 align:start position:0%
mean safety reliability and
 

00:45:47.000 --> 00:45:49.390 align:start position:0%
mean safety reliability and
affordability<00:45:48.000> are<00:45:48.559> I<00:45:48.640> think<00:45:48.839> within<00:45:49.079> our

00:45:49.390 --> 00:45:49.400 align:start position:0%
affordability are I think within our
 

00:45:49.400 --> 00:45:51.230 align:start position:0%
affordability are I think within our
mandate<00:45:49.920> to<00:45:50.160> have<00:45:50.280> an<00:45:50.440> opinion<00:45:50.760> on<00:45:51.000> and

00:45:51.230 --> 00:45:51.240 align:start position:0%
mandate to have an opinion on and
 

00:45:51.240 --> 00:45:53.109 align:start position:0%
mandate to have an opinion on and
certainly<00:45:51.960> something<00:45:52.280> the<00:45:52.400> governor<00:45:52.800> spent<00:45:53.040> a

00:45:53.109 --> 00:45:53.119 align:start position:0%
certainly something the governor spent a
 

00:45:53.119 --> 00:45:54.549 align:start position:0%
certainly something the governor spent a
lot<00:45:53.240> of<00:45:53.400> time<00:45:53.720> talking<00:45:54.000> about<00:45:54.200> and<00:45:54.319> members<00:45:54.520> of

00:45:54.549 --> 00:45:54.559 align:start position:0%
lot of time talking about and members of
 

00:45:54.559 --> 00:45:56.349 align:start position:0%
lot of time talking about and members of
the<00:45:54.640> general<00:45:54.920> assembly<00:45:55.880> I<00:45:55.960> don't<00:45:56.079> know<00:45:56.240> that

00:45:56.349 --> 00:45:56.359 align:start position:0%
the general assembly I don't know that
 

00:45:56.359 --> 00:45:58.589 align:start position:0%
the general assembly I don't know that
I'd<00:45:56.559> be<00:45:56.680> more<00:45:56.960> specific<00:45:57.480> than<00:45:57.680> just<00:45:57.839> saying

00:45:58.589 --> 00:45:58.599 align:start position:0%
I'd be more specific than just saying
 

00:45:58.599 --> 00:46:01.309 align:start position:0%
I'd be more specific than just saying
safety<00:45:59.000> reliability<00:45:59.520> and

00:46:01.309 --> 00:46:01.319 align:start position:0%
safety reliability and
 

00:46:01.319 --> 00:46:04.710 align:start position:0%
safety reliability and
affordability<00:46:02.319> I<00:46:02.480> think<00:46:02.960> also<00:46:03.400> do<00:46:03.599> we<00:46:04.440> put

00:46:04.710 --> 00:46:04.720 align:start position:0%
affordability I think also do we put
 

00:46:04.720 --> 00:46:06.470 align:start position:0%
affordability I think also do we put
safety<00:46:05.160> affordability<00:46:05.720> and<00:46:05.880> reliability

00:46:06.470 --> 00:46:06.480 align:start position:0%
safety affordability and reliability
 

00:46:06.480 --> 00:46:09.829 align:start position:0%
safety affordability and reliability
into<00:46:06.720> the<00:46:06.880> lead<00:46:07.200> in<00:46:08.200> I<00:46:08.319> think<00:46:08.960> Virginia<00:46:09.559> want

00:46:09.829 --> 00:46:09.839 align:start position:0%
into the lead in I think Virginia want
 

00:46:09.839 --> 00:46:11.710 align:start position:0%
into the lead in I think Virginia want
reliable<00:46:10.440> safe<00:46:10.800> affordable<00:46:11.280> and<00:46:11.440> clean

00:46:11.710 --> 00:46:11.720 align:start position:0%
reliable safe affordable and clean
 

00:46:11.720 --> 00:46:13.549 align:start position:0%
reliable safe affordable and clean
energy<00:46:12.160> and<00:46:12.359> the<00:46:12.480> first<00:46:12.760> sentence<00:46:13.240> of<00:46:13.400> the

00:46:13.549 --> 00:46:13.559 align:start position:0%
energy and the first sentence of the
 

00:46:13.559 --> 00:46:16.069 align:start position:0%
energy and the first sentence of the
recommendations<00:46:14.400> section<00:46:15.400> maybe<00:46:15.720> that<00:46:15.960> kind

00:46:16.069 --> 00:46:16.079 align:start position:0%
recommendations section maybe that kind
 

00:46:16.079 --> 00:46:19.510 align:start position:0%
recommendations section maybe that kind
of<00:46:16.520> sets<00:46:16.880> the<00:46:17.079> tone<00:46:18.040> and<00:46:18.200> we<00:46:18.359> just<00:46:18.640> assume

00:46:19.510 --> 00:46:19.520 align:start position:0%
of sets the tone and we just assume
 

00:46:19.520 --> 00:46:23.790 align:start position:0%
of sets the tone and we just assume
everything<00:46:20.640> below<00:46:21.640> us<00:46:22.200> is<00:46:23.200> having<00:46:23.520> the

00:46:23.790 --> 00:46:23.800 align:start position:0%
everything below us is having the
 

00:46:23.800 --> 00:46:28.309 align:start position:0%
everything below us is having the
Baseline<00:46:24.760> of<00:46:25.280> reliable<00:46:26.079> safety

00:46:28.309 --> 00:46:28.319 align:start position:0%
Baseline of reliable safety
 

00:46:28.319 --> 00:46:30.510 align:start position:0%
Baseline of reliable safety
affordable<00:46:29.319> be<00:46:29.440> an<00:46:29.520> easier<00:46:29.800> way<00:46:29.920> to<00:46:30.040> do<00:46:30.119> it<00:46:30.280> I

00:46:30.510 --> 00:46:30.520 align:start position:0%
affordable be an easier way to do it I
 

00:46:30.520 --> 00:46:32.349 align:start position:0%
affordable be an easier way to do it I
like<00:46:30.760> I<00:46:30.880> like<00:46:31.040> your<00:46:31.280> word<00:46:31.880> actually<00:46:32.119> and<00:46:32.200> I

00:46:32.349 --> 00:46:32.359 align:start position:0%
like I like your word actually and I
 

00:46:32.359 --> 00:46:35.230 align:start position:0%
like I like your word actually and I
like<00:46:32.559> your<00:46:32.839> word<00:46:33.680> the<00:46:34.160> at<00:46:34.400> this<00:46:34.800> this<00:46:35.000> very

00:46:35.230 --> 00:46:35.240 align:start position:0%
like your word the at this this very
 

00:46:35.240 --> 00:46:36.069 align:start position:0%
like your word the at this this very
first

00:46:36.069 --> 00:46:36.079 align:start position:0%
first
 

00:46:36.079 --> 00:46:37.750 align:start position:0%
first
bullet

00:46:37.750 --> 00:46:37.760 align:start position:0%
bullet
 

00:46:37.760 --> 00:46:41.109 align:start position:0%
bullet
um<00:46:38.760> you<00:46:38.920> said<00:46:39.319> promoting<00:46:40.119> right<00:46:40.359> so<00:46:40.680> again<00:46:41.000> I

00:46:41.109 --> 00:46:41.119 align:start position:0%
um you said promoting right so again I
 

00:46:41.119 --> 00:46:42.870 align:start position:0%
um you said promoting right so again I
think<00:46:41.319> it's<00:46:41.480> some<00:46:41.599> of<00:46:41.760> the<00:46:41.920> words<00:46:42.319> using<00:46:42.720> like

00:46:42.870 --> 00:46:42.880 align:start position:0%
think it's some of the words using like
 

00:46:42.880 --> 00:46:45.910 align:start position:0%
think it's some of the words using like
using<00:46:43.119> words<00:46:43.359> like<00:46:43.680> unblocking<00:46:44.920> that's

00:46:45.910 --> 00:46:45.920 align:start position:0%
using words like unblocking that's
 

00:46:45.920 --> 00:46:47.710 align:start position:0%
using words like unblocking that's
that's<00:46:46.079> for<00:46:46.240> sort<00:46:46.359> of<00:46:46.480> reaching<00:46:46.760> a<00:46:47.000> conclusion

00:46:47.710 --> 00:46:47.720 align:start position:0%
that's for sort of reaching a conclusion
 

00:46:47.720 --> 00:46:49.349 align:start position:0%
that's for sort of reaching a conclusion
that<00:46:47.880> some<00:46:48.119> might<00:46:48.280> not<00:46:48.520> necessarily<00:46:49.040> agree

00:46:49.349 --> 00:46:49.359 align:start position:0%
that some might not necessarily agree
 

00:46:49.359 --> 00:46:51.790 align:start position:0%
that some might not necessarily agree
with<00:46:49.520> all<00:46:49.680> things<00:46:50.040> below<00:46:50.359> it<00:46:50.760> are

00:46:51.790 --> 00:46:51.800 align:start position:0%
with all things below it are
 

00:46:51.800 --> 00:46:54.990 align:start position:0%
with all things below it are
actually<00:46:52.800> I'm<00:46:52.880> not<00:46:53.040> saying<00:46:53.440> whether<00:46:54.440> I<00:46:54.599> do<00:46:54.839> or

00:46:54.990 --> 00:46:55.000 align:start position:0%
actually I'm not saying whether I do or
 

00:46:55.000 --> 00:46:57.870 align:start position:0%
actually I'm not saying whether I do or
we<00:46:55.200> do<00:46:55.599> but<00:46:55.920> but<00:46:56.920> if<00:46:57.040> we<00:46:57.119> were<00:46:57.319> to<00:46:57.480> say

00:46:57.870 --> 00:46:57.880 align:start position:0%
we do but but if we were to say
 

00:46:57.880 --> 00:46:59.670 align:start position:0%
we do but but if we were to say
something<00:46:58.359> to<00:46:58.559> your<00:46:58.800> point<00:46:59.040> that<00:46:59.160> is<00:46:59.319> aligned

00:46:59.670 --> 00:46:59.680 align:start position:0%
something to your point that is aligned
 

00:46:59.680 --> 00:47:01.190 align:start position:0%
something to your point that is aligned
with<00:46:59.880> the

00:47:01.190 --> 00:47:01.200 align:start position:0%
with the
 

00:47:01.200 --> 00:47:04.510 align:start position:0%
with the
authorities<00:47:02.200> um<00:47:03.119> governing<00:47:03.640> documents<00:47:04.400> that

00:47:04.510 --> 00:47:04.520 align:start position:0%
authorities um governing documents that
 

00:47:04.520 --> 00:47:06.549 align:start position:0%
authorities um governing documents that
the<00:47:04.640> authority<00:47:05.079> recommends<00:47:05.880> promoting<00:47:06.400> the

00:47:06.549 --> 00:47:06.559 align:start position:0%
the authority recommends promoting the
 

00:47:06.559 --> 00:47:08.390 align:start position:0%
the authority recommends promoting the
development

00:47:08.390 --> 00:47:08.400 align:start position:0%
development
 

00:47:08.400 --> 00:47:09.950 align:start position:0%
development
of

00:47:09.950 --> 00:47:09.960 align:start position:0%
of
 

00:47:09.960 --> 00:47:13.390 align:start position:0%
of
um<00:47:10.960> solar<00:47:11.319> and<00:47:11.440> energy

00:47:13.390 --> 00:47:13.400 align:start position:0%
um solar and energy
 

00:47:13.400 --> 00:47:16.349 align:start position:0%
um solar and energy
storage<00:47:14.400> while<00:47:14.640> maintaining<00:47:15.119> a<00:47:15.319> focus<00:47:15.760> on

00:47:16.349 --> 00:47:16.359 align:start position:0%
storage while maintaining a focus on
 

00:47:16.359 --> 00:47:18.470 align:start position:0%
storage while maintaining a focus on
reliability<00:47:17.079> affordability<00:47:17.760> and<00:47:17.960> safety<00:47:18.319> of

00:47:18.470 --> 00:47:18.480 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability and safety of
 

00:47:18.480 --> 00:47:21.069 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability and safety of
the<00:47:18.599> electric<00:47:19.240> grid<00:47:20.240> and<00:47:20.359> then<00:47:20.680> every

00:47:21.069 --> 00:47:21.079 align:start position:0%
the electric grid and then every
 

00:47:21.079 --> 00:47:24.710 align:start position:0%
the electric grid and then every
recommendation<00:47:21.800> Falls<00:47:22.160> underneath<00:47:22.559> of

00:47:24.710 --> 00:47:24.720 align:start position:0%
recommendation Falls underneath of
 

00:47:24.720 --> 00:47:27.430 align:start position:0%
recommendation Falls underneath of
that

00:47:27.430 --> 00:47:27.440 align:start position:0%
that
 

00:47:27.440 --> 00:47:33.109 align:start position:0%
that
I<00:47:27.559> think<00:47:27.720> it's<00:47:27.960> promoting<00:47:28.760> the<00:47:29.119> development

00:47:33.109 --> 00:47:33.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:47:33.119 --> 00:47:35.309 align:start position:0%
 
of<00:47:34.119> yeah<00:47:34.240> and<00:47:34.319> I<00:47:34.440> think<00:47:34.599> Ken<00:47:34.839> was<00:47:35.000> sort<00:47:35.119> of

00:47:35.309 --> 00:47:35.319 align:start position:0%
of yeah and I think Ken was sort of
 

00:47:35.319 --> 00:47:36.790 align:start position:0%
of yeah and I think Ken was sort of
putting<00:47:35.559> his<00:47:35.760> cursor<00:47:36.160> above<00:47:36.359> the<00:47:36.480> language

00:47:36.790 --> 00:47:36.800 align:start position:0%
putting his cursor above the language
 

00:47:36.800 --> 00:47:37.829 align:start position:0%
putting his cursor above the language
it's<00:47:36.960> already<00:47:37.200> in<00:47:37.400> there<00:47:37.599> that<00:47:37.720> the

00:47:37.829 --> 00:47:37.839 align:start position:0%
it's already in there that the
 

00:47:37.839 --> 00:47:39.150 align:start position:0%
it's already in there that the
recommendations<00:47:38.400> have<00:47:38.520> a<00:47:38.599> lead<00:47:38.800> in<00:47:38.960> there

00:47:39.150 --> 00:47:39.160 align:start position:0%
recommendations have a lead in there
 

00:47:39.160 --> 00:47:40.829 align:start position:0%
recommendations have a lead in there
with<00:47:39.319> reliable<00:47:39.760> safe<00:47:39.960> and<00:47:40.119> affordable<00:47:40.520> clean

00:47:40.829 --> 00:47:40.839 align:start position:0%
with reliable safe and affordable clean
 

00:47:40.839 --> 00:47:43.430 align:start position:0%
with reliable safe and affordable clean
and<00:47:40.960> clean<00:47:41.280> energy<00:47:42.280> so<00:47:42.520> I<00:47:42.880> sort<00:47:43.040> of<00:47:43.119> think<00:47:43.319> that

00:47:43.430 --> 00:47:43.440 align:start position:0%
and clean energy so I sort of think that
 

00:47:43.440 --> 00:47:48.910 align:start position:0%
and clean energy so I sort of think that
sort<00:47:43.599> of<00:47:43.760> captures<00:47:44.160> all<00:47:44.400> of

00:47:48.910 --> 00:47:48.920 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:47:48.920 --> 00:47:53.030 align:start position:0%
 
it<00:47:49.920> yeah<00:47:50.200> I<00:47:50.280> think<00:47:50.440> it<00:47:51.359> in<00:47:51.440> a<00:47:51.640> way<00:47:52.040> that<00:47:52.240> is<00:47:52.720> but

00:47:53.030 --> 00:47:53.040 align:start position:0%
it yeah I think it in a way that is but
 

00:47:53.040 --> 00:47:56.109 align:start position:0%
it yeah I think it in a way that is but
it's<00:47:53.760> it<00:47:54.000> implies<00:47:54.599> that<00:47:54.800> they<00:47:54.960> are<00:47:55.800> in

00:47:56.109 --> 00:47:56.119 align:start position:0%
it's it implies that they are in
 

00:47:56.119 --> 00:47:58.190 align:start position:0%
it's it implies that they are in
conflict<00:47:56.559> with<00:47:56.720> each<00:47:56.839> other<00:47:57.280> and<00:47:57.480> not<00:47:57.960> the

00:47:58.190 --> 00:47:58.200 align:start position:0%
conflict with each other and not the
 

00:47:58.200 --> 00:48:00.870 align:start position:0%
conflict with each other and not the
focus<00:47:58.960> a<00:47:59.200> a<00:47:59.440> a<00:47:59.599> primary<00:48:00.040> focus<00:48:00.480> of<00:48:00.720> the

00:48:00.870 --> 00:48:00.880 align:start position:0%
focus a a a primary focus of the
 

00:48:00.880 --> 00:48:02.549 align:start position:0%
focus a a a primary focus of the
recommendations<00:48:01.680> the<00:48:01.800> recommendations<00:48:02.319> are

00:48:02.549 --> 00:48:02.559 align:start position:0%
recommendations the recommendations are
 

00:48:02.559 --> 00:48:05.670 align:start position:0%
recommendations the recommendations are
premised<00:48:03.359> upon<00:48:04.359> promoting<00:48:04.760> the<00:48:04.880> development

00:48:05.670 --> 00:48:05.680 align:start position:0%
premised upon promoting the development
 

00:48:05.680 --> 00:48:08.069 align:start position:0%
premised upon promoting the development
of<00:48:06.680> while

00:48:08.069 --> 00:48:08.079 align:start position:0%
of while
 

00:48:08.079 --> 00:48:10.710 align:start position:0%
of while
maintaining<00:48:09.079> reliable<00:48:09.640> safe<00:48:09.880> and

00:48:10.710 --> 00:48:10.720 align:start position:0%
maintaining reliable safe and
 

00:48:10.720 --> 00:48:14.790 align:start position:0%
maintaining reliable safe and
affordable

00:48:14.790 --> 00:48:14.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:48:14.800 --> 00:48:19.870 align:start position:0%
 
Energy<00:48:15.800> may<00:48:16.359> maybe<00:48:17.000> the<00:48:17.839> maybe<00:48:18.280> we<00:48:19.040> modify<00:48:19.559> the

00:48:19.870 --> 00:48:19.880 align:start position:0%
Energy may maybe the maybe we modify the
 

00:48:19.880 --> 00:48:22.230 align:start position:0%
Energy may maybe the maybe we modify the
second<00:48:20.319> sentence<00:48:20.960> in<00:48:21.079> the<00:48:21.319> recommendation<00:48:22.119> in

00:48:22.230 --> 00:48:22.240 align:start position:0%
second sentence in the recommendation in
 

00:48:22.240 --> 00:48:27.230 align:start position:0%
second sentence in the recommendation in
the<00:48:22.720> leadin<00:48:23.720> where<00:48:24.160> we<00:48:24.400> say<00:48:25.079> the<00:48:25.240> author

00:48:27.230 --> 00:48:27.240 align:start position:0%
the leadin where we say the author
 

00:48:27.240 --> 00:48:29.109 align:start position:0%
the leadin where we say the author
um<00:48:28.000> you

00:48:29.109 --> 00:48:29.119 align:start position:0%
um you
 

00:48:29.119 --> 00:48:33.349 align:start position:0%
um you
know<00:48:30.200> thus<00:48:31.200> uh<00:48:31.559> you<00:48:31.680> know<00:48:32.160> given<00:48:32.520> the<00:48:32.760> mandate

00:48:33.349 --> 00:48:33.359 align:start position:0%
know thus uh you know given the mandate
 

00:48:33.359 --> 00:48:36.750 align:start position:0%
know thus uh you know given the mandate
to<00:48:33.760> promote<00:48:34.119> the<00:48:34.240> development<00:48:35.079> of<00:48:35.760> solar

00:48:36.750 --> 00:48:36.760 align:start position:0%
to promote the development of solar
 

00:48:36.760 --> 00:48:39.390 align:start position:0%
to promote the development of solar
energy<00:48:37.319> and<00:48:37.559> energy<00:48:37.880> storage<00:48:38.280> in

00:48:39.390 --> 00:48:39.400 align:start position:0%
energy and energy storage in
 

00:48:39.400 --> 00:48:42.309 align:start position:0%
energy and energy storage in
Virginia<00:48:40.400> offer<00:48:40.920> these

00:48:42.309 --> 00:48:42.319 align:start position:0%
Virginia offer these
 

00:48:42.319 --> 00:48:44.950 align:start position:0%
Virginia offer these
recommendations<00:48:43.440> that<00:48:44.440> and<00:48:44.599> then<00:48:44.760> we

00:48:44.950 --> 00:48:44.960 align:start position:0%
recommendations that and then we
 

00:48:44.960 --> 00:48:49.150 align:start position:0%
recommendations that and then we
continue<00:48:45.760> if<00:48:46.280> enacted<00:48:47.280> We<00:48:47.520> Believe<00:48:47.920> will<00:48:48.240> help

00:48:49.150 --> 00:48:49.160 align:start position:0%
continue if enacted We Believe will help
 

00:48:49.160 --> 00:48:50.829 align:start position:0%
continue if enacted We Believe will help
Virginia

00:48:50.829 --> 00:48:50.839 align:start position:0%
Virginia
 

00:48:50.839 --> 00:48:53.390 align:start position:0%
Virginia
access<00:48:51.839> and<00:48:52.200> Ken<00:48:52.440> if<00:48:52.520> you<00:48:52.680> like<00:48:52.920> I<00:48:53.000> can<00:48:53.200> just

00:48:53.390 --> 00:48:53.400 align:start position:0%
access and Ken if you like I can just
 

00:48:53.400 --> 00:48:55.270 align:start position:0%
access and Ken if you like I can just
type<00:48:53.640> that<00:48:53.760> out<00:48:53.920> and<00:48:54.400> text<00:48:54.680> it<00:48:54.799> to<00:48:54.920> you<00:48:55.079> really

00:48:55.270 --> 00:48:55.280 align:start position:0%
type that out and text it to you really
 

00:48:55.280 --> 00:49:05.829 align:start position:0%
type that out and text it to you really
quickly

00:49:05.829 --> 00:49:05.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:49:05.839 --> 00:49:08.470 align:start position:0%
 
so<00:49:06.839> does<00:49:07.079> that<00:49:07.319> make<00:49:07.559> sense<00:49:07.799> so<00:49:07.960> we<00:49:08.079> lead<00:49:08.280> in

00:49:08.470 --> 00:49:08.480 align:start position:0%
so does that make sense so we lead in
 

00:49:08.480 --> 00:49:10.390 align:start position:0%
so does that make sense so we lead in
with<00:49:08.680> saying<00:49:08.920> Virginians<00:49:09.520> want<00:49:09.799> reliable

00:49:10.390 --> 00:49:10.400 align:start position:0%
with saying Virginians want reliable
 

00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:12.789 align:start position:0%
with saying Virginians want reliable
safe<00:49:10.760> affordable<00:49:11.280> clean<00:49:11.599> energy<00:49:12.480> but<00:49:12.640> there

00:49:12.789 --> 00:49:12.799 align:start position:0%
safe affordable clean energy but there
 

00:49:12.799 --> 00:49:16.549 align:start position:0%
safe affordable clean energy but there
are<00:49:13.160> barriers<00:49:13.960> to<00:49:14.880> development<00:49:15.559> of<00:49:15.720> solar<00:49:16.160> and

00:49:16.549 --> 00:49:16.559 align:start position:0%
are barriers to development of solar and
 

00:49:16.559 --> 00:49:19.750 align:start position:0%
are barriers to development of solar and
storage<00:49:17.559> that<00:49:17.720> we<00:49:18.240> acknowledge<00:49:19.240> and<00:49:19.400> and<00:49:19.640> part

00:49:19.750 --> 00:49:19.760 align:start position:0%
storage that we acknowledge and and part
 

00:49:19.760 --> 00:49:21.510 align:start position:0%
storage that we acknowledge and and part
of<00:49:19.920> that<00:49:20.079> acknowledgement<00:49:20.680> is<00:49:20.920> actually

00:49:21.510 --> 00:49:21.520 align:start position:0%
of that acknowledgement is actually
 

00:49:21.520 --> 00:49:24.710 align:start position:0%
of that acknowledgement is actually
creation<00:49:22.079> of<00:49:22.319> this<00:49:22.520> Authority<00:49:23.559> originally<00:49:24.559> it

00:49:24.710 --> 00:49:24.720 align:start position:0%
creation of this Authority originally it
 

00:49:24.720 --> 00:49:26.829 align:start position:0%
creation of this Authority originally it
was<00:49:24.880> for<00:49:25.119> the<00:49:25.240> pr<00:49:25.920> of<00:49:26.040> the<00:49:26.160> development<00:49:26.640> of

00:49:26.829 --> 00:49:26.839 align:start position:0%
was for the pr of the development of
 

00:49:26.839 --> 00:49:31.309 align:start position:0%
was for the pr of the development of
these<00:49:27.280> Technologies<00:49:28.280> so<00:49:28.559> now<00:49:28.760> we<00:49:29.000> say<00:49:30.319> um

00:49:31.309 --> 00:49:31.319 align:start position:0%
these Technologies so now we say um
 

00:49:31.319 --> 00:49:34.670 align:start position:0%
these Technologies so now we say um
given<00:49:31.799> that<00:49:32.040> the<00:49:32.400> Mandate<00:49:32.880> of<00:49:33.079> the<00:49:33.680> authority

00:49:34.670 --> 00:49:34.680 align:start position:0%
given that the Mandate of the authority
 

00:49:34.680 --> 00:49:38.190 align:start position:0%
given that the Mandate of the authority
is<00:49:34.839> to<00:49:35.200> promote<00:49:35.680> solar<00:49:36.119> and<00:49:36.559> storage<00:49:37.559> we<00:49:37.799> offer

00:49:38.190 --> 00:49:38.200 align:start position:0%
is to promote solar and storage we offer
 

00:49:38.200 --> 00:49:39.430 align:start position:0%
is to promote solar and storage we offer
these

00:49:39.430 --> 00:49:39.440 align:start position:0%
these
 

00:49:39.440 --> 00:49:41.789 align:start position:0%
these
recommendations<00:49:40.440> which<00:49:40.760> we<00:49:40.920> believe<00:49:41.280> if

00:49:41.789 --> 00:49:41.799 align:start position:0%
recommendations which we believe if
 

00:49:41.799 --> 00:49:44.630 align:start position:0%
recommendations which we believe if
enacted<00:49:42.799> will<00:49:43.040> help<00:49:43.280> Virginia<00:49:44.079> access

00:49:44.630 --> 00:49:44.640 align:start position:0%
enacted will help Virginia access
 

00:49:44.640 --> 00:49:46.589 align:start position:0%
enacted will help Virginia access
preferred<00:49:45.240> clean<00:49:45.559> energy<00:49:45.920> and<00:49:46.119> create<00:49:46.440> the

00:49:46.589 --> 00:49:46.599 align:start position:0%
preferred clean energy and create the
 

00:49:46.599 --> 00:49:48.549 align:start position:0%
preferred clean energy and create the
economic<00:49:47.040> and<00:49:47.200> health<00:49:47.480> benefits<00:49:48.040> associated

00:49:48.549 --> 00:49:48.559 align:start position:0%
economic and health benefits associated
 

00:49:48.559 --> 00:49:50.270 align:start position:0%
economic and health benefits associated
with<00:49:48.760> transitioning<00:49:49.240> to<00:49:49.400> the<00:49:49.559> clean<00:49:49.760> energy

00:49:50.270 --> 00:49:50.280 align:start position:0%
with transitioning to the clean energy
 

00:49:50.280 --> 00:49:54.510 align:start position:0%
with transitioning to the clean energy
economy<00:49:51.280> in<00:49:51.440> the

00:49:54.510 --> 00:49:54.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:49:54.520 --> 00:49:57.270 align:start position:0%
 
Commonwealth

00:49:57.270 --> 00:49:57.280 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth
 

00:49:57.280 --> 00:50:07.430 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth
I<00:49:57.440> like<00:49:57.640> that

00:50:07.430 --> 00:50:07.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:50:07.440 --> 00:50:10.470 align:start position:0%
 
Colleen<00:50:08.440> if<00:50:08.640> something<00:50:08.960> were<00:50:09.200> to<00:50:09.319> be<00:50:09.559> added

00:50:10.470 --> 00:50:10.480 align:start position:0%
Colleen if something were to be added
 

00:50:10.480 --> 00:50:13.710 align:start position:0%
Colleen if something were to be added
that<00:50:11.000> again<00:50:12.000> maintains<00:50:12.440> a<00:50:12.640> focus<00:50:13.000> on

00:50:13.710 --> 00:50:13.720 align:start position:0%
that again maintains a focus on
 

00:50:13.720 --> 00:50:17.430 align:start position:0%
that again maintains a focus on
reliability<00:50:14.720> affordability<00:50:15.520> and<00:50:16.280> safety<00:50:17.280> of

00:50:17.430 --> 00:50:17.440 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability and safety of
 

00:50:17.440 --> 00:50:24.430 align:start position:0%
reliability affordability and safety of
the

00:50:24.430 --> 00:50:24.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:50:24.440 --> 00:50:26.349 align:start position:0%
 
grid

00:50:26.349 --> 00:50:26.359 align:start position:0%
grid
 

00:50:26.359 --> 00:50:28.430 align:start position:0%
grid
maybe<00:50:26.720> it's<00:50:27.160> in<00:50:27.400> that<00:50:27.640> last<00:50:27.960> phrase

00:50:28.430 --> 00:50:28.440 align:start position:0%
maybe it's in that last phrase
 

00:50:28.440 --> 00:50:31.030 align:start position:0%
maybe it's in that last phrase
transitioning<00:50:29.079> to<00:50:29.280> a<00:50:29.440> clean<00:50:29.720> energy<00:50:30.200> economy

00:50:31.030 --> 00:50:31.040 align:start position:0%
transitioning to a clean energy economy
 

00:50:31.040 --> 00:50:33.069 align:start position:0%
transitioning to a clean energy economy
which<00:50:31.200> is<00:50:31.480> what<00:50:31.960> you<00:50:32.119> know<00:50:32.319> the<00:50:32.440> clean<00:50:32.720> energy

00:50:33.069 --> 00:50:33.079 align:start position:0%
which is what you know the clean energy
 

00:50:33.079 --> 00:50:37.549 align:start position:0%
which is what you know the clean energy
economy<00:50:33.599> Act<00:50:33.799> is<00:50:34.559> doing<00:50:35.559> um<00:50:36.040> while

00:50:37.549 --> 00:50:37.559 align:start position:0%
economy Act is doing um while
 

00:50:37.559 --> 00:50:45.230 align:start position:0%
economy Act is doing um while
maintaining<00:50:38.559> um<00:50:39.280> safety<00:50:40.000> affordability<00:50:40.720> and

00:50:45.230 --> 00:50:45.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:50:45.240 --> 00:50:48.630 align:start position:0%
 
reliability<00:50:46.240> I<00:50:46.319> mean<00:50:46.880> it<00:50:47.880> so<00:50:48.119> reliability

00:50:48.630 --> 00:50:48.640 align:start position:0%
reliability I mean it so reliability
 

00:50:48.640 --> 00:50:50.390 align:start position:0%
reliability I mean it so reliability
safety<00:50:48.960> affordability<00:50:49.559> are<00:50:49.760> embedded<00:50:50.200> in<00:50:50.280> the

00:50:50.390 --> 00:50:50.400 align:start position:0%
safety affordability are embedded in the
 

00:50:50.400 --> 00:50:51.910 align:start position:0%
safety affordability are embedded in the
clean<00:50:50.680> economy<00:50:51.079> act<00:50:51.280> I<00:50:51.359> don't<00:50:51.520> think<00:50:51.680> it's

00:50:51.910 --> 00:50:51.920 align:start position:0%
clean economy act I don't think it's
 

00:50:51.920 --> 00:50:53.510 align:start position:0%
clean economy act I don't think it's
meet<00:50:52.160> the<00:50:52.280> goals<00:50:52.480> of<00:50:52.599> clean<00:50:52.839> economy<00:50:53.160> act<00:50:53.359> and

00:50:53.510 --> 00:50:53.520 align:start position:0%
meet the goals of clean economy act and
 

00:50:53.520 --> 00:50:57.390 align:start position:0%
meet the goals of clean economy act and
do<00:50:53.760> these<00:50:54.319> things<00:50:55.319> um<00:50:55.559> um<00:50:56.359> it's<00:50:56.799> it<00:50:56.960> really<00:50:57.200> is

00:50:57.390 --> 00:50:57.400 align:start position:0%
do these things um um it's it really is
 

00:50:57.400 --> 00:50:59.589 align:start position:0%
do these things um um it's it really is
embedded<00:50:57.880> in<00:50:58.079> all<00:50:58.240> of<00:50:58.480> this<00:50:58.799> like<00:50:59.079> we<00:50:59.200> can<00:50:59.400> say

00:50:59.589 --> 00:50:59.599 align:start position:0%
embedded in all of this like we can say
 

00:50:59.599 --> 00:51:04.109 align:start position:0%
embedded in all of this like we can say
the<00:50:59.760> words<00:51:00.040> over<00:51:00.240> and<00:51:00.359> over<00:51:01.079> again<00:51:02.079> um<00:51:03.040> but<00:51:03.760> any

00:51:04.109 --> 00:51:04.119 align:start position:0%
the words over and over again um but any
 

00:51:04.119 --> 00:51:06.069 align:start position:0%
the words over and over again um but any
recommendation<00:51:05.000> ought<00:51:05.240> to<00:51:05.359> be<00:51:05.520> taken<00:51:05.799> into

00:51:06.069 --> 00:51:06.079 align:start position:0%
recommendation ought to be taken into
 

00:51:06.079 --> 00:51:07.750 align:start position:0%
recommendation ought to be taken into
account<00:51:06.319> the<00:51:06.440> advancement<00:51:06.839> of<00:51:06.960> clean<00:51:07.240> energy

00:51:07.750 --> 00:51:07.760 align:start position:0%
account the advancement of clean energy
 

00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:11.950 align:start position:0%
account the advancement of clean energy
in<00:51:07.920> a<00:51:08.280> safe<00:51:08.680> reliable<00:51:09.520> affordable<00:51:10.200> way<00:51:11.200> and<00:51:11.440> so

00:51:11.950 --> 00:51:11.960 align:start position:0%
in a safe reliable affordable way and so
 

00:51:11.960 --> 00:51:14.069 align:start position:0%
in a safe reliable affordable way and so
I<00:51:12.160> I<00:51:12.280> would<00:51:12.480> just<00:51:12.640> put<00:51:12.760> a<00:51:12.920> sentence<00:51:13.240> up<00:51:13.480> top<00:51:13.799> all

00:51:14.069 --> 00:51:14.079 align:start position:0%
I I would just put a sentence up top all
 

00:51:14.079 --> 00:51:15.910 align:start position:0%
I I would just put a sentence up top all
these<00:51:14.319> recommendations<00:51:15.079> are<00:51:15.240> set<00:51:15.520> forth<00:51:15.760> to

00:51:15.910 --> 00:51:15.920 align:start position:0%
these recommendations are set forth to
 

00:51:15.920 --> 00:51:18.190 align:start position:0%
these recommendations are set forth to
encourage<00:51:16.280> the<00:51:16.440> promotion<00:51:17.400> of<00:51:17.720> renewable

00:51:18.190 --> 00:51:18.200 align:start position:0%
encourage the promotion of renewable
 

00:51:18.200 --> 00:51:21.190 align:start position:0%
encourage the promotion of renewable
energies<00:51:18.520> in<00:51:18.680> Virginia<00:51:19.079> in<00:51:19.200> a<00:51:19.559> safe<00:51:20.559> reliable

00:51:21.190 --> 00:51:21.200 align:start position:0%
energies in Virginia in a safe reliable
 

00:51:21.200 --> 00:51:23.670 align:start position:0%
energies in Virginia in a safe reliable
affordable<00:51:21.880> manner<00:51:22.880> consistent<00:51:23.359> with<00:51:23.559> you

00:51:23.670 --> 00:51:23.680 align:start position:0%
affordable manner consistent with you
 

00:51:23.680 --> 00:51:25.069 align:start position:0%
affordable manner consistent with you
know<00:51:23.839> the<00:51:23.960> policies<00:51:24.319> enacted<00:51:24.680> by<00:51:24.760> the<00:51:24.880> general

00:51:25.069 --> 00:51:25.079 align:start position:0%
know the policies enacted by the general
 

00:51:25.079 --> 00:51:27.630 align:start position:0%
know the policies enacted by the general
assembly<00:51:25.480> or<00:51:25.680> whatever<00:51:26.240> but<00:51:27.240> I<00:51:27.319> think<00:51:27.480> you

00:51:27.630 --> 00:51:27.640 align:start position:0%
assembly or whatever but I think you
 

00:51:27.640 --> 00:51:29.150 align:start position:0%
assembly or whatever but I think you
have<00:51:27.760> some<00:51:27.960> catch<00:51:28.160> all<00:51:28.359> language<00:51:28.680> lot<00:51:28.880> e<00:51:29.040> and

00:51:29.150 --> 00:51:29.160 align:start position:0%
have some catch all language lot e and
 

00:51:29.160 --> 00:51:31.230 align:start position:0%
have some catch all language lot e and
trying<00:51:29.280> to<00:51:29.400> word<00:51:29.599> Smith<00:51:29.920> every<00:51:30.079> single<00:51:30.359> one<00:51:31.000> is

00:51:31.230 --> 00:51:31.240 align:start position:0%
trying to word Smith every single one is
 

00:51:31.240 --> 00:51:33.390 align:start position:0%
trying to word Smith every single one is
make<00:51:31.400> it<00:51:31.520> clear<00:51:31.720> that<00:51:31.880> every<00:51:32.160> recommendation

00:51:33.390 --> 00:51:33.400 align:start position:0%
make it clear that every recommendation
 

00:51:33.400 --> 00:51:36.069 align:start position:0%
make it clear that every recommendation
acknowledges<00:51:34.400> those<00:51:34.920> basic<00:51:35.319> principles<00:51:35.839> of

00:51:36.069 --> 00:51:36.079 align:start position:0%
acknowledges those basic principles of
 

00:51:36.079 --> 00:51:39.230 align:start position:0%
acknowledges those basic principles of
our<00:51:36.319> current<00:51:36.640> energy

00:51:39.230 --> 00:51:39.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:51:39.240 --> 00:51:45.190 align:start position:0%
 
policy

00:51:45.190 --> 00:51:45.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:51:45.200 --> 00:51:47.950 align:start position:0%
 
agree<00:51:46.200> can<00:51:46.359> you<00:51:46.520> maybe<00:51:46.760> say<00:51:47.040> that<00:51:47.240> again<00:51:47.520> Greg

00:51:47.950 --> 00:51:47.960 align:start position:0%
agree can you maybe say that again Greg
 

00:51:47.960 --> 00:51:51.109 align:start position:0%
agree can you maybe say that again Greg
and<00:51:48.559> uh<00:51:48.720> so<00:51:48.960> that<00:51:49.280> Ken<00:51:49.640> can<00:51:50.240> so<00:51:50.640> we<00:51:50.720> can<00:51:50.960> get

00:51:51.109 --> 00:51:51.119 align:start position:0%
and uh so that Ken can so we can get
 

00:51:51.119 --> 00:51:54.349 align:start position:0%
and uh so that Ken can so we can get
that<00:51:51.440> down<00:51:51.760> if<00:51:51.920> that<00:51:52.319> we're<00:51:52.680> vote<00:51:52.839> on<00:51:53.000> this

00:51:54.349 --> 00:51:54.359 align:start position:0%
that down if that we're vote on this
 

00:51:54.359 --> 00:51:58.069 align:start position:0%
that down if that we're vote on this
today<00:51:55.440> yeah<00:51:55.680> so

00:51:58.069 --> 00:51:58.079 align:start position:0%
today yeah so
 

00:51:58.079 --> 00:52:01.150 align:start position:0%
today yeah so
um<00:51:59.079> I<00:51:59.200> mean<00:51:59.720> yeah<00:51:59.880> where<00:52:00.160> CL<00:52:00.480> Ken<00:52:00.720> is<00:52:00.880> you<00:52:01.000> could

00:52:01.150 --> 00:52:01.160 align:start position:0%
um I mean yeah where CL Ken is you could
 

00:52:01.160 --> 00:52:02.150 align:start position:0%
um I mean yeah where CL Ken is you could
so<00:52:01.240> there's<00:52:01.359> a<00:52:01.440> couple<00:52:01.640> ways<00:52:01.760> you<00:52:01.839> can<00:52:01.920> say<00:52:02.079> it

00:52:02.150 --> 00:52:02.160 align:start position:0%
so there's a couple ways you can say it
 

00:52:02.160 --> 00:52:03.670 align:start position:0%
so there's a couple ways you can say it
you<00:52:02.240> could<00:52:02.440> either<00:52:02.720> say<00:52:03.480> these

00:52:03.670 --> 00:52:03.680 align:start position:0%
you could either say these
 

00:52:03.680 --> 00:52:06.069 align:start position:0%
you could either say these
recommendations<00:52:04.280> if<00:52:04.440> an<00:52:04.599> act<00:52:04.880> will<00:52:05.160> will<00:52:05.839> help

00:52:06.069 --> 00:52:06.079 align:start position:0%
recommendations if an act will will help
 

00:52:06.079 --> 00:52:09.349 align:start position:0%
recommendations if an act will will help
Virginia's<00:52:06.640> access<00:52:07.200> preferred<00:52:07.799> clean<00:52:08.359> energy

00:52:09.349 --> 00:52:09.359 align:start position:0%
Virginia's access preferred clean energy
 

00:52:09.359 --> 00:52:11.589 align:start position:0%
Virginia's access preferred clean energy
in<00:52:09.559> a<00:52:09.760> safe<00:52:10.079> affordable<00:52:10.520> and<00:52:10.640> reliable<00:52:11.079> manner

00:52:11.589 --> 00:52:11.599 align:start position:0%
in a safe affordable and reliable manner
 

00:52:11.599 --> 00:52:13.109 align:start position:0%
in a safe affordable and reliable manner
while<00:52:11.880> creating<00:52:12.319> economic<00:52:12.720> and<00:52:12.880> health

00:52:13.109 --> 00:52:13.119 align:start position:0%
while creating economic and health
 

00:52:13.119 --> 00:52:16.470 align:start position:0%
while creating economic and health
benefits<00:52:14.040> or<00:52:14.520> you<00:52:14.680> could<00:52:15.520> more<00:52:15.799> explicitly

00:52:16.470 --> 00:52:16.480 align:start position:0%
benefits or you could more explicitly
 

00:52:16.480 --> 00:52:17.990 align:start position:0%
benefits or you could more explicitly
say

00:52:17.990 --> 00:52:18.000 align:start position:0%
say
 

00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:20.870 align:start position:0%
say
um<00:52:19.000> that<00:52:19.359> all<00:52:19.599> these<00:52:19.920> recommendations<00:52:20.599> are

00:52:20.870 --> 00:52:20.880 align:start position:0%
um that all these recommendations are
 

00:52:20.880 --> 00:52:24.750 align:start position:0%
um that all these recommendations are
based<00:52:21.400> upon<00:52:22.400> the<00:52:22.640> promotion<00:52:23.400> of<00:52:24.319> solar<00:52:24.640> and

00:52:24.750 --> 00:52:24.760 align:start position:0%
based upon the promotion of solar and
 

00:52:24.760 --> 00:52:25.990 align:start position:0%
based upon the promotion of solar and
energy<00:52:25.000> stor

00:52:25.990 --> 00:52:26.000 align:start position:0%
energy stor
 

00:52:26.000 --> 00:52:29.630 align:start position:0%
energy stor
in<00:52:26.160> a<00:52:26.359> safe<00:52:27.680> AFF<00:52:28.680> I<00:52:28.799> think<00:52:29.200> I<00:52:29.280> think<00:52:29.440> what<00:52:29.520> you

00:52:29.630 --> 00:52:29.640 align:start position:0%
in a safe AFF I think I think what you
 

00:52:29.640 --> 00:52:32.230 align:start position:0%
in a safe AFF I think I think what you
would<00:52:29.839> say<00:52:30.000> is<00:52:30.200> not<00:52:30.319> so<00:52:30.480> much<00:52:30.640> in<00:52:30.760> a<00:52:31.480> safe<00:52:31.880> but

00:52:32.230 --> 00:52:32.240 align:start position:0%
would say is not so much in a safe but
 

00:52:32.240 --> 00:52:34.150 align:start position:0%
would say is not so much in a safe but
without

00:52:34.150 --> 00:52:34.160 align:start position:0%
without
 

00:52:34.160 --> 00:52:36.349 align:start position:0%
without
compromising<00:52:35.160> or<00:52:35.319> should<00:52:35.480> be<00:52:35.720> Advanced

00:52:36.349 --> 00:52:36.359 align:start position:0%
compromising or should be Advanced
 

00:52:36.359 --> 00:52:37.950 align:start position:0%
compromising or should be Advanced
without

00:52:37.950 --> 00:52:37.960 align:start position:0%
without
 

00:52:37.960 --> 00:52:41.349 align:start position:0%
without
compromising<00:52:38.960> safety<00:52:39.319> affordability

00:52:41.349 --> 00:52:41.359 align:start position:0%
compromising safety affordability
 

00:52:41.359 --> 00:52:43.589 align:start position:0%
compromising safety affordability
and<00:52:42.359> yeah<00:52:42.559> I<00:52:42.640> think<00:52:42.880> I'm<00:52:43.160> I<00:52:43.240> think<00:52:43.400> that

00:52:43.589 --> 00:52:43.599 align:start position:0%
and yeah I think I'm I think that
 

00:52:43.599 --> 00:52:45.990 align:start position:0%
and yeah I think I'm I think that
probably<00:52:43.839> makes<00:52:44.079> sense<00:52:44.720> if<00:52:45.480> Ken<00:52:45.720> you<00:52:45.799> want<00:52:45.920> to

00:52:45.990 --> 00:52:46.000 align:start position:0%
probably makes sense if Ken you want to
 

00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:48.069 align:start position:0%
probably makes sense if Ken you want to
take<00:52:46.119> a<00:52:46.240> stab<00:52:46.599> at<00:52:47.240> the<00:52:47.359> eight<00:52:47.599> versions<00:52:47.960> you

00:52:48.069 --> 00:52:48.079 align:start position:0%
take a stab at the eight versions you
 

00:52:48.079 --> 00:52:52.030 align:start position:0%
take a stab at the eight versions you
just

00:52:52.030 --> 00:52:52.040 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:52:52.040 --> 00:52:54.589 align:start position:0%
 
heard<00:52:53.040> I'm<00:52:53.160> gonna<00:52:53.440> try<00:52:53.599> to<00:52:53.799> type<00:52:54.119> something<00:52:54.440> in

00:52:54.589 --> 00:52:54.599 align:start position:0%
heard I'm gonna try to type something in
 

00:52:54.599 --> 00:52:56.870 align:start position:0%
heard I'm gonna try to type something in
the<00:52:54.799> chat<00:52:55.640> can<00:52:56.079> well<00:52:56.240> here<00:52:56.359> I<00:52:56.440> think<00:52:56.599> the<00:52:56.720> way

00:52:56.870 --> 00:52:56.880 align:start position:0%
the chat can well here I think the way
 

00:52:56.880 --> 00:52:57.990 align:start position:0%
the chat can well here I think the way
that<00:52:57.079> Katherine<00:52:57.400> just<00:52:57.520> said<00:52:57.680> it<00:52:57.839> these

00:52:57.990 --> 00:52:58.000 align:start position:0%
that Katherine just said it these
 

00:52:58.000 --> 00:52:59.190 align:start position:0%
that Katherine just said it these
recommendations<00:52:58.480> if<00:52:58.599> an<00:52:58.760> act<00:52:58.960> will<00:52:59.040> help

00:52:59.190 --> 00:52:59.200 align:start position:0%
recommendations if an act will help
 

00:52:59.200 --> 00:53:01.190 align:start position:0%
recommendations if an act will help
Virginia's<00:52:59.680> access<00:52:59.960> preferred<00:53:00.280> clean<00:53:00.520> energy

00:53:01.190 --> 00:53:01.200 align:start position:0%
Virginia's access preferred clean energy
 

00:53:01.200 --> 00:53:02.670 align:start position:0%
Virginia's access preferred clean energy
and<00:53:01.359> create<00:53:01.640> economic<00:53:02.040> and<00:53:02.160> health<00:53:02.359> benefits

00:53:02.670 --> 00:53:02.680 align:start position:0%
and create economic and health benefits
 

00:53:02.680 --> 00:53:03.990 align:start position:0%
and create economic and health benefits
associated<00:53:03.040> with<00:53:03.200> transition<00:53:03.599> clean<00:53:03.799> and

00:53:03.990 --> 00:53:04.000 align:start position:0%
associated with transition clean and
 

00:53:04.000 --> 00:53:06.390 align:start position:0%
associated with transition clean and
economy<00:53:04.440> in<00:53:04.880> in<00:53:05.040> the<00:53:05.200> Commonwealth<00:53:05.960> without

00:53:06.390 --> 00:53:06.400 align:start position:0%
economy in in the Commonwealth without
 

00:53:06.400 --> 00:53:09.430 align:start position:0%
economy in in the Commonwealth without
adversely<00:53:07.040> affecting<00:53:07.960> the<00:53:08.119> delivery<00:53:08.520> of<00:53:08.720> safe

00:53:09.430 --> 00:53:09.440 align:start position:0%
adversely affecting the delivery of safe
 

00:53:09.440 --> 00:53:11.349 align:start position:0%
adversely affecting the delivery of safe
affordable<00:53:09.920> and<00:53:10.079> reliable

00:53:11.349 --> 00:53:11.359 align:start position:0%
affordable and reliable
 

00:53:11.359 --> 00:53:13.990 align:start position:0%
affordable and reliable
energy<00:53:12.359> and<00:53:12.480> should<00:53:12.680> be<00:53:12.799> under<00:53:13.319> we<00:53:13.400> make<00:53:13.480> it<00:53:13.599> a

00:53:13.990 --> 00:53:14.000 align:start position:0%
energy and should be under we make it a
 

00:53:14.000 --> 00:53:16.589 align:start position:0%
energy and should be under we make it a
positive<00:53:14.799> too

00:53:16.589 --> 00:53:16.599 align:start position:0%
positive too
 

00:53:16.599 --> 00:53:19.910 align:start position:0%
positive too
like<00:53:17.720> wall<00:53:18.720> while

00:53:19.910 --> 00:53:19.920 align:start position:0%
like wall while
 

00:53:19.920 --> 00:53:24.150 align:start position:0%
like wall while
improving<00:53:20.920> I<00:53:21.040> mean<00:53:21.319> I<00:53:22.160> no<00:53:23.160> yeah<00:53:23.640> I<00:53:23.760> think<00:53:23.960> we

00:53:24.150 --> 00:53:24.160 align:start position:0%
improving I mean I no yeah I think we
 

00:53:24.160 --> 00:53:26.069 align:start position:0%
improving I mean I no yeah I think we
probably<00:53:24.559> disagreement<00:53:24.960> on

00:53:26.069 --> 00:53:26.079 align:start position:0%
probably disagreement on
 

00:53:26.079 --> 00:53:29.349 align:start position:0%
probably disagreement on
transition<00:53:26.880> is<00:53:27.480> is<00:53:27.799> going<00:53:28.119> to<00:53:28.480> improve<00:53:29.160> the

00:53:29.349 --> 00:53:29.359 align:start position:0%
transition is is going to improve the
 

00:53:29.359 --> 00:53:31.789 align:start position:0%
transition is is going to improve the
quality<00:53:29.839> of<00:53:30.280> energy<00:53:30.680> delivered<00:53:31.119> to<00:53:31.319> consumers

00:53:31.789 --> 00:53:31.799 align:start position:0%
quality of energy delivered to consumers
 

00:53:31.799 --> 00:53:33.109 align:start position:0%
quality of energy delivered to consumers
in<00:53:32.000> the

00:53:33.109 --> 00:53:33.119 align:start position:0%
in the
 

00:53:33.119 --> 00:53:35.670 align:start position:0%
in the
Commonwealth<00:53:34.119> um<00:53:34.799> like<00:53:34.960> for<00:53:35.119> example<00:53:35.520> I'm

00:53:35.670 --> 00:53:35.680 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth um like for example I'm
 

00:53:35.680 --> 00:53:37.510 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth um like for example I'm
looking<00:53:35.960> forward<00:53:36.240> to<00:53:36.319> having<00:53:37.280> that<00:53:37.400> it

00:53:37.510 --> 00:53:37.520 align:start position:0%
looking forward to having that it
 

00:53:37.520 --> 00:53:40.390 align:start position:0%
looking forward to having that it
presents<00:53:38.400> challenges<00:53:39.400> like<00:53:39.680> it<00:53:39.839> also<00:53:40.119> does

00:53:40.390 --> 00:53:40.400 align:start position:0%
presents challenges like it also does
 

00:53:40.400 --> 00:53:42.309 align:start position:0%
presents challenges like it also does
present<00:53:40.720> challenges<00:53:41.359> they're<00:53:41.920> again<00:53:42.119> they're

00:53:42.309 --> 00:53:42.319 align:start position:0%
present challenges they're again they're
 

00:53:42.319 --> 00:53:44.910 align:start position:0%
present challenges they're again they're
not<00:53:42.559> insurmountable<00:53:43.520> but<00:53:43.680> we<00:53:43.880> still<00:53:44.599> need<00:53:44.760> to

00:53:44.910 --> 00:53:44.920 align:start position:0%
not insurmountable but we still need to
 

00:53:44.920 --> 00:53:46.670 align:start position:0%
not insurmountable but we still need to
maintain<00:53:45.280> a<00:53:45.480> focus<00:53:45.760> on<00:53:45.960> reliability

00:53:46.670 --> 00:53:46.680 align:start position:0%
maintain a focus on reliability
 

00:53:46.680 --> 00:53:48.950 align:start position:0%
maintain a focus on reliability
affordability<00:53:47.280> and<00:53:47.480> safety<00:53:48.240> and<00:53:48.359> so<00:53:48.640> I<00:53:48.720> don't

00:53:48.950 --> 00:53:48.960 align:start position:0%
affordability and safety and so I don't
 

00:53:48.960 --> 00:53:50.390 align:start position:0%
affordability and safety and so I don't
think<00:53:49.359> we<00:53:49.480> can<00:53:49.599> make<00:53:49.720> a<00:53:49.839> declarative

00:53:50.390 --> 00:53:50.400 align:start position:0%
think we can make a declarative
 

00:53:50.400 --> 00:53:53.710 align:start position:0%
think we can make a declarative
statement<00:53:51.040> that<00:53:51.880> all<00:53:52.119> those

00:53:53.710 --> 00:53:53.720 align:start position:0%
statement that all those
 

00:53:53.720 --> 00:53:56.349 align:start position:0%
statement that all those
things<00:53:54.720> absolutely<00:53:55.119> absolutely<00:53:55.920> in<00:53:56.079> all

00:53:56.349 --> 00:53:56.359 align:start position:0%
things absolutely absolutely in all
 

00:53:56.359 --> 00:53:59.270 align:start position:0%
things absolutely absolutely in all
cases<00:53:56.799> will<00:53:57.079> contribute<00:53:57.640> to<00:53:58.640> affordability

00:53:59.270 --> 00:53:59.280 align:start position:0%
cases will contribute to affordability
 

00:53:59.280 --> 00:54:01.069 align:start position:0%
cases will contribute to affordability
reliability<00:53:59.880> and<00:54:00.079> safety<00:54:00.559> we<00:54:00.760> have<00:54:00.880> to

00:54:01.069 --> 00:54:01.079 align:start position:0%
reliability and safety we have to
 

00:54:01.079 --> 00:54:03.829 align:start position:0%
reliability and safety we have to
maintain<00:54:01.440> a<00:54:01.680> focus<00:54:02.200> on<00:54:03.000> reliability

00:54:03.829 --> 00:54:03.839 align:start position:0%
maintain a focus on reliability
 

00:54:03.839 --> 00:54:06.750 align:start position:0%
maintain a focus on reliability
affordability<00:54:04.520> and

00:54:06.750 --> 00:54:06.760 align:start position:0%
affordability and
 

00:54:06.760 --> 00:54:11.990 align:start position:0%
affordability and
safety<00:54:07.760> while<00:54:08.079> undertaking<00:54:08.839> these

00:54:11.990 --> 00:54:12.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:54:12.000 --> 00:54:15.710 align:start position:0%
 
things<00:54:13.000> yeah<00:54:13.280> no<00:54:13.839> no<00:54:14.160> disagreements<00:54:15.040> there

00:54:15.710 --> 00:54:15.720 align:start position:0%
things yeah no no disagreements there
 

00:54:15.720 --> 00:54:18.190 align:start position:0%
things yeah no no disagreements there
it's<00:54:15.880> just<00:54:16.040> that<00:54:16.200> when<00:54:16.359> I<00:54:16.520> Envision<00:54:17.319> the<00:54:18.079> kind

00:54:18.190 --> 00:54:18.200 align:start position:0%
it's just that when I Envision the kind
 

00:54:18.200 --> 00:54:22.349 align:start position:0%
it's just that when I Envision the kind
of<00:54:18.559> transition<00:54:19.799> complete<00:54:20.799> it<00:54:20.960> is<00:54:21.119> a<00:54:21.440> much<00:54:21.720> more

00:54:22.349 --> 00:54:22.359 align:start position:0%
of transition complete it is a much more
 

00:54:22.359 --> 00:54:25.710 align:start position:0%
of transition complete it is a much more
reliable<00:54:23.200> resilient<00:54:24.040> grid<00:54:24.760> because<00:54:25.400> there's

00:54:25.710 --> 00:54:25.720 align:start position:0%
reliable resilient grid because there's
 

00:54:25.720 --> 00:54:28.870 align:start position:0%
reliable resilient grid because there's
more<00:54:26.160> distributed<00:54:26.720> solar<00:54:27.079> and<00:54:27.559> storage

00:54:28.870 --> 00:54:28.880 align:start position:0%
more distributed solar and storage
 

00:54:28.880 --> 00:54:31.710 align:start position:0%
more distributed solar and storage
across<00:54:29.880> the<00:54:30.079> grid<00:54:30.520> that<00:54:30.720> allows<00:54:31.119> you<00:54:31.240> to<00:54:31.440> have

00:54:31.710 --> 00:54:31.720 align:start position:0%
across the grid that allows you to have
 

00:54:31.720 --> 00:54:34.270 align:start position:0%
across the grid that allows you to have
higher<00:54:32.040> levels<00:54:32.359> of<00:54:32.559> reliability<00:54:33.359> and<00:54:33.799> reduced

00:54:34.270 --> 00:54:34.280 align:start position:0%
higher levels of reliability and reduced
 

00:54:34.280 --> 00:54:39.990 align:start position:0%
higher levels of reliability and reduced
outages<00:54:35.119> and<00:54:36.119> higher<00:54:36.720> safety<00:54:37.839> levels<00:54:38.839> so<00:54:39.680> I<00:54:39.880> I

00:54:39.990 --> 00:54:40.000 align:start position:0%
outages and higher safety levels so I I
 

00:54:40.000 --> 00:54:43.430 align:start position:0%
outages and higher safety levels so I I
think<00:54:40.200> it's<00:54:40.640> it's<00:54:40.880> a<00:54:41.119> little<00:54:41.319> bit<00:54:41.839> just

00:54:43.430 --> 00:54:43.440 align:start position:0%
think it's it's a little bit just
 

00:54:43.440 --> 00:54:45.589 align:start position:0%
think it's it's a little bit just
um<00:54:44.440> word

00:54:45.589 --> 00:54:45.599 align:start position:0%
um word
 

00:54:45.599 --> 00:54:48.870 align:start position:0%
um word
choice<00:54:46.599> but<00:54:46.839> I<00:54:46.920> think<00:54:47.119> without<00:54:47.839> compromising

00:54:48.870 --> 00:54:48.880 align:start position:0%
choice but I think without compromising
 

00:54:48.880 --> 00:54:54.069 align:start position:0%
choice but I think without compromising
is<00:54:49.880> uh<00:54:50.040> is<00:54:50.280> fine<00:54:50.760> with

00:54:54.069 --> 00:54:54.079 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:54:54.079 --> 00:54:56.150 align:start position:0%
 
me

00:54:56.150 --> 00:54:56.160 align:start position:0%
me
 

00:54:56.160 --> 00:55:00.109 align:start position:0%
me
reli<00:54:57.000> um<00:54:57.839> reliabil<00:54:58.839> reliability<00:54:59.599> afford

00:55:00.109 --> 00:55:00.119 align:start position:0%
reli um reliabil reliability afford
 

00:55:00.119 --> 00:55:03.670 align:start position:0%
reli um reliabil reliability afford
affordability<00:55:01.040> and<00:55:02.200> safety<00:55:03.200> I<00:55:03.280> would<00:55:03.440> say

00:55:03.670 --> 00:55:03.680 align:start position:0%
affordability and safety I would say
 

00:55:03.680 --> 00:55:06.030 align:start position:0%
affordability and safety I would say
without<00:55:04.040> compromising<00:55:04.760> the<00:55:05.000> safe<00:55:05.480> reliable

00:55:06.030 --> 00:55:06.040 align:start position:0%
without compromising the safe reliable
 

00:55:06.040 --> 00:55:07.829 align:start position:0%
without compromising the safe reliable
and

00:55:07.829 --> 00:55:07.839 align:start position:0%
and
 

00:55:07.839 --> 00:55:09.910 align:start position:0%
and
affordable<00:55:08.839> delivery<00:55:09.280> of<00:55:09.400> energy<00:55:09.760> or

00:55:09.910 --> 00:55:09.920 align:start position:0%
affordable delivery of energy or
 

00:55:09.920 --> 00:55:11.710 align:start position:0%
affordable delivery of energy or
something<00:55:10.200> like<00:55:10.440> that<00:55:11.200> but<00:55:11.319> whatever<00:55:11.599> the

00:55:11.710 --> 00:55:11.720 align:start position:0%
something like that but whatever the
 

00:55:11.720 --> 00:55:15.309 align:start position:0%
something like that but whatever the
verb<00:55:12.000> is<00:55:12.400> that<00:55:12.960> Mak<00:55:13.960> I<00:55:14.079> think<00:55:14.319> that<00:55:14.599> that<00:55:14.799> makes

00:55:15.309 --> 00:55:15.319 align:start position:0%
verb is that Mak I think that that makes
 

00:55:15.319 --> 00:55:18.230 align:start position:0%
verb is that Mak I think that that makes
that<00:55:15.480> makes<00:55:15.640> sense<00:55:16.160> the<00:55:16.359> safe

00:55:18.230 --> 00:55:18.240 align:start position:0%
that makes sense the safe
 

00:55:18.240 --> 00:55:20.789 align:start position:0%
that makes sense the safe
reliable<00:55:19.240> and

00:55:20.789 --> 00:55:20.799 align:start position:0%
reliable and
 

00:55:20.799 --> 00:55:22.910 align:start position:0%
reliable and
affordable<00:55:21.799> Katherine<00:55:22.160> would<00:55:22.359> delivery<00:55:22.760> be

00:55:22.910 --> 00:55:22.920 align:start position:0%
affordable Katherine would delivery be
 

00:55:22.920 --> 00:55:25.990 align:start position:0%
affordable Katherine would delivery be
the<00:55:23.079> right<00:55:23.240> word<00:55:23.480> or<00:55:24.200> provision

00:55:25.990 --> 00:55:26.000 align:start position:0%
the right word or provision
 

00:55:26.000 --> 00:55:28.990 align:start position:0%
the right word or provision
yes<00:55:26.559> I<00:55:26.640> think<00:55:26.839> delivery<00:55:27.160> is<00:55:27.680> fine<00:55:28.680> compromise

00:55:28.990 --> 00:55:29.000 align:start position:0%
yes I think delivery is fine compromise
 

00:55:29.000 --> 00:55:30.150 align:start position:0%
yes I think delivery is fine compromise
and<00:55:29.119> save<00:55:29.359> reliable<00:55:29.680> and<00:55:29.760> affordable

00:55:30.150 --> 00:55:30.160 align:start position:0%
and save reliable and affordable
 

00:55:30.160 --> 00:55:53.990 align:start position:0%
and save reliable and affordable
delivery<00:55:30.599> of<00:55:30.960> energy<00:55:31.319> in<00:55:31.480> the

00:55:53.990 --> 00:55:54.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:57.870 align:start position:0%
 
Commonwealth

00:55:57.870 --> 00:55:57.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:55:57.880 --> 00:56:02.190 align:start position:0%
 
excellent<00:55:58.359> thanks

00:56:02.190 --> 00:56:02.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:56:02.200 --> 00:56:06.510 align:start position:0%
 
everyone<00:56:03.200> also<00:56:03.559> promoting<00:56:04.319> instead<00:56:04.599> of

00:56:06.510 --> 00:56:06.520 align:start position:0%
everyone also promoting instead of
 

00:56:06.520 --> 00:56:18.109 align:start position:0%
everyone also promoting instead of
unblocking<00:56:07.520> yep<00:56:08.520> I<00:56:08.680> believe<00:56:09.039> that<00:56:09.160> was<00:56:09.280> a

00:56:18.109 --> 00:56:18.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:56:18.119 --> 00:56:20.390 align:start position:0%
 
consensus<00:56:19.119> and<00:56:19.240> then<00:56:19.400> I<00:56:19.520> think<00:56:19.720> where<00:56:19.880> it<00:56:20.240> sort

00:56:20.390 --> 00:56:20.400 align:start position:0%
consensus and then I think where it sort
 

00:56:20.400 --> 00:56:22.470 align:start position:0%
consensus and then I think where it sort
of<00:56:20.559> declares<00:56:21.240> that<00:56:21.400> the

00:56:22.470 --> 00:56:22.480 align:start position:0%
of declares that the
 

00:56:22.480 --> 00:56:30.270 align:start position:0%
of declares that the
utilities<00:56:23.480> uh<00:56:23.680> there's<00:56:24.240> the<00:56:25.400> the<00:56:25.599> final

00:56:30.270 --> 00:56:30.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:56:30.280 --> 00:56:33.549 align:start position:0%
 
recommendation<00:56:31.280> I<00:56:31.480> think

00:56:33.549 --> 00:56:33.559 align:start position:0%
recommendation I think
 

00:56:33.559 --> 00:56:37.069 align:start position:0%
recommendation I think
that<00:56:34.559> support<00:56:34.960> the<00:56:35.079> SEC<00:56:35.559> and<00:56:35.720> requiring<00:56:36.640> all

00:56:37.069 --> 00:56:37.079 align:start position:0%
that support the SEC and requiring all
 

00:56:37.079 --> 00:56:38.990 align:start position:0%
that support the SEC and requiring all
that<00:56:37.680> I<00:56:37.799> think<00:56:38.039> that<00:56:38.240> at<00:56:38.400> this<00:56:38.559> point<00:56:38.839> it's

00:56:38.990 --> 00:56:39.000 align:start position:0%
that I think that at this point it's
 

00:56:39.000 --> 00:56:41.349 align:start position:0%
that I think that at this point it's
already<00:56:39.480> before<00:56:39.799> the<00:56:39.920> SEC<00:56:40.599> and<00:56:40.760> there's<00:56:41.079> lots

00:56:41.349 --> 00:56:41.359 align:start position:0%
already before the SEC and there's lots
 

00:56:41.359 --> 00:56:45.270 align:start position:0%
already before the SEC and there's lots
of<00:56:42.119> different<00:56:42.520> perspectives<00:56:43.200> on<00:56:43.640> that<00:56:44.640> so<00:56:45.200> I

00:56:45.270 --> 00:56:45.280 align:start position:0%
of different perspectives on that so I
 

00:56:45.280 --> 00:56:48.549 align:start position:0%
of different perspectives on that so I
would<00:56:45.680> suggest<00:56:46.359> REM<00:56:46.680> removing<00:56:47.599> that

00:56:48.549 --> 00:56:48.559 align:start position:0%
would suggest REM removing that
 

00:56:48.559 --> 00:56:51.150 align:start position:0%
would suggest REM removing that
bullet<00:56:49.559> alog<00:56:49.960> together<00:56:50.720> and<00:56:50.839> if<00:56:50.920> you<00:56:51.000> don't

00:56:51.150 --> 00:56:51.160 align:start position:0%
bullet alog together and if you don't
 

00:56:51.160 --> 00:56:52.549 align:start position:0%
bullet alog together and if you don't
want<00:56:51.240> to<00:56:51.400> remove<00:56:51.680> it<00:56:51.920> then<00:56:52.039> I'm<00:56:52.200> happy<00:56:52.400> to

00:56:52.549 --> 00:56:52.559 align:start position:0%
want to remove it then I'm happy to
 

00:56:52.559 --> 00:56:53.990 align:start position:0%
want to remove it then I'm happy to
provide<00:56:52.839> some<00:56:53.039> suggestions<00:56:53.480> for<00:56:53.640> changing

00:56:53.990 --> 00:56:54.000 align:start position:0%
provide some suggestions for changing
 

00:56:54.000 --> 00:56:57.069 align:start position:0%
provide some suggestions for changing
the

00:56:57.069 --> 00:56:57.079 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:56:57.079 --> 00:56:59.190 align:start position:0%
 
I'd<00:56:57.280> like<00:56:57.440> to<00:56:57.599> hear<00:56:57.880> the

00:56:59.190 --> 00:56:59.200 align:start position:0%
I'd like to hear the
 

00:56:59.200 --> 00:57:01.390 align:start position:0%
I'd like to hear the
suggestions<00:57:00.200> I<00:57:00.280> think<00:57:00.480> it's<00:57:00.720> important<00:57:01.119> to

00:57:01.390 --> 00:57:01.400 align:start position:0%
suggestions I think it's important to
 

00:57:01.400 --> 00:57:09.109 align:start position:0%
suggestions I think it's important to
acknowledge<00:57:02.240> that<00:57:02.839> that<00:57:03.000> it's<00:57:03.200> not<00:57:03.520> a<00:57:04.520> solved

00:57:09.109 --> 00:57:09.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:57:09.119 --> 00:57:11.750 align:start position:0%
 
problem<00:57:10.119> I'm<00:57:10.240> not<00:57:10.400> suggesting<00:57:10.839> it's<00:57:10.920> a<00:57:11.119> solve

00:57:11.750 --> 00:57:11.760 align:start position:0%
problem I'm not suggesting it's a solve
 

00:57:11.760 --> 00:57:12.910 align:start position:0%
problem I'm not suggesting it's a solve
problem<00:57:12.000> I'm<00:57:12.079> just<00:57:12.240> suggesting<00:57:12.599> that<00:57:12.720> it's

00:57:12.910 --> 00:57:12.920 align:start position:0%
problem I'm just suggesting that it's
 

00:57:12.920 --> 00:57:15.230 align:start position:0%
problem I'm just suggesting that it's
before<00:57:13.160> the<00:57:13.280> state<00:57:13.520> Corporation<00:57:14.240> Commission

00:57:15.230 --> 00:57:15.240 align:start position:0%
before the state Corporation Commission
 

00:57:15.240 --> 00:57:17.589 align:start position:0%
before the state Corporation Commission
and<00:57:15.480> there's<00:57:16.160> active

00:57:17.589 --> 00:57:17.599 align:start position:0%
and there's active
 

00:57:17.599 --> 00:57:20.829 align:start position:0%
and there's active
participation<00:57:18.599> you<00:57:18.920> in<00:57:19.200> that<00:57:20.039> and<00:57:20.480> will

00:57:20.829 --> 00:57:20.839 align:start position:0%
participation you in that and will
 

00:57:20.839 --> 00:57:22.270 align:start position:0%
participation you in that and will
continue<00:57:21.240> to

00:57:22.270 --> 00:57:22.280 align:start position:0%
continue to
 

00:57:22.280 --> 00:57:23.789 align:start position:0%
continue to
be

00:57:23.789 --> 00:57:23.799 align:start position:0%
be
 

00:57:23.799 --> 00:57:26.029 align:start position:0%
be
um

00:57:26.029 --> 00:57:26.039 align:start position:0%
um
 

00:57:26.039 --> 00:57:27.470 align:start position:0%
um
and<00:57:26.240> I<00:57:26.359> just<00:57:26.559> I<00:57:26.640> don't<00:57:26.880> think<00:57:27.079> that<00:57:27.280> this

00:57:27.470 --> 00:57:27.480 align:start position:0%
and I just I don't think that this
 

00:57:27.480 --> 00:57:29.150 align:start position:0%
and I just I don't think that this
Authority<00:57:27.880> at<00:57:28.000> this<00:57:28.160> stage<00:57:28.400> is<00:57:28.640> in<00:57:28.880> in<00:57:28.960> a

00:57:29.150 --> 00:57:29.160 align:start position:0%
Authority at this stage is in in a
 

00:57:29.160 --> 00:57:30.870 align:start position:0%
Authority at this stage is in in a
position<00:57:29.480> to<00:57:29.680> say<00:57:29.920> that<00:57:30.079> the<00:57:30.200> SEC<00:57:30.640> should

00:57:30.870 --> 00:57:30.880 align:start position:0%
position to say that the SEC should
 

00:57:30.880 --> 00:57:33.829 align:start position:0%
position to say that the SEC should
require<00:57:31.559> utilities<00:57:32.039> to<00:57:32.200> do<00:57:32.520> something<00:57:33.520> of

00:57:33.829 --> 00:57:33.839 align:start position:0%
require utilities to do something of
 

00:57:33.839 --> 00:57:37.029 align:start position:0%
require utilities to do something of
this<00:57:34.200> nature<00:57:35.000> because<00:57:35.559> again<00:57:35.799> we're<00:57:36.680> we<00:57:36.799> are

00:57:37.029 --> 00:57:37.039 align:start position:0%
this nature because again we're we are
 

00:57:37.039 --> 00:57:38.589 align:start position:0%
this nature because again we're we are
declaring<00:57:37.559> as<00:57:37.680> an<00:57:37.880> authority<00:57:38.319> that<00:57:38.440> it's

00:57:38.589 --> 00:57:38.599 align:start position:0%
declaring as an authority that it's
 

00:57:38.599 --> 00:57:40.990 align:start position:0%
declaring as an authority that it's
unnecessary<00:57:39.520> and<00:57:39.680> that<00:57:39.799> it's<00:57:40.000> burdensome<00:57:40.839> and

00:57:40.990 --> 00:57:41.000 align:start position:0%
unnecessary and that it's burdensome and
 

00:57:41.000 --> 00:57:44.109 align:start position:0%
unnecessary and that it's burdensome and
that<00:57:41.119> the<00:57:41.280> recommendation<00:57:42.480> is<00:57:43.480> uh<00:57:43.799> and<00:57:43.960> that

00:57:44.109 --> 00:57:44.119 align:start position:0%
that the recommendation is uh and that
 

00:57:44.119 --> 00:57:47.029 align:start position:0%
that the recommendation is uh and that
it's<00:57:44.480> it<00:57:44.599> is<00:57:44.799> cost<00:57:45.160> prohibitive<00:57:46.119> so<00:57:46.559> to<00:57:46.720> me

00:57:47.029 --> 00:57:47.039 align:start position:0%
it's it is cost prohibitive so to me
 

00:57:47.039 --> 00:57:48.750 align:start position:0%
it's it is cost prohibitive so to me
those<00:57:47.319> contradict<00:57:47.920> the<00:57:48.039> fund<00:57:48.440> some<00:57:48.559> of<00:57:48.640> the

00:57:48.750 --> 00:57:48.760 align:start position:0%
those contradict the fund some of the
 

00:57:48.760 --> 00:57:50.390 align:start position:0%
those contradict the fund some of the
fundamental<00:57:49.240> things<00:57:49.440> that<00:57:49.559> are<00:57:49.760> above<00:57:50.280> in

00:57:50.390 --> 00:57:50.400 align:start position:0%
fundamental things that are above in
 

00:57:50.400 --> 00:57:51.710 align:start position:0%
fundamental things that are above in
terms<00:57:50.640> of<00:57:50.760> the<00:57:50.920> safe<00:57:51.160> affordable<00:57:51.559> and

00:57:51.710 --> 00:57:51.720 align:start position:0%
terms of the safe affordable and
 

00:57:51.720 --> 00:57:54.309 align:start position:0%
terms of the safe affordable and
reliable<00:57:52.119> delivery<00:57:52.559> of<00:57:53.240> electricity<00:57:54.039> in<00:57:54.160> the

00:57:54.309 --> 00:57:54.319 align:start position:0%
reliable delivery of electricity in the
 

00:57:54.319 --> 00:57:57.349 align:start position:0%
reliable delivery of electricity in the
Commonwealth<00:57:55.039> and<00:57:55.160> so<00:57:55.440> again<00:57:55.799> I<00:57:56.799> we<00:57:57.039> we<00:57:57.160> are

00:57:57.349 --> 00:57:57.359 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth and so again I we we are
 

00:57:57.359 --> 00:58:00.430 align:start position:0%
Commonwealth and so again I we we are
likely<00:57:57.680> not<00:57:57.839> to<00:57:58.240> necessarily<00:57:58.960> agree<00:57:59.559> on<00:58:00.280> the

00:58:00.430 --> 00:58:00.440 align:start position:0%
likely not to necessarily agree on the
 

00:58:00.440 --> 00:58:03.589 align:start position:0%
likely not to necessarily agree on the
declarative<00:58:01.000> statements<00:58:01.520> that<00:58:01.599> are<00:58:02.000> here

00:58:03.589 --> 00:58:03.599 align:start position:0%
declarative statements that are here
 

00:58:03.599 --> 00:58:07.029 align:start position:0%
declarative statements that are here
but<00:58:04.599> should<00:58:04.960> we<00:58:05.200> in<00:58:05.440> fact<00:58:05.839> just<00:58:06.119> say<00:58:06.680> something

00:58:07.029 --> 00:58:07.039 align:start position:0%
but should we in fact just say something
 

00:58:07.039 --> 00:58:09.750 align:start position:0%
but should we in fact just say something
along<00:58:07.359> the<00:58:07.520> lines<00:58:08.079> of<00:58:08.400> the<00:58:08.599> authority

00:58:09.750 --> 00:58:09.760 align:start position:0%
along the lines of the authority
 

00:58:09.760 --> 00:58:11.470 align:start position:0%
along the lines of the authority
recommends

00:58:11.470 --> 00:58:11.480 align:start position:0%
recommends
 

00:58:11.480 --> 00:58:14.309 align:start position:0%
recommends
um<00:58:12.480> again<00:58:12.760> without<00:58:13.160> compromising<00:58:14.039> safe

00:58:14.309 --> 00:58:14.319 align:start position:0%
um again without compromising safe
 

00:58:14.319 --> 00:58:16.549 align:start position:0%
um again without compromising safe
affordable<00:58:14.760> reliable<00:58:15.160> delivery<00:58:15.520> of<00:58:15.680> energy

00:58:16.549 --> 00:58:16.559 align:start position:0%
affordable reliable delivery of energy
 

00:58:16.559 --> 00:58:18.029 align:start position:0%
affordable reliable delivery of energy
the<00:58:16.720> SEC

00:58:18.029 --> 00:58:18.039 align:start position:0%
the SEC
 

00:58:18.039 --> 00:58:21.150 align:start position:0%
the SEC
examine<00:58:19.039> those<00:58:19.359> things<00:58:19.720> the<00:58:20.039> the<00:58:20.400> the

00:58:21.150 --> 00:58:21.160 align:start position:0%
examine those things the the the
 

00:58:21.160 --> 00:58:23.710 align:start position:0%
examine those things the the the
distribution<00:58:21.680> interconnect

00:58:23.710 --> 00:58:23.720 align:start position:0%
distribution interconnect
 

00:58:23.720 --> 00:58:28.270 align:start position:0%
distribution interconnect
process

00:58:28.270 --> 00:58:28.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:58:28.280 --> 00:58:30.150 align:start position:0%
 
hey<00:58:28.480> cther<00:58:28.799> can<00:58:28.880> I<00:58:29.039> ask<00:58:29.240> you<00:58:29.640> can<00:58:29.760> I<00:58:29.880> ask<00:58:30.000> you

00:58:30.150 --> 00:58:30.160 align:start position:0%
hey cther can I ask you can I ask you
 

00:58:30.160 --> 00:58:31.630 align:start position:0%
hey cther can I ask you can I ask you
just<00:58:30.280> a<00:58:30.920> question<00:58:31.160> you<00:58:31.240> might<00:58:31.400> know<00:58:31.559> the

00:58:31.630 --> 00:58:31.640 align:start position:0%
just a question you might know the
 

00:58:31.640 --> 00:58:33.549 align:start position:0%
just a question you might know the
answer<00:58:31.839> to<00:58:32.000> from<00:58:32.240> a<00:58:32.599> from<00:58:32.799> a<00:58:33.000> just<00:58:33.079> a<00:58:33.280> status

00:58:33.549 --> 00:58:33.559 align:start position:0%
answer to from a from a just a status
 

00:58:33.559 --> 00:58:36.069 align:start position:0%
answer to from a from a just a status
where<00:58:33.760> we<00:58:34.200> are<00:58:35.200> Ken<00:58:35.400> can<00:58:35.480> you<00:58:35.559> go<00:58:35.680> back<00:58:35.799> to<00:58:35.960> that

00:58:36.069 --> 00:58:36.079 align:start position:0%
where we are Ken can you go back to that
 

00:58:36.079 --> 00:58:41.309 align:start position:0%
where we are Ken can you go back to that
one<00:58:36.280> I'm

00:58:41.309 --> 00:58:41.319 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:58:41.319 --> 00:58:44.870 align:start position:0%
 
sorry<00:58:42.319> I<00:58:42.400> don't<00:58:42.640> think<00:58:42.760> we<00:58:42.920> need<00:58:43.039> to<00:58:43.359> repeat<00:58:44.359> sa

00:58:44.870 --> 00:58:44.880 align:start position:0%
sorry I don't think we need to repeat sa
 

00:58:44.880 --> 00:58:47.150 align:start position:0%
sorry I don't think we need to repeat sa
affable<00:58:45.559> and<00:58:45.720> Rel<00:58:46.200> we<00:58:46.319> put<00:58:46.440> it<00:58:46.559> at<00:58:46.680> the<00:58:46.839> top<00:58:47.000> so

00:58:47.150 --> 00:58:47.160 align:start position:0%
affable and Rel we put it at the top so
 

00:58:47.160 --> 00:58:49.470 align:start position:0%
affable and Rel we put it at the top so
that<00:58:47.240> it<00:58:47.400> applies<00:58:47.720> to<00:58:48.119> everything<00:58:49.119> so

00:58:49.470 --> 00:58:49.480 align:start position:0%
that it applies to everything so
 

00:58:49.480 --> 00:58:51.630 align:start position:0%
that it applies to everything so
Katherine<00:58:50.000> these<00:58:50.319> questions<00:58:50.960> are<00:58:51.200> these

00:58:51.630 --> 00:58:51.640 align:start position:0%
Katherine these questions are these
 

00:58:51.640 --> 00:58:54.710 align:start position:0%
Katherine these questions are these
questions<00:58:52.640> ones<00:58:52.960> that<00:58:53.079> are<00:58:53.480> currently<00:58:54.039> in<00:58:54.200> a

00:58:54.710 --> 00:58:54.720 align:start position:0%
questions ones that are currently in a
 

00:58:54.720 --> 00:58:56.750 align:start position:0%
questions ones that are currently in a
would<00:58:54.839> be<00:58:54.960> in<00:58:55.079> a<00:58:55.280> docket<00:58:55.720> before<00:58:56.079> the<00:58:56.200> SEC

00:58:56.750 --> 00:58:56.760 align:start position:0%
would be in a docket before the SEC
 

00:58:56.760 --> 00:59:00.549 align:start position:0%
would be in a docket before the SEC
currently<00:58:57.720> or<00:58:58.359> they<00:58:59.359> would<00:58:59.599> they<00:58:59.760> be<00:59:00.240> are<00:59:00.440> they

00:59:00.549 --> 00:59:00.559 align:start position:0%
currently or they would they be are they
 

00:59:00.559 --> 00:59:02.390 align:start position:0%
currently or they would they be are they
teed<00:59:00.880> up<00:59:01.000> to<00:59:01.119> be<00:59:01.240> something<00:59:01.480> in<00:59:01.599> the<00:59:01.680> future<00:59:02.119> or

00:59:02.390 --> 00:59:02.400 align:start position:0%
teed up to be something in the future or
 

00:59:02.400 --> 00:59:04.069 align:start position:0%
teed up to be something in the future or
would<00:59:02.599> the<00:59:02.799> legislature<00:59:03.440> have<00:59:03.559> to<00:59:03.839> do

00:59:04.069 --> 00:59:04.079 align:start position:0%
would the legislature have to do
 

00:59:04.079 --> 00:59:07.750 align:start position:0%
would the legislature have to do
something<00:59:04.440> in<00:59:04.599> order<00:59:05.240> to<00:59:06.240> which<00:59:06.880> what<00:59:07.119> they

00:59:07.750 --> 00:59:07.760 align:start position:0%
something in order to which what they
 

00:59:07.760 --> 00:59:10.510 align:start position:0%
something in order to which what they
does<00:59:07.880> not<00:59:08.079> have<00:59:08.200> to<00:59:08.400> do<00:59:08.760> anything<00:59:09.559> yeah<00:59:09.680> I

00:59:10.510 --> 00:59:10.520 align:start position:0%
does not have to do anything yeah I
 

00:59:10.520 --> 00:59:11.789 align:start position:0%
does not have to do anything yeah I
think<00:59:10.680> this<00:59:10.799> is<00:59:10.880> an<00:59:11.000> issue<00:59:11.240> that's<00:59:11.520> that<00:59:11.640> is

00:59:11.789 --> 00:59:11.799 align:start position:0%
think this is an issue that's that is
 

00:59:11.799 --> 00:59:13.349 align:start position:0%
think this is an issue that's that is
teed<00:59:12.119> up<00:59:12.400> yeah<00:59:12.480> I<00:59:12.559> think<00:59:12.680> this<00:59:12.839> is<00:59:12.960> an<00:59:13.119> issue

00:59:13.349 --> 00:59:13.359 align:start position:0%
teed up yeah I think this is an issue
 

00:59:13.359 --> 00:59:16.670 align:start position:0%
teed up yeah I think this is an issue
that's<00:59:13.559> teed<00:59:13.920> up<00:59:14.520> again<00:59:14.880> my<00:59:15.200> my<00:59:15.359> issue<00:59:15.680> is<00:59:15.880> not

00:59:16.670 --> 00:59:16.680 align:start position:0%
that's teed up again my my issue is not
 

00:59:16.680 --> 00:59:19.630 align:start position:0%
that's teed up again my my issue is not
in<00:59:16.920> mentioning<00:59:17.839> this<00:59:18.119> is<00:59:18.280> an<00:59:18.559> area<00:59:19.119> that<00:59:19.359> again

00:59:19.630 --> 00:59:19.640 align:start position:0%
in mentioning this is an area that again
 

00:59:19.640 --> 00:59:22.950 align:start position:0%
in mentioning this is an area that again
was<00:59:19.839> reported<00:59:20.440> on<00:59:21.440> by<00:59:21.680> one<00:59:22.000> perspective

00:59:22.950 --> 00:59:22.960 align:start position:0%
was reported on by one perspective
 

00:59:22.960 --> 00:59:26.750 align:start position:0%
was reported on by one perspective
that's<00:59:23.440> part<00:59:23.559> of<00:59:23.720> the<00:59:23.920> dialogue<00:59:25.039> around<00:59:25.440> these

00:59:26.750 --> 00:59:26.760 align:start position:0%
that's part of the dialogue around these
 

00:59:26.760 --> 00:59:29.589 align:start position:0%
that's part of the dialogue around these
issues<00:59:27.760> my<00:59:27.960> issue<00:59:28.280> is<00:59:28.480> with<00:59:28.640> the<00:59:28.839> declarative

00:59:29.589 --> 00:59:29.599 align:start position:0%
issues my issue is with the declarative
 

00:59:29.599 --> 00:59:31.230 align:start position:0%
issues my issue is with the declarative
statements<00:59:30.079> that<00:59:30.200> are<00:59:30.359> included<00:59:30.720> in<00:59:30.880> this<00:59:31.079> and

00:59:31.230 --> 00:59:31.240 align:start position:0%
statements that are included in this and
 

00:59:31.240 --> 00:59:35.549 align:start position:0%
statements that are included in this and
some<00:59:31.400> of<00:59:31.559> the<00:59:32.039> other<00:59:33.119> um<00:59:34.359> recommendations<00:59:35.359> for

00:59:35.549 --> 00:59:35.559 align:start position:0%
some of the other um recommendations for
 

00:59:35.559 --> 00:59:38.069 align:start position:0%
some of the other um recommendations for
example<00:59:36.000> the<00:59:36.119> ones<00:59:36.359> about<00:59:36.599> the<00:59:37.079> localities

00:59:38.069 --> 00:59:38.079 align:start position:0%
example the ones about the localities
 

00:59:38.079 --> 00:59:38.950 align:start position:0%
example the ones about the localities
about

00:59:38.950 --> 00:59:38.960 align:start position:0%
about
 

00:59:38.960 --> 00:59:40.750 align:start position:0%
about
pjm

00:59:40.750 --> 00:59:40.760 align:start position:0%
pjm
 

00:59:40.760 --> 00:59:50.549 align:start position:0%
pjm
and<00:59:41.760> again

00:59:50.549 --> 00:59:50.559 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:59:50.559 --> 00:59:53.390 align:start position:0%
 
here<00:59:51.559> so<00:59:52.079> I<00:59:52.240> actually<00:59:52.680> probably<00:59:52.920> would<00:59:53.079> word

00:59:53.390 --> 00:59:53.400 align:start position:0%
here so I actually probably would word
 

00:59:53.400 --> 00:59:54.750 align:start position:0%
here so I actually probably would word
smitth<00:59:53.720> this<00:59:53.839> one<00:59:54.000> although<00:59:54.240> I'm<00:59:54.319> not<00:59:54.400> sure

00:59:54.750 --> 00:59:54.760 align:start position:0%
smitth this one although I'm not sure
 

00:59:54.760 --> 00:59:56.430 align:start position:0%
smitth this one although I'm not sure
would<00:59:54.920> make<00:59:55.359> cther<00:59:55.640> I'm<00:59:55.720> not<00:59:55.839> sure<00:59:55.960> it<00:59:56.079> would

00:59:56.430 --> 00:59:56.440 align:start position:0%
would make cther I'm not sure it would
 

00:59:56.440 --> 00:59:58.390 align:start position:0%
would make cther I'm not sure it would
make<00:59:56.640> you<00:59:56.880> happy<00:59:57.720> and<00:59:57.839> I<00:59:57.920> don't<00:59:58.039> mean<00:59:58.200> that<00:59:58.319> in

00:59:58.390 --> 00:59:58.400 align:start position:0%
make you happy and I don't mean that in
 

00:59:58.400 --> 00:59:59.630 align:start position:0%
make you happy and I don't mean that in
a<00:59:58.480> flippant<00:59:58.839> way<00:59:59.000> I<00:59:59.039> mean<00:59:59.160> I'm<00:59:59.240> just<00:59:59.359> not<00:59:59.440> sure

00:59:59.630 --> 00:59:59.640 align:start position:0%
a flippant way I mean I'm just not sure
 

00:59:59.640 --> 01:00:01.349 align:start position:0%
a flippant way I mean I'm just not sure
we'd<00:59:59.880> get<01:00:00.000> to<01:00:00.119> where<01:00:00.319> you<01:00:00.400> would<01:00:00.559> want<01:00:00.680> to<01:00:00.880> be

01:00:01.349 --> 01:00:01.359 align:start position:0%
we'd get to where you would want to be
 

01:00:01.359 --> 01:00:03.309 align:start position:0%
we'd get to where you would want to be
I'm<01:00:01.480> not<01:00:01.599> sure<01:00:01.839> the<01:00:02.039> legislature<01:00:02.960> should

01:00:03.309 --> 01:00:03.319 align:start position:0%
I'm not sure the legislature should
 

01:00:03.319 --> 01:00:05.750 align:start position:0%
I'm not sure the legislature should
support<01:00:03.799> the<01:00:03.960> SEC<01:00:04.480> I'm<01:00:04.559> not<01:00:04.680> sure<01:00:04.920> that<01:00:05.039> is<01:00:05.160> a

01:00:05.750 --> 01:00:05.760 align:start position:0%
support the SEC I'm not sure that is a
 

01:00:05.760 --> 01:00:08.309 align:start position:0%
support the SEC I'm not sure that is a
concept<01:00:06.760> um<01:00:07.119> and<01:00:07.280> I<01:00:07.480> apologize<01:00:08.000> for<01:00:08.160> not

01:00:08.309 --> 01:00:08.319 align:start position:0%
concept um and I apologize for not
 

01:00:08.319 --> 01:00:10.990 align:start position:0%
concept um and I apologize for not
having<01:00:08.720> sort<01:00:08.920> of<01:00:09.039> thought<01:00:09.240> of<01:00:09.440> that<01:00:09.839> earlier<01:00:10.839> I

01:00:10.990 --> 01:00:11.000 align:start position:0%
having sort of thought of that earlier I
 

01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:13.670 align:start position:0%
having sort of thought of that earlier I
do<01:00:11.559> support<01:00:12.000> the<01:00:12.200> idea<01:00:12.559> of<01:00:12.720> us<01:00:12.920> encouraging

01:00:13.670 --> 01:00:13.680 align:start position:0%
do support the idea of us encouraging
 

01:00:13.680 --> 01:00:16.109 align:start position:0%
do support the idea of us encouraging
policy<01:00:14.160> makers<01:00:15.119> to<01:00:15.359> look<01:00:15.520> for<01:00:15.760> ways<01:00:15.960> to

01:00:16.109 --> 01:00:16.119 align:start position:0%
policy makers to look for ways to
 

01:00:16.119 --> 01:00:17.230 align:start position:0%
policy makers to look for ways to
streamline<01:00:16.640> the<01:00:16.760> distribution

01:00:17.230 --> 01:00:17.240 align:start position:0%
streamline the distribution
 

01:00:17.240 --> 01:00:19.230 align:start position:0%
streamline the distribution
interconnection<01:00:17.920> process<01:00:18.720> and<01:00:18.880> revoke

01:00:19.230 --> 01:00:19.240 align:start position:0%
interconnection process and revoke
 

01:00:19.240 --> 01:00:21.029 align:start position:0%
interconnection process and revoke
unnecessarily<01:00:19.720> burdens<01:00:20.079> in<01:00:20.440> rules<01:00:20.720> and<01:00:20.880> make

01:00:21.029 --> 01:00:21.039 align:start position:0%
unnecessarily burdens in rules and make
 

01:00:21.039 --> 01:00:22.950 align:start position:0%
unnecessarily burdens in rules and make
distribution<01:00:21.440> level<01:00:21.760> process<01:00:22.319> projects<01:00:22.680> cost

01:00:22.950 --> 01:00:22.960 align:start position:0%
distribution level process projects cost
 

01:00:22.960 --> 01:00:26.589 align:start position:0%
distribution level process projects cost
prohibitive<01:00:23.880> I<01:00:24.160> I<01:00:25.000> I<01:00:25.119> do<01:00:25.359> agree<01:00:25.680> with<01:00:25.880> that<01:00:26.359> so

01:00:26.589 --> 01:00:26.599 align:start position:0%
prohibitive I I I do agree with that so
 

01:00:26.599 --> 01:00:29.069 align:start position:0%
prohibitive I I I do agree with that so
if<01:00:26.720> I<01:00:26.799> were<01:00:27.000> drafting<01:00:27.440> this<01:00:27.839> now<01:00:28.839> my

01:00:29.069 --> 01:00:29.079 align:start position:0%
if I were drafting this now my
 

01:00:29.079 --> 01:00:30.950 align:start position:0%
if I were drafting this now my
recommendation<01:00:29.839> would<01:00:30.039> be<01:00:30.599> that<01:00:30.760> we

01:00:30.950 --> 01:00:30.960 align:start position:0%
recommendation would be that we
 

01:00:30.960 --> 01:00:33.390 align:start position:0%
recommendation would be that we
recommend<01:00:31.359> that<01:00:31.640> policy

01:00:33.390 --> 01:00:33.400 align:start position:0%
recommend that policy
 

01:00:33.400 --> 01:00:35.910 align:start position:0%
recommend that policy
makers<01:00:34.400> you<01:00:34.520> know<01:00:34.799> look<01:00:35.039> for<01:00:35.280> opportunities

01:00:35.910 --> 01:00:35.920 align:start position:0%
makers you know look for opportunities
 

01:00:35.920 --> 01:00:37.630 align:start position:0%
makers you know look for opportunities
to<01:00:36.319> and<01:00:36.440> then<01:00:36.559> strike<01:00:36.960> everything<01:00:37.240> before<01:00:37.520> the

01:00:37.630 --> 01:00:37.640 align:start position:0%
to and then strike everything before the
 

01:00:37.640 --> 01:00:38.870 align:start position:0%
to and then strike everything before the
word

01:00:38.870 --> 01:00:38.880 align:start position:0%
word
 

01:00:38.880 --> 01:00:43.990 align:start position:0%
word
streamline<01:00:40.119> um<01:00:41.559> but<01:00:42.559> I<01:00:43.119> I<01:00:43.280> would<01:00:43.520> agree<01:00:43.839> with

01:00:43.990 --> 01:00:44.000 align:start position:0%
streamline um but I I would agree with
 

01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:46.029 align:start position:0%
streamline um but I I would agree with
that<01:00:44.280> as<01:00:44.480> well<01:00:44.880> yeah<01:00:45.079> and<01:00:45.280> one<01:00:45.400> of<01:00:45.559> the<01:00:45.720> things

01:00:46.029 --> 01:00:46.039 align:start position:0%
that as well yeah and one of the things
 

01:00:46.039 --> 01:00:48.029 align:start position:0%
that as well yeah and one of the things
that<01:00:46.280> I<01:00:46.640> I<01:00:46.760> mentioned<01:00:47.119> in<01:00:47.240> my<01:00:47.400> recommendations

01:00:48.029 --> 01:00:48.039 align:start position:0%
that I I mentioned in my recommendations
 

01:00:48.039 --> 01:00:50.870 align:start position:0%
that I I mentioned in my recommendations
was<01:00:48.319> please<01:00:49.000> correct<01:00:49.760> anything<01:00:50.599> that's

01:00:50.870 --> 01:00:50.880 align:start position:0%
was please correct anything that's
 

01:00:50.880 --> 01:00:53.190 align:start position:0%
was please correct anything that's
legislatively<01:00:51.880> and<01:00:52.119> like<01:00:52.359> regulatorily

01:00:53.190 --> 01:00:53.200 align:start position:0%
legislatively and like regulatorily
 

01:00:53.200 --> 01:00:55.190 align:start position:0%
legislatively and like regulatorily
incorrect<01:00:53.880> in<01:00:54.000> the<01:00:54.160> way<01:00:54.319> that<01:00:54.559> we<01:00:54.720> making<01:00:55.039> the

01:00:55.190 --> 01:00:55.200 align:start position:0%
incorrect in the way that we making the
 

01:00:55.200 --> 01:00:57.270 align:start position:0%
incorrect in the way that we making the
recommendations<01:00:56.079> so<01:00:56.599> I<01:00:56.720> think<01:00:56.920> that's<01:00:57.079> a

01:00:57.270 --> 01:00:57.280 align:start position:0%
recommendations so I think that's a
 

01:00:57.280 --> 01:01:04.829 align:start position:0%
recommendations so I think that's a
really<01:00:57.599> positive

01:01:04.829 --> 01:01:04.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:01:04.839 --> 01:01:18.069 align:start position:0%
 
change<01:01:05.839> cool<01:01:06.160> Ken<01:01:06.400> could<01:01:06.559> we<01:01:06.680> see<01:01:06.960> that

01:01:18.069 --> 01:01:18.079 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:01:18.079 --> 01:01:21.789 align:start position:0%
 
reflected<01:01:19.079> so<01:01:19.640> I<01:01:19.760> would<01:01:20.039> say<01:01:21.000> if<01:01:21.119> this<01:01:21.280> were<01:01:21.480> me

01:01:21.789 --> 01:01:21.799 align:start position:0%
reflected so I would say if this were me
 

01:01:21.799 --> 01:01:23.589 align:start position:0%
reflected so I would say if this were me
again<01:01:22.119> I<01:01:22.240> would<01:01:22.400> say<01:01:22.680> policy<01:01:23.079> maker<01:01:23.359> should

01:01:23.589 --> 01:01:23.599 align:start position:0%
again I would say policy maker should
 

01:01:23.599 --> 01:01:25.069 align:start position:0%
again I would say policy maker should
instead<01:01:23.799> of<01:01:23.880> the<01:01:23.960> legisl<01:01:24.640> should<01:01:24.880> because

01:01:25.069 --> 01:01:25.079 align:start position:0%
instead of the legisl should because
 

01:01:25.079 --> 01:01:27.630 align:start position:0%
instead of the legisl should because
frankly<01:01:25.400> it's<01:01:25.520> the<01:01:26.200> it's<01:01:26.359> all<01:01:27.280> it's<01:01:27.440> all

01:01:27.630 --> 01:01:27.640 align:start position:0%
frankly it's the it's all it's all
 

01:01:27.640 --> 01:01:28.950 align:start position:0%
frankly it's the it's all it's all
branches<01:01:28.039> of

01:01:28.950 --> 01:01:28.960 align:start position:0%
branches of
 

01:01:28.960 --> 01:01:32.029 align:start position:0%
branches of
policymaking<01:01:29.960> in<01:01:30.200> this<01:01:30.559> one<01:01:31.559> um<01:01:31.799> and<01:01:31.920> then

01:01:32.029 --> 01:01:32.039 align:start position:0%
policymaking in this one um and then
 

01:01:32.039 --> 01:01:33.390 align:start position:0%
policymaking in this one um and then
rather<01:01:32.280> than<01:01:32.480> support<01:01:32.680> the<01:01:32.760> SC<01:01:33.079> required

01:01:33.390 --> 01:01:33.400 align:start position:0%
rather than support the SC required
 

01:01:33.400 --> 01:01:35.789 align:start position:0%
rather than support the SC required
virin<01:01:33.760> utilities<01:01:34.680> I<01:01:34.760> would<01:01:34.960> say<01:01:35.440> Seek

01:01:35.789 --> 01:01:35.799 align:start position:0%
virin utilities I would say Seek
 

01:01:35.799 --> 01:01:39.109 align:start position:0%
virin utilities I would say Seek
opportunities<01:01:36.480> to<01:01:36.720> streamline<01:01:37.520> or

01:01:39.109 --> 01:01:39.119 align:start position:0%
opportunities to streamline or
 

01:01:39.119 --> 01:01:41.789 align:start position:0%
opportunities to streamline or
Advance<01:01:40.119> policy<01:01:40.559> to

01:01:41.789 --> 01:01:41.799 align:start position:0%
Advance policy to
 

01:01:41.799 --> 01:01:49.230 align:start position:0%
Advance policy to
streamline

01:01:49.230 --> 01:01:49.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:01:49.240 --> 01:01:52.589 align:start position:0%
 
um<01:01:50.240> I<01:01:50.400> like<01:01:50.680> Advanced<01:01:51.279> policies<01:01:51.799> too<01:01:52.160> because

01:01:52.589 --> 01:01:52.599 align:start position:0%
um I like Advanced policies too because
 

01:01:52.599 --> 01:01:55.710 align:start position:0%
um I like Advanced policies too because
this<01:01:52.720> is<01:01:52.920> an<01:01:53.279> active<01:01:54.279> um

01:01:55.710 --> 01:01:55.720 align:start position:0%
this is an active um
 

01:01:55.720 --> 01:02:01.390 align:start position:0%
this is an active um
dock<01:01:56.039> it<01:01:56.279> at<01:01:56.640> the<01:01:56.799> SEC

01:02:01.390 --> 01:02:01.400 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:02:01.400 --> 01:02:05.069 align:start position:0%
 
right<01:02:02.400> Katherine<01:02:02.760> does<01:02:03.039> that<01:02:03.880> does<01:02:04.119> that

01:02:05.069 --> 01:02:05.079 align:start position:0%
right Katherine does that does that
 

01:02:05.079 --> 01:02:16.190 align:start position:0%
right Katherine does that does that
reduce<01:02:05.480> any

01:02:16.190 --> 01:02:16.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:02:16.200 --> 01:02:19.029 align:start position:0%
 
heartburn<01:02:17.200> uh<01:02:17.400> I<01:02:17.480> mean<01:02:17.799> again<01:02:18.079> I<01:02:18.200> think<01:02:18.440> that

01:02:19.029 --> 01:02:19.039 align:start position:0%
heartburn uh I mean again I think that
 

01:02:19.039 --> 01:02:20.150 align:start position:0%
heartburn uh I mean again I think that
advanced<01:02:19.400> policy<01:02:19.640> is<01:02:19.760> streamline

01:02:20.150 --> 01:02:20.160 align:start position:0%
advanced policy is streamline
 

01:02:20.160 --> 01:02:22.910 align:start position:0%
advanced policy is streamline
distribution<01:02:20.559> n<01:02:20.839> connect

01:02:22.910 --> 01:02:22.920 align:start position:0%
distribution n connect
 

01:02:22.920 --> 01:02:26.950 align:start position:0%
distribution n connect
process<01:02:23.920> uh<01:02:24.480> is<01:02:24.640> fine<01:02:25.039> I<01:02:25.119> think<01:02:25.400> after<01:02:25.760> that<01:02:26.160> is

01:02:26.950 --> 01:02:26.960 align:start position:0%
process uh is fine I think after that is
 

01:02:26.960 --> 01:02:28.029 align:start position:0%
process uh is fine I think after that is
still<01:02:27.240> an

01:02:28.029 --> 01:02:28.039 align:start position:0%
still an
 

01:02:28.039 --> 01:02:31.829 align:start position:0%
still an
issue<01:02:29.119> my<01:02:30.119> the<01:02:30.279> question<01:02:30.599> with<01:02:30.799> that<01:02:31.000> is<01:02:31.640> the

01:02:31.829 --> 01:02:31.839 align:start position:0%
issue my the question with that is the
 

01:02:31.839 --> 01:02:33.750 align:start position:0%
issue my the question with that is the
question<01:02:32.200> with<01:02:32.520> that<01:02:32.880> is<01:02:33.160> is<01:02:33.279> it<01:02:33.480> cost

01:02:33.750 --> 01:02:33.760 align:start position:0%
question with that is is it cost
 

01:02:33.760 --> 01:02:36.470 align:start position:0%
question with that is is it cost
prohibitive<01:02:34.319> to<01:02:34.559> the<01:02:35.039> individual<01:02:36.000> developer

01:02:36.470 --> 01:02:36.480 align:start position:0%
prohibitive to the individual developer
 

01:02:36.480 --> 01:02:39.829 align:start position:0%
prohibitive to the individual developer
or<01:02:36.680> cost<01:02:36.920> prohibitive<01:02:37.760> to<01:02:38.760> overall<01:02:39.279> customers

01:02:39.829 --> 01:02:39.839 align:start position:0%
or cost prohibitive to overall customers
 

01:02:39.839 --> 01:02:41.349 align:start position:0%
or cost prohibitive to overall customers
who<01:02:40.000> might<01:02:40.160> be<01:02:40.400> absorbing<01:02:40.760> some<01:02:40.920> of<01:02:41.079> those

01:02:41.349 --> 01:02:41.359 align:start position:0%
who might be absorbing some of those
 

01:02:41.359 --> 01:02:42.750 align:start position:0%
who might be absorbing some of those
costs<01:02:41.720> I<01:02:41.799> don't<01:02:41.960> I<01:02:42.039> don't<01:02:42.160> know<01:02:42.359> exactly<01:02:42.680> what

01:02:42.750 --> 01:02:42.760 align:start position:0%
costs I don't I don't know exactly what
 

01:02:42.760 --> 01:02:44.309 align:start position:0%
costs I don't I don't know exactly what
we<01:02:42.880> mean<01:02:43.039> by<01:02:43.240> cost<01:02:43.520> prohibitive<01:02:43.960> and<01:02:44.079> if<01:02:44.200> this

01:02:44.309 --> 01:02:44.319 align:start position:0%
we mean by cost prohibitive and if this
 

01:02:44.319 --> 01:02:46.029 align:start position:0%
we mean by cost prohibitive and if this
is<01:02:44.440> a<01:02:44.599> recommendation<01:02:45.200> the<01:02:45.319> legislature<01:02:45.880> or

01:02:46.029 --> 01:02:46.039 align:start position:0%
is a recommendation the legislature or
 

01:02:46.039 --> 01:02:47.349 align:start position:0%
is a recommendation the legislature or
other<01:02:46.279> policy<01:02:46.599> makers<01:02:46.839> are<01:02:46.920> going<01:02:47.039> to<01:02:47.160> get

01:02:47.349 --> 01:02:47.359 align:start position:0%
other policy makers are going to get
 

01:02:47.359 --> 01:02:50.990 align:start position:0%
other policy makers are going to get
we've<01:02:47.520> got<01:02:47.640> to<01:02:48.400> I<01:02:48.480> think<01:02:48.640> be<01:02:48.760> clear<01:02:49.039> on

01:02:50.990 --> 01:02:51.000 align:start position:0%
we've got to I think be clear on
 

01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:52.990 align:start position:0%
we've got to I think be clear on
that<01:02:52.000> yeah<01:02:52.119> but<01:02:52.240> what<01:02:52.359> you're<01:02:52.520> really<01:02:52.760> talking

01:02:52.990 --> 01:02:53.000 align:start position:0%
that yeah but what you're really talking
 

01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:54.630 align:start position:0%
that yeah but what you're really talking
about<01:02:53.160> is<01:02:53.359> unnecessarily<01:02:53.960> burdens<01:02:54.520> some

01:02:54.630 --> 01:02:54.640 align:start position:0%
about is unnecessarily burdens some
 

01:02:54.640 --> 01:02:56.910 align:start position:0%
about is unnecessarily burdens some
rules<01:02:55.079> and<01:02:55.279> so<01:02:55.880> I<01:02:55.960> mean<01:02:56.119> it's<01:02:56.240> hard<01:02:56.400> to<01:02:56.599> not<01:02:56.799> be

01:02:56.910 --> 01:02:56.920 align:start position:0%
rules and so I mean it's hard to not be
 

01:02:56.920 --> 01:02:58.309 align:start position:0%
rules and so I mean it's hard to not be
in<01:02:57.079> favor<01:02:57.319> of<01:02:57.440> removing<01:02:57.799> unnecessarily

01:02:58.309 --> 01:02:58.319 align:start position:0%
in favor of removing unnecessarily
 

01:02:58.319 --> 01:03:00.069 align:start position:0%
in favor of removing unnecessarily
burdensome<01:02:58.799> rules<01:02:59.400> we're<01:02:59.599> not<01:02:59.760> coming<01:02:59.960> out

01:03:00.069 --> 01:03:00.079 align:start position:0%
burdensome rules we're not coming out
 

01:03:00.079 --> 01:03:02.870 align:start position:0%
burdensome rules we're not coming out
and<01:03:00.279> explicitly<01:03:01.000> like<01:03:01.319> blaming<01:03:02.319> somebody<01:03:02.640> for

01:03:02.870 --> 01:03:02.880 align:start position:0%
and explicitly like blaming somebody for
 

01:03:02.880 --> 01:03:05.269 align:start position:0%
and explicitly like blaming somebody for
that<01:03:03.000> or<01:03:03.160> setting<01:03:03.440> out<01:03:03.599> what<01:03:03.799> they<01:03:03.920> are<01:03:04.920> but

01:03:05.269 --> 01:03:05.279 align:start position:0%
that or setting out what they are but
 

01:03:05.279 --> 01:03:06.829 align:start position:0%
that or setting out what they are but
it's<01:03:05.559> they<01:03:05.640> should<01:03:05.839> be<01:03:06.039> aware<01:03:06.400> of<01:03:06.599> the

01:03:06.829 --> 01:03:06.839 align:start position:0%
it's they should be aware of the
 

01:03:06.839 --> 01:03:08.150 align:start position:0%
it's they should be aware of the
processes<01:03:07.279> and<01:03:07.440> when<01:03:07.640> they've<01:03:07.839> become

01:03:08.150 --> 01:03:08.160 align:start position:0%
processes and when they've become
 

01:03:08.160 --> 01:03:13.269 align:start position:0%
processes and when they've become
unnecessarily

01:03:13.269 --> 01:03:13.279 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:03:13.279 --> 01:03:15.309 align:start position:0%
 
burdensome<01:03:14.279> so<01:03:14.520> end<01:03:14.680> the<01:03:14.799> sentence<01:03:15.119> after

01:03:15.309 --> 01:03:15.319 align:start position:0%
burdensome so end the sentence after
 

01:03:15.319 --> 01:03:22.750 align:start position:0%
burdensome so end the sentence after
burdensome

01:03:22.750 --> 01:03:22.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:03:22.760 --> 01:03:25.870 align:start position:0%
 
rules<01:03:23.760> yeah<01:03:23.880> I<01:03:23.960> mean<01:03:24.119> I<01:03:24.760> I<01:03:25.039> like<01:03:25.200> it<01:03:25.359> as<01:03:25.480> it<01:03:25.640> is

01:03:25.870 --> 01:03:25.880 align:start position:0%
rules yeah I mean I I like it as it is
 

01:03:25.880 --> 01:03:28.549 align:start position:0%
rules yeah I mean I I like it as it is
now<01:03:26.160> but<01:03:26.359> I<01:03:26.799> understand<01:03:26.960> that<01:03:27.160> we<01:03:28.160> aren't<01:03:28.400> all

01:03:28.549 --> 01:03:28.559 align:start position:0%
now but I understand that we aren't all
 

01:03:28.559 --> 01:03:36.829 align:start position:0%
now but I understand that we aren't all
going<01:03:28.640> to

01:03:36.829 --> 01:03:36.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:03:36.839 --> 01:03:40.589 align:start position:0%
 
agree<01:03:37.839> uh<01:03:38.240> Katherine<01:03:38.680> would<01:03:38.920> you<01:03:39.720> kind<01:03:39.839> of

01:03:40.589 --> 01:03:40.599 align:start position:0%
agree uh Katherine would you kind of
 

01:03:40.599 --> 01:03:44.549 align:start position:0%
agree uh Katherine would you kind of
wholeheartedly<01:03:41.400> sign<01:03:41.680> on<01:03:41.880> to<01:03:42.160> this<01:03:42.440> if<01:03:42.880> if<01:03:43.359> we

01:03:44.549 --> 01:03:44.559 align:start position:0%
wholeheartedly sign on to this if if we
 

01:03:44.559 --> 01:03:50.109 align:start position:0%
wholeheartedly sign on to this if if we
remove<01:03:45.559> everything<01:03:45.960> after<01:03:46.279> burdensome

01:03:50.109 --> 01:03:50.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:03:50.119 --> 01:03:52.230 align:start position:0%
 
roles<01:03:51.119> again<01:03:51.319> I<01:03:51.400> think<01:03:51.520> that<01:03:51.640> there's<01:03:51.839> some

01:03:52.230 --> 01:03:52.240 align:start position:0%
roles again I think that there's some
 

01:03:52.240 --> 01:03:53.750 align:start position:0%
roles again I think that there's some
other<01:03:52.520> recommendations<01:03:53.240> that<01:03:53.440> might<01:03:53.599> need

01:03:53.750 --> 01:03:53.760 align:start position:0%
other recommendations that might need
 

01:03:53.760 --> 01:03:55.670 align:start position:0%
other recommendations that might need
word<01:03:54.039> Smith<01:03:54.680> but<01:03:54.839> I'd<01:03:55.000> be<01:03:55.119> more<01:03:55.279> comfortable

01:03:55.670 --> 01:03:55.680 align:start position:0%
word Smith but I'd be more comfortable
 

01:03:55.680 --> 01:03:57.549 align:start position:0%
word Smith but I'd be more comfortable
with<01:03:55.920> this<01:03:56.119> language<01:03:56.640> in<01:03:56.880> this<01:03:57.079> particular

01:03:57.549 --> 01:03:57.559 align:start position:0%
with this language in this particular
 

01:03:57.559 --> 01:03:58.990 align:start position:0%
with this language in this particular
section<01:03:58.000> if<01:03:58.160> it

01:03:58.990 --> 01:03:59.000 align:start position:0%
section if it
 

01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:03.589 align:start position:0%
section if it
said<01:04:00.000> if<01:04:00.119> it<01:04:00.279> didn't<01:04:00.559> make<01:04:00.760> the<01:04:00.960> presumption

01:04:03.589 --> 01:04:03.599 align:start position:0%
said if it didn't make the presumption
 

01:04:03.599 --> 01:04:08.309 align:start position:0%
said if it didn't make the presumption
that<01:04:04.599> related<01:04:04.920> to<01:04:05.079> some<01:04:05.200> of

01:04:08.309 --> 01:04:08.319 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:04:08.319 --> 01:04:10.829 align:start position:0%
 
the<01:04:09.319> you<01:04:09.400> can<01:04:09.520> leave<01:04:09.760> rules<01:04:10.000> and<01:04:10.160> put<01:04:10.319> a<01:04:10.440> peri

01:04:10.829 --> 01:04:10.839 align:start position:0%
the you can leave rules and put a peri
 

01:04:10.839 --> 01:04:17.269 align:start position:0%
the you can leave rules and put a peri
period<01:04:11.119> after

01:04:17.269 --> 01:04:17.279 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:04:17.279 --> 01:04:19.870 align:start position:0%
 
rules<01:04:18.279> I<01:04:18.559> I<01:04:18.640> would<01:04:18.799> say<01:04:18.960> address<01:04:19.640> you<01:04:19.720> could

01:04:19.870 --> 01:04:19.880 align:start position:0%
rules I I would say address you could
 

01:04:19.880 --> 01:04:21.670 align:start position:0%
rules I I would say address you could
say<01:04:20.079> address<01:04:20.559> unnecessarily<01:04:21.160> burdensome

01:04:21.670 --> 01:04:21.680 align:start position:0%
say address unnecessarily burdensome
 

01:04:21.680 --> 01:04:24.750 align:start position:0%
say address unnecessarily burdensome
rules<01:04:22.279> because<01:04:23.240> I<01:04:23.359> don't<01:04:23.520> know<01:04:23.680> what<01:04:23.799> their

01:04:24.750 --> 01:04:24.760 align:start position:0%
rules because I don't know what their
 

01:04:24.760 --> 01:04:26.670 align:start position:0%
rules because I don't know what their
I

01:04:26.670 --> 01:04:26.680 align:start position:0%
I
 

01:04:26.680 --> 01:04:31.510 align:start position:0%
I
don't

01:04:31.510 --> 01:04:31.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:04:31.520 --> 01:04:34.470 align:start position:0%
 
okay<01:04:32.520> well<01:04:32.680> I<01:04:32.760> think<01:04:32.920> it<01:04:33.039> would<01:04:33.240> be<01:04:33.680> the<01:04:33.920> things

01:04:34.470 --> 01:04:34.480 align:start position:0%
okay well I think it would be the things
 

01:04:34.480 --> 01:04:37.710 align:start position:0%
okay well I think it would be the things
that<01:04:34.960> um<01:04:35.839> we<01:04:36.000> see<01:04:36.880> I<01:04:36.960> mean<01:04:37.200> above<01:04:37.440> in<01:04:37.559> the

01:04:37.710 --> 01:04:37.720 align:start position:0%
that um we see I mean above in the
 

01:04:37.720 --> 01:04:39.470 align:start position:0%
that um we see I mean above in the
report<01:04:38.000> I'm<01:04:38.119> forgetting<01:04:38.559> his<01:04:38.760> name<01:04:39.039> who<01:04:39.240> gave

01:04:39.470 --> 01:04:39.480 align:start position:0%
report I'm forgetting his name who gave
 

01:04:39.480 --> 01:04:43.190 align:start position:0%
report I'm forgetting his name who gave
the<01:04:39.720> presentation<01:04:40.440> in<01:04:41.319> April<01:04:42.119> on<01:04:42.960> the

01:04:43.190 --> 01:04:43.200 align:start position:0%
the presentation in April on the
 

01:04:43.200 --> 01:04:45.589 align:start position:0%
the presentation in April on the
distribution<01:04:43.799> level<01:04:44.640> challenges<01:04:45.319> of

01:04:45.589 --> 01:04:45.599 align:start position:0%
distribution level challenges of
 

01:04:45.599 --> 01:04:48.710 align:start position:0%
distribution level challenges of
development<01:04:46.599> of<01:04:46.760> solar<01:04:47.119> and<01:04:47.279> storage<01:04:47.720> in

01:04:48.710 --> 01:04:48.720 align:start position:0%
development of solar and storage in
 

01:04:48.720 --> 01:04:51.589 align:start position:0%
development of solar and storage in
Virginia<01:04:49.720> and<01:04:49.960> I<01:04:50.079> think<01:04:50.440> you

01:04:51.589 --> 01:04:51.599 align:start position:0%
Virginia and I think you
 

01:04:51.599 --> 01:04:54.950 align:start position:0%
Virginia and I think you
know<01:04:52.599> so<01:04:53.279> okay<01:04:53.480> first<01:04:53.680> of<01:04:53.839> all<01:04:54.480> we<01:04:54.599> still<01:04:54.760> need

01:04:54.950 --> 01:04:54.960 align:start position:0%
know so okay first of all we still need
 

01:04:54.960 --> 01:04:59.230 align:start position:0%
know so okay first of all we still need
the<01:04:55.039> word

01:04:59.230 --> 01:04:59.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:04:59.240 --> 01:05:03.109 align:start position:0%
 
rules<01:05:00.240> and<01:05:00.359> then<01:05:00.480> I<01:05:00.599> think<01:05:00.799> that

01:05:03.109 --> 01:05:03.119 align:start position:0%
rules and then I think that
 

01:05:03.119 --> 01:05:06.190 align:start position:0%
rules and then I think that
sorry<01:05:04.160> and<01:05:05.160> I

01:05:06.190 --> 01:05:06.200 align:start position:0%
sorry and I
 

01:05:06.200 --> 01:05:18.870 align:start position:0%
sorry and I
mean<01:05:07.200> I<01:05:07.319> guess<01:05:07.559> address<01:05:07.960> and<01:05:08.200> revoke<01:05:08.799> are<01:05:09.799> uh

01:05:18.870 --> 01:05:18.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:05:18.880 --> 01:05:21.470 align:start position:0%
 
similar

01:05:21.470 --> 01:05:21.480 align:start position:0%
similar
 

01:05:21.480 --> 01:05:23.069 align:start position:0%
similar
um

01:05:23.069 --> 01:05:23.079 align:start position:0%
um
 

01:05:23.079 --> 01:05:24.950 align:start position:0%
um
policies

01:05:24.950 --> 01:05:24.960 align:start position:0%
policies
 

01:05:24.960 --> 01:05:28.109 align:start position:0%
policies
without<01:05:25.599> without<01:05:26.200> the<01:05:26.480> last<01:05:26.920> Clause<01:05:27.640> it<01:05:27.799> makes

01:05:28.109 --> 01:05:28.119 align:start position:0%
without without the last Clause it makes
 

01:05:28.119 --> 01:05:30.829 align:start position:0%
without without the last Clause it makes
unnecessarily<01:05:28.760> burdensome<01:05:29.279> rules<01:05:29.559> seem<01:05:29.839> very

01:05:30.829 --> 01:05:30.839 align:start position:0%
unnecessarily burdensome rules seem very
 

01:05:30.839 --> 01:05:33.150 align:start position:0%
unnecessarily burdensome rules seem very
broad<01:05:31.839> but<01:05:32.119> instead<01:05:32.480> we're<01:05:32.680> talking

01:05:33.150 --> 01:05:33.160 align:start position:0%
broad but instead we're talking
 

01:05:33.160 --> 01:05:35.309 align:start position:0%
broad but instead we're talking
specifically<01:05:33.760> about<01:05:34.000> the<01:05:34.160> ones<01:05:34.559> that<01:05:34.960> make

01:05:35.309 --> 01:05:35.319 align:start position:0%
specifically about the ones that make
 

01:05:35.319 --> 01:05:38.910 align:start position:0%
specifically about the ones that make
distribution<01:05:35.960> level<01:05:36.359> development<01:05:36.960> cost

01:05:38.910 --> 01:05:38.920 align:start position:0%
distribution level development cost
 

01:05:38.920 --> 01:05:43.710 align:start position:0%
distribution level development cost
prohibitive<01:05:40.400> um<01:05:41.400> and<01:05:41.799> I<01:05:42.000> I<01:05:42.079> don't<01:05:42.680> like<01:05:43.000> I'd<01:05:43.200> be

01:05:43.710 --> 01:05:43.720 align:start position:0%
prohibitive um and I I don't like I'd be
 

01:05:43.720 --> 01:05:46.430 align:start position:0%
prohibitive um and I I don't like I'd be
interested<01:05:44.160> in<01:05:44.559> other<01:05:44.799> members<01:05:45.640> particularly

01:05:46.430 --> 01:05:46.440 align:start position:0%
interested in other members particularly
 

01:05:46.440 --> 01:05:49.230 align:start position:0%
interested in other members particularly
if<01:05:46.559> we<01:05:46.680> have<01:05:46.839> any<01:05:47.039> developer<01:05:47.520> members<01:05:47.880> on<01:05:48.200> the

01:05:49.230 --> 01:05:49.240 align:start position:0%
if we have any developer members on the
 

01:05:49.240 --> 01:05:53.069 align:start position:0%
if we have any developer members on the
um<01:05:50.240> call<01:05:50.599> that<01:05:50.760> want<01:05:51.000> to<01:05:51.200> chime

01:05:53.069 --> 01:05:53.079 align:start position:0%
um call that want to chime
 

01:05:53.079 --> 01:05:58.430 align:start position:0%
um call that want to chime
in

01:05:58.430 --> 01:05:58.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:05:58.440 --> 01:06:00.430 align:start position:0%
 
I<01:05:58.520> don't<01:05:58.760> think<01:05:58.920> it's<01:05:59.079> too<01:05:59.640> my<01:05:59.839> personal<01:06:00.200> view

01:06:00.430 --> 01:06:00.440 align:start position:0%
I don't think it's too my personal view
 

01:06:00.440 --> 01:06:02.069 align:start position:0%
I don't think it's too my personal view
is<01:06:00.559> that<01:06:00.680> it's<01:06:00.839> not<01:06:01.039> too<01:06:01.279> controversial<01:06:01.880> to

01:06:02.069 --> 01:06:02.079 align:start position:0%
is that it's not too controversial to
 

01:06:02.079 --> 01:06:03.829 align:start position:0%
is that it's not too controversial to
leave<01:06:02.319> the<01:06:02.440> cost<01:06:02.760> prohibitive<01:06:03.440> part<01:06:03.599> of<01:06:03.720> the

01:06:03.829 --> 01:06:03.839 align:start position:0%
leave the cost prohibitive part of the
 

01:06:03.839 --> 01:06:07.550 align:start position:0%
leave the cost prohibitive part of the
sentence

01:06:07.550 --> 01:06:07.560 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:07.560 --> 01:06:15.029 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

01:06:15.029 --> 01:06:15.039 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:15.039 --> 01:06:19.230 align:start position:0%
 
in<01:06:16.039> yeah<01:06:16.400> and<01:06:17.039> I<01:06:17.119> mean<01:06:17.359> we<01:06:17.720> spent<01:06:18.200> some<01:06:19.039> time

01:06:19.230 --> 01:06:19.240 align:start position:0%
in yeah and I mean we spent some time
 

01:06:19.240 --> 01:06:22.109 align:start position:0%
in yeah and I mean we spent some time
and<01:06:19.440> energy<01:06:19.960> adding<01:06:20.319> in<01:06:20.480> the<01:06:20.760> safe

01:06:22.109 --> 01:06:22.119 align:start position:0%
and energy adding in the safe
 

01:06:22.119 --> 01:06:25.109 align:start position:0%
and energy adding in the safe
reliable<01:06:23.119> affordable<01:06:23.680> element<01:06:24.279> to<01:06:24.480> be<01:06:24.760> to<01:06:24.920> the

01:06:25.109 --> 01:06:25.119 align:start position:0%
reliable affordable element to be to the
 

01:06:25.119 --> 01:06:32.269 align:start position:0%
reliable affordable element to be to the
beginning<01:06:25.520> so<01:06:25.720> that<01:06:25.880> sets<01:06:26.160> the<01:06:26.319> stage

01:06:32.269 --> 01:06:32.279 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:32.279 --> 01:06:34.829 align:start position:0%
 
here<01:06:33.279> so<01:06:33.760> the<01:06:33.880> recommendation<01:06:34.400> above<01:06:34.720> this

01:06:34.829 --> 01:06:34.839 align:start position:0%
here so the recommendation above this
 

01:06:34.839 --> 01:06:38.589 align:start position:0%
here so the recommendation above this
one<01:06:35.279> Ken<01:06:35.520> if<01:06:35.839> you<01:06:36.839> which

01:06:38.589 --> 01:06:38.599 align:start position:0%
one Ken if you which
 

01:06:38.599 --> 01:06:43.190 align:start position:0%
one Ken if you which
one<01:06:39.599> the<01:06:39.720> recommendation<01:06:40.359> above<01:06:40.680> this

01:06:43.190 --> 01:06:43.200 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:43.200 --> 01:06:46.029 align:start position:0%
 
one<01:06:44.200> above<01:06:44.599> this

01:06:46.029 --> 01:06:46.039 align:start position:0%
one above this
 

01:06:46.039 --> 01:06:49.630 align:start position:0%
one above this
one<01:06:47.039> yeah<01:06:47.279> then<01:06:47.640> the<01:06:48.319> yes<01:06:48.640> the<01:06:48.880> the

01:06:49.630 --> 01:06:49.640 align:start position:0%
one yeah then the yes the the
 

01:06:49.640 --> 01:06:52.990 align:start position:0%
one yeah then the yes the the
recommendation<01:06:50.279> before

01:06:52.990 --> 01:06:53.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:56.990 align:start position:0%
 
this

01:06:56.990 --> 01:06:57.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:10.029 align:start position:0%
 
this

01:07:10.029 --> 01:07:10.039 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:07:10.039 --> 01:07:12.630 align:start position:0%
 
one<01:07:11.039> could<01:07:11.240> you<01:07:11.359> scroll<01:07:11.680> so<01:07:11.799> we<01:07:11.920> could<01:07:12.039> see<01:07:12.359> the

01:07:12.630 --> 01:07:12.640 align:start position:0%
one could you scroll so we could see the
 

01:07:12.640 --> 01:07:22.910 align:start position:0%
one could you scroll so we could see the
that<01:07:12.799> entire

01:07:22.910 --> 01:07:22.920 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:07:22.920 --> 01:07:25.069 align:start position:0%
 
Rec

01:07:25.069 --> 01:07:25.079 align:start position:0%
Rec
 

01:07:25.079 --> 01:07:29.309 align:start position:0%
Rec
I<01:07:25.160> mean<01:07:25.359> I

01:07:29.309 --> 01:07:29.319 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:07:29.319 --> 01:07:31.710 align:start position:0%
 
guess<01:07:30.319> again<01:07:30.520> there's<01:07:30.680> a<01:07:30.880> presumption<01:07:31.480> that

01:07:31.710 --> 01:07:31.720 align:start position:0%
guess again there's a presumption that
 

01:07:31.720 --> 01:07:33.789 align:start position:0%
guess again there's a presumption that
the<01:07:31.960> Virginia<01:07:32.279> Utilities<01:07:32.839> are<01:07:33.039> not<01:07:33.279> using

01:07:33.789 --> 01:07:33.799 align:start position:0%
the Virginia Utilities are not using
 

01:07:33.799 --> 01:07:36.349 align:start position:0%
the Virginia Utilities are not using
existing<01:07:34.160> grid<01:07:34.559> capacity<01:07:35.039> wisely<01:07:35.440> in<01:07:35.640> this<01:07:36.000> so

01:07:36.349 --> 01:07:36.359 align:start position:0%
existing grid capacity wisely in this so
 

01:07:36.359 --> 01:07:52.910 align:start position:0%
existing grid capacity wisely in this so
that's<01:07:36.920> my<01:07:37.200> primary<01:07:37.559> issue<01:07:37.839> with

01:07:52.910 --> 01:07:52.920 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:07:52.920 --> 01:07:56.269 align:start position:0%
 
it<01:07:54.359> and<01:07:54.559> again<01:07:54.720> I<01:07:54.920> think<01:07:55.119> this<01:07:55.279> recommendation

01:07:56.269 --> 01:07:56.279 align:start position:0%
it and again I think this recommendation
 

01:07:56.279 --> 01:07:57.789 align:start position:0%
it and again I think this recommendation
this<01:07:56.559> this<01:07:56.720> recommendation<01:07:57.400> just<01:07:57.599> I<01:07:57.680> think

01:07:57.789 --> 01:07:57.799 align:start position:0%
this this recommendation just I think
 

01:07:57.799 --> 01:07:59.470 align:start position:0%
this this recommendation just I think
goes<01:07:58.000> into<01:07:58.240> some<01:07:58.400> areas<01:07:58.760> that<01:07:58.880> are<01:07:59.039> not<01:07:59.200> within

01:07:59.470 --> 01:07:59.480 align:start position:0%
goes into some areas that are not within
 

01:07:59.480 --> 01:08:02.150 align:start position:0%
goes into some areas that are not within
the<01:07:59.720> authorities<01:08:00.279> purview<01:08:00.720> and<01:08:01.039> have<01:08:02.000> we

01:08:02.150 --> 01:08:02.160 align:start position:0%
the authorities purview and have we
 

01:08:02.160 --> 01:08:04.309 align:start position:0%
the authorities purview and have we
cannot<01:08:02.440> make<01:08:02.559> a<01:08:02.920> recommendation<01:08:03.920> about

01:08:04.309 --> 01:08:04.319 align:start position:0%
cannot make a recommendation about
 

01:08:04.319 --> 01:08:06.870 align:start position:0%
cannot make a recommendation about
retiring<01:08:05.000> certain<01:08:05.480> Assets<01:08:06.160> in<01:08:06.319> favor<01:08:06.680> of

01:08:06.870 --> 01:08:06.880 align:start position:0%
retiring certain Assets in favor of
 

01:08:06.880 --> 01:08:10.069 align:start position:0%
retiring certain Assets in favor of
others<01:08:07.359> without<01:08:08.359> considering<01:08:09.359> the<01:08:09.599> complete

01:08:10.069 --> 01:08:10.079 align:start position:0%
others without considering the complete
 

01:08:10.079 --> 01:08:12.230 align:start position:0%
others without considering the complete
picture<01:08:10.480> and<01:08:10.680> we<01:08:10.799> don't<01:08:11.240> have<01:08:11.400> the<01:08:11.559> expertise

01:08:12.230 --> 01:08:12.240 align:start position:0%
picture and we don't have the expertise
 

01:08:12.240 --> 01:08:14.750 align:start position:0%
picture and we don't have the expertise
nor<01:08:12.480> the<01:08:12.599> authority<01:08:13.240> to<01:08:13.400> do<01:08:13.720> that<01:08:14.079> so<01:08:14.440> I<01:08:14.559> I<01:08:14.640> just

01:08:14.750 --> 01:08:14.760 align:start position:0%
nor the authority to do that so I I just
 

01:08:14.760 --> 01:08:17.870 align:start position:0%
nor the authority to do that so I I just
think<01:08:15.000> this<01:08:15.119> one<01:08:15.319> Falls<01:08:15.599> outside<01:08:16.120> to<01:08:16.520> me<01:08:17.520> as

01:08:17.870 --> 01:08:17.880 align:start position:0%
think this one Falls outside to me as
 

01:08:17.880 --> 01:08:21.910 align:start position:0%
think this one Falls outside to me as
worded<01:08:18.880> um<01:08:19.279> outside<01:08:19.679> the<01:08:19.799> purview<01:08:20.120> of<01:08:20.239> the

01:08:21.910 --> 01:08:21.920 align:start position:0%
worded um outside the purview of the
 

01:08:21.920 --> 01:08:24.189 align:start position:0%
worded um outside the purview of the
authority<01:08:22.920> I<01:08:23.040> would<01:08:23.239> argue<01:08:23.560> that<01:08:23.679> if<01:08:24.000> not

01:08:24.189 --> 01:08:24.199 align:start position:0%
authority I would argue that if not
 

01:08:24.199 --> 01:08:27.269 align:start position:0%
authority I would argue that if not
outside<01:08:24.679> our<01:08:25.560> purview<01:08:26.560> I<01:08:26.719> think<01:08:27.040> it's

01:08:27.269 --> 01:08:27.279 align:start position:0%
outside our purview I think it's
 

01:08:27.279 --> 01:08:29.110 align:start position:0%
outside our purview I think it's
perfectly<01:08:27.719> fine<01:08:27.920> to<01:08:28.080> have<01:08:28.319> disagreements

01:08:29.110 --> 01:08:29.120 align:start position:0%
perfectly fine to have disagreements
 

01:08:29.120 --> 01:08:32.430 align:start position:0%
perfectly fine to have disagreements
about<01:08:29.759> whether<01:08:30.759> these<01:08:30.960> are

01:08:32.430 --> 01:08:32.440 align:start position:0%
about whether these are
 

01:08:32.440 --> 01:08:35.430 align:start position:0%
about whether these are
directionally<01:08:33.440> how<01:08:33.640> you<01:08:33.759> want<01:08:34.000> our

01:08:35.430 --> 01:08:35.440 align:start position:0%
directionally how you want our
 

01:08:35.440 --> 01:08:39.229 align:start position:0%
directionally how you want our
recommendations<01:08:36.440> um<01:08:37.159> to<01:08:37.839> form<01:08:38.759> like<01:08:38.920> the<01:08:39.000> form

01:08:39.229 --> 01:08:39.239 align:start position:0%
recommendations um to form like the form
 

01:08:39.239 --> 01:08:41.229 align:start position:0%
recommendations um to form like the form
of<01:08:39.400> the<01:08:39.480> recommendation<01:08:40.080> you<01:08:40.159> want<01:08:40.319> it<01:08:40.440> to

01:08:41.229 --> 01:08:41.239 align:start position:0%
of the recommendation you want it to
 

01:08:41.239 --> 01:08:43.189 align:start position:0%
of the recommendation you want it to
take

01:08:43.189 --> 01:08:43.199 align:start position:0%
take
 

01:08:43.199 --> 01:08:45.990 align:start position:0%
take
um<01:08:44.199> but<01:08:44.560> just<01:08:44.839> going<01:08:45.199> back<01:08:45.400> to<01:08:45.560> the<01:08:45.719> very

01:08:45.990 --> 01:08:46.000 align:start position:0%
um but just going back to the very
 

01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.390 align:start position:0%
um but just going back to the very
simple<01:08:46.480> job<01:08:47.120> that<01:08:47.279> the<01:08:47.400> authority<01:08:47.960> has<01:08:48.199> of

01:08:48.390 --> 01:08:48.400 align:start position:0%
simple job that the authority has of
 

01:08:48.400 --> 01:08:49.870 align:start position:0%
simple job that the authority has of
promoting<01:08:48.759> the<01:08:48.880> development<01:08:49.279> of<01:08:49.400> solar<01:08:49.719> and

01:08:49.870 --> 01:08:49.880 align:start position:0%
promoting the development of solar and
 

01:08:49.880 --> 01:08:52.709 align:start position:0%
promoting the development of solar and
storage<01:08:50.199> in<01:08:50.600> Virginia<01:08:51.600> transmission<01:08:52.239> level

01:08:52.709 --> 01:08:52.719 align:start position:0%
storage in Virginia transmission level
 

01:08:52.719 --> 01:08:54.430 align:start position:0%
storage in Virginia transmission level
projects<01:08:53.199> are<01:08:53.400> blocked<01:08:54.080> because<01:08:54.279> of

01:08:54.430 --> 01:08:54.440 align:start position:0%
projects are blocked because of
 

01:08:54.440 --> 01:08:56.030 align:start position:0%
projects are blocked because of
interconnection<01:08:55.159> Q

01:08:56.030 --> 01:08:56.040 align:start position:0%
interconnection Q
 

01:08:56.040 --> 01:08:59.950 align:start position:0%
interconnection Q
delays<01:08:57.040> so<01:08:57.719> here<01:08:57.880> are<01:08:58.159> some<01:08:58.960> ways<01:08:59.560> that<01:08:59.759> you

01:08:59.950 --> 01:08:59.960 align:start position:0%
delays so here are some ways that you
 

01:08:59.960 --> 01:09:02.950 align:start position:0%
delays so here are some ways that you
can<01:09:00.279> add<01:09:00.560> more<01:09:00.759> solar<01:09:01.120> and<01:09:01.279> energy<01:09:01.759> storage<01:09:02.759> by

01:09:02.950 --> 01:09:02.960 align:start position:0%
can add more solar and energy storage by
 

01:09:02.960 --> 01:09:06.070 align:start position:0%
can add more solar and energy storage by
using<01:09:03.279> our<01:09:03.480> existing<01:09:03.880> grid<01:09:04.199> capacity<01:09:05.080> wisely

01:09:06.070 --> 01:09:06.080 align:start position:0%
using our existing grid capacity wisely
 

01:09:06.080 --> 01:09:10.149 align:start position:0%
using our existing grid capacity wisely
one<01:09:06.719> is<01:09:07.759> replacing<01:09:08.759> near<01:09:09.120> retirement<01:09:09.759> fossil

01:09:10.149 --> 01:09:10.159 align:start position:0%
one is replacing near retirement fossil
 

01:09:10.159 --> 01:09:12.590 align:start position:0%
one is replacing near retirement fossil
assets<01:09:10.920> that<01:09:11.120> already<01:09:11.560> have<01:09:11.719> interconnection

01:09:12.590 --> 01:09:12.600 align:start position:0%
assets that already have interconnection
 

01:09:12.600 --> 01:09:14.070 align:start position:0%
assets that already have interconnection
capacity

01:09:14.070 --> 01:09:14.080 align:start position:0%
capacity
 

01:09:14.080 --> 01:09:17.110 align:start position:0%
capacity
available<01:09:15.080> with<01:09:15.400> solar<01:09:15.759> and<01:09:15.960> energy

01:09:17.110 --> 01:09:17.120 align:start position:0%
available with solar and energy
 

01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:21.309 align:start position:0%
available with solar and energy
storage<01:09:18.120> it's<01:09:18.319> not<01:09:19.359> saying<01:09:20.359> you<01:09:20.600> have<01:09:20.799> to<01:09:21.159> it's

01:09:21.309 --> 01:09:21.319 align:start position:0%
storage it's not saying you have to it's
 

01:09:21.319 --> 01:09:23.390 align:start position:0%
storage it's not saying you have to it's
saying<01:09:21.600> consider<01:09:22.159> I<01:09:22.239> think<01:09:22.640> I<01:09:22.759> think<01:09:23.199> I<01:09:23.279> think

01:09:23.390 --> 01:09:23.400 align:start position:0%
saying consider I think I think I think
 

01:09:23.400 --> 01:09:25.390 align:start position:0%
saying consider I think I think I think
the<01:09:23.759> concerns<01:09:24.040> can<01:09:24.199> be<01:09:24.359> addressed<01:09:25.000> if<01:09:25.159> we

01:09:25.390 --> 01:09:25.400 align:start position:0%
the concerns can be addressed if we
 

01:09:25.400 --> 01:09:26.590 align:start position:0%
the concerns can be addressed if we
remove

01:09:26.590 --> 01:09:26.600 align:start position:0%
remove
 

01:09:26.600 --> 01:09:29.510 align:start position:0%
remove
the<01:09:27.600> legislature<01:09:28.279> should<01:09:28.600> direct<01:09:29.400> the

01:09:29.510 --> 01:09:29.520 align:start position:0%
the legislature should direct the
 

01:09:29.520 --> 01:09:31.309 align:start position:0%
the legislature should direct the
utilities<01:09:30.000> to<01:09:30.159> use<01:09:30.400> the<01:09:30.560> existing<01:09:31.040> good

01:09:31.309 --> 01:09:31.319 align:start position:0%
utilities to use the existing good
 

01:09:31.319 --> 01:09:33.070 align:start position:0%
utilities to use the existing good
capacity<01:09:31.839> wisely<01:09:32.120> if<01:09:32.199> you<01:09:32.279> can<01:09:32.520> just<01:09:32.719> if<01:09:32.799> you

01:09:33.070 --> 01:09:33.080 align:start position:0%
capacity wisely if you can just if you
 

01:09:33.080 --> 01:09:36.149 align:start position:0%
capacity wisely if you can just if you
delete<01:09:34.080> the<01:09:34.279> reference<01:09:34.719> to<01:09:35.640> directing

01:09:36.149 --> 01:09:36.159 align:start position:0%
delete the reference to directing
 

01:09:36.159 --> 01:09:38.189 align:start position:0%
delete the reference to directing
Virginia<01:09:36.600> Utilities<01:09:37.080> to<01:09:37.199> use<01:09:37.520> existing<01:09:37.880> Gade

01:09:38.189 --> 01:09:38.199 align:start position:0%
Virginia Utilities to use existing Gade
 

01:09:38.199 --> 01:09:41.189 align:start position:0%
Virginia Utilities to use existing Gade
capacity<01:09:38.759> wisely<01:09:39.759> because<01:09:40.520> then<01:09:41.000> the

01:09:41.189 --> 01:09:41.199 align:start position:0%
capacity wisely because then the
 

01:09:41.199 --> 01:09:43.630 align:start position:0%
capacity wisely because then the
recommendation<01:09:42.120> could<01:09:42.440> simply

01:09:43.630 --> 01:09:43.640 align:start position:0%
recommendation could simply
 

01:09:43.640 --> 01:09:46.390 align:start position:0%
recommendation could simply
be<01:09:44.640> the<01:09:44.960> policy<01:09:45.319> maker<01:09:45.719> like<01:09:45.839> we've<01:09:46.000> worded<01:09:46.279> it

01:09:46.390 --> 01:09:46.400 align:start position:0%
be the policy maker like we've worded it
 

01:09:46.400 --> 01:09:49.349 align:start position:0%
be the policy maker like we've worded it
elsewhere<01:09:46.920> policy<01:09:47.239> makers<01:09:47.520> should

01:09:49.349 --> 01:09:49.359 align:start position:0%
elsewhere policy makers should
 

01:09:49.359 --> 01:09:52.030 align:start position:0%
elsewhere policy makers should
consider<01:09:50.359> requiring<01:09:50.920> utilities<01:09:51.520> to<01:09:51.719> consider

01:09:52.030 --> 01:09:52.040 align:start position:0%
consider requiring utilities to consider
 

01:09:52.040 --> 01:09:54.229 align:start position:0%
consider requiring utilities to consider
grid<01:09:52.279> enhancing<01:09:52.799> Technologies<01:09:53.440> and<01:09:53.719> to<01:09:53.839> study

01:09:54.229 --> 01:09:54.239 align:start position:0%
grid enhancing Technologies and to study
 

01:09:54.239 --> 01:09:56.110 align:start position:0%
grid enhancing Technologies and to study
whether<01:09:54.440> or

01:09:56.110 --> 01:09:56.120 align:start position:0%
whether or
 

01:09:56.120 --> 01:09:59.189 align:start position:0%
whether or
not<01:09:57.120> I<01:09:57.239> don't<01:09:57.400> know<01:09:58.120> again<01:09:58.360> I<01:09:58.440> don't<01:09:58.600> know<01:09:58.800> that

01:09:59.189 --> 01:09:59.199 align:start position:0%
not I don't know again I don't know that
 

01:09:59.199 --> 01:10:00.310 align:start position:0%
not I don't know again I don't know that
that<01:09:59.400> the<01:09:59.560> authority<01:09:59.960> should<01:10:00.080> make<01:10:00.199> a

01:10:00.310 --> 01:10:00.320 align:start position:0%
that the authority should make a
 

01:10:00.320 --> 01:10:02.750 align:start position:0%
that the authority should make a
recommendation<01:10:01.000> about<01:10:01.800> pjm<01:10:02.320> but<01:10:02.440> I'll<01:10:02.560> leave

01:10:02.750 --> 01:10:02.760 align:start position:0%
recommendation about pjm but I'll leave
 

01:10:02.760 --> 01:10:03.630 align:start position:0%
recommendation about pjm but I'll leave
that<01:10:02.880> to

01:10:03.630 --> 01:10:03.640 align:start position:0%
that to
 

01:10:03.640 --> 01:10:07.070 align:start position:0%
that to
others<01:10:04.640> would<01:10:04.800> it<01:10:05.000> help<01:10:05.239> if<01:10:06.080> legislator

01:10:07.070 --> 01:10:07.080 align:start position:0%
others would it help if legislator
 

01:10:07.080 --> 01:10:09.030 align:start position:0%
others would it help if legislator
legislature<01:10:07.640> was<01:10:07.800> changed<01:10:08.120> to<01:10:08.320> policy<01:10:08.679> makers

01:10:09.030 --> 01:10:09.040 align:start position:0%
legislature was changed to policy makers
 

01:10:09.040 --> 01:10:11.830 align:start position:0%
legislature was changed to policy makers
here<01:10:09.280> and<01:10:09.480> wisle<01:10:10.000> was<01:10:10.239> changed<01:10:10.760> more

01:10:11.830 --> 01:10:11.840 align:start position:0%
here and wisle was changed more
 

01:10:11.840 --> 01:10:13.830 align:start position:0%
here and wisle was changed more
efficiently<01:10:12.840> because<01:10:13.000> isn't<01:10:13.280> that<01:10:13.440> the<01:10:13.600> whole

01:10:13.830 --> 01:10:13.840 align:start position:0%
efficiently because isn't that the whole
 

01:10:13.840 --> 01:10:17.669 align:start position:0%
efficiently because isn't that the whole
idea<01:10:14.280> of<01:10:14.480> the<01:10:15.239> gets<01:10:15.679> no<01:10:15.960> again<01:10:16.920> no<01:10:17.199> again<01:10:17.560> I

01:10:17.669 --> 01:10:17.679 align:start position:0%
idea of the gets no again no again I
 

01:10:17.679 --> 01:10:21.110 align:start position:0%
idea of the gets no again no again I
think<01:10:18.120> it's<01:10:19.120> it<01:10:19.280> is<01:10:20.080> if<01:10:20.560> if<01:10:20.679> it<01:10:20.800> is<01:10:20.920> the

01:10:21.110 --> 01:10:21.120 align:start position:0%
think it's it is if if it is the
 

01:10:21.120 --> 01:10:22.590 align:start position:0%
think it's it is if if it is the
recommendation<01:10:21.880> then<01:10:22.000> it<01:10:22.120> should<01:10:22.280> be<01:10:22.440> just

01:10:22.590 --> 01:10:22.600 align:start position:0%
recommendation then it should be just
 

01:10:22.600 --> 01:10:24.149 align:start position:0%
recommendation then it should be just
the<01:10:22.760> recommendation<01:10:23.360> that<01:10:23.480> we

01:10:24.149 --> 01:10:24.159 align:start position:0%
the recommendation that we
 

01:10:24.159 --> 01:10:26.510 align:start position:0%
the recommendation that we
recommend<01:10:25.159> that<01:10:25.400> the<01:10:25.600> that<01:10:25.800> policy<01:10:26.120> makers

01:10:26.510 --> 01:10:26.520 align:start position:0%
recommend that the that policy makers
 

01:10:26.520 --> 01:10:28.669 align:start position:0%
recommend that the that policy makers
consider<01:10:26.880> requiring<01:10:27.360> utilities<01:10:27.880> to<01:10:28.159> consider

01:10:28.669 --> 01:10:28.679 align:start position:0%
consider requiring utilities to consider
 

01:10:28.679 --> 01:10:36.189 align:start position:0%
consider requiring utilities to consider
grid<01:10:28.960> enhancing<01:10:29.520> Technologies<01:10:30.199> keep<01:10:30.480> that

01:10:36.189 --> 01:10:36.199 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:10:36.199 --> 01:10:41.310 align:start position:0%
 
bullet<01:10:37.239> um<01:10:38.239> let<01:10:38.400> me<01:10:38.560> try<01:10:38.760> to<01:10:39.400> so<01:10:39.800> one<01:10:39.960> of<01:10:40.320> the

01:10:41.310 --> 01:10:41.320 align:start position:0%
bullet um let me try to so one of the
 

01:10:41.320 --> 01:10:44.149 align:start position:0%
bullet um let me try to so one of the
one<01:10:41.440> of<01:10:41.600> the<01:10:41.840> re<01:10:42.120> the<01:10:42.320> reason<01:10:42.800> that<01:10:43.480> I<01:10:43.640> started

01:10:44.149 --> 01:10:44.159 align:start position:0%
one of the re the reason that I started
 

01:10:44.159 --> 01:10:45.630 align:start position:0%
one of the re the reason that I started
this<01:10:44.360> recommendation<01:10:45.040> with<01:10:45.199> giv<01:10:45.480> the

01:10:45.630 --> 01:10:45.640 align:start position:0%
this recommendation with giv the
 

01:10:45.640 --> 01:10:47.149 align:start position:0%
this recommendation with giv the
bottlenecks<01:10:46.199> in<01:10:46.360> the<01:10:46.480> current<01:10:46.760> pjm

01:10:47.149 --> 01:10:47.159 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the current pjm
 

01:10:47.159 --> 01:10:49.270 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the current pjm
interconnection<01:10:47.760> q<01:10:48.040> and<01:10:48.159> it's<01:10:48.280> a<01:10:48.400> little<01:10:49.000> typ

01:10:49.270 --> 01:10:49.280 align:start position:0%
interconnection q and it's a little typ
 

01:10:49.280 --> 01:10:54.510 align:start position:0%
interconnection q and it's a little typ
of<01:10:49.400> the<01:10:49.560> Q<01:10:49.800> should<01:10:50.000> just<01:10:50.159> be<01:10:50.360> Q<01:10:50.679> not<01:10:51.239> Q's<01:10:52.360> um<01:10:53.360> the

01:10:54.510 --> 01:10:54.520 align:start position:0%
of the Q should just be Q not Q's um the
 

01:10:54.520 --> 01:10:56.030 align:start position:0%
of the Q should just be Q not Q's um the
is<01:10:54.800> that

01:10:56.030 --> 01:10:56.040 align:start position:0%
is that
 

01:10:56.040 --> 01:10:59.270 align:start position:0%
is that
given<01:10:57.040> it<01:10:57.239> is<01:10:57.840> difficult<01:10:58.120> to<01:10:58.600> add<01:10:58.880> new

01:10:59.270 --> 01:10:59.280 align:start position:0%
given it is difficult to add new
 

01:10:59.280 --> 01:11:01.189 align:start position:0%
given it is difficult to add new
resources<01:10:59.840> at<01:11:00.040> the<01:11:00.199> transmission<01:11:00.800> level

01:11:01.189 --> 01:11:01.199 align:start position:0%
resources at the transmission level
 

01:11:01.199 --> 01:11:04.030 align:start position:0%
resources at the transmission level
right<01:11:01.360> now<01:11:02.000> and<01:11:02.239> given<01:11:02.679> that<01:11:03.080> so<01:11:03.360> two<01:11:03.640> ways<01:11:03.880> to

01:11:04.030 --> 01:11:04.040 align:start position:0%
right now and given that so two ways to
 

01:11:04.040 --> 01:11:07.229 align:start position:0%
right now and given that so two ways to
do<01:11:04.280> that<01:11:04.440> are<01:11:04.600> to<01:11:04.800> interconnect<01:11:05.520> them<01:11:06.239> at<01:11:06.800> you

01:11:07.229 --> 01:11:07.239 align:start position:0%
do that are to interconnect them at you
 

01:11:07.239 --> 01:11:11.310 align:start position:0%
do that are to interconnect them at you
know<01:11:08.239> at<01:11:08.600> at<01:11:08.920> transmission<01:11:09.520> nodes<01:11:10.040> or<01:11:10.760> add<01:11:11.000> new

01:11:11.310 --> 01:11:11.320 align:start position:0%
know at at transmission nodes or add new
 

01:11:11.320 --> 01:11:14.630 align:start position:0%
know at at transmission nodes or add new
transmission<01:11:12.000> capacity<01:11:12.640> so<01:11:13.000> that's<01:11:13.640> actually

01:11:14.630 --> 01:11:14.640 align:start position:0%
transmission capacity so that's actually
 

01:11:14.640 --> 01:11:17.590 align:start position:0%
transmission capacity so that's actually
assumed<01:11:15.120> in<01:11:15.280> here<01:11:15.520> but<01:11:15.719> not<01:11:16.080> not<01:11:16.320> stated<01:11:17.280> it's

01:11:17.590 --> 01:11:17.600 align:start position:0%
assumed in here but not not stated it's
 

01:11:17.600 --> 01:11:19.870 align:start position:0%
assumed in here but not not stated it's
that<01:11:17.840> given<01:11:18.320> new<01:11:18.640> transmission<01:11:19.280> capacity<01:11:19.719> is

01:11:19.870 --> 01:11:19.880 align:start position:0%
that given new transmission capacity is
 

01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:21.310 align:start position:0%
that given new transmission capacity is
hard<01:11:20.040> to<01:11:20.199> build<01:11:20.679> and<01:11:20.920> given<01:11:21.199> the

01:11:21.310 --> 01:11:21.320 align:start position:0%
hard to build and given the
 

01:11:21.320 --> 01:11:24.550 align:start position:0%
hard to build and given the
interconnection<01:11:22.040> cues<01:11:22.920> are

01:11:24.550 --> 01:11:24.560 align:start position:0%
interconnection cues are
 

01:11:24.560 --> 01:11:28.510 align:start position:0%
interconnection cues are
stagnated<01:11:25.560> this<01:11:25.719> is<01:11:25.880> a<01:11:26.480> you<01:11:26.600> know<01:11:27.360> um<01:11:27.960> barrier

01:11:28.510 --> 01:11:28.520 align:start position:0%
stagnated this is a you know um barrier
 

01:11:28.520 --> 01:11:30.110 align:start position:0%
stagnated this is a you know um barrier
to<01:11:28.679> solar<01:11:29.000> and<01:11:29.159> storage<01:11:29.520> development<01:11:29.960> in

01:11:30.110 --> 01:11:30.120 align:start position:0%
to solar and storage development in
 

01:11:30.120 --> 01:11:32.110 align:start position:0%
to solar and storage development in
Virginia<01:11:31.120> so

01:11:32.110 --> 01:11:32.120 align:start position:0%
Virginia so
 

01:11:32.120 --> 01:11:34.390 align:start position:0%
Virginia so
therefore<01:11:33.120> we<01:11:33.239> should<01:11:33.560> direct<01:11:33.880> Virginia

01:11:34.390 --> 01:11:34.400 align:start position:0%
therefore we should direct Virginia
 

01:11:34.400 --> 01:11:36.550 align:start position:0%
therefore we should direct Virginia
Utilities<01:11:34.920> to<01:11:35.159> use<01:11:35.440> their<01:11:35.719> existing<01:11:36.199> grid

01:11:36.550 --> 01:11:36.560 align:start position:0%
Utilities to use their existing grid
 

01:11:36.560 --> 01:11:38.310 align:start position:0%
Utilities to use their existing grid
capacity

01:11:38.310 --> 01:11:38.320 align:start position:0%
capacity
 

01:11:38.320 --> 01:11:41.270 align:start position:0%
capacity
wisely<01:11:39.320> for<01:11:39.760> promotion<01:11:40.120> of<01:11:40.280> development<01:11:40.719> of

01:11:41.270 --> 01:11:41.280 align:start position:0%
wisely for promotion of development of
 

01:11:41.280 --> 01:11:42.950 align:start position:0%
wisely for promotion of development of
of<01:11:41.560> solar<01:11:41.920> and<01:11:42.080> energy

01:11:42.950 --> 01:11:42.960 align:start position:0%
of solar and energy
 

01:11:42.960 --> 01:11:45.870 align:start position:0%
of solar and energy
storage<01:11:43.960> and<01:11:44.120> then<01:11:44.440> the<01:11:44.600> recommendations<01:11:45.360> are

01:11:45.870 --> 01:11:45.880 align:start position:0%
storage and then the recommendations are
 

01:11:45.880 --> 01:11:48.590 align:start position:0%
storage and then the recommendations are
kind<01:11:46.000> of<01:11:46.400> presuming<01:11:47.199> that<01:11:47.960> we<01:11:48.120> can't<01:11:48.320> build

01:11:48.590 --> 01:11:48.600 align:start position:0%
kind of presuming that we can't build
 

01:11:48.600 --> 01:11:51.270 align:start position:0%
kind of presuming that we can't build
new<01:11:48.840> transmission<01:11:49.639> we<01:11:49.800> can't<01:11:50.280> interconnect

01:11:51.270 --> 01:11:51.280 align:start position:0%
new transmission we can't interconnect
 

01:11:51.280 --> 01:11:54.229 align:start position:0%
new transmission we can't interconnect
new<01:11:51.800> projects<01:11:52.719> unless

01:11:54.229 --> 01:11:54.239 align:start position:0%
new projects unless
 

01:11:54.239 --> 01:11:57.149 align:start position:0%
new projects unless
we<01:11:55.239> do<01:11:55.560> these<01:11:55.880> creative<01:11:56.400> things<01:11:56.719> it's<01:11:56.880> kind<01:11:57.000> of

01:11:57.149 --> 01:11:57.159 align:start position:0%
we do these creative things it's kind of
 

01:11:57.159 --> 01:11:59.310 align:start position:0%
we do these creative things it's kind of
like<01:11:57.280> use<01:11:57.639> existing<01:11:58.000> grid<01:11:58.320> capacity

01:11:59.310 --> 01:11:59.320 align:start position:0%
like use existing grid capacity
 

01:11:59.320 --> 01:12:04.790 align:start position:0%
like use existing grid capacity
creatively<01:12:00.320> if<01:12:00.600> that<01:12:00.840> is<01:12:01.000> a<01:12:01.560> better<01:12:02.400> word

01:12:04.790 --> 01:12:04.800 align:start position:0%
creatively if that is a better word
 

01:12:04.800 --> 01:12:07.629 align:start position:0%
creatively if that is a better word
choice<01:12:05.800> again<01:12:06.560> if<01:12:06.800> if<01:12:06.960> policy<01:12:07.280> makers<01:12:07.520> are

01:12:07.629 --> 01:12:07.639 align:start position:0%
choice again if if policy makers are
 

01:12:07.639 --> 01:12:09.229 align:start position:0%
choice again if if policy makers are
going<01:12:07.760> to<01:12:07.840> be<01:12:08.040> encouraged<01:12:08.520> to<01:12:08.639> do<01:12:08.840> anything

01:12:09.229 --> 01:12:09.239 align:start position:0%
going to be encouraged to do anything
 

01:12:09.239 --> 01:12:11.870 align:start position:0%
going to be encouraged to do anything
perhaps<01:12:09.719> the<01:12:09.840> bullets<01:12:10.159> are<01:12:11.080> the<01:12:11.239> bullets

01:12:11.870 --> 01:12:11.880 align:start position:0%
perhaps the bullets are the bullets
 

01:12:11.880 --> 01:12:13.669 align:start position:0%
perhaps the bullets are the bullets
themselves

01:12:13.669 --> 01:12:13.679 align:start position:0%
themselves
 

01:12:13.679 --> 01:12:16.110 align:start position:0%
themselves
say<01:12:14.679> use

01:12:16.110 --> 01:12:16.120 align:start position:0%
say use
 

01:12:16.120 --> 01:12:19.350 align:start position:0%
say use
existing<01:12:17.120> develop<01:12:17.440> a<01:12:17.760> creative<01:12:18.600> approaches

01:12:19.350 --> 01:12:19.360 align:start position:0%
existing develop a creative approaches
 

01:12:19.360 --> 01:12:22.229 align:start position:0%
existing develop a creative approaches
to<01:12:19.960> using<01:12:20.560> existing<01:12:20.920> grid

01:12:22.229 --> 01:12:22.239 align:start position:0%
to using existing grid
 

01:12:22.239 --> 01:12:24.189 align:start position:0%
to using existing grid
capacity<01:12:23.239> I

01:12:24.189 --> 01:12:24.199 align:start position:0%
capacity I
 

01:12:24.199 --> 01:12:25.990 align:start position:0%
capacity I
creative<01:12:24.560> approaches<01:12:25.080> to<01:12:25.239> using<01:12:25.600> existing

01:12:25.990 --> 01:12:26.000 align:start position:0%
creative approaches to using existing
 

01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:26.990 align:start position:0%
creative approaches to using existing
grid

01:12:26.990 --> 01:12:27.000 align:start position:0%
grid
 

01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:29.870 align:start position:0%
grid
capacity<01:12:28.000> require<01:12:28.480> utilities<01:12:29.239> to<01:12:29.520> consider

01:12:29.870 --> 01:12:29.880 align:start position:0%
capacity require utilities to consider
 

01:12:29.880 --> 01:12:32.590 align:start position:0%
capacity require utilities to consider
the<01:12:30.000> grid<01:12:30.199> enhancing<01:12:30.760> Technologies<01:12:31.639> and

01:12:32.590 --> 01:12:32.600 align:start position:0%
the grid enhancing Technologies and
 

01:12:32.600 --> 01:12:35.310 align:start position:0%
the grid enhancing Technologies and
then<01:12:33.600> I<01:12:33.719> would<01:12:34.360> suggest<01:12:34.800> that<01:12:34.960> instead<01:12:35.199> of

01:12:35.310 --> 01:12:35.320 align:start position:0%
then I would suggest that instead of
 

01:12:35.320 --> 01:12:37.510 align:start position:0%
then I would suggest that instead of
being<01:12:35.520> as<01:12:35.800> specific<01:12:36.440> on<01:12:36.560> the<01:12:36.719> last<01:12:36.960> bullet<01:12:37.280> to

01:12:37.510 --> 01:12:37.520 align:start position:0%
being as specific on the last bullet to
 

01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:39.669 align:start position:0%
being as specific on the last bullet to
say

01:12:39.669 --> 01:12:39.679 align:start position:0%
say
 

01:12:39.679 --> 01:12:44.270 align:start position:0%
say
study

01:12:44.270 --> 01:12:44.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:12:44.280 --> 01:12:48.030 align:start position:0%
 
uh<01:12:45.320> opportunities

01:12:48.030 --> 01:12:48.040 align:start position:0%
uh opportunities
 

01:12:48.040 --> 01:12:52.430 align:start position:0%
uh opportunities
to

01:12:52.430 --> 01:12:52.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:12:52.440 --> 01:12:56.830 align:start position:0%
 
reduce<01:12:53.920> time<01:12:54.120> of<01:12:54.280> the<01:12:54.440> que<01:12:54.840> whatever<01:12:55.159> Q<01:12:55.400> it<01:12:55.840> is

01:12:56.830 --> 01:12:56.840 align:start position:0%
reduce time of the que whatever Q it is
 

01:12:56.840 --> 01:13:22.350 align:start position:0%
reduce time of the que whatever Q it is
that's<01:12:57.080> distribution<01:12:57.560> or

01:13:22.350 --> 01:13:22.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:13:22.360 --> 01:13:24.830 align:start position:0%
 
trend

01:13:24.830 --> 01:13:24.840 align:start position:0%
trend
 

01:13:24.840 --> 01:13:27.629 align:start position:0%
trend
other<01:13:25.080> members<01:13:25.440> please<01:13:25.679> chime<01:13:26.000> in<01:13:26.239> here

01:13:27.629 --> 01:13:27.639 align:start position:0%
other members please chime in here
 

01:13:27.639 --> 01:13:31.550 align:start position:0%
other members please chime in here
um<01:13:28.639> you<01:13:28.800> all<01:13:29.280> have<01:13:30.280> I<01:13:30.320> don't<01:13:30.520> know<01:13:30.639> if<01:13:30.760> you<01:13:31.400> were

01:13:31.550 --> 01:13:31.560 align:start position:0%
um you all have I don't know if you were
 

01:13:31.560 --> 01:13:32.830 align:start position:0%
um you all have I don't know if you were
you<01:13:31.719> was<01:13:31.880> some<01:13:31.960> of<01:13:32.080> that<01:13:32.199> getting<01:13:32.480> put<01:13:32.639> in

01:13:32.830 --> 01:13:32.840 align:start position:0%
you was some of that getting put in
 

01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:35.669 align:start position:0%
you was some of that getting put in
there<01:13:33.080> or<01:13:33.280> you<01:13:33.360> just<01:13:33.639> looking<01:13:33.800> for<01:13:33.960> more

01:13:35.669 --> 01:13:35.679 align:start position:0%
there or you just looking for more
 

01:13:35.679 --> 01:13:38.030 align:start position:0%
there or you just looking for more
comments<01:13:36.679> yeah<01:13:36.840> I'm<01:13:37.000> just<01:13:37.199> waiting<01:13:37.520> for<01:13:37.880> some

01:13:38.030 --> 01:13:38.040 align:start position:0%
comments yeah I'm just waiting for some
 

01:13:38.040 --> 01:13:43.669 align:start position:0%
comments yeah I'm just waiting for some
sort<01:13:38.239> of<01:13:39.080> agreement<01:13:39.600> on<01:13:39.800> what<01:13:39.920> it<01:13:40.080> should

01:13:43.669 --> 01:13:43.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:13:43.679 --> 01:13:47.390 align:start position:0%
 
be<01:13:44.679> it<01:13:44.760> should<01:13:44.960> be<01:13:45.239> I<01:13:45.440> put<01:13:45.719> I<01:13:45.840> put<01:13:45.960> in<01:13:46.639> a

01:13:47.390 --> 01:13:47.400 align:start position:0%
be it should be I put I put in a
 

01:13:47.400 --> 01:13:50.350 align:start position:0%
be it should be I put I put in a
proposal<01:13:48.360> I<01:13:48.520> guess<01:13:48.719> for<01:13:48.960> the<01:13:49.159> first<01:13:49.960> I<01:13:50.040> mean

01:13:50.350 --> 01:13:50.360 align:start position:0%
proposal I guess for the first I mean
 

01:13:50.360 --> 01:13:51.950 align:start position:0%
proposal I guess for the first I mean
the<01:13:50.639> the<01:13:50.800> second<01:13:51.159> bullet<01:13:51.560> given<01:13:51.840> the

01:13:51.950 --> 01:13:51.960 align:start position:0%
the the second bullet given the
 

01:13:51.960 --> 01:13:54.750 align:start position:0%
the the second bullet given the
bottlenecks<01:13:52.600> in<01:13:52.760> the<01:13:52.920> chat

01:13:54.750 --> 01:13:54.760 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the chat
 

01:13:54.760 --> 01:13:58.709 align:start position:0%
bottlenecks in the chat
um<01:13:55.760> I<01:13:55.840> don't<01:13:56.080> know<01:13:56.960> if<01:13:57.960> so<01:13:58.159> can<01:13:58.320> I<01:13:58.440> take<01:13:58.600> a

01:13:58.709 --> 01:13:58.719 align:start position:0%
um I don't know if so can I take a
 

01:13:58.719 --> 01:13:59.990 align:start position:0%
um I don't know if so can I take a
slightly<01:13:59.040> different<01:13:59.320> approach<01:13:59.600> and<01:13:59.719> see<01:13:59.880> if

01:13:59.990 --> 01:14:00.000 align:start position:0%
slightly different approach and see if
 

01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:01.350 align:start position:0%
slightly different approach and see if
this<01:14:00.239> offends

01:14:01.350 --> 01:14:01.360 align:start position:0%
this offends
 

01:14:01.360 --> 01:14:03.750 align:start position:0%
this offends
everybody<01:14:02.360> oh<01:14:02.639> now<01:14:02.880> Ken<01:14:03.120> now<01:14:03.239> you're<01:14:03.360> sharing

01:14:03.750 --> 01:14:03.760 align:start position:0%
everybody oh now Ken now you're sharing
 

01:14:03.760 --> 01:14:06.790 align:start position:0%
everybody oh now Ken now you're sharing
over<01:14:04.520> your<01:14:05.520> he<01:14:05.639> had<01:14:05.760> to<01:14:05.960> go<01:14:06.080> see<01:14:06.320> what<01:14:06.440> I<01:14:06.560> put<01:14:06.719> in

01:14:06.790 --> 01:14:06.800 align:start position:0%
over your he had to go see what I put in
 

01:14:06.800 --> 01:14:08.790 align:start position:0%
over your he had to go see what I put in
the<01:14:06.920> chat<01:14:07.400> yeah<01:14:07.560> I'm<01:14:07.719> just<01:14:08.360> copying<01:14:08.639> what

01:14:08.790 --> 01:14:08.800 align:start position:0%
the chat yeah I'm just copying what
 

01:14:08.800 --> 01:14:11.070 align:start position:0%
the chat yeah I'm just copying what
colie<01:14:09.199> put<01:14:09.560> can<01:14:09.840> but<01:14:10.040> before<01:14:10.360> you<01:14:10.639> before<01:14:10.880> you

01:14:11.070 --> 01:14:11.080 align:start position:0%
colie put can but before you before you
 

01:14:11.080 --> 01:14:13.350 align:start position:0%
colie put can but before you before you
put<01:14:11.280> that<01:14:11.400> in<01:14:11.560> there<01:14:11.760> can<01:14:11.920> I<01:14:12.120> offer<01:14:12.480> a<01:14:13.199> an

01:14:13.350 --> 01:14:13.360 align:start position:0%
put that in there can I offer a an
 

01:14:13.360 --> 01:14:17.629 align:start position:0%
put that in there can I offer a an
alternative<01:14:13.960> idea<01:14:14.960> so<01:14:15.760> the<01:14:16.280> first<01:14:16.800> so<01:14:17.320> leave

01:14:17.629 --> 01:14:17.639 align:start position:0%
alternative idea so the first so leave
 

01:14:17.639 --> 01:14:19.270 align:start position:0%
alternative idea so the first so leave
the<01:14:17.920> leave<01:14:18.120> the<01:14:18.239> first<01:14:18.480> bullet<01:14:18.800> as<01:14:18.920> it<01:14:19.000> is<01:14:19.159> the

01:14:19.270 --> 01:14:19.280 align:start position:0%
the leave the first bullet as it is the
 

01:14:19.280 --> 01:14:22.070 align:start position:0%
the leave the first bullet as it is the
authority<01:14:20.199> recommends<01:14:21.199> I<01:14:21.280> would<01:14:21.480> make<01:14:21.760> the

01:14:22.070 --> 01:14:22.080 align:start position:0%
authority recommends I would make the
 

01:14:22.080 --> 01:14:25.189 align:start position:0%
authority recommends I would make the
next<01:14:22.760> bullet<01:14:23.400> say<01:14:23.920> something<01:14:24.440> like<01:14:24.960> and<01:14:25.080> you

01:14:25.189 --> 01:14:25.199 align:start position:0%
next bullet say something like and you
 

01:14:25.199 --> 01:14:27.990 align:start position:0%
next bullet say something like and you
know<01:14:25.400> don't<01:14:25.639> don't<01:14:25.800> type<01:14:26.080> this<01:14:26.280> yet<01:14:26.920> um<01:14:27.400> policy

01:14:27.990 --> 01:14:28.000 align:start position:0%
know don't don't type this yet um policy
 

01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.990 align:start position:0%
know don't don't type this yet um policy
makers<01:14:28.480> should<01:14:29.040> consider<01:14:29.960> solutions<01:14:30.639> to<01:14:30.840> the

01:14:30.990 --> 01:14:31.000 align:start position:0%
makers should consider solutions to the
 

01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:34.270 align:start position:0%
makers should consider solutions to the
current<01:14:31.920> pjm<01:14:32.920> issues

01:14:34.270 --> 01:14:34.280 align:start position:0%
current pjm issues
 

01:14:34.280 --> 01:14:35.990 align:start position:0%
current pjm issues
affecting

01:14:35.990 --> 01:14:36.000 align:start position:0%
affecting
 

01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:37.950 align:start position:0%
affecting
transmission<01:14:37.000> what<01:14:37.280> how<01:14:37.440> it<01:14:37.520> wants<01:14:37.719> to<01:14:37.840> be

01:14:37.950 --> 01:14:37.960 align:start position:0%
transmission what how it wants to be
 

01:14:37.960 --> 01:14:41.149 align:start position:0%
transmission what how it wants to be
done<01:14:38.520> and<01:14:38.639> then<01:14:38.760> the<01:14:38.880> next<01:14:39.120> blocks<01:14:39.800> below<01:14:40.280> that

01:14:41.149 --> 01:14:41.159 align:start position:0%
done and then the next blocks below that
 

01:14:41.159 --> 01:14:43.070 align:start position:0%
done and then the next blocks below that
the<01:14:41.320> first<01:14:41.600> one<01:14:41.800> would<01:14:41.960> be<01:14:42.360> encourage<01:14:42.880> gen

01:14:43.070 --> 01:14:43.080 align:start position:0%
the first one would be encourage gen
 

01:14:43.080 --> 01:14:46.110 align:start position:0%
the first one would be encourage gen
utility<01:14:43.440> to<01:14:43.560> creatively<01:14:44.080> utilize<01:14:44.760> grid

01:14:46.110 --> 01:14:46.120 align:start position:0%
utility to creatively utilize grid
 

01:14:46.120 --> 01:14:48.669 align:start position:0%
utility to creatively utilize grid
capacity<01:14:47.120> um<01:14:47.760> require<01:14:48.159> utilities<01:14:48.560> to

01:14:48.669 --> 01:14:48.679 align:start position:0%
capacity um require utilities to
 

01:14:48.679 --> 01:14:50.790 align:start position:0%
capacity um require utilities to
consider<01:14:48.960> grid<01:14:49.159> enhancing<01:14:49.800> Technologies

01:14:50.790 --> 01:14:50.800 align:start position:0%
consider grid enhancing Technologies
 

01:14:50.800 --> 01:14:54.189 align:start position:0%
consider grid enhancing Technologies
study<01:14:51.280> whether<01:14:52.280> pjm<01:14:52.800> reform<01:14:53.440> PGM<01:14:53.800> departure

01:14:54.189 --> 01:14:54.199 align:start position:0%
study whether pjm reform PGM departure
 

01:14:54.199 --> 01:14:55.870 align:start position:0%
study whether pjm reform PGM departure
would<01:14:54.360> provide<01:14:54.639> a<01:14:54.760> faster<01:14:55.120> path<01:14:55.280> to<01:14:55.400> lowc<01:14:55.639> cost

01:14:55.870 --> 01:14:55.880 align:start position:0%
would provide a faster path to lowc cost
 

01:14:55.880 --> 01:15:04.270 align:start position:0%
would provide a faster path to lowc cost
energy<01:14:56.800> and<01:14:56.960> structure<01:14:57.320> it<01:14:57.560> that

01:15:04.270 --> 01:15:04.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:15:04.280 --> 01:15:08.270 align:start position:0%
 
way<01:15:05.280> so<01:15:05.600> rather<01:15:06.159> start<01:15:06.920> the<01:15:07.120> Bott<01:15:07.800> we<01:15:08.040> start

01:15:08.270 --> 01:15:08.280 align:start position:0%
way so rather start the Bott we start
 

01:15:08.280 --> 01:15:10.629 align:start position:0%
way so rather start the Bott we start
with<01:15:08.560> policy<01:15:08.960> makers<01:15:09.360> should

01:15:10.629 --> 01:15:10.639 align:start position:0%
with policy makers should
 

01:15:10.639 --> 01:15:12.870 align:start position:0%
with policy makers should
consider<01:15:11.639> yeah<01:15:11.840> and<01:15:11.960> I<01:15:12.040> don't<01:15:12.320> I<01:15:12.360> mean<01:15:12.520> I

01:15:12.870 --> 01:15:12.880 align:start position:0%
consider yeah and I don't I mean I
 

01:15:12.880 --> 01:15:13.870 align:start position:0%
consider yeah and I don't I mean I
understand<01:15:13.040> what<01:15:13.159> you're<01:15:13.320> saying<01:15:13.679> there's

01:15:13.870 --> 01:15:13.880 align:start position:0%
understand what you're saying there's
 

01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:15.550 align:start position:0%
understand what you're saying there's
some<01:15:14.080> language<01:15:14.440> in<01:15:14.600> there<01:15:14.800> that<01:15:14.960> just<01:15:15.120> feels

01:15:15.550 --> 01:15:15.560 align:start position:0%
some language in there that just feels
 

01:15:15.560 --> 01:15:17.149 align:start position:0%
some language in there that just feels
slightly<01:15:15.880> off<01:15:16.040> to<01:15:16.159> me<01:15:16.320> the<01:15:16.440> bottlenecks<01:15:17.000> and

01:15:17.149 --> 01:15:17.159 align:start position:0%
slightly off to me the bottlenecks and
 

01:15:17.159 --> 01:15:19.910 align:start position:0%
slightly off to me the bottlenecks and
the<01:15:17.360> wisely<01:15:18.239> just<01:15:18.400> feel<01:15:18.840> slightly

01:15:19.910 --> 01:15:19.920 align:start position:0%
the wisely just feel slightly
 

01:15:19.920 --> 01:15:25.110 align:start position:0%
the wisely just feel slightly
off<01:15:20.960> yeah<01:15:21.960> and<01:15:22.159> so<01:15:22.880> I<01:15:23.000> would<01:15:23.480> say<01:15:24.480> you<01:15:24.600> know

01:15:25.110 --> 01:15:25.120 align:start position:0%
off yeah and so I would say you know
 

01:15:25.120 --> 01:15:27.390 align:start position:0%
off yeah and so I would say you know
policy<01:15:25.480> maker<01:15:25.760> should<01:15:26.000> consider<01:15:26.440> solutions

01:15:27.390 --> 01:15:27.400 align:start position:0%
policy maker should consider solutions
 

01:15:27.400 --> 01:15:30.750 align:start position:0%
policy maker should consider solutions
to<01:15:28.120> current<01:15:28.719> pjm<01:15:29.239> intercon<01:15:30.000> interconnection

01:15:30.750 --> 01:15:30.760 align:start position:0%
to current pjm intercon interconnection
 

01:15:30.760 --> 01:15:33.709 align:start position:0%
to current pjm intercon interconnection
Q<01:15:31.120> issues<01:15:31.600> which<01:15:31.719> are<01:15:32.199> affecting<01:15:33.199> projects<01:15:33.560> at

01:15:33.709 --> 01:15:33.719 align:start position:0%
Q issues which are affecting projects at
 

01:15:33.719 --> 01:15:37.270 align:start position:0%
Q issues which are affecting projects at
the<01:15:33.840> transmission

01:15:37.270 --> 01:15:37.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:15:37.280 --> 01:15:41.350 align:start position:0%
 
level

01:15:41.350 --> 01:15:41.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:15:41.360 --> 01:15:44.470 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<01:15:42.360> type<01:15:42.679> I<01:15:42.760> would<01:15:42.920> say<01:15:43.560> current<01:15:43.920> pjm

01:15:44.470 --> 01:15:44.480 align:start position:0%
yeah type I would say current pjm
 

01:15:44.480 --> 01:15:48.390 align:start position:0%
yeah type I would say current pjm
interconnection<01:15:45.280> Q<01:15:45.679> issues<01:15:46.639> should<01:15:46.960> consider

01:15:48.390 --> 01:15:48.400 align:start position:0%
interconnection Q issues should consider
 

01:15:48.400 --> 01:15:52.189 align:start position:0%
interconnection Q issues should consider
current<01:15:49.400> pjm<01:15:50.000> interconnection<01:15:50.679> Q

01:15:52.189 --> 01:15:52.199 align:start position:0%
current pjm interconnection Q
 

01:15:52.199 --> 01:15:54.110 align:start position:0%
current pjm interconnection Q
issues

01:15:54.110 --> 01:15:54.120 align:start position:0%
issues
 

01:15:54.120 --> 01:15:58.510 align:start position:0%
issues
solutions<01:15:54.760> to<01:15:55.760> I<01:15:55.880> think<01:15:56.040> you<01:15:56.480> said<01:15:57.480> yeah<01:15:58.320> yeah

01:15:58.510 --> 01:15:58.520 align:start position:0%
solutions to I think you said yeah yeah
 

01:15:58.520 --> 01:16:00.470 align:start position:0%
solutions to I think you said yeah yeah
po<01:15:59.000> should<01:15:59.159> consider<01:15:59.520> solutions<01:16:00.000> to<01:16:00.239> you're

01:16:00.470 --> 01:16:00.480 align:start position:0%
po should consider solutions to you're
 

01:16:00.480 --> 01:16:01.910 align:start position:0%
po should consider solutions to you're
right<01:16:01.000> policymaker<01:16:01.480> should<01:16:01.639> consider

01:16:01.910 --> 01:16:01.920 align:start position:0%
right policymaker should consider
 

01:16:01.920 --> 01:16:04.390 align:start position:0%
right policymaker should consider
solutions<01:16:02.400> to<01:16:03.040> current<01:16:03.360> pjm<01:16:03.800> interconnection

01:16:04.390 --> 01:16:04.400 align:start position:0%
solutions to current pjm interconnection
 

01:16:04.400 --> 01:16:06.790 align:start position:0%
solutions to current pjm interconnection
Q<01:16:04.679> issue<01:16:05.080> no<01:16:05.280> no<01:16:05.800> sorry

01:16:06.790 --> 01:16:06.800 align:start position:0%
Q issue no no sorry
 

01:16:06.800 --> 01:16:09.629 align:start position:0%
Q issue no no sorry
Ken<01:16:07.800> yeah<01:16:08.040> policy<01:16:08.360> maker<01:16:08.639> should<01:16:08.880> consider

01:16:09.629 --> 01:16:09.639 align:start position:0%
Ken yeah policy maker should consider
 

01:16:09.639 --> 01:16:21.550 align:start position:0%
Ken yeah policy maker should consider
solutions

01:16:21.550 --> 01:16:21.560 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:16:21.560 --> 01:16:29.350 align:start position:0%
 
to<01:16:22.560> Solutions

01:16:29.350 --> 01:16:29.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:16:29.360 --> 01:16:34.470 align:start position:0%
 
to<01:16:30.360> solutions<01:16:31.120> to<01:16:31.760> to<01:16:32.880> current<01:16:33.880> pjm

01:16:34.470 --> 01:16:34.480 align:start position:0%
to solutions to to current pjm
 

01:16:34.480 --> 01:16:38.229 align:start position:0%
to solutions to to current pjm
interconnection<01:16:35.199> queue

01:16:38.229 --> 01:16:38.239 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:16:38.239 --> 01:16:41.669 align:start position:0%
 
issues<01:16:39.239> that<01:16:39.800> are<01:16:40.800> and<01:16:40.920> then<01:16:41.080> I<01:16:41.159> don't<01:16:41.320> know

01:16:41.669 --> 01:16:41.679 align:start position:0%
issues that are and then I don't know
 

01:16:41.679 --> 01:16:43.270 align:start position:0%
issues that are and then I don't know
again<01:16:41.880> how<01:16:42.000> you<01:16:42.120> phrase<01:16:42.400> it<01:16:42.520> is<01:16:42.639> it<01:16:42.800> barriers

01:16:43.270 --> 01:16:43.280 align:start position:0%
again how you phrase it is it barriers
 

01:16:43.280 --> 01:16:45.110 align:start position:0%
again how you phrase it is it barriers
at<01:16:43.440> the<01:16:43.560> transmission

01:16:45.110 --> 01:16:45.120 align:start position:0%
at the transmission
 

01:16:45.120 --> 01:16:50.149 align:start position:0%
at the transmission
level<01:16:46.120> I<01:16:46.280> put<01:16:46.480> an<01:16:47.120> uh<01:16:47.800> in<01:16:47.960> the<01:16:48.159> chat<01:16:48.920> um<01:16:49.639> maybe

01:16:50.149 --> 01:16:50.159 align:start position:0%
level I put an uh in the chat um maybe
 

01:16:50.159 --> 01:16:53.149 align:start position:0%
level I put an uh in the chat um maybe
which<01:16:51.040> the<01:16:51.239> issues<01:16:52.080> which<01:16:52.239> are<01:16:52.440> delaying

01:16:53.149 --> 01:16:53.159 align:start position:0%
which the issues which are delaying
 

01:16:53.159 --> 01:16:55.430 align:start position:0%
which the issues which are delaying
projects<01:16:53.719> trying<01:16:54.080> to<01:16:54.320> connect<01:16:54.639> to<01:16:54.800> the<01:16:54.960> Grid

01:16:55.430 --> 01:16:55.440 align:start position:0%
projects trying to connect to the Grid
 

01:16:55.440 --> 01:16:57.510 align:start position:0%
projects trying to connect to the Grid
at<01:16:55.600> the<01:16:55.760> transmission

01:16:57.510 --> 01:16:57.520 align:start position:0%
at the transmission
 

01:16:57.520 --> 01:16:59.750 align:start position:0%
at the transmission
level<01:16:58.520> I<01:16:58.600> think<01:16:58.840> that's<01:16:59.120> good<01:16:59.320> language

01:16:59.750 --> 01:16:59.760 align:start position:0%
level I think that's good language
 

01:16:59.760 --> 01:17:06.470 align:start position:0%
level I think that's good language
calling<01:17:00.199> iug<01:17:00.520> with<01:17:00.960> that<01:17:01.880> with<01:17:02.040> your

01:17:06.470 --> 01:17:06.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:17:06.480 --> 01:17:09.750 align:start position:0%
 
approach<01:17:07.480> all<01:17:07.600> right<01:17:08.000> um<01:17:08.320> do<01:17:08.480> I<01:17:08.600> need<01:17:08.800> to<01:17:09.520> go

01:17:09.750 --> 01:17:09.760 align:start position:0%
approach all right um do I need to go
 

01:17:09.760 --> 01:17:12.830 align:start position:0%
approach all right um do I need to go
back<01:17:09.920> to<01:17:10.600> the<01:17:11.600> comments<01:17:12.080> I<01:17:12.159> can<01:17:12.360> I<01:17:12.440> can<01:17:12.600> just

01:17:12.830 --> 01:17:12.840 align:start position:0%
back to the comments I can I can just
 

01:17:12.840 --> 01:17:17.110 align:start position:0%
back to the comments I can I can just
read<01:17:13.040> it<01:17:13.199> to<01:17:13.440> you<01:17:13.679> so<01:17:14.400> after<01:17:15.400> after<01:17:16.040> issues<01:17:17.040> I

01:17:17.110 --> 01:17:17.120 align:start position:0%
read it to you so after after issues I
 

01:17:17.120 --> 01:17:20.430 align:start position:0%
read it to you so after after issues I
would<01:17:17.320> just<01:17:17.639> yeah<01:17:18.040> that<01:17:18.440> are<01:17:19.440> and<01:17:19.600> then<01:17:20.120> after

01:17:20.430 --> 01:17:20.440 align:start position:0%
would just yeah that are and then after
 

01:17:20.440 --> 01:17:23.510 align:start position:0%
would just yeah that are and then after
that<01:17:20.800> are<01:17:22.000> um

01:17:23.510 --> 01:17:23.520 align:start position:0%
that are um
 

01:17:23.520 --> 01:17:27.910 align:start position:0%
that are um
you<01:17:23.639> can<01:17:23.960> delete<01:17:24.960> um<01:17:25.920> or<01:17:26.920> just<01:17:27.199> write<01:17:27.600> this<01:17:27.760> and

01:17:27.910 --> 01:17:27.920 align:start position:0%
you can delete um or just write this and
 

01:17:27.920 --> 01:17:30.189 align:start position:0%
you can delete um or just write this and
then<01:17:28.080> delete<01:17:28.400> the<01:17:28.560> rest

01:17:30.189 --> 01:17:30.199 align:start position:0%
then delete the rest
 

01:17:30.199 --> 01:17:36.149 align:start position:0%
then delete the rest
yeah<01:17:31.199> delaying

01:17:36.149 --> 01:17:36.159 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:17:36.159 --> 01:17:44.550 align:start position:0%
 
projects<01:17:37.159> trying<01:17:37.760> to<01:17:38.120> connect<01:17:38.520> to<01:17:38.719> the

01:17:44.550 --> 01:17:44.560 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:17:44.560 --> 01:17:51.990 align:start position:0%
 
Grid<01:17:45.560> at<01:17:45.800> the<01:17:46.040> transmission

01:17:51.990 --> 01:17:52.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:17:52.000 --> 01:18:01.910 align:start position:0%
 
level

01:18:01.910 --> 01:18:01.920 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:18:01.920 --> 01:18:04.709 align:start position:0%
 
and<01:18:02.560> and<01:18:02.800> then<01:18:03.199> so<01:18:03.440> then<01:18:03.639> the<01:18:03.960> first<01:18:04.320> I<01:18:04.440> agree

01:18:04.709 --> 01:18:04.719 align:start position:0%
and and then so then the first I agree
 

01:18:04.719 --> 01:18:07.149 align:start position:0%
and and then so then the first I agree
with<01:18:04.840> that<01:18:04.960> and<01:18:05.040> then<01:18:05.159> I<01:18:05.239> would<01:18:05.360> make<01:18:05.560> the<01:18:05.840> next

01:18:07.149 --> 01:18:07.159 align:start position:0%
with that and then I would make the next
 

01:18:07.159 --> 01:18:09.669 align:start position:0%
with that and then I would make the next
bullet<01:18:08.159> um<01:18:08.320> a<01:18:08.480> version<01:18:08.800> what<01:18:08.960> colen<01:18:09.280> had<01:18:09.440> said

01:18:09.669 --> 01:18:09.679 align:start position:0%
bullet um a version what colen had said
 

01:18:09.679 --> 01:18:13.510 align:start position:0%
bullet um a version what colen had said
before<01:18:10.120> but<01:18:10.239> it's<01:18:10.400> what<01:18:10.520> you<01:18:10.679> just<01:18:10.840> cut<01:18:11.480> out<01:18:12.520> um

01:18:13.510 --> 01:18:13.520 align:start position:0%
before but it's what you just cut out um
 

01:18:13.520 --> 01:18:16.430 align:start position:0%
before but it's what you just cut out um
wait<01:18:13.600> a

01:18:16.430 --> 01:18:16.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:18:16.440 --> 01:18:20.189 align:start position:0%
 
minute<01:18:17.600> it<01:18:18.600> I<01:18:18.800> I<01:18:19.080> again<01:18:19.239> I<01:18:19.480> wouldn't<01:18:19.719> use<01:18:19.880> the

01:18:20.189 --> 01:18:20.199 align:start position:0%
minute it I I again I wouldn't use the
 

01:18:20.199 --> 01:18:23.390 align:start position:0%
minute it I I again I wouldn't use the
word<01:18:21.199> wisely<01:18:21.800> but<01:18:21.960> it<01:18:22.080> would<01:18:22.280> be<01:18:22.560> you<01:18:22.679> know

01:18:23.390 --> 01:18:23.400 align:start position:0%
word wisely but it would be you know
 

01:18:23.400 --> 01:18:26.270 align:start position:0%
word wisely but it would be you know
creative<01:18:23.840> use<01:18:24.040> of<01:18:24.600> existing<01:18:25.600> capacity<01:18:26.199> would

01:18:26.270 --> 01:18:26.280 align:start position:0%
creative use of existing capacity would
 

01:18:26.280 --> 01:18:29.310 align:start position:0%
creative use of existing capacity would
it<01:18:26.400> be<01:18:26.560> one<01:18:26.639> of<01:18:26.840> these<01:18:27.159> these<01:18:27.320> sub

01:18:29.310 --> 01:18:29.320 align:start position:0%
it be one of these these sub
 

01:18:29.320 --> 01:18:41.740 align:start position:0%
it be one of these these sub
bullets<01:18:30.320> I

01:18:41.740 --> 01:18:41.750 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:18:41.750 --> 01:18:45.709 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

01:18:45.709 --> 01:18:45.719 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:18:45.719 --> 01:18:50.110 align:start position:0%
 
would<01:18:46.719> all

01:18:50.110 --> 01:18:50.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:18:50.120 --> 01:18:52.990 align:start position:0%
 
right<01:18:51.120> so<01:18:51.360> to<01:18:51.520> me<01:18:51.800> that<01:18:51.960> so<01:18:52.280> so<01:18:52.520> Colleen's

01:18:52.990 --> 01:18:53.000 align:start position:0%
right so to me that so so Colleen's
 

01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:55.590 align:start position:0%
right so to me that so so Colleen's
giving<01:18:53.239> you<01:18:53.400> language<01:18:54.120> the<01:18:54.360> second<01:18:55.239> part<01:18:55.480> of

01:18:55.590 --> 01:18:55.600 align:start position:0%
giving you language the second part of
 

01:18:55.600 --> 01:18:58.470 align:start position:0%
giving you language the second part of
her<01:18:55.840> first<01:18:56.159> sentence<01:18:56.639> in<01:18:56.840> that<01:18:57.560> in<01:18:57.760> that<01:18:58.040> chat

01:18:58.470 --> 01:18:58.480 align:start position:0%
her first sentence in that in that chat
 

01:18:58.480 --> 01:19:00.270 align:start position:0%
her first sentence in that in that chat
comment<01:18:58.880> giv<01:18:59.120> the<01:18:59.239> bottlenecks<01:18:59.880> blah<01:19:00.080> blah

01:19:00.270 --> 01:19:00.280 align:start position:0%
comment giv the bottlenecks blah blah
 

01:19:00.280 --> 01:19:03.149 align:start position:0%
comment giv the bottlenecks blah blah
blah<01:19:00.520> but<01:19:00.639> it's<01:19:01.000> the<01:19:02.000> creatively<01:19:02.600> utiliz

01:19:03.149 --> 01:19:03.159 align:start position:0%
blah but it's the creatively utiliz
 

01:19:03.159 --> 01:19:10.709 align:start position:0%
blah but it's the creatively utiliz
existing<01:19:03.480> grid

01:19:10.709 --> 01:19:10.719 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:19:10.719 --> 01:19:14.070 align:start position:0%
 
capacity<01:19:11.719> I<01:19:11.880> bet<01:19:12.800> yeah<01:19:12.920> I<01:19:13.080> bet<01:19:13.679> Katherine<01:19:14.000> you

01:19:14.070 --> 01:19:14.080 align:start position:0%
capacity I bet yeah I bet Katherine you
 

01:19:14.080 --> 01:19:17.550 align:start position:0%
capacity I bet yeah I bet Katherine you
would<01:19:14.280> like<01:19:14.480> encourage<01:19:15.000> more<01:19:15.159> than<01:19:15.719> direct

01:19:17.550 --> 01:19:17.560 align:start position:0%
would like encourage more than direct
 

01:19:17.560 --> 01:19:19.870 align:start position:0%
would like encourage more than direct
but<01:19:18.560> I<01:19:18.679> think<01:19:18.840> it's<01:19:18.960> a<01:19:19.159> brilliant<01:19:19.560> use<01:19:19.719> of

01:19:19.870 --> 01:19:19.880 align:start position:0%
but I think it's a brilliant use of
 

01:19:19.880 --> 01:19:23.790 align:start position:0%
but I think it's a brilliant use of
words<01:19:20.600> Greg<01:19:21.600> I<01:19:21.679> mean<01:19:22.080> I<01:19:22.480> I<01:19:23.159> I'm<01:19:23.320> cool<01:19:23.600> with

01:19:23.790 --> 01:19:23.800 align:start position:0%
words Greg I mean I I I'm cool with
 

01:19:23.800 --> 01:19:26.270 align:start position:0%
words Greg I mean I I I'm cool with
direct<01:19:24.400> but<01:19:25.320> I<01:19:25.400> would<01:19:25.560> like<01:19:25.719> us<01:19:25.840> to<01:19:25.960> get<01:19:26.159> as

01:19:26.270 --> 01:19:26.280 align:start position:0%
direct but I would like us to get as
 

01:19:26.280 --> 01:19:28.629 align:start position:0%
direct but I would like us to get as
much<01:19:26.520> consensus<01:19:26.960> as<01:19:27.080> we<01:19:27.199> can<01:19:27.440> get<01:19:28.159> if<01:19:28.320> anybody

01:19:28.629 --> 01:19:28.639 align:start position:0%
much consensus as we can get if anybody
 

01:19:28.639 --> 01:19:30.189 align:start position:0%
much consensus as we can get if anybody
thinks<01:19:28.880> that<01:19:29.120> dramatically<01:19:29.639> substantively

01:19:30.189 --> 01:19:30.199 align:start position:0%
thinks that dramatically substantively
 

01:19:30.199 --> 01:19:32.669 align:start position:0%
thinks that dramatically substantively
undermines<01:19:30.880> the<01:19:31.760> the<01:19:31.920> point<01:19:32.159> that<01:19:32.280> I'll<01:19:32.480> fight

01:19:32.669 --> 01:19:32.679 align:start position:0%
undermines the the point that I'll fight
 

01:19:32.679 --> 01:19:36.590 align:start position:0%
undermines the the point that I'll fight
for<01:19:32.880> direct<01:19:33.840> but<01:19:34.840> I<01:19:35.000> I<01:19:35.120> like<01:19:35.360> direct<01:19:36.080> it<01:19:36.239> it<01:19:36.360> is

01:19:36.590 --> 01:19:36.600 align:start position:0%
for direct but I I like direct it it is
 

01:19:36.600 --> 01:19:48.790 align:start position:0%
for direct but I I like direct it it is
direct<01:19:37.080> I<01:19:37.239> like<01:19:37.560> I<01:19:37.679> like

01:19:48.790 --> 01:19:48.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:19:48.800 --> 01:19:53.350 align:start position:0%
 
direct<01:19:49.800> well<01:19:50.920> do<01:19:51.920> I<01:19:52.120> see<01:19:52.600> the

01:19:53.350 --> 01:19:53.360 align:start position:0%
direct well do I see the
 

01:19:53.360 --> 01:19:57.830 align:start position:0%
direct well do I see the
then<01:19:53.679> is<01:19:53.880> a<01:19:54.120> sub<01:19:54.679> bullet<01:19:55.679> to<01:19:56.400> this<01:19:56.639> one<01:19:57.639> the

01:19:57.830 --> 01:19:57.840 align:start position:0%
then is a sub bullet to this one the
 

01:19:57.840 --> 01:20:04.590 align:start position:0%
then is a sub bullet to this one the
creative<01:19:58.360> ways<01:19:58.960> are<01:19:59.400> by<01:19:59.600> doing<01:19:59.880> all<01:20:00.000> of

01:20:04.590 --> 01:20:04.600 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:20:04.600 --> 01:20:10.709 align:start position:0%
 
these<01:20:05.600> I<01:20:05.880> I<01:20:06.120> I<01:20:06.239> agree

01:20:10.709 --> 01:20:10.719 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:20:10.719 --> 01:20:14.629 align:start position:0%
 
Ken<01:20:11.719> so<01:20:12.400> also<01:20:12.880> you<01:20:13.040> can<01:20:13.320> delete<01:20:13.880> wisely

01:20:14.629 --> 01:20:14.639 align:start position:0%
Ken so also you can delete wisely
 

01:20:14.639 --> 01:20:16.510 align:start position:0%
Ken so also you can delete wisely
because<01:20:14.840> we<01:20:14.960> wanted<01:20:15.320> to<01:20:15.600> replace<01:20:16.320> the

01:20:16.510 --> 01:20:16.520 align:start position:0%
because we wanted to replace the
 

01:20:16.520 --> 01:20:19.270 align:start position:0%
because we wanted to replace the
creatively<01:20:17.440> concept<01:20:18.040> so<01:20:18.280> that<01:20:18.719> we<01:20:18.840> don't<01:20:19.040> have

01:20:19.270 --> 01:20:19.280 align:start position:0%
creatively concept so that we don't have
 

01:20:19.280 --> 01:20:22.390 align:start position:0%
creatively concept so that we don't have
wisely<01:20:19.800> so<01:20:19.920> we<01:20:20.000> don't<01:20:20.199> imply<01:20:20.760> anything<01:20:21.760> um

01:20:22.390 --> 01:20:22.400 align:start position:0%
wisely so we don't imply anything um
 

01:20:22.400 --> 01:20:24.149 align:start position:0%
wisely so we don't imply anything um
that<01:20:22.520> we<01:20:22.600> don't<01:20:23.040> mean

01:20:24.149 --> 01:20:24.159 align:start position:0%
that we don't mean
 

01:20:24.159 --> 01:20:26.750 align:start position:0%
that we don't mean
to<01:20:25.159> I<01:20:25.239> think<01:20:25.440> there<01:20:25.560> would<01:20:25.679> be<01:20:25.800> a<01:20:25.920> colon<01:20:26.360> after

01:20:26.750 --> 01:20:26.760 align:start position:0%
to I think there would be a colon after
 

01:20:26.760 --> 01:20:31.350 align:start position:0%
to I think there would be a colon after
capacity<01:20:27.360> and<01:20:27.840> then<01:20:28.840> we<01:20:29.040> would<01:20:29.760> um<01:20:30.760> delete<01:20:31.199> the

01:20:31.350 --> 01:20:31.360 align:start position:0%
capacity and then we would um delete the
 

01:20:31.360 --> 01:20:41.510 align:start position:0%
capacity and then we would um delete the
word<01:20:31.800> example<01:20:32.800> right

01:20:41.510 --> 01:20:41.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:20:41.520 --> 01:20:43.149 align:start position:0%
 
above

01:20:43.149 --> 01:20:43.159 align:start position:0%
above
 

01:20:43.159 --> 01:20:45.510 align:start position:0%
above
cool<01:20:44.159> and<01:20:44.360> I<01:20:44.440> don't<01:20:44.679> even<01:20:44.920> think<01:20:45.080> we<01:20:45.199> need

01:20:45.510 --> 01:20:45.520 align:start position:0%
cool and I don't even think we need
 

01:20:45.520 --> 01:20:47.669 align:start position:0%
cool and I don't even think we need
including<01:20:46.440> like<01:20:46.600> if<01:20:46.760> you<01:20:46.880> just<01:20:47.040> put<01:20:47.159> a<01:20:47.320> colon

01:20:47.669 --> 01:20:47.679 align:start position:0%
including like if you just put a colon
 

01:20:47.679 --> 01:20:51.709 align:start position:0%
including like if you just put a colon
after<01:20:48.120> capacity<01:20:48.920> all<01:20:49.159> three<01:20:49.360> of<01:20:49.560> those

01:20:51.709 --> 01:20:51.719 align:start position:0%
after capacity all three of those
 

01:20:51.719 --> 01:20:55.310 align:start position:0%
after capacity all three of those
bullets<01:20:52.880> are<01:20:53.320> under

01:20:55.310 --> 01:20:55.320 align:start position:0%
bullets are under
 

01:20:55.320 --> 01:20:57.510 align:start position:0%
bullets are under
consideration<01:20:56.320> yeah<01:20:56.679> so<01:20:56.880> this<01:20:57.000> is<01:20:57.159> way<01:20:57.360> then

01:20:57.510 --> 01:20:57.520 align:start position:0%
consideration yeah so this is way then
 

01:20:57.520 --> 01:20:59.270 align:start position:0%
consideration yeah so this is way then
in<01:20:57.639> the<01:20:57.719> weeds<01:20:57.920> of<01:20:58.040> w<01:20:58.320> smithing<01:20:58.719> but<01:20:58.840> I<01:20:58.960> think

01:20:59.270 --> 01:20:59.280 align:start position:0%
in the weeds of w smithing but I think
 

01:20:59.280 --> 01:21:00.830 align:start position:0%
in the weeds of w smithing but I think
that<01:20:59.600> those<01:20:59.800> three<01:21:00.000> bullets<01:21:00.400> need<01:21:00.600> to<01:21:00.719> be

01:21:00.830 --> 01:21:00.840 align:start position:0%
that those three bullets need to be
 

01:21:00.840 --> 01:21:02.149 align:start position:0%
that those three bullets need to be
phrased<01:21:01.159> slightly<01:21:01.480> differently<01:21:01.840> now<01:21:02.040> that

01:21:02.149 --> 01:21:02.159 align:start position:0%
phrased slightly differently now that
 

01:21:02.159 --> 01:21:05.070 align:start position:0%
phrased slightly differently now that
you<01:21:02.880> have<01:21:03.880> that<01:21:04.040> intro<01:21:04.480> sentence<01:21:04.880> so<01:21:05.000> it

01:21:05.070 --> 01:21:05.080 align:start position:0%
you have that intro sentence so it
 

01:21:05.080 --> 01:21:06.229 align:start position:0%
you have that intro sentence so it
should<01:21:05.199> be<01:21:05.320> the<01:21:05.400> legislature<01:21:05.840> should<01:21:06.000> direct

01:21:06.229 --> 01:21:06.239 align:start position:0%
should be the legislature should direct
 

01:21:06.239 --> 01:21:08.149 align:start position:0%
should be the legislature should direct
Viria<01:21:06.560> utility<01:21:06.880> to<01:21:06.960> creatively<01:21:07.400> use<01:21:07.800> existing

01:21:08.149 --> 01:21:08.159 align:start position:0%
Viria utility to creatively use existing
 

01:21:08.159 --> 01:21:09.110 align:start position:0%
Viria utility to creatively use existing
grid

01:21:09.110 --> 01:21:09.120 align:start position:0%
grid
 

01:21:09.120 --> 01:21:12.830 align:start position:0%
grid
capacity<01:21:10.280> um<01:21:11.280> and<01:21:11.440> then<01:21:11.719> whether<01:21:11.960> it's

01:21:12.830 --> 01:21:12.840 align:start position:0%
capacity um and then whether it's
 

01:21:12.840 --> 01:21:15.149 align:start position:0%
capacity um and then whether it's
consider<01:21:13.280> or<01:21:13.480> direct<01:21:14.120> but

01:21:15.149 --> 01:21:15.159 align:start position:0%
consider or direct but
 

01:21:15.159 --> 01:21:18.470 align:start position:0%
consider or direct but
it

01:21:18.470 --> 01:21:18.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:21:18.480 --> 01:21:21.270 align:start position:0%
 
um<01:21:19.480> I<01:21:19.679> I<01:21:19.800> would<01:21:20.080> I<01:21:20.159> would<01:21:20.360> put<01:21:20.560> all<01:21:20.719> of<01:21:20.840> those<01:21:21.040> as

01:21:21.270 --> 01:21:21.280 align:start position:0%
um I I would I would put all of those as
 

01:21:21.280 --> 01:21:26.990 align:start position:0%
um I I would I would put all of those as
just<01:21:21.600> con<01:21:22.159> consider

01:21:26.990 --> 01:21:27.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:28.390 align:start position:0%
 
because<01:21:27.280> that<01:21:27.400> one<01:21:27.560> already<01:21:27.800> has<01:21:28.000> considered

01:21:28.390 --> 01:21:28.400 align:start position:0%
because that one already has considered
 

01:21:28.400 --> 01:21:30.709 align:start position:0%
because that one already has considered
we<01:21:28.560> just<01:21:28.840> had<01:21:29.080> requiring<01:21:29.560> them<01:21:29.719> to

01:21:30.709 --> 01:21:30.719 align:start position:0%
we just had requiring them to
 

01:21:30.719 --> 01:21:34.310 align:start position:0%
we just had requiring them to
consider<01:21:31.719> I<01:21:31.800> would<01:21:31.960> say<01:21:32.199> consider<01:21:32.600> the<01:21:32.760> use

01:21:34.310 --> 01:21:34.320 align:start position:0%
consider I would say consider the use
 

01:21:34.320 --> 01:21:37.189 align:start position:0%
consider I would say consider the use
of<01:21:35.360> May

01:21:37.189 --> 01:21:37.199 align:start position:0%
of May
 

01:21:37.199 --> 01:21:39.470 align:start position:0%
of May
um<01:21:38.199> so

01:21:39.470 --> 01:21:39.480 align:start position:0%
um so
 

01:21:39.480 --> 01:21:42.310 align:start position:0%
um so
maybe<01:21:40.480> we<01:21:40.719> actually<01:21:41.080> put<01:21:41.360> I'm<01:21:41.520> s<01:21:41.840> I'm<01:21:41.960> sorry

01:21:42.310 --> 01:21:42.320 align:start position:0%
maybe we actually put I'm s I'm sorry
 

01:21:42.320 --> 01:21:43.870 align:start position:0%
maybe we actually put I'm s I'm sorry
for<01:21:42.480> this<01:21:42.600> is<01:21:42.840> in<01:21:42.960> the<01:21:43.080> weeds<01:21:43.320> of<01:21:43.520> forsmith

01:21:43.870 --> 01:21:43.880 align:start position:0%
for this is in the weeds of forsmith
 

01:21:43.880 --> 01:21:46.070 align:start position:0%
for this is in the weeds of forsmith
thing<01:21:44.280> but<01:21:44.719> the<01:21:44.920> legislature<01:21:45.520> should<01:21:45.760> direct

01:21:46.070 --> 01:21:46.080 align:start position:0%
thing but the legislature should direct
 

01:21:46.080 --> 01:21:48.470 align:start position:0%
thing but the legislature should direct
Virginia<01:21:46.520> Utilities<01:21:47.080> to<01:21:47.280> creatively<01:21:47.920> use

01:21:48.470 --> 01:21:48.480 align:start position:0%
Virginia Utilities to creatively use
 

01:21:48.480 --> 01:21:51.910 align:start position:0%
Virginia Utilities to creatively use
existing<01:21:48.960> grid<01:21:49.600> capacity<01:21:50.600> consider<01:21:51.280> comma

01:21:51.910 --> 01:21:51.920 align:start position:0%
existing grid capacity consider comma
 

01:21:51.920 --> 01:21:54.550 align:start position:0%
existing grid capacity consider comma
considering<01:21:52.760> for

01:21:54.550 --> 01:21:54.560 align:start position:0%
considering for
 

01:21:54.560 --> 01:21:56.550 align:start position:0%
considering for
example

01:21:56.550 --> 01:21:56.560 align:start position:0%
example
 

01:21:56.560 --> 01:21:59.310 align:start position:0%
example
colon<01:21:57.560> then<01:21:57.679> you<01:21:57.760> get<01:21:57.920> rid<01:21:58.080> of<01:21:58.239> all<01:21:59.080> we<01:21:59.199> can

01:21:59.310 --> 01:21:59.320 align:start position:0%
colon then you get rid of all we can
 

01:21:59.320 --> 01:22:01.470 align:start position:0%
colon then you get rid of all we can
remove<01:21:59.800> consider<01:22:00.320> from<01:22:00.480> each<01:22:00.679> of<01:22:00.840> the<01:22:01.000> bullets

01:22:01.470 --> 01:22:01.480 align:start position:0%
remove consider from each of the bullets
 

01:22:01.480 --> 01:22:03.189 align:start position:0%
remove consider from each of the bullets
below

01:22:03.189 --> 01:22:03.199 align:start position:0%
below
 

01:22:03.199 --> 01:22:05.709 align:start position:0%
below
okay<01:22:04.199> especially<01:22:04.639> the<01:22:04.800> second<01:22:05.080> one<01:22:05.320> which

01:22:05.709 --> 01:22:05.719 align:start position:0%
okay especially the second one which
 

01:22:05.719 --> 01:22:19.270 align:start position:0%
okay especially the second one which
says<01:22:06.080> consider<01:22:06.520> twice

01:22:19.270 --> 01:22:19.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:22:19.280 --> 01:22:21.590 align:start position:0%
 
now<01:22:20.280> so<01:22:20.480> this<01:22:20.600> one<01:22:20.760> would<01:22:20.880> be<01:22:21.000> using<01:22:21.400> can<01:22:21.480> we

01:22:21.590 --> 01:22:21.600 align:start position:0%
now so this one would be using can we
 

01:22:21.600 --> 01:22:26.070 align:start position:0%
now so this one would be using can we
just<01:22:21.800> say<01:22:22.320> you<01:22:23.040> uh<01:22:23.960> using<01:22:24.960> using<01:22:25.520> using<01:22:25.840> grid

01:22:26.070 --> 01:22:26.080 align:start position:0%
just say you uh using using using grid
 

01:22:26.080 --> 01:22:27.790 align:start position:0%
just say you uh using using using grid
enhancing<01:22:26.560> technology<01:22:27.040> so<01:22:27.239> take<01:22:27.440> the<01:22:27.560> first

01:22:27.790 --> 01:22:27.800 align:start position:0%
enhancing technology so take the first
 

01:22:27.800 --> 01:22:31.310 align:start position:0%
enhancing technology so take the first
five<01:22:28.000> words<01:22:28.719> out

01:22:31.310 --> 01:22:31.320 align:start position:0%
five words out
 

01:22:31.320 --> 01:22:37.350 align:start position:0%
five words out
yeah

01:22:37.350 --> 01:22:37.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:22:37.360 --> 01:22:46.870 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<01:22:38.360> and<01:22:38.520> that's<01:22:38.760> studying

01:22:46.870 --> 01:22:46.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:22:46.880 --> 01:22:55.189 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<01:22:47.880> maybe<01:22:48.920> well<01:22:49.920> okay<01:22:50.320> yeah<01:22:51.560> excellent

01:22:55.189 --> 01:22:55.199 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:22:55.199 --> 01:22:59.750 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<01:22:55.320> that

01:22:59.750 --> 01:22:59.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:22:59.760 --> 01:23:03.310 align:start position:0%
 
works<01:23:00.760> awesome<01:23:01.480> well<01:23:01.760> thank<01:23:01.960> you<01:23:02.159> all<01:23:02.440> for<01:23:03.159> the

01:23:03.310 --> 01:23:03.320 align:start position:0%
works awesome well thank you all for the
 

01:23:03.320 --> 01:23:05.750 align:start position:0%
works awesome well thank you all for the
word<01:23:03.639> smithing<01:23:04.320> and<01:23:04.600> for

01:23:05.750 --> 01:23:05.760 align:start position:0%
word smithing and for
 

01:23:05.760 --> 01:23:08.510 align:start position:0%
word smithing and for
the<01:23:06.760> help<01:23:07.040> there<01:23:07.280> thank<01:23:07.440> you<01:23:07.639> Ken<01:23:07.920> for<01:23:08.120> dealing

01:23:08.510 --> 01:23:08.520 align:start position:0%
the help there thank you Ken for dealing
 

01:23:08.520 --> 01:23:09.350 align:start position:0%
the help there thank you Ken for dealing
with

01:23:09.350 --> 01:23:09.360 align:start position:0%
with
 

01:23:09.360 --> 01:23:12.110 align:start position:0%
with
us<01:23:10.360> um<01:23:11.040> we<01:23:11.239> we've<01:23:11.400> touched<01:23:11.880> most

01:23:12.110 --> 01:23:12.120 align:start position:0%
us um we we've touched most
 

01:23:12.120 --> 01:23:14.390 align:start position:0%
us um we we've touched most
recommendations<01:23:12.840> that<01:23:13.000> seemed

01:23:14.390 --> 01:23:14.400 align:start position:0%
recommendations that seemed
 

01:23:14.400 --> 01:23:16.790 align:start position:0%
recommendations that seemed
to<01:23:15.400> raise

01:23:16.790 --> 01:23:16.800 align:start position:0%
to raise
 

01:23:16.800 --> 01:23:18.590 align:start position:0%
to raise
questions

01:23:18.590 --> 01:23:18.600 align:start position:0%
questions
 

01:23:18.600 --> 01:23:20.990 align:start position:0%
questions
um<01:23:19.600> right<01:23:19.760> now<01:23:19.920> we<01:23:20.080> just<01:23:20.199> kind<01:23:20.320> of<01:23:20.440> like<01:23:20.560> to

01:23:20.990 --> 01:23:21.000 align:start position:0%
um right now we just kind of like to
 

01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:23.110 align:start position:0%
um right now we just kind of like to
pull<01:23:21.760> Authority<01:23:22.199> me

01:23:23.110 --> 01:23:23.120 align:start position:0%
pull Authority me
 

01:23:23.120 --> 01:23:26.430 align:start position:0%
pull Authority me
are<01:23:23.320> we<01:23:23.719> comfortable<01:23:24.560> adopting

01:23:26.430 --> 01:23:26.440 align:start position:0%
are we comfortable adopting
 

01:23:26.440 --> 01:23:28.870 align:start position:0%
are we comfortable adopting
the

01:23:28.870 --> 01:23:28.880 align:start position:0%
the
 

01:23:28.880 --> 01:23:31.390 align:start position:0%
the
report<01:23:29.880> as<01:23:30.080> written<01:23:30.360> do<01:23:30.560> we<01:23:30.679> feel<01:23:30.880> the<01:23:31.000> need<01:23:31.199> to

01:23:31.390 --> 01:23:31.400 align:start position:0%
report as written do we feel the need to
 

01:23:31.400 --> 01:23:34.390 align:start position:0%
report as written do we feel the need to
go<01:23:31.880> one<01:23:32.159> by<01:23:32.600> one<01:23:33.600> to<01:23:33.760> make<01:23:33.880> sure<01:23:34.040> we<01:23:34.159> have

01:23:34.390 --> 01:23:34.400 align:start position:0%
go one by one to make sure we have
 

01:23:34.400 --> 01:23:37.430 align:start position:0%
go one by one to make sure we have
majority<01:23:34.880> support<01:23:35.560> on<01:23:36.000> each<01:23:36.440> recommendation

01:23:37.430 --> 01:23:37.440 align:start position:0%
majority support on each recommendation
 

01:23:37.440 --> 01:23:46.830 align:start position:0%
majority support on each recommendation
what<01:23:37.600> are<01:23:37.960> what<01:23:38.080> are<01:23:38.280> put

01:23:46.830 --> 01:23:46.840 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:23:46.840 --> 01:23:48.790 align:start position:0%
 
thinking<01:23:47.840> what<01:23:47.960> I<01:23:48.080> can<01:23:48.199> do<01:23:48.440> is<01:23:48.560> can<01:23:48.600> you<01:23:48.679> just

01:23:48.790 --> 01:23:48.800 align:start position:0%
thinking what I can do is can you just
 

01:23:48.800 --> 01:23:49.669 align:start position:0%
thinking what I can do is can you just
scroll<01:23:49.080> back<01:23:49.199> up<01:23:49.280> to<01:23:49.400> the<01:23:49.520> other

01:23:49.669 --> 01:23:49.679 align:start position:0%
scroll back up to the other
 

01:23:49.679 --> 01:23:51.229 align:start position:0%
scroll back up to the other
recommendations<01:23:50.440> Ken<01:23:50.679> can<01:23:50.760> you<01:23:50.840> just<01:23:50.960> scroll

01:23:51.229 --> 01:23:51.239 align:start position:0%
recommendations Ken can you just scroll
 

01:23:51.239 --> 01:23:52.430 align:start position:0%
recommendations Ken can you just scroll
back<01:23:51.360> up<01:23:51.440> to<01:23:51.560> the<01:23:51.639> other<01:23:51.800> recommendations

01:23:52.430 --> 01:23:52.440 align:start position:0%
back up to the other recommendations
 

01:23:52.440 --> 01:23:53.750 align:start position:0%
back up to the other recommendations
there's<01:23:52.639> another<01:23:52.880> page<01:23:53.080> of<01:23:53.199> recommendations

01:23:53.750 --> 01:23:53.760 align:start position:0%
there's another page of recommendations
 

01:23:53.760 --> 01:24:01.870 align:start position:0%
there's another page of recommendations
is<01:23:53.920> there

01:24:01.870 --> 01:24:01.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:01.880 --> 01:24:03.990 align:start position:0%
 
not<01:24:02.880> can<01:24:02.960> you<01:24:03.080> scroll<01:24:03.360> down<01:24:03.520> just<01:24:03.639> so<01:24:03.760> we<01:24:03.840> can

01:24:03.990 --> 01:24:04.000 align:start position:0%
not can you scroll down just so we can
 

01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:08.790 align:start position:0%
not can you scroll down just so we can
see<01:24:04.360> the<01:24:04.480> bottom<01:24:04.719> of<01:24:04.880> this<01:24:05.040> page

01:24:08.790 --> 01:24:08.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:08.800 --> 01:24:20.350 align:start position:0%
 
please

01:24:20.350 --> 01:24:20.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:20.360 --> 01:24:29.709 align:start position:0%
 
thank<01:24:21.360> the<01:24:21.440> governor<01:24:21.760> instruct<01:24:22.080> it

01:24:29.709 --> 01:24:29.719 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:29.719 --> 01:24:33.350 align:start position:0%
 
ordinance

01:24:33.350 --> 01:24:33.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:33.360 --> 01:24:49.109 align:start position:0%
 
Rec

01:24:49.109 --> 01:24:49.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:49.119 --> 01:24:51.350 align:start position:0%
 
govern

01:24:51.350 --> 01:24:51.360 align:start position:0%
govern
 

01:24:51.360 --> 01:24:54.870 align:start position:0%
govern
um

01:24:54.870 --> 01:24:54.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:54.880 --> 01:24:58.109 align:start position:0%
 
any<01:24:55.159> comments

01:24:58.109 --> 01:24:58.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:24:58.119 --> 01:25:14.470 align:start position:0%
 
here

01:25:14.470 --> 01:25:14.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:25:14.480 --> 01:25:18.750 align:start position:0%
 
um<01:25:15.480> couple<01:25:15.719> of<01:25:15.840> other<01:25:16.080> items<01:25:16.400> to<01:25:16.600> raise<01:25:17.360> um<01:25:18.360> I

01:25:18.750 --> 01:25:18.760 align:start position:0%
um couple of other items to raise um I
 

01:25:18.760 --> 01:25:21.270 align:start position:0%
um couple of other items to raise um I
recommended<01:25:19.679> we<01:25:20.199> not<01:25:20.480> include<01:25:21.040> the

01:25:21.270 --> 01:25:21.280 align:start position:0%
recommended we not include the
 

01:25:21.280 --> 01:25:23.270 align:start position:0%
recommended we not include the
appendices

01:25:23.270 --> 01:25:23.280 align:start position:0%
appendices
 

01:25:23.280 --> 01:25:25.950 align:start position:0%
appendices
describing<01:25:23.719> the<01:25:23.920> history<01:25:24.239> of<01:25:24.360> the<01:25:24.960> authority

01:25:25.950 --> 01:25:25.960 align:start position:0%
describing the history of the authority
 

01:25:25.960 --> 01:25:28.350 align:start position:0%
describing the history of the authority
we<01:25:26.159> keep<01:25:26.679> the<01:25:26.880> enabling<01:25:27.440> legislation<01:25:28.080> as<01:25:28.199> a

01:25:28.350 --> 01:25:28.360 align:start position:0%
we keep the enabling legislation as a
 

01:25:28.360 --> 01:25:31.229 align:start position:0%
we keep the enabling legislation as a
reminder<01:25:28.840> to<01:25:29.639> policy<01:25:30.000> makers<01:25:30.520> that<01:25:30.639> our<01:25:30.840> turn

01:25:31.229 --> 01:25:31.239 align:start position:0%
reminder to policy makers that our turn
 

01:25:31.239 --> 01:25:35.030 align:start position:0%
reminder to policy makers that our turn
required<01:25:31.760> at<01:25:31.960> 25<01:25:32.560> unless<01:25:33.520> renewed<01:25:34.520> and<01:25:34.719> then

01:25:35.030 --> 01:25:35.040 align:start position:0%
required at 25 unless renewed and then
 

01:25:35.040 --> 01:25:36.910 align:start position:0%
required at 25 unless renewed and then
did<01:25:35.320> have

01:25:36.910 --> 01:25:36.920 align:start position:0%
did have
 

01:25:36.920 --> 01:25:39.189 align:start position:0%
did have
a<01:25:37.920> of<01:25:38.040> course<01:25:38.320> keep<01:25:38.560> the<01:25:38.679> listing<01:25:38.960> of

01:25:39.189 --> 01:25:39.199 align:start position:0%
a of course keep the listing of
 

01:25:39.199 --> 01:25:41.510 align:start position:0%
a of course keep the listing of
authority<01:25:39.600> members<01:25:39.920> and<01:25:40.159> demonstrate

01:25:41.510 --> 01:25:41.520 align:start position:0%
authority members and demonstrate
 

01:25:41.520 --> 01:25:45.950 align:start position:0%
authority members and demonstrate
the<01:25:42.520> um<01:25:43.159> the<01:25:43.360> vacancies<01:25:43.880> that<01:25:44.000> we<01:25:44.440> have<01:25:45.440> for

01:25:45.950 --> 01:25:45.960 align:start position:0%
the um the vacancies that we have for
 

01:25:45.960 --> 01:25:49.310 align:start position:0%
the um the vacancies that we have for
governor<01:25:46.440> Senate<01:25:46.920> and<01:25:47.920> speaker

01:25:49.310 --> 01:25:49.320 align:start position:0%
governor Senate and speaker
 

01:25:49.320 --> 01:25:52.030 align:start position:0%
governor Senate and speaker
appointees<01:25:50.320> and<01:25:50.760> Skyler<01:25:51.360> kind<01:25:51.440> of<01:25:51.560> created<01:25:51.920> a

01:25:52.030 --> 01:25:52.040 align:start position:0%
appointees and Skyler kind of created a
 

01:25:52.040 --> 01:25:54.470 align:start position:0%
appointees and Skyler kind of created a
score<01:25:52.239> score<01:25:52.480> sheet<01:25:52.800> here<01:25:53.000> for<01:25:53.880> member

01:25:54.470 --> 01:25:54.480 align:start position:0%
score score sheet here for member
 

01:25:54.480 --> 01:25:57.109 align:start position:0%
score score sheet here for member
attendance<01:25:55.480> which<01:25:55.719> I<01:25:55.840> thought<01:25:56.080> was

01:25:57.109 --> 01:25:57.119 align:start position:0%
attendance which I thought was
 

01:25:57.119 --> 01:26:00.310 align:start position:0%
attendance which I thought was
good<01:25:58.119> yeah<01:25:58.880> so<01:25:59.199> and<01:25:59.679> I<01:25:59.760> don't<01:25:59.880> know<01:26:00.040> whether

01:26:00.310 --> 01:26:00.320 align:start position:0%
good yeah so and I don't know whether
 

01:26:00.320 --> 01:26:01.790 align:start position:0%
good yeah so and I don't know whether
anyone<01:26:00.600> can't<01:26:00.840> off<01:26:01.000> the<01:26:01.119> top<01:26:01.239> of<01:26:01.320> their<01:26:01.480> head

01:26:01.790 --> 01:26:01.800 align:start position:0%
anyone can't off the top of their head
 

01:26:01.800 --> 01:26:04.510 align:start position:0%
anyone can't off the top of their head
confirm<01:26:02.800> their<01:26:03.000> tendance<01:26:03.600> quick<01:26:03.920> yeah<01:26:04.119> just<01:26:04.199> a

01:26:04.510 --> 01:26:04.520 align:start position:0%
confirm their tendance quick yeah just a
 

01:26:04.520 --> 01:26:06.229 align:start position:0%
confirm their tendance quick yeah just a
quick<01:26:04.960> a<01:26:05.119> quick<01:26:05.320> question<01:26:05.679> are<01:26:05.800> there<01:26:06.000> any

01:26:06.229 --> 01:26:06.239 align:start position:0%
quick a quick question are there any
 

01:26:06.239 --> 01:26:09.149 align:start position:0%
quick a quick question are there any
other<01:26:06.639> reports<01:26:07.239> of<01:26:07.440> various<01:26:07.800> authorities<01:26:08.360> or

01:26:09.149 --> 01:26:09.159 align:start position:0%
other reports of various authorities or
 

01:26:09.159 --> 01:26:10.990 align:start position:0%
other reports of various authorities or
uh<01:26:09.320> citizen<01:26:09.760> advisory<01:26:10.199> boards<01:26:10.520> that<01:26:10.679> include

01:26:10.990 --> 01:26:11.000 align:start position:0%
uh citizen advisory boards that include
 

01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:13.149 align:start position:0%
uh citizen advisory boards that include
an<01:26:11.159> attendance<01:26:11.679> report<01:26:12.000> for

01:26:13.149 --> 01:26:13.159 align:start position:0%
an attendance report for
 

01:26:13.159 --> 01:26:16.470 align:start position:0%
an attendance report for
me<01:26:14.159> um<01:26:14.480> I<01:26:14.560> don't<01:26:14.800> know<01:26:15.119> but<01:26:15.280> I<01:26:15.400> know<01:26:15.679> we<01:26:15.880> do<01:26:16.280> a

01:26:16.470 --> 01:26:16.480 align:start position:0%
me um I don't know but I know we do a
 

01:26:16.480 --> 01:26:18.430 align:start position:0%
me um I don't know but I know we do a
report<01:26:16.719> to<01:26:16.880> the<01:26:17.000> governor's<01:26:17.560> office<01:26:18.159> every

01:26:18.430 --> 01:26:18.440 align:start position:0%
report to the governor's office every
 

01:26:18.440 --> 01:26:21.189 align:start position:0%
report to the governor's office every
year<01:26:18.960> on<01:26:19.280> member

01:26:21.189 --> 01:26:21.199 align:start position:0%
year on member
 

01:26:21.199 --> 01:26:26.830 align:start position:0%
year on member
attendance

01:26:26.830 --> 01:26:26.840 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:26:26.840 --> 01:26:29.350 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<01:26:27.000> we've<01:26:27.159> struggled<01:26:27.760> a<01:26:27.960> couple<01:26:28.280> times<01:26:28.719> this

01:26:29.350 --> 01:26:29.360 align:start position:0%
yeah we've struggled a couple times this
 

01:26:29.360 --> 01:26:33.390 align:start position:0%
yeah we've struggled a couple times this
this<01:26:29.639> past<01:26:29.840> year<01:26:29.960> to<01:26:30.080> reach<01:26:30.440> the<01:26:30.840> Forum<01:26:31.880> um<01:26:32.880> and

01:26:33.390 --> 01:26:33.400 align:start position:0%
this past year to reach the Forum um and
 

01:26:33.400 --> 01:26:39.870 align:start position:0%
this past year to reach the Forum um and
thought<01:26:33.600> this<01:26:33.679> would<01:26:33.840> be<01:26:33.960> a<01:26:34.320> useful<01:26:35.320> tracking

01:26:39.870 --> 01:26:39.880 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:26:39.880 --> 01:26:43.270 align:start position:0%
 
tool<01:26:40.880> I<01:26:41.000> think<01:26:41.320> this<01:26:41.760> may<01:26:42.000> come<01:26:42.199> into<01:26:42.520> play<01:26:43.040> in

01:26:43.270 --> 01:26:43.280 align:start position:0%
tool I think this may come into play in
 

01:26:43.280 --> 01:26:47.910 align:start position:0%
tool I think this may come into play in
whether<01:26:43.480> or<01:26:43.639> not<01:26:43.840> members<01:26:44.159> are

01:26:47.910 --> 01:26:47.920 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:26:47.920 --> 01:26:53.189 align:start position:0%
 
reelected<01:26:48.920> just<01:26:49.040> a<01:26:49.320> quick<01:26:50.320> on<01:26:51.080> on<01:26:51.360> Robert

01:26:53.189 --> 01:26:53.199 align:start position:0%
reelected just a quick on on Robert
 

01:26:53.199 --> 01:26:55.950 align:start position:0%
reelected just a quick on on Robert
sorry<01:26:53.520> you're<01:26:53.719> new<01:26:54.119> and<01:26:54.320> I'm<01:26:54.679> picking<01:26:55.000> on<01:26:55.199> you

01:26:55.950 --> 01:26:55.960 align:start position:0%
sorry you're new and I'm picking on you
 

01:26:55.960 --> 01:26:59.470 align:start position:0%
sorry you're new and I'm picking on you
the<01:26:56.080> term<01:26:56.560> expiration<01:26:57.199> date<01:26:57.480> I<01:26:57.560> think<01:26:57.760> has<01:26:57.880> a

01:26:59.470 --> 01:26:59.480 align:start position:0%
the term expiration date I think has a
 

01:26:59.480 --> 01:27:03.270 align:start position:0%
the term expiration date I think has a
typo<01:27:00.480> um

01:27:03.270 --> 01:27:03.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:27:03.280 --> 01:27:06.350 align:start position:0%
 
273<01:27:04.280> Robert<01:27:04.560> will<01:27:04.719> still<01:27:04.880> be<01:27:05.199> kicking<01:27:06.199> he'll

01:27:06.350 --> 01:27:06.360 align:start position:0%
273 Robert will still be kicking he'll
 

01:27:06.360 --> 01:27:12.669 align:start position:0%
273 Robert will still be kicking he'll
be<01:27:06.920> here<01:27:07.920> for<01:27:08.480> another<01:27:08.920> thousand

01:27:12.669 --> 01:27:12.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:27:12.679 --> 01:27:16.390 align:start position:0%
 
years<01:27:13.679> and<01:27:13.800> does<01:27:14.119> everybody's<01:27:15.400> uh

01:27:16.390 --> 01:27:16.400 align:start position:0%
years and does everybody's uh
 

01:27:16.400 --> 01:27:19.430 align:start position:0%
years and does everybody's uh
appointment<01:27:16.920> expiration<01:27:17.480> date<01:27:17.679> look

01:27:19.430 --> 01:27:19.440 align:start position:0%
appointment expiration date look
 

01:27:19.440 --> 01:27:21.109 align:start position:0%
appointment expiration date look
correct

01:27:21.109 --> 01:27:21.119 align:start position:0%
correct
 

01:27:21.119 --> 01:27:24.229 align:start position:0%
correct
yes

01:27:24.229 --> 01:27:24.239 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:27:24.239 --> 01:27:27.109 align:start position:0%
 
great<01:27:25.239> and<01:27:25.520> what<01:27:25.679> I<01:27:25.800> can<01:27:26.000> do<01:27:26.679> is<01:27:26.840> after

01:27:27.109 --> 01:27:27.119 align:start position:0%
great and what I can do is after
 

01:27:27.119 --> 01:27:28.790 align:start position:0%
great and what I can do is after
cleaning<01:27:27.480> this<01:27:27.679> all<01:27:27.880> up<01:27:28.080> doing<01:27:28.320> all<01:27:28.440> the<01:27:28.560> final

01:27:28.790 --> 01:27:28.800 align:start position:0%
cleaning this all up doing all the final
 

01:27:28.800 --> 01:27:30.350 align:start position:0%
cleaning this all up doing all the final
formatting<01:27:29.400> and<01:27:29.520> stuff<01:27:29.760> like<01:27:29.880> that<01:27:30.040> if<01:27:30.239> you

01:27:30.350 --> 01:27:30.360 align:start position:0%
formatting and stuff like that if you
 

01:27:30.360 --> 01:27:33.510 align:start position:0%
formatting and stuff like that if you
all<01:27:30.520> are<01:27:30.679> going<01:27:30.800> to<01:27:31.280> vote<01:27:31.520> to<01:27:31.719> approve<01:27:32.000> it<01:27:32.520> now

01:27:33.510 --> 01:27:33.520 align:start position:0%
all are going to vote to approve it now
 

01:27:33.520 --> 01:27:35.950 align:start position:0%
all are going to vote to approve it now
send<01:27:33.760> it<01:27:33.920> out<01:27:34.440> later<01:27:34.760> today<01:27:35.320> give<01:27:35.520> everyone<01:27:35.840> a

01:27:35.950 --> 01:27:35.960 align:start position:0%
send it out later today give everyone a
 

01:27:35.960 --> 01:27:40.270 align:start position:0%
send it out later today give everyone a
chance<01:27:36.280> to<01:27:36.480> read<01:27:36.719> the<01:27:36.880> thing<01:27:37.080> in<01:27:37.280> full<01:27:38.000> and<01:27:39.280> um

01:27:40.270 --> 01:27:40.280 align:start position:0%
chance to read the thing in full and um
 

01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:42.470 align:start position:0%
chance to read the thing in full and um
if<01:27:40.360> you<01:27:40.520> find<01:27:40.840> errors<01:27:41.280> Corrections<01:27:41.800> typos<01:27:42.280> and

01:27:42.470 --> 01:27:42.480 align:start position:0%
if you find errors Corrections typos and
 

01:27:42.480 --> 01:27:44.470 align:start position:0%
if you find errors Corrections typos and
stuff<01:27:42.719> like<01:27:42.920> that<01:27:43.480> those<01:27:43.679> can<01:27:43.880> probably<01:27:44.239> be

01:27:44.470 --> 01:27:44.480 align:start position:0%
stuff like that those can probably be
 

01:27:44.480 --> 01:27:46.310 align:start position:0%
stuff like that those can probably be
easily<01:27:45.119> Incorporated<01:27:45.800> it<01:27:45.920> sounds<01:27:46.159> like

01:27:46.310 --> 01:27:46.320 align:start position:0%
easily Incorporated it sounds like
 

01:27:46.320 --> 01:27:47.350 align:start position:0%
easily Incorporated it sounds like
you've<01:27:46.480> all<01:27:46.719> made<01:27:46.840> it<01:27:46.920> through<01:27:47.080> the<01:27:47.199> big

01:27:47.350 --> 01:27:47.360 align:start position:0%
you've all made it through the big
 

01:27:47.360 --> 01:27:49.750 align:start position:0%
you've all made it through the big
hurdles<01:27:48.000> which<01:27:48.320> I<01:27:48.440> knew<01:27:48.800> the<01:27:49.600> the

01:27:49.750 --> 01:27:49.760 align:start position:0%
hurdles which I knew the the
 

01:27:49.760 --> 01:27:53.070 align:start position:0%
hurdles which I knew the the
recommendations<01:27:50.400> were<01:27:50.560> going<01:27:50.679> to<01:27:50.840> be<01:27:51.360> those

01:27:53.070 --> 01:27:53.080 align:start position:0%
recommendations were going to be those
 

01:27:53.080 --> 01:27:54.910 align:start position:0%
recommendations were going to be those
yeah<01:27:53.480> can<01:27:53.719> I<01:27:54.040> think<01:27:54.199> that's<01:27:54.360> an<01:27:54.480> excellent

01:27:54.910 --> 01:27:54.920 align:start position:0%
yeah can I think that's an excellent
 

01:27:54.920 --> 01:27:57.350 align:start position:0%
yeah can I think that's an excellent
idea<01:27:55.360> let's<01:27:55.639> clean<01:27:55.960> this<01:27:56.199> up<01:27:56.719> I<01:27:56.840> think<01:27:57.119> there

01:27:57.350 --> 01:27:57.360 align:start position:0%
idea let's clean this up I think there
 

01:27:57.360 --> 01:28:00.310 align:start position:0%
idea let's clean this up I think there
any<01:27:58.040> formatting<01:27:58.960> spelling<01:27:59.560> grammatical

01:28:00.310 --> 01:28:00.320 align:start position:0%
any formatting spelling grammatical
 

01:28:00.320 --> 01:28:02.189 align:start position:0%
any formatting spelling grammatical
changes<01:28:01.320> uh<01:28:01.520> I<01:28:01.639> think<01:28:01.760> we'd<01:28:01.960> have<01:28:02.080> the

01:28:02.189 --> 01:28:02.199 align:start position:0%
changes uh I think we'd have the
 

01:28:02.199 --> 01:28:05.709 align:start position:0%
changes uh I think we'd have the
authorities<01:28:02.679> approval<01:28:03.119> to<01:28:03.239> make<01:28:03.600> those<01:28:04.159> as<01:28:04.719> uh

01:28:05.709 --> 01:28:05.719 align:start position:0%
authorities approval to make those as uh
 

01:28:05.719 --> 01:28:09.229 align:start position:0%
authorities approval to make those as uh
as<01:28:06.040> are<01:28:06.360> SE<01:28:06.760> best<01:28:07.159> fit<01:28:08.040> um<01:28:08.520> but<01:28:08.679> we<01:28:08.800> do<01:28:09.000> have<01:28:09.119> the

01:28:09.229 --> 01:28:09.239 align:start position:0%
as are SE best fit um but we do have the
 

01:28:09.239 --> 01:28:12.550 align:start position:0%
as are SE best fit um but we do have the
meat<01:28:09.440> of<01:28:09.600> everything<01:28:10.040> solidified<01:28:10.800> now<01:28:11.560> so

01:28:12.550 --> 01:28:12.560 align:start position:0%
meat of everything solidified now so
 

01:28:12.560 --> 01:28:15.310 align:start position:0%
meat of everything solidified now so
with<01:28:12.800> that<01:28:13.239> with<01:28:13.480> 15<01:28:13.880> minutes<01:28:14.199> to<01:28:14.440> spare<01:28:15.199> uh

01:28:15.310 --> 01:28:15.320 align:start position:0%
with that with 15 minutes to spare uh
 

01:28:15.320 --> 01:28:20.590 align:start position:0%
with that with 15 minutes to spare uh
would<01:28:15.520> entertain<01:28:15.880> a<01:28:16.080> motion<01:28:16.840> to<01:28:17.880> approve<01:28:19.360> the

01:28:20.590 --> 01:28:20.600 align:start position:0%
would entertain a motion to approve the
 

01:28:20.600 --> 01:28:22.590 align:start position:0%
would entertain a motion to approve the
2023<01:28:21.600> annual

01:28:22.590 --> 01:28:22.600 align:start position:0%
2023 annual
 

01:28:22.600 --> 01:28:24.990 align:start position:0%
2023 annual
of<01:28:22.719> the<01:28:22.840> Virginia<01:28:23.280> solar<01:28:24.159> energy<01:28:24.520> development

01:28:24.990 --> 01:28:25.000 align:start position:0%
of the Virginia solar energy development
 

01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:26.709 align:start position:0%
of the Virginia solar energy development
and<01:28:25.199> energy<01:28:25.560> storage

01:28:26.709 --> 01:28:26.719 align:start position:0%
and energy storage
 

01:28:26.719 --> 01:28:30.109 align:start position:0%
and energy storage
Authority<01:28:27.719> um<01:28:28.239> to<01:28:28.560> get<01:28:29.119> it<01:28:29.480> to<01:28:29.719> the<01:28:29.880> right

01:28:30.109 --> 01:28:30.119 align:start position:0%
Authority um to get it to the right
 

01:28:30.119 --> 01:28:32.790 align:start position:0%
Authority um to get it to the right
folks<01:28:30.520> for<01:28:31.080> eventual<01:28:32.080> delivery<01:28:32.520> to<01:28:32.639> the

01:28:32.790 --> 01:28:32.800 align:start position:0%
folks for eventual delivery to the
 

01:28:32.800 --> 01:28:35.910 align:start position:0%
folks for eventual delivery to the
governor<01:28:33.360> and<01:28:33.920> chairs<01:28:34.239> of<01:28:34.440> the<01:28:35.000> proper

01:28:35.910 --> 01:28:35.920 align:start position:0%
governor and chairs of the proper
 

01:28:35.920 --> 01:28:37.950 align:start position:0%
governor and chairs of the proper
committees<01:28:36.360> in<01:28:36.480> the<01:28:36.639> general

01:28:37.950 --> 01:28:37.960 align:start position:0%
committees in the general
 

01:28:37.960 --> 01:28:42.590 align:start position:0%
committees in the general
assembly<01:28:38.960> I<01:28:39.119> make<01:28:39.320> that<01:28:39.760> motion<01:28:40.800> second

01:28:42.590 --> 01:28:42.600 align:start position:0%
assembly I make that motion second
 

01:28:42.600 --> 01:28:46.990 align:start position:0%
assembly I make that motion second
second<01:28:43.600> who<01:28:43.920> who<01:28:44.040> was<01:28:44.159> the<01:28:44.520> second<01:28:45.520> I<01:28:45.679> was<01:28:46.000> Paul

01:28:46.990 --> 01:28:47.000 align:start position:0%
second who who was the second I was Paul
 

01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.870 align:start position:0%
second who who was the second I was Paul
Paul<01:28:47.960> whoever<01:28:48.440> doesn't

01:28:49.870 --> 01:28:49.880 align:start position:0%
Paul whoever doesn't
 

01:28:49.880 --> 01:28:51.790 align:start position:0%
Paul whoever doesn't
matter<01:28:50.880> you<01:28:50.960> want<01:28:51.040> to<01:28:51.119> flip<01:28:51.320> a<01:28:51.440> coin<01:28:51.600> or<01:28:51.719> you

01:28:51.790 --> 01:28:51.800 align:start position:0%
matter you want to flip a coin or you
 

01:28:51.800 --> 01:28:53.910 align:start position:0%
matter you want to flip a coin or you
want<01:28:52.040> we<01:28:52.159> just<01:28:52.320> pick<01:28:52.520> one<01:28:53.280> pick<01:28:53.480> one<01:28:53.639> I<01:28:53.719> think<01:28:53.800> I

01:28:53.910 --> 01:28:53.920 align:start position:0%
want we just pick one pick one I think I
 

01:28:53.920 --> 01:28:55.430 align:start position:0%
want we just pick one pick one I think I
heard<01:28:54.080> Greg

01:28:55.430 --> 01:28:55.440 align:start position:0%
heard Greg
 

01:28:55.440 --> 01:28:58.629 align:start position:0%
heard Greg
first<01:28:56.440> well<01:28:56.600> a<01:28:56.800> motion<01:28:57.440> having<01:28:57.800> been<01:28:58.239> properly

01:28:58.629 --> 01:28:58.639 align:start position:0%
first well a motion having been properly
 

01:28:58.639 --> 01:29:02.950 align:start position:0%
first well a motion having been properly
made<01:28:58.840> and<01:28:59.280> seconded<01:29:00.280> uh<01:29:01.119> all<01:29:01.360> those<01:29:01.679> in<01:29:02.080> favor

01:29:02.950 --> 01:29:02.960 align:start position:0%
made and seconded uh all those in favor
 

01:29:02.960 --> 01:29:08.990 align:start position:0%
made and seconded uh all those in favor
please<01:29:03.520> signify<01:29:04.080> by<01:29:04.280> saying<01:29:05.000> I<01:29:06.000> I<01:29:06.719> I

01:29:08.990 --> 01:29:09.000 align:start position:0%
please signify by saying I I I
 

01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:15.470 align:start position:0%
please signify by saying I I I
I<01:29:10.000> um<01:29:10.239> any

01:29:15.470 --> 01:29:15.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:18.270 align:start position:0%
 
opposed<01:29:16.480> can<01:29:16.679> I<01:29:16.840> to<01:29:17.040> say<01:29:17.360> that<01:29:17.719> this<01:29:17.880> is<01:29:18.159> kind

01:29:18.270 --> 01:29:18.280 align:start position:0%
opposed can I to say that this is kind
 

01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:20.870 align:start position:0%
opposed can I to say that this is kind
of<01:29:18.400> a<01:29:18.560> milestone<01:29:19.400> in<01:29:19.719> that<01:29:19.960> this<01:29:20.159> may<01:29:20.360> be<01:29:20.679> the

01:29:20.870 --> 01:29:20.880 align:start position:0%
of a milestone in that this may be the
 

01:29:20.880 --> 01:29:23.750 align:start position:0%
of a milestone in that this may be the
first<01:29:21.280> year<01:29:22.280> that<01:29:22.520> this<01:29:22.719> report<01:29:23.119> has<01:29:23.239> been

01:29:23.750 --> 01:29:23.760 align:start position:0%
first year that this report has been
 

01:29:23.760 --> 01:29:26.830 align:start position:0%
first year that this report has been
submitted<01:29:24.760> on

01:29:26.830 --> 01:29:26.840 align:start position:0%
submitted on
 

01:29:26.840 --> 01:29:34.229 align:start position:0%
submitted on
time<01:29:27.840> one<01:29:28.520> secondos<01:29:29.520> anyone

01:29:34.229 --> 01:29:34.239 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:29:34.239 --> 01:29:39.149 align:start position:0%
 
in<01:29:35.239> okay<01:29:35.639> no<01:29:36.199> no<01:29:36.480> opposes<01:29:37.280> no<01:29:37.960> abstentions<01:29:38.960> uh

01:29:39.149 --> 01:29:39.159 align:start position:0%
in okay no no opposes no abstentions uh
 

01:29:39.159 --> 01:29:41.189 align:start position:0%
in okay no no opposes no abstentions uh
looks<01:29:39.440> to<01:29:39.560> be<01:29:39.840> unanimous<01:29:40.440> approval<01:29:40.880> of

01:29:41.189 --> 01:29:41.199 align:start position:0%
looks to be unanimous approval of
 

01:29:41.199 --> 01:29:43.870 align:start position:0%
looks to be unanimous approval of
authority<01:29:41.760> members<01:29:42.480> for<01:29:42.800> this<01:29:43.000> report<01:29:43.400> and

01:29:43.870 --> 01:29:43.880 align:start position:0%
authority members for this report and
 

01:29:43.880 --> 01:29:45.510 align:start position:0%
authority members for this report and
sorry<01:29:44.080> to<01:29:44.199> interrupt<01:29:44.560> you<01:29:44.760> but<01:29:45.080> completely

01:29:45.510 --> 01:29:45.520 align:start position:0%
sorry to interrupt you but completely
 

01:29:45.520 --> 01:29:49.550 align:start position:0%
sorry to interrupt you but completely
agree<01:29:46.040> it<01:29:47.040> years<01:29:47.440> to<01:29:47.840> get<01:29:48.199> here<01:29:49.199> making

01:29:49.550 --> 01:29:49.560 align:start position:0%
agree it years to get here making
 

01:29:49.560 --> 01:29:52.229 align:start position:0%
agree it years to get here making
concrete<01:29:50.000> recomendations<01:29:50.840> to<01:29:51.520> policy<01:29:51.960> makers

01:29:52.229 --> 01:29:52.239 align:start position:0%
concrete recomendations to policy makers
 

01:29:52.239 --> 01:29:55.149 align:start position:0%
concrete recomendations to policy makers
in<01:29:52.360> Virginia<01:29:52.760> so<01:29:52.960> everybody<01:29:53.560> feel<01:29:53.880> very<01:29:54.159> proud

01:29:55.149 --> 01:29:55.159 align:start position:0%
in Virginia so everybody feel very proud
 

01:29:55.159 --> 01:29:57.790 align:start position:0%
in Virginia so everybody feel very proud
uh<01:29:55.360> this<01:29:55.880> tailor<01:29:56.400> down<01:29:57.040> report<01:29:57.400> I<01:29:57.480> think<01:29:57.639> made

01:29:57.790 --> 01:29:57.800 align:start position:0%
uh this tailor down report I think made
 

01:29:57.800 --> 01:30:00.590 align:start position:0%
uh this tailor down report I think made
it<01:29:57.920> a<01:29:58.040> lot<01:29:58.280> easier<01:29:59.159> of<01:29:59.400> a<01:29:59.600> document<01:30:00.159> to<01:30:00.360> deal

01:30:00.590 --> 01:30:00.600 align:start position:0%
it a lot easier of a document to deal
 

01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:03.550 align:start position:0%
it a lot easier of a document to deal
with<01:30:00.760> and<01:30:01.400> consider<01:30:02.400> um<01:30:02.840> so<01:30:03.239> thank<01:30:03.400> you

01:30:03.550 --> 01:30:03.560 align:start position:0%
with and consider um so thank you
 

01:30:03.560 --> 01:30:06.189 align:start position:0%
with and consider um so thank you
everybody<01:30:03.920> this<01:30:04.040> is<01:30:04.159> a<01:30:04.320> huge<01:30:04.560> milestone<01:30:05.480> folks

01:30:06.189 --> 01:30:06.199 align:start position:0%
everybody this is a huge milestone folks
 

01:30:06.199 --> 01:30:07.750 align:start position:0%
everybody this is a huge milestone folks
uh<01:30:06.320> in<01:30:06.560> the<01:30:06.800> the<01:30:06.920> governor's<01:30:07.360> office<01:30:07.600> are

01:30:07.750 --> 01:30:07.760 align:start position:0%
uh in the the governor's office are
 

01:30:07.760 --> 01:30:10.350 align:start position:0%
uh in the the governor's office are
really<01:30:08.000> excited<01:30:08.360> to<01:30:08.520> read<01:30:08.719> it<01:30:09.320> um<01:30:09.880> I<01:30:10.040> spoke

01:30:10.350 --> 01:30:10.360 align:start position:0%
really excited to read it um I spoke
 

01:30:10.360 --> 01:30:11.830 align:start position:0%
really excited to read it um I spoke
with<01:30:10.760> one

01:30:11.830 --> 01:30:11.840 align:start position:0%
with one
 

01:30:11.840 --> 01:30:13.910 align:start position:0%
with one
representative<01:30:12.840> since<01:30:13.080> our<01:30:13.360> last<01:30:13.600> meeting

01:30:13.910 --> 01:30:13.920 align:start position:0%
representative since our last meeting
 

01:30:13.920 --> 01:30:16.350 align:start position:0%
representative since our last meeting
and<01:30:14.040> she<01:30:14.280> emphatically<01:30:15.000> said<01:30:15.440> absolutely<01:30:16.159> yes

01:30:16.350 --> 01:30:16.360 align:start position:0%
and she emphatically said absolutely yes
 

01:30:16.360 --> 01:30:18.830 align:start position:0%
and she emphatically said absolutely yes
we<01:30:16.480> want<01:30:16.719> recommendations<01:30:17.560> we<01:30:17.719> want<01:30:17.880> to<01:30:18.159> know

01:30:18.830 --> 01:30:18.840 align:start position:0%
we want recommendations we want to know
 

01:30:18.840 --> 01:30:21.310 align:start position:0%
we want recommendations we want to know
how<01:30:19.040> to<01:30:19.280> make<01:30:19.600> things<01:30:20.040> better<01:30:20.639> for<01:30:21.040> clean

01:30:21.310 --> 01:30:21.320 align:start position:0%
how to make things better for clean
 

01:30:21.320 --> 01:30:24.350 align:start position:0%
how to make things better for clean
energy<01:30:22.199> solar<01:30:22.520> and<01:30:22.639> storage<01:30:23.119> development<01:30:23.760> so

01:30:24.350 --> 01:30:24.360 align:start position:0%
energy solar and storage development so
 

01:30:24.360 --> 01:30:26.950 align:start position:0%
energy solar and storage development so
I<01:30:24.480> think<01:30:24.639> there<01:30:24.760> will<01:30:24.920> be<01:30:25.159> receptive<01:30:25.960> years

01:30:26.950 --> 01:30:26.960 align:start position:0%
I think there will be receptive years
 

01:30:26.960 --> 01:30:29.070 align:start position:0%
I think there will be receptive years
receptive<01:30:27.400> eyeballs<01:30:27.880> reading<01:30:28.239> this<01:30:28.440> report

01:30:29.070 --> 01:30:29.080 align:start position:0%
receptive eyeballs reading this report
 

01:30:29.080 --> 01:30:32.510 align:start position:0%
receptive eyeballs reading this report
so<01:30:29.480> thank<01:30:29.679> you<01:30:30.520> every<01:30:31.520> hey<01:30:31.800> hey<01:30:31.920> scyler<01:30:32.320> can<01:30:32.400> I

01:30:32.510 --> 01:30:32.520 align:start position:0%
so thank you every hey hey scyler can I
 

01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:33.950 align:start position:0%
so thank you every hey hey scyler can I
make<01:30:32.719> can<01:30:32.800> I<01:30:32.920> make<01:30:33.040> comments<01:30:33.400> think<01:30:33.560> about

01:30:33.950 --> 01:30:33.960 align:start position:0%
make can I make comments think about
 

01:30:33.960 --> 01:30:36.070 align:start position:0%
make can I make comments think about
next<01:30:34.239> year<01:30:34.920> um<01:30:35.040> and<01:30:35.159> I<01:30:35.239> totally<01:30:35.520> agree<01:30:35.840> agree

01:30:36.070 --> 01:30:36.080 align:start position:0%
next year um and I totally agree agree
 

01:30:36.080 --> 01:30:38.550 align:start position:0%
next year um and I totally agree agree
with<01:30:36.199> all<01:30:36.400> that<01:30:36.560> and<01:30:36.719> also<01:30:37.600> um<01:30:37.880> one<01:30:38.239> comment

01:30:38.550 --> 01:30:38.560 align:start position:0%
with all that and also um one comment
 

01:30:38.560 --> 01:30:40.109 align:start position:0%
with all that and also um one comment
that<01:30:38.880> Katherine<01:30:39.239> said<01:30:39.440> that<01:30:39.560> I<01:30:39.679> think<01:30:39.800> was<01:30:39.960> a

01:30:40.109 --> 01:30:40.119 align:start position:0%
that Katherine said that I think was a
 

01:30:40.119 --> 01:30:43.109 align:start position:0%
that Katherine said that I think was a
fair<01:30:40.960> comment<01:30:41.400> it<01:30:41.520> was<01:30:42.239> it<01:30:42.360> was<01:30:42.480> just<01:30:42.600> a<01:30:42.760> small

01:30:43.109 --> 01:30:43.119 align:start position:0%
fair comment it was it was just a small
 

01:30:43.119 --> 01:30:45.390 align:start position:0%
fair comment it was it was just a small
comment<01:30:43.520> in<01:30:43.880> in<01:30:44.000> the<01:30:44.239> larger<01:30:44.679> conversation

01:30:45.390 --> 01:30:45.400 align:start position:0%
comment in in the larger conversation
 

01:30:45.400 --> 01:30:48.430 align:start position:0%
comment in in the larger conversation
but<01:30:46.040> um<01:30:46.679> we<01:30:47.119> received<01:30:47.320> a<01:30:47.520> lot<01:30:47.800> of

01:30:48.430 --> 01:30:48.440 align:start position:0%
but um we received a lot of
 

01:30:48.440 --> 01:30:49.990 align:start position:0%
but um we received a lot of
presentations<01:30:49.080> from<01:30:49.320> subject<01:30:49.600> matter

01:30:49.990 --> 01:30:50.000 align:start position:0%
presentations from subject matter
 

01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:53.430 align:start position:0%
presentations from subject matter
experts<01:30:50.440> this<01:30:50.639> year<01:30:51.440> one<01:30:52.000> could<01:30:52.320> argue<01:30:53.159> that

01:30:53.430 --> 01:30:53.440 align:start position:0%
experts this year one could argue that
 

01:30:53.440 --> 01:30:56.910 align:start position:0%
experts this year one could argue that
they<01:30:53.800> were<01:30:54.280> one<01:30:54.719> side<01:30:54.960> of<01:30:55.119> a<01:30:55.760> conversation<01:30:56.760> and

01:30:56.910 --> 01:30:56.920 align:start position:0%
they were one side of a conversation and
 

01:30:56.920 --> 01:30:59.590 align:start position:0%
they were one side of a conversation and
so<01:30:57.440> without<01:30:58.040> without<01:30:58.840> create<01:30:59.239> turning<01:30:59.480> this

01:30:59.590 --> 01:30:59.600 align:start position:0%
so without without create turning this
 

01:30:59.600 --> 01:31:03.109 align:start position:0%
so without without create turning this
into<01:30:59.800> a<01:30:59.960> debate<01:31:00.520> Forum<01:31:01.520> um<01:31:02.000> I<01:31:02.119> do<01:31:02.360> think<01:31:02.600> if<01:31:02.760> we

01:31:03.109 --> 01:31:03.119 align:start position:0%
into a debate Forum um I do think if we
 

01:31:03.119 --> 01:31:06.070 align:start position:0%
into a debate Forum um I do think if we
have<01:31:04.119> a<01:31:04.360> presentation<01:31:05.080> where<01:31:05.280> we<01:31:05.520> know

01:31:06.070 --> 01:31:06.080 align:start position:0%
have a presentation where we know
 

01:31:06.080 --> 01:31:08.510 align:start position:0%
have a presentation where we know
there's<01:31:06.360> like<01:31:06.520> a<01:31:06.840> discreet<01:31:07.840> other<01:31:08.159> side<01:31:08.360> to

01:31:08.510 --> 01:31:08.520 align:start position:0%
there's like a discreet other side to
 

01:31:08.520 --> 01:31:11.830 align:start position:0%
there's like a discreet other side to
the<01:31:09.000> story<01:31:10.000> um<01:31:10.800> and<01:31:10.960> and<01:31:11.080> I<01:31:11.159> know<01:31:11.320> you<01:31:11.440> did<01:31:11.679> give

01:31:11.830 --> 01:31:11.840 align:start position:0%
the story um and and I know you did give
 

01:31:11.840 --> 01:31:14.550 align:start position:0%
the story um and and I know you did give
some<01:31:11.960> folks<01:31:12.199> some<01:31:12.400> opportunities<01:31:12.960> to<01:31:13.400> to<01:31:14.280> who

01:31:14.550 --> 01:31:14.560 align:start position:0%
some folks some opportunities to to who
 

01:31:14.560 --> 01:31:17.149 align:start position:0%
some folks some opportunities to to who
declined<01:31:14.960> to<01:31:15.119> participate<01:31:15.560> in<01:31:15.639> other<01:31:15.920> ways<01:31:16.760> um

01:31:17.149 --> 01:31:17.159 align:start position:0%
declined to participate in other ways um
 

01:31:17.159 --> 01:31:18.870 align:start position:0%
declined to participate in other ways um
but<01:31:17.320> let's<01:31:17.520> just<01:31:17.679> make<01:31:17.840> sure<01:31:18.239> it<01:31:18.719> we<01:31:18.800> don't

01:31:18.870 --> 01:31:18.880 align:start position:0%
but let's just make sure it we don't
 

01:31:18.880 --> 01:31:20.790 align:start position:0%
but let's just make sure it we don't
want<01:31:19.000> a<01:31:19.080> free-for-all<01:31:19.639> debate<01:31:20.280> concept<01:31:20.719> but

01:31:20.790 --> 01:31:20.800 align:start position:0%
want a free-for-all debate concept but
 

01:31:20.800 --> 01:31:22.070 align:start position:0%
want a free-for-all debate concept but
if<01:31:20.920> there's<01:31:21.080> someone<01:31:21.320> going<01:31:21.400> to<01:31:21.520> come<01:31:21.639> in<01:31:21.920> that

01:31:22.070 --> 01:31:22.080 align:start position:0%
if there's someone going to come in that
 

01:31:22.080 --> 01:31:24.790 align:start position:0%
if there's someone going to come in that
says<01:31:22.560> Dominion<01:31:23.080> sucks<01:31:23.719> right<01:31:24.119> all<01:31:24.280> right<01:31:24.520> well

01:31:24.790 --> 01:31:24.800 align:start position:0%
says Dominion sucks right all right well
 

01:31:24.800 --> 01:31:25.870 align:start position:0%
says Dominion sucks right all right well
they're<01:31:24.960> going<01:31:25.040> to<01:31:25.159> say<01:31:25.320> that<01:31:25.440> Dominion<01:31:25.760> ought

01:31:25.870 --> 01:31:25.880 align:start position:0%
they're going to say that Dominion ought
 

01:31:25.880 --> 01:31:29.030 align:start position:0%
they're going to say that Dominion ought
to<01:31:26.000> have<01:31:26.119> an<01:31:26.239> opportunity<01:31:26.920> to<01:31:27.880> um<01:31:28.360> to<01:31:28.520> be<01:31:28.679> heard

01:31:29.030 --> 01:31:29.040 align:start position:0%
to have an opportunity to um to be heard
 

01:31:29.040 --> 01:31:31.790 align:start position:0%
to have an opportunity to um to be heard
on<01:31:29.400> you<01:31:29.560> know<01:31:29.960> why<01:31:30.119> they<01:31:30.320> don't<01:31:31.320> and<01:31:31.440> so<01:31:31.639> just

01:31:31.790 --> 01:31:31.800 align:start position:0%
on you know why they don't and so just
 

01:31:31.800 --> 01:31:33.350 align:start position:0%
on you know why they don't and so just
as<01:31:31.920> we<01:31:32.080> think<01:31:32.239> about<01:31:32.480> topics<01:31:32.760> for<01:31:32.960> next<01:31:33.119> year

01:31:33.350 --> 01:31:33.360 align:start position:0%
as we think about topics for next year
 

01:31:33.360 --> 01:31:34.510 align:start position:0%
as we think about topics for next year
just<01:31:33.480> maybe<01:31:33.719> something<01:31:33.960> keep<01:31:34.080> in<01:31:34.199> the<01:31:34.280> back<01:31:34.440> of

01:31:34.510 --> 01:31:34.520 align:start position:0%
just maybe something keep in the back of
 

01:31:34.520 --> 01:31:37.350 align:start position:0%
just maybe something keep in the back of
our<01:31:35.040> minds<01:31:36.040> I<01:31:36.199> think<01:31:36.440> too<01:31:36.760> Greg<01:31:37.119> you<01:31:37.199> know

01:31:37.350 --> 01:31:37.360 align:start position:0%
our minds I think too Greg you know
 

01:31:37.360 --> 01:31:38.990 align:start position:0%
our minds I think too Greg you know
seeing<01:31:37.800> support<01:31:38.040> of<01:31:38.199> that<01:31:38.400> we<01:31:38.520> had<01:31:38.719> also

01:31:38.990 --> 01:31:39.000 align:start position:0%
seeing support of that we had also
 

01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:40.590 align:start position:0%
seeing support of that we had also
talked<01:31:39.320> about<01:31:39.639> having<01:31:39.920> the<01:31:40.119> local

01:31:40.590 --> 01:31:40.600 align:start position:0%
talked about having the local
 

01:31:40.600 --> 01:31:42.629 align:start position:0%
talked about having the local
governments<01:31:41.440> also<01:31:41.719> come<01:31:41.880> in<01:31:42.000> and<01:31:42.119> give<01:31:42.360> their

01:31:42.629 --> 01:31:42.639 align:start position:0%
governments also come in and give their
 

01:31:42.639 --> 01:31:44.990 align:start position:0%
governments also come in and give their
perspective<01:31:43.119> so<01:31:43.320> I<01:31:43.440> think<01:31:43.719> that<01:31:44.159> feeds<01:31:44.719> very

01:31:44.990 --> 01:31:45.000 align:start position:0%
perspective so I think that feeds very
 

01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:47.750 align:start position:0%
perspective so I think that feeds very
very<01:31:45.320> well<01:31:46.080> into<01:31:46.400> that<01:31:46.600> overall<01:31:47.440> you<01:31:47.560> know

01:31:47.750 --> 01:31:47.760 align:start position:0%
very well into that overall you know
 

01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:50.149 align:start position:0%
very well into that overall you know
let's<01:31:48.040> get<01:31:48.360> a<01:31:48.600> voice<01:31:49.040> from<01:31:49.480> from<01:31:49.719> both<01:31:49.960> sides

01:31:50.149 --> 01:31:50.159 align:start position:0%
let's get a voice from from both sides
 

01:31:50.159 --> 01:31:51.510 align:start position:0%
let's get a voice from from both sides
of<01:31:50.280> the<01:31:50.440> table<01:31:50.760> so<01:31:50.920> that<01:31:51.000> we<01:31:51.119> have<01:31:51.199> an

01:31:51.510 --> 01:31:51.520 align:start position:0%
of the table so that we have an
 

01:31:51.520 --> 01:31:53.350 align:start position:0%
of the table so that we have an
understanding<01:31:51.920> in<01:31:52.080> for<01:31:52.239> instance<01:31:52.560> of<01:31:52.719> the

01:31:53.350 --> 01:31:53.360 align:start position:0%
understanding in for instance of the
 

01:31:53.360 --> 01:31:55.870 align:start position:0%
understanding in for instance of the
setback<01:31:54.360> uh<01:31:54.600> considerations<01:31:55.440> that<01:31:55.600> they're

01:31:55.870 --> 01:31:55.880 align:start position:0%
setback uh considerations that they're
 

01:31:55.880 --> 01:31:58.390 align:start position:0%
setback uh considerations that they're
they're<01:31:56.119> proposing<01:31:56.600> and<01:31:57.239> legislating<01:31:58.239> and

01:31:58.390 --> 01:31:58.400 align:start position:0%
they're proposing and legislating and
 

01:31:58.400 --> 01:32:01.229 align:start position:0%
they're proposing and legislating and
things<01:31:58.719> like<01:31:58.920> that<01:31:59.040> so<01:31:59.239> I<01:31:59.480> do<01:32:00.480> I<01:32:00.600> second

01:32:01.229 --> 01:32:01.239 align:start position:0%
things like that so I do I second
 

01:32:01.239 --> 01:32:02.870 align:start position:0%
things like that so I do I second
everything<01:32:01.560> you<01:32:01.719> just<01:32:01.840> said<01:32:02.119> I<01:32:02.199> think<01:32:02.360> that's

01:32:02.870 --> 01:32:02.880 align:start position:0%
everything you just said I think that's
 

01:32:02.880 --> 01:32:05.830 align:start position:0%
everything you just said I think that's
a<01:32:03.880> a<01:32:04.040> definite<01:32:04.400> focus<01:32:04.719> of<01:32:04.880> what<01:32:05.000> we<01:32:05.080> need<01:32:05.239> to<01:32:05.360> do

01:32:05.830 --> 01:32:05.840 align:start position:0%
a a definite focus of what we need to do
 

01:32:05.840 --> 01:32:08.270 align:start position:0%
a a definite focus of what we need to do
well<01:32:06.280> and<01:32:06.480> that's<01:32:06.800> the<01:32:07.080> that's<01:32:07.400> the<01:32:07.880> the<01:32:08.000> one<01:32:08.199> I

01:32:08.270 --> 01:32:08.280 align:start position:0%
well and that's the that's the the one I
 

01:32:08.280 --> 01:32:09.910 align:start position:0%
well and that's the that's the the one I
was<01:32:08.440> thinking<01:32:08.719> of<01:32:08.880> where<01:32:09.080> my<01:32:09.239> recollection<01:32:09.760> is

01:32:09.910 --> 01:32:09.920 align:start position:0%
was thinking of where my recollection is
 

01:32:09.920 --> 01:32:12.350 align:start position:0%
was thinking of where my recollection is
that<01:32:10.080> Skylar<01:32:10.440> said<01:32:10.600> we<01:32:10.800> tried<01:32:11.080> to<01:32:11.280> get<01:32:12.080> them<01:32:12.239> to

01:32:12.350 --> 01:32:12.360 align:start position:0%
that Skylar said we tried to get them to
 

01:32:12.360 --> 01:32:14.510 align:start position:0%
that Skylar said we tried to get them to
come<01:32:12.520> in<01:32:12.760> just<01:32:12.880> haven't<01:32:13.080> been<01:32:13.199> able<01:32:13.360> to<01:32:13.440> get

01:32:14.510 --> 01:32:14.520 align:start position:0%
come in just haven't been able to get
 

01:32:14.520 --> 01:32:17.229 align:start position:0%
come in just haven't been able to get
anybody<01:32:15.520> um<01:32:15.800> yeah<01:32:16.440> so<01:32:16.639> we<01:32:16.719> can<01:32:16.840> only<01:32:17.000> do<01:32:17.119> what

01:32:17.229 --> 01:32:17.239 align:start position:0%
anybody um yeah so we can only do what
 

01:32:17.239 --> 01:32:21.270 align:start position:0%
anybody um yeah so we can only do what
we<01:32:17.320> can<01:32:17.679> do<01:32:18.679> yeah<01:32:19.560> perfect<01:32:19.880> segue<01:32:20.440> to<01:32:20.639> the<01:32:20.920> next

01:32:21.270 --> 01:32:21.280 align:start position:0%
we can do yeah perfect segue to the next
 

01:32:21.280 --> 01:32:24.030 align:start position:0%
we can do yeah perfect segue to the next
topic<01:32:22.080> topics<01:32:22.400> for<01:32:22.600> future<01:32:22.960> meetings<01:32:23.760> uh<01:32:23.880> you

01:32:24.030 --> 01:32:24.040 align:start position:0%
topic topics for future meetings uh you
 

01:32:24.040 --> 01:32:26.790 align:start position:0%
topic topics for future meetings uh you
all<01:32:24.239> right<01:32:24.400> we<01:32:24.520> did<01:32:24.719> invite<01:32:25.159> Veo<01:32:25.840> that<01:32:26.239> quietly

01:32:26.790 --> 01:32:26.800 align:start position:0%
all right we did invite Veo that quietly
 

01:32:26.800 --> 01:32:30.709 align:start position:0%
all right we did invite Veo that quietly
cin<01:32:27.280> maybe<01:32:27.840> later<01:32:28.840> um<01:32:29.560> my<01:32:29.840> plan<01:32:30.119> is<01:32:30.239> to<01:32:30.400> invite

01:32:30.709 --> 01:32:30.719 align:start position:0%
cin maybe later um my plan is to invite
 

01:32:30.719 --> 01:32:32.750 align:start position:0%
cin maybe later um my plan is to invite
V<01:32:31.080> and<01:32:31.199> the<01:32:31.280> data<01:32:31.560> center<01:32:31.880> Coalition<01:32:32.360> there

01:32:32.750 --> 01:32:32.760 align:start position:0%
V and the data center Coalition there
 

01:32:32.760 --> 01:32:35.109 align:start position:0%
V and the data center Coalition there
two<01:32:33.280> organizations<01:32:34.239> that<01:32:34.440> Authority<01:32:34.840> members

01:32:35.109 --> 01:32:35.119 align:start position:0%
two organizations that Authority members
 

01:32:35.119 --> 01:32:37.510 align:start position:0%
two organizations that Authority members
have<01:32:35.360> previously<01:32:36.080> identified<01:32:37.080> give<01:32:37.280> them<01:32:37.440> the

01:32:37.510 --> 01:32:37.520 align:start position:0%
have previously identified give them the
 

01:32:37.520 --> 01:32:41.270 align:start position:0%
have previously identified give them the
floor<01:32:37.960> on<01:32:38.159> our<01:32:38.520> I<01:32:38.639> believe<01:32:39.800> January<01:32:40.800> 10th

01:32:41.270 --> 01:32:41.280 align:start position:0%
floor on our I believe January 10th
 

01:32:41.280 --> 01:32:42.750 align:start position:0%
floor on our I believe January 10th
meeting<01:32:41.639> don't<01:32:41.880> putote<01:32:42.080> me<01:32:42.199> on<01:32:42.320> that<01:32:42.520> think

01:32:42.750 --> 01:32:42.760 align:start position:0%
meeting don't putote me on that think
 

01:32:42.760 --> 01:32:44.430 align:start position:0%
meeting don't putote me on that think
can<01:32:42.960> correct<01:32:43.360> me<01:32:43.639> but<01:32:43.880> let's<01:32:44.080> get<01:32:44.199> that<01:32:44.320> on

01:32:44.430 --> 01:32:44.440 align:start position:0%
can correct me but let's get that on
 

01:32:44.440 --> 01:32:46.870 align:start position:0%
can correct me but let's get that on
their<01:32:44.639> calendars<01:32:45.159> now<01:32:45.480> and<01:32:46.119> and<01:32:46.280> make<01:32:46.520> the

01:32:46.870 --> 01:32:46.880 align:start position:0%
their calendars now and and make the
 

01:32:46.880 --> 01:32:49.870 align:start position:0%
their calendars now and and make the
offer<01:32:47.880> to<01:32:48.119> that<01:32:48.320> end<01:32:49.159> um<01:32:49.520> have<01:32:49.719> this

01:32:49.870 --> 01:32:49.880 align:start position:0%
offer to that end um have this
 

01:32:49.880 --> 01:32:50.990 align:start position:0%
offer to that end um have this
opportunity<01:32:50.320> at<01:32:50.440> every<01:32:50.600> meeting<01:32:50.840> to

01:32:50.990 --> 01:32:51.000 align:start position:0%
opportunity at every meeting to
 

01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:54.149 align:start position:0%
opportunity at every meeting to
brainstorm<01:32:51.679> future<01:32:52.040> topics<01:32:52.880> presenters<01:32:53.880> do

01:32:54.149 --> 01:32:54.159 align:start position:0%
brainstorm future topics presenters do
 

01:32:54.159 --> 01:32:55.510 align:start position:0%
brainstorm future topics presenters do
any<01:32:54.480> party<01:32:54.800> members<01:32:55.159> have<01:32:55.280> any

01:32:55.510 --> 01:32:55.520 align:start position:0%
any party members have any
 

01:32:55.520 --> 01:32:59.070 align:start position:0%
any party members have any
recommendations<01:32:56.520> on<01:32:57.159> who<01:32:57.360> we<01:32:57.440> should<01:32:58.080> invite

01:32:59.070 --> 01:32:59.080 align:start position:0%
recommendations on who we should invite
 

01:32:59.080 --> 01:33:00.790 align:start position:0%
recommendations on who we should invite
and<01:32:59.320> would<01:32:59.639> you<01:32:59.840> as<01:32:59.920> an<01:33:00.040> authority<01:33:00.400> member<01:33:00.639> be

01:33:00.790 --> 01:33:00.800 align:start position:0%
and would you as an authority member be
 

01:33:00.800 --> 01:33:03.950 align:start position:0%
and would you as an authority member be
willing<01:33:01.040> to<01:33:01.440> help<01:33:01.639> us<01:33:01.880> invite<01:33:02.320> those<01:33:02.800> these

01:33:03.950 --> 01:33:03.960 align:start position:0%
willing to help us invite those these
 

01:33:03.960 --> 01:33:06.510 align:start position:0%
willing to help us invite those these
people<01:33:04.960> I<01:33:05.080> think<01:33:05.239> the<01:33:05.360> electrification<01:33:06.199> theme

01:33:06.510 --> 01:33:06.520 align:start position:0%
people I think the electrification theme
 

01:33:06.520 --> 01:33:09.629 align:start position:0%
people I think the electrification theme
is<01:33:06.719> something<01:33:07.159> that<01:33:08.080> you<01:33:08.199> know

01:33:09.629 --> 01:33:09.639 align:start position:0%
is something that you know
 

01:33:09.639 --> 01:33:13.270 align:start position:0%
is something that you know
contacting<01:33:10.639> uh<01:33:11.440> for<01:33:11.679> instance<01:33:12.119> Blacksburg<01:33:13.119> uh

01:33:13.270 --> 01:33:13.280 align:start position:0%
contacting uh for instance Blacksburg uh
 

01:33:13.280 --> 01:33:16.149 align:start position:0%
contacting uh for instance Blacksburg uh
I<01:33:13.360> know<01:33:13.560> they<01:33:13.679> have<01:33:13.800> a<01:33:14.239> big<01:33:15.239> push<01:33:15.679> right<01:33:15.920> now

01:33:16.149 --> 01:33:16.159 align:start position:0%
I know they have a big push right now
 

01:33:16.159 --> 01:33:18.430 align:start position:0%
I know they have a big push right now
for<01:33:16.719> electrification<01:33:17.719> uh<01:33:17.840> with<01:33:18.000> Virginia

01:33:18.430 --> 01:33:18.440 align:start position:0%
for electrification uh with Virginia
 

01:33:18.440 --> 01:33:21.270 align:start position:0%
for electrification uh with Virginia
Tech<01:33:19.119> there<01:33:20.119> uh<01:33:20.280> I<01:33:20.360> think<01:33:20.600> that's<01:33:20.840> one<01:33:21.119> thing

01:33:21.270 --> 01:33:21.280 align:start position:0%
Tech there uh I think that's one thing
 

01:33:21.280 --> 01:33:23.350 align:start position:0%
Tech there uh I think that's one thing
that<01:33:21.719> should<01:33:21.920> consider<01:33:22.600> and<01:33:22.760> I<01:33:22.880> could<01:33:23.080> reach

01:33:23.350 --> 01:33:23.360 align:start position:0%
that should consider and I could reach
 

01:33:23.360 --> 01:33:25.750 align:start position:0%
that should consider and I could reach
out<01:33:23.719> and<01:33:23.920> take<01:33:24.239> action<01:33:24.679> with<01:33:25.080> with<01:33:25.239> them<01:33:25.480> it's

01:33:25.750 --> 01:33:25.760 align:start position:0%
out and take action with with them it's
 

01:33:25.760 --> 01:33:28.669 align:start position:0%
out and take action with with them it's
my<01:33:26.080> my<01:33:26.199> former<01:33:26.520> all<01:33:26.920> mod<01:33:27.280> so<01:33:27.520> I<01:33:27.600> could<01:33:28.119> easily

01:33:28.669 --> 01:33:28.679 align:start position:0%
my my former all mod so I could easily
 

01:33:28.679 --> 01:33:30.790 align:start position:0%
my my former all mod so I could easily
reach<01:33:28.880> out<01:33:29.119> through<01:33:29.400> there<01:33:29.920> through<01:33:30.239> peek<01:33:30.560> and

01:33:30.790 --> 01:33:30.800 align:start position:0%
reach out through there through peek and
 

01:33:30.800 --> 01:33:33.070 align:start position:0%
reach out through there through peek and
and<01:33:30.920> the<01:33:31.000> other<01:33:31.320> organizations<01:33:32.320> uh<01:33:32.440> I<01:33:32.520> know

01:33:33.070 --> 01:33:33.080 align:start position:0%
and the other organizations uh I know
 

01:33:33.080 --> 01:33:36.470 align:start position:0%
and the other organizations uh I know
obviously<01:33:34.080> uh<01:33:34.440> Ken<01:33:34.760> and<01:33:35.199> and<01:33:35.520> Aaron<01:33:36.040> can<01:33:36.239> also

01:33:36.470 --> 01:33:36.480 align:start position:0%
obviously uh Ken and and Aaron can also
 

01:33:36.480 --> 01:33:38.870 align:start position:0%
obviously uh Ken and and Aaron can also
reach<01:33:36.719> out<01:33:36.960> through<01:33:37.679> tech<01:33:38.000> and<01:33:38.320> and<01:33:38.440> reach<01:33:38.719> to

01:33:38.870 --> 01:33:38.880 align:start position:0%
reach out through tech and and reach to
 

01:33:38.880 --> 01:33:40.550 align:start position:0%
reach out through tech and and reach to
the<01:33:39.040> right<01:33:39.280> people<01:33:40.000> so<01:33:40.159> I<01:33:40.239> think<01:33:40.360> the

01:33:40.550 --> 01:33:40.560 align:start position:0%
the right people so I think the
 

01:33:40.560 --> 01:33:43.629 align:start position:0%
the right people so I think the
electrification<01:33:41.560> component<01:33:42.080> is<01:33:42.239> a<01:33:42.480> big<01:33:42.719> deal

01:33:43.629 --> 01:33:43.639 align:start position:0%
electrification component is a big deal
 

01:33:43.639 --> 01:33:45.189 align:start position:0%
electrification component is a big deal
I<01:33:43.719> think<01:33:43.840> it<01:33:44.000> has<01:33:44.119> an

01:33:45.189 --> 01:33:45.199 align:start position:0%
I think it has an
 

01:33:45.199 --> 01:33:48.669 align:start position:0%
I think it has an
implication<01:33:46.199> uh<01:33:46.320> for<01:33:46.639> cities<01:33:47.679> jurisdictions

01:33:48.669 --> 01:33:48.679 align:start position:0%
implication uh for cities jurisdictions
 

01:33:48.679 --> 01:33:51.510 align:start position:0%
implication uh for cities jurisdictions
towns<01:33:49.239> you<01:33:49.360> know<01:33:49.639> Etc<01:33:50.400> the<01:33:50.600> local<01:33:51.199> U

01:33:51.510 --> 01:33:51.520 align:start position:0%
towns you know Etc the local U
 

01:33:51.520 --> 01:33:54.030 align:start position:0%
towns you know Etc the local U
communities<01:33:51.840> and<01:33:52.199> co-ops<01:33:53.199> and<01:33:53.360> I<01:33:53.480> would<01:33:53.880> like

01:33:54.030 --> 01:33:54.040 align:start position:0%
communities and co-ops and I would like
 

01:33:54.040 --> 01:33:57.709 align:start position:0%
communities and co-ops and I would like
to<01:33:54.239> hear<01:33:54.560> that<01:33:55.239> um<01:33:55.760> I<01:33:56.320> personally<01:33:57.000> I<01:33:57.159> think

01:33:57.709 --> 01:33:57.719 align:start position:0%
to hear that um I personally I think
 

01:33:57.719 --> 01:34:01.669 align:start position:0%
to hear that um I personally I think
it's<01:33:58.719> more<01:33:59.119> challenging<01:33:59.800> down<01:33:59.960> in<01:34:00.679> Southwest

01:34:01.669 --> 01:34:01.679 align:start position:0%
it's more challenging down in Southwest
 

01:34:01.679 --> 01:34:04.149 align:start position:0%
it's more challenging down in Southwest
uh<01:34:01.800> and<01:34:01.960> the<01:34:02.119> electrifications<01:34:03.119> that<01:34:03.320> are<01:34:03.800> are

01:34:04.149 --> 01:34:04.159 align:start position:0%
uh and the electrifications that are are
 

01:34:04.159 --> 01:34:06.430 align:start position:0%
uh and the electrifications that are are
are<01:34:04.360> coming<01:34:04.639> there<01:34:04.800> so<01:34:05.119> having<01:34:05.800> voices<01:34:06.199> from

01:34:06.430 --> 01:34:06.440 align:start position:0%
are coming there so having voices from
 

01:34:06.440 --> 01:34:08.629 align:start position:0%
are coming there so having voices from
down<01:34:06.719> there<01:34:07.040> might<01:34:07.320> be<01:34:07.719> a<01:34:07.920> different<01:34:08.239> story

01:34:08.629 --> 01:34:08.639 align:start position:0%
down there might be a different story
 

01:34:08.639 --> 01:34:11.510 align:start position:0%
down there might be a different story
than<01:34:08.840> what<01:34:08.960> we<01:34:09.119> have<01:34:09.320> up<01:34:09.760> here<01:34:10.760> uh<01:34:10.920> in<01:34:11.119> Northern

01:34:11.510 --> 01:34:11.520 align:start position:0%
than what we have up here uh in Northern
 

01:34:11.520 --> 01:34:15.030 align:start position:0%
than what we have up here uh in Northern
Virginia<01:34:12.040> like<01:34:12.199> with<01:34:12.360> Novak<01:34:12.920> etc<01:34:13.400> etc<01:34:14.400> so<01:34:14.719> I<01:34:14.960> I

01:34:15.030 --> 01:34:15.040 align:start position:0%
Virginia like with Novak etc etc so I I
 

01:34:15.040 --> 01:34:17.149 align:start position:0%
Virginia like with Novak etc etc so I I
would<01:34:15.239> urge<01:34:15.600> some<01:34:15.840> diversity<01:34:16.480> there<01:34:16.880> and<01:34:17.000> then

01:34:17.149 --> 01:34:17.159 align:start position:0%
would urge some diversity there and then
 

01:34:17.159 --> 01:34:19.990 align:start position:0%
would urge some diversity there and then
the<01:34:17.280> other<01:34:17.920> I<01:34:18.000> think<01:34:18.239> the<01:34:18.480> key<01:34:18.800> thing<01:34:19.440> is<01:34:19.719> is

01:34:19.990 --> 01:34:20.000 align:start position:0%
the other I think the key thing is is
 

01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:22.910 align:start position:0%
the other I think the key thing is is
just<01:34:20.960> with<01:34:21.560> the<01:34:21.679> infrastructure

01:34:22.910 --> 01:34:22.920 align:start position:0%
just with the infrastructure
 

01:34:22.920 --> 01:34:26.990 align:start position:0%
just with the infrastructure
bill<01:34:23.920> um<01:34:24.760> some<01:34:24.880> of<01:34:25.000> the<01:34:25.159> localities<01:34:25.719> are<01:34:26.080> just

01:34:26.990 --> 01:34:27.000 align:start position:0%
bill um some of the localities are just
 

01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:29.550 align:start position:0%
bill um some of the localities are just
they're<01:34:27.280> challenged<01:34:27.800> on<01:34:28.800> where<01:34:28.960> it<01:34:29.119> fits<01:34:29.400> in

01:34:29.550 --> 01:34:29.560 align:start position:0%
they're challenged on where it fits in
 

01:34:29.560 --> 01:34:31.910 align:start position:0%
they're challenged on where it fits in
the<01:34:29.679> bigger<01:34:30.040> picture<01:34:30.360> of<01:34:30.560> what<01:34:30.679> they're<01:34:30.920> doing

01:34:31.910 --> 01:34:31.920 align:start position:0%
the bigger picture of what they're doing
 

01:34:31.920 --> 01:34:35.070 align:start position:0%
the bigger picture of what they're doing
and<01:34:32.040> I<01:34:32.159> don't<01:34:32.800> know<01:34:33.520> if<01:34:33.679> we<01:34:33.840> could<01:34:34.119> get

01:34:35.070 --> 01:34:35.080 align:start position:0%
and I don't know if we could get
 

01:34:35.080 --> 01:34:37.310 align:start position:0%
and I don't know if we could get
somebody<01:34:35.560> from<01:34:35.719> the<01:34:35.920> localities<01:34:36.600> to<01:34:37.000> either

01:34:37.310 --> 01:34:37.320 align:start position:0%
somebody from the localities to either
 

01:34:37.320 --> 01:34:41.669 align:start position:0%
somebody from the localities to either
Express<01:34:38.159> their<01:34:39.159> you<01:34:39.280> know<01:34:40.320> confusion<01:34:41.320> their

01:34:41.669 --> 01:34:41.679 align:start position:0%
Express their you know confusion their
 

01:34:41.679 --> 01:34:45.070 align:start position:0%
Express their you know confusion their
support<01:34:42.679> their<01:34:43.239> you<01:34:43.360> know<01:34:43.600> whatever<01:34:44.119> on<01:34:44.880> some

01:34:45.070 --> 01:34:45.080 align:start position:0%
support their you know whatever on some
 

01:34:45.080 --> 01:34:46.709 align:start position:0%
support their you know whatever on some
of<01:34:45.159> the<01:34:45.320> infastructure<01:34:45.719> works<01:34:46.360> that<01:34:46.480> are

01:34:46.709 --> 01:34:46.719 align:start position:0%
of the infastructure works that are
 

01:34:46.719 --> 01:34:48.910 align:start position:0%
of the infastructure works that are
going<01:34:46.920> on<01:34:47.119> and<01:34:47.320> how<01:34:47.440> it<01:34:47.600> fits<01:34:47.880> in<01:34:48.520> I<01:34:48.600> think<01:34:48.800> that

01:34:48.910 --> 01:34:48.920 align:start position:0%
going on and how it fits in I think that
 

01:34:48.920 --> 01:34:50.350 align:start position:0%
going on and how it fits in I think that
could<01:34:49.040> be<01:34:49.199> useful<01:34:49.560> too<01:34:49.800> because<01:34:50.000> that<01:34:50.119> goes

01:34:50.350 --> 01:34:50.360 align:start position:0%
could be useful too because that goes
 

01:34:50.360 --> 01:34:51.950 align:start position:0%
could be useful too because that goes
right<01:34:50.520> towards<01:34:50.920> the<01:34:51.199> the<01:34:51.480> use<01:34:51.600> of<01:34:51.679> the<01:34:51.760> grid

01:34:51.950 --> 01:34:51.960 align:start position:0%
right towards the the use of the grid
 

01:34:51.960 --> 01:34:53.830 align:start position:0%
right towards the the use of the grid
Edge<01:34:52.280> Technologies<01:34:52.840> it<01:34:52.960> goes<01:34:53.280> right<01:34:53.480> towards

01:34:53.830 --> 01:34:53.840 align:start position:0%
Edge Technologies it goes right towards
 

01:34:53.840 --> 01:34:55.669 align:start position:0%
Edge Technologies it goes right towards
the<01:34:54.000> electrification<01:34:54.800> components<01:34:55.280> it<01:34:55.440> goes

01:34:55.669 --> 01:34:55.679 align:start position:0%
the electrification components it goes
 

01:34:55.679 --> 01:34:59.030 align:start position:0%
the electrification components it goes
right<01:34:55.840> towards<01:34:56.520> all<01:34:56.639> of<01:34:56.880> that<01:34:57.760> and<01:34:58.440> I<01:34:58.639> feel

01:34:59.030 --> 01:34:59.040 align:start position:0%
right towards all of that and I feel
 

01:34:59.040 --> 01:35:02.109 align:start position:0%
right towards all of that and I feel
there's<01:34:59.239> a<01:34:59.520> there<01:34:59.920> there<01:35:00.119> for<01:35:00.480> us<01:35:01.480> at<01:35:01.679> least<01:35:01.960> to

01:35:02.109 --> 01:35:02.119 align:start position:0%
there's a there there for us at least to
 

01:35:02.119 --> 01:35:04.709 align:start position:0%
there's a there there for us at least to
be<01:35:02.320> aware<01:35:02.800> and<01:35:02.960> be<01:35:03.119> able<01:35:03.360> to<01:35:03.679> talk<01:35:04.000> about<01:35:04.280> it

01:35:04.709 --> 01:35:04.719 align:start position:0%
be aware and be able to talk about it
 

01:35:04.719 --> 01:35:07.910 align:start position:0%
be aware and be able to talk about it
next<01:35:04.960> year<01:35:05.199> at<01:35:05.400> this<01:35:05.719> time<01:35:06.719> but<01:35:06.920> I'll<01:35:07.119> defer<01:35:07.560> to

01:35:07.910 --> 01:35:07.920 align:start position:0%
next year at this time but I'll defer to
 

01:35:07.920 --> 01:35:11.510 align:start position:0%
next year at this time but I'll defer to
to<01:35:08.080> everyone's<01:35:08.440> wisdom<01:35:08.760> and<01:35:08.960> comments

01:35:11.510 --> 01:35:11.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:35:11.520 --> 01:35:16.510 align:start position:0%
 
here<01:35:12.520> so<01:35:12.800> Paul<01:35:13.159> was<01:35:13.920> two<01:35:14.280> ideas<01:35:15.280> one

01:35:16.510 --> 01:35:16.520 align:start position:0%
here so Paul was two ideas one
 

01:35:16.520 --> 01:35:18.590 align:start position:0%
here so Paul was two ideas one
electrification<01:35:17.520> using<01:35:17.920> Virginia<01:35:18.320> T

01:35:18.590 --> 01:35:18.600 align:start position:0%
electrification using Virginia T
 

01:35:18.600 --> 01:35:21.430 align:start position:0%
electrification using Virginia T
blackburg<01:35:19.199> and<01:35:19.360> their<01:35:19.560> goals<01:35:20.080> as<01:35:20.199> an<01:35:20.400> example

01:35:21.430 --> 01:35:21.440 align:start position:0%
blackburg and their goals as an example
 

01:35:21.440 --> 01:35:24.390 align:start position:0%
blackburg and their goals as an example
resentative<01:35:21.840> of<01:35:22.000> Southwest<01:35:22.639> and<01:35:22.840> the<01:35:23.760> yeah

01:35:24.390 --> 01:35:24.400 align:start position:0%
resentative of Southwest and the yeah
 

01:35:24.400 --> 01:35:27.790 align:start position:0%
resentative of Southwest and the yeah
suggestion<01:35:25.040> was<01:35:25.600> the<01:35:25.800> infrastructure

01:35:27.790 --> 01:35:27.800 align:start position:0%
suggestion was the infrastructure
 

01:35:27.800 --> 01:35:31.070 align:start position:0%
suggestion was the infrastructure
bills<01:35:28.800> impact<01:35:29.199> on<01:35:29.320> the

01:35:31.070 --> 01:35:31.080 align:start position:0%
bills impact on the
 

01:35:31.080 --> 01:35:33.709 align:start position:0%
bills impact on the
localities<01:35:32.080> not<01:35:32.440> so<01:35:32.639> that's<01:35:32.880> different<01:35:33.280> than

01:35:33.709 --> 01:35:33.719 align:start position:0%
localities not so that's different than
 

01:35:33.719 --> 01:35:37.709 align:start position:0%
localities not so that's different than
the<01:35:34.639> uh<01:35:35.360> so<01:35:35.920> you<01:35:36.040> know<01:35:36.199> the<01:35:36.360> IRA<01:35:36.960> and<01:35:37.280> and<01:35:37.560> those

01:35:37.709 --> 01:35:37.719 align:start position:0%
the uh so you know the IRA and and those
 

01:35:37.719 --> 01:35:41.310 align:start position:0%
the uh so you know the IRA and and those
are<01:35:38.159> different<01:35:38.960> and<01:35:39.199> how<01:35:39.679> localities<01:35:40.440> can

01:35:41.310 --> 01:35:41.320 align:start position:0%
are different and how localities can
 

01:35:41.320 --> 01:35:43.790 align:start position:0%
are different and how localities can
utilize<01:35:41.920> that<01:35:42.080> money<01:35:42.480> as<01:35:42.679> part<01:35:42.840> of<01:35:42.960> the<01:35:43.119> grid

01:35:43.790 --> 01:35:43.800 align:start position:0%
utilize that money as part of the grid
 

01:35:43.800 --> 01:35:45.830 align:start position:0%
utilize that money as part of the grid
Technologies<01:35:44.440> so<01:35:44.639> I<01:35:44.719> think<01:35:44.840> there's<01:35:45.000> a<01:35:45.719> the

01:35:45.830 --> 01:35:45.840 align:start position:0%
Technologies so I think there's a the
 

01:35:45.840 --> 01:35:47.910 align:start position:0%
Technologies so I think there's a the
ven<01:35:46.159> diagrams<01:35:46.639> do<01:35:46.920> overlap<01:35:47.400> the<01:35:47.480> Virginia

01:35:47.910 --> 01:35:47.920 align:start position:0%
ven diagrams do overlap the Virginia
 

01:35:47.920 --> 01:35:49.629 align:start position:0%
ven diagrams do overlap the Virginia
Tech<01:35:48.119> thing<01:35:48.280> was<01:35:48.440> completely<01:35:48.880> different<01:35:49.560> I

01:35:49.629 --> 01:35:49.639 align:start position:0%
Tech thing was completely different I
 

01:35:49.639 --> 01:35:51.430 align:start position:0%
Tech thing was completely different I
know<01:35:49.840> Virginia<01:35:50.320> Tech<01:35:50.520> and<01:35:50.679> Charlottesville

01:35:51.430 --> 01:35:51.440 align:start position:0%
know Virginia Tech and Charlottesville
 

01:35:51.440 --> 01:35:53.669 align:start position:0%
know Virginia Tech and Charlottesville
for<01:35:51.600> instance<01:35:52.119> and<01:35:52.400> and<01:35:52.679> other<01:35:53.080> jurisdictions

01:35:53.669 --> 01:35:53.679 align:start position:0%
for instance and and other jurisdictions
 

01:35:53.679 --> 01:35:55.310 align:start position:0%
for instance and and other jurisdictions
are<01:35:53.880> looking<01:35:54.239> for<01:35:54.440> the<01:35:54.560> electrification

01:35:55.310 --> 01:35:55.320 align:start position:0%
are looking for the electrification
 

01:35:55.320 --> 01:35:57.950 align:start position:0%
are looking for the electrification
component<01:35:55.880> which<01:35:56.040> includes<01:35:57.000> energy<01:35:57.440> storage

01:35:57.950 --> 01:35:57.960 align:start position:0%
component which includes energy storage
 

01:35:57.960 --> 01:36:01.830 align:start position:0%
component which includes energy storage
mass<01:35:58.560> transportation<01:35:59.560> a<01:35:59.719> depot<01:36:00.320> level<01:36:01.320> uh<01:36:01.600> at

01:36:01.830 --> 01:36:01.840 align:start position:0%
mass transportation a depot level uh at
 

01:36:01.840 --> 01:36:04.870 align:start position:0%
mass transportation a depot level uh at
at<01:36:02.080> you<01:36:02.159> know<01:36:02.360> semi-<01:36:03.040> Etc<01:36:04.040> and<01:36:04.199> that<01:36:04.320> is<01:36:04.520> all

01:36:04.870 --> 01:36:04.880 align:start position:0%
at you know semi- Etc and that is all
 

01:36:04.880 --> 01:36:08.510 align:start position:0%
at you know semi- Etc and that is all
putting<01:36:05.520> pressure<01:36:06.440> on<01:36:07.440> local

01:36:08.510 --> 01:36:08.520 align:start position:0%
putting pressure on local
 

01:36:08.520 --> 01:36:10.390 align:start position:0%
putting pressure on local
utilities<01:36:09.520> and<01:36:09.679> I<01:36:09.760> think<01:36:09.960> that's<01:36:10.159> going<01:36:10.239> to

01:36:10.390 --> 01:36:10.400 align:start position:0%
utilities and I think that's going to
 

01:36:10.400 --> 01:36:12.990 align:start position:0%
utilities and I think that's going to
have<01:36:10.520> an<01:36:10.719> impact<01:36:11.280> back<01:36:11.760> in<01:36:12.199> the<01:36:12.400> Commonwealth

01:36:12.990 --> 01:36:13.000 align:start position:0%
have an impact back in the Commonwealth
 

01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:14.990 align:start position:0%
have an impact back in the Commonwealth
and<01:36:13.119> so<01:36:13.360> I<01:36:13.480> would<01:36:13.719> like<01:36:13.920> to<01:36:14.400> hear<01:36:14.719> those

01:36:14.990 --> 01:36:15.000 align:start position:0%
and so I would like to hear those
 

01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:16.950 align:start position:0%
and so I would like to hear those
perspectives<01:36:15.880> I<01:36:15.960> don't<01:36:16.159> think

01:36:16.950 --> 01:36:16.960 align:start position:0%
perspectives I don't think
 

01:36:16.960 --> 01:36:20.070 align:start position:0%
perspectives I don't think
we're<01:36:17.960> we<01:36:18.199> have<01:36:18.320> a<01:36:18.520> very<01:36:18.840> vocal<01:36:19.400> footprint

01:36:20.070 --> 01:36:20.080 align:start position:0%
we're we have a very vocal footprint
 

01:36:20.080 --> 01:36:22.390 align:start position:0%
we're we have a very vocal footprint
with<01:36:20.719> respect<01:36:20.960> to<01:36:21.440> rication<01:36:22.119> and<01:36:22.280> the

01:36:22.390 --> 01:36:22.400 align:start position:0%
with respect to rication and the
 

01:36:22.400 --> 01:36:26.750 align:start position:0%
with respect to rication and the
components<01:36:22.840> of<01:36:23.119> EVs<01:36:23.800> and<01:36:24.760> and<01:36:25.400> perhaps<01:36:25.840> larger

01:36:26.750 --> 01:36:26.760 align:start position:0%
components of EVs and and perhaps larger
 

01:36:26.760 --> 01:36:28.709 align:start position:0%
components of EVs and and perhaps larger
Transportation<01:36:27.520> type<01:36:27.719> of<01:36:27.840> electrification

01:36:28.709 --> 01:36:28.719 align:start position:0%
Transportation type of electrification
 

01:36:28.719 --> 01:36:31.070 align:start position:0%
Transportation type of electrification
so<01:36:28.960> I<01:36:29.080> think<01:36:29.800> having<01:36:30.040> a<01:36:30.239> voice<01:36:30.600> there<01:36:30.840> next

01:36:31.070 --> 01:36:31.080 align:start position:0%
so I think having a voice there next
 

01:36:31.080 --> 01:36:34.109 align:start position:0%
so I think having a voice there next
year<01:36:31.320> would<01:36:31.480> be<01:36:32.000> something<01:36:32.600> of

01:36:34.109 --> 01:36:34.119 align:start position:0%
year would be something of
 

01:36:34.119 --> 01:36:36.910 align:start position:0%
year would be something of
worthwhile<01:36:35.119> okay<01:36:35.520> for<01:36:35.800> what<01:36:36.119> what<01:36:36.239> it's<01:36:36.480> worth

01:36:36.910 --> 01:36:36.920 align:start position:0%
worthwhile okay for what what it's worth
 

01:36:36.920 --> 01:36:39.070 align:start position:0%
worthwhile okay for what what it's worth
uh<01:36:37.040> one<01:36:37.199> of<01:36:37.360> our<01:36:37.760> ex<01:36:38.000> employees<01:36:38.600> is<01:36:38.800> now<01:36:38.960> the

01:36:39.070 --> 01:36:39.080 align:start position:0%
uh one of our ex employees is now the
 

01:36:39.080 --> 01:36:41.030 align:start position:0%
uh one of our ex employees is now the
head<01:36:39.199> of<01:36:39.320> the<01:36:39.440> utilities<01:36:39.960> for<01:36:40.199> Virginia<01:36:40.760> Tech

01:36:41.030 --> 01:36:41.040 align:start position:0%
head of the utilities for Virginia Tech
 

01:36:41.040 --> 01:36:42.790 align:start position:0%
head of the utilities for Virginia Tech
and<01:36:41.159> he's<01:36:41.320> very<01:36:41.520> knowledgeable<01:36:42.159> and<01:36:42.320> he<01:36:42.560> comes

01:36:42.790 --> 01:36:42.800 align:start position:0%
and he's very knowledgeable and he comes
 

01:36:42.800 --> 01:36:46.350 align:start position:0%
and he's very knowledgeable and he comes
from<01:36:42.960> Dominion<01:36:43.800> also<01:36:44.800> um<01:36:45.080> and<01:36:45.400> he<01:36:45.560> might<01:36:46.080> be<01:36:46.199> a

01:36:46.350 --> 01:36:46.360 align:start position:0%
from Dominion also um and he might be a
 

01:36:46.360 --> 01:36:47.510 align:start position:0%
from Dominion also um and he might be a
good

01:36:47.510 --> 01:36:47.520 align:start position:0%
good
 

01:36:47.520 --> 01:36:49.790 align:start position:0%
good
candidate<01:36:48.520> that<01:36:48.600> would<01:36:48.760> be<01:36:48.960> perfect<01:36:49.560> yeah

01:36:49.790 --> 01:36:49.800 align:start position:0%
candidate that would be perfect yeah
 

01:36:49.800 --> 01:36:51.590 align:start position:0%
candidate that would be perfect yeah
that<01:36:50.040> that<01:36:50.119> would<01:36:50.280> be<01:36:50.480> perfect<01:36:50.880> and<01:36:51.280> I<01:36:51.360> have<01:36:51.480> a

01:36:51.590 --> 01:36:51.600 align:start position:0%
that that would be perfect and I have a
 

01:36:51.600 --> 01:36:53.310 align:start position:0%
that that would be perfect and I have a
relationship<01:36:52.119> with<01:36:52.320> peek<01:36:52.600> and<01:36:52.960> you<01:36:53.040> know<01:36:53.199> the

01:36:53.310 --> 01:36:53.320 align:start position:0%
relationship with peek and you know the
 

01:36:53.320 --> 01:36:55.990 align:start position:0%
relationship with peek and you know the
folks<01:36:53.600> down<01:36:53.840> there<01:36:54.400> within<01:36:55.000> the<01:36:55.199> town<01:36:55.760> within

01:36:55.990 --> 01:36:56.000 align:start position:0%
folks down there within the town within
 

01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:58.709 align:start position:0%
folks down there within the town within
the<01:36:56.119> city<01:36:56.440> for<01:36:57.000> from<01:36:57.520> other<01:36:57.840> stuff<01:36:58.119> so<01:36:58.320> I'd<01:36:58.520> be

01:36:58.709 --> 01:36:58.719 align:start position:0%
the city for from other stuff so I'd be
 

01:36:58.719 --> 01:37:01.910 align:start position:0%
the city for from other stuff so I'd be
happy<01:36:58.960> to<01:36:59.560> to<01:36:59.800> help<01:37:00.320> lead<01:37:00.679> that<01:37:00.920> with<01:37:01.360> with<01:37:01.520> you

01:37:01.910 --> 01:37:01.920 align:start position:0%
happy to to help lead that with with you
 

01:37:01.920 --> 01:37:04.550 align:start position:0%
happy to to help lead that with with you
guys<01:37:02.920> um<01:37:03.560> so<01:37:03.760> those<01:37:03.880> would<01:37:04.000> be<01:37:04.159> the<01:37:04.239> two<01:37:04.440> and

01:37:04.550 --> 01:37:04.560 align:start position:0%
guys um so those would be the two and
 

01:37:04.560 --> 01:37:06.350 align:start position:0%
guys um so those would be the two and
then<01:37:04.679> I<01:37:04.840> also<01:37:05.040> have<01:37:05.159> an<01:37:05.360> open<01:37:05.719> item<01:37:06.080> that<01:37:06.239> I

01:37:06.350 --> 01:37:06.360 align:start position:0%
then I also have an open item that I
 

01:37:06.360 --> 01:37:08.189 align:start position:0%
then I also have an open item that I
committed<01:37:06.719> to<01:37:06.960> at<01:37:07.119> the<01:37:07.360> last<01:37:07.639> meeting<01:37:08.040> and

01:37:08.189 --> 01:37:08.199 align:start position:0%
committed to at the last meeting and
 

01:37:08.199 --> 01:37:09.950 align:start position:0%
committed to at the last meeting and
that<01:37:08.280> was<01:37:08.400> to<01:37:08.600> reach<01:37:08.840> out<01:37:09.159> to<01:37:09.320> the<01:37:09.480> Engineering

01:37:09.950 --> 01:37:09.960 align:start position:0%
that was to reach out to the Engineering
 

01:37:09.960 --> 01:37:11.430 align:start position:0%
that was to reach out to the Engineering
Group<01:37:10.239> at<01:37:10.360> the

01:37:11.430 --> 01:37:11.440 align:start position:0%
Group at the
 

01:37:11.440 --> 01:37:14.870 align:start position:0%
Group at the
SEC<01:37:12.440> um<01:37:13.239> and<01:37:13.800> asked<01:37:14.199> them<01:37:14.400> if<01:37:14.520> they'd<01:37:14.760> be

01:37:14.870 --> 01:37:14.880 align:start position:0%
SEC um and asked them if they'd be
 

01:37:14.880 --> 01:37:16.470 align:start position:0%
SEC um and asked them if they'd be
willing<01:37:15.119> to<01:37:15.320> come<01:37:15.480> in<01:37:15.600> and<01:37:15.760> give<01:37:15.880> us<01:37:16.159> their

01:37:16.470 --> 01:37:16.480 align:start position:0%
willing to come in and give us their
 

01:37:16.480 --> 01:37:19.950 align:start position:0%
willing to come in and give us their
perspectives<01:37:16.960> on<01:37:17.639> interconnection<01:37:18.639> of<01:37:19.360> uh

01:37:19.950 --> 01:37:19.960 align:start position:0%
perspectives on interconnection of uh
 

01:37:19.960 --> 01:37:21.750 align:start position:0%
perspectives on interconnection of uh
both<01:37:20.960> uh

01:37:21.750 --> 01:37:21.760 align:start position:0%
both uh
 

01:37:21.760 --> 01:37:24.590 align:start position:0%
both uh
not<01:37:22.040> just<01:37:22.280> both<01:37:22.639> but<01:37:23.000> including<01:37:23.920> uh<01:37:24.080> solar

01:37:24.590 --> 01:37:24.600 align:start position:0%
not just both but including uh solar
 

01:37:24.600 --> 01:37:27.229 align:start position:0%
not just both but including uh solar
energy<01:37:25.040> storage<01:37:25.840> and<01:37:26.239> electric<01:37:26.639> vehicle

01:37:27.229 --> 01:37:27.239 align:start position:0%
energy storage and electric vehicle
 

01:37:27.239 --> 01:37:31.350 align:start position:0%
energy storage and electric vehicle
service<01:37:27.639> equipment<01:37:28.000> or<01:37:28.119> evse<01:37:28.880> type<01:37:29.080> of<01:37:29.440> of

01:37:31.350 --> 01:37:31.360 align:start position:0%
service equipment or evse type of of
 

01:37:31.360 --> 01:37:34.030 align:start position:0%
service equipment or evse type of of
things<01:37:32.360> but<01:37:33.080> Skyler<01:37:33.600> would<01:37:33.719> it<01:37:33.840> be

01:37:34.030 --> 01:37:34.040 align:start position:0%
things but Skyler would it be
 

01:37:34.040 --> 01:37:35.510 align:start position:0%
things but Skyler would it be
appropriate<01:37:34.440> and<01:37:34.560> maybe<01:37:34.800> this<01:37:34.880> is<01:37:35.000> as<01:37:35.159> much<01:37:35.320> a

01:37:35.510 --> 01:37:35.520 align:start position:0%
appropriate and maybe this is as much a
 

01:37:35.520 --> 01:37:37.030 align:start position:0%
appropriate and maybe this is as much a
question<01:37:35.719> for<01:37:36.000> Katherine<01:37:36.400> if<01:37:36.679> Katherine<01:37:36.960> if

01:37:37.030 --> 01:37:37.040 align:start position:0%
question for Katherine if Katherine if
 

01:37:37.040 --> 01:37:39.149 align:start position:0%
question for Katherine if Katherine if
you're<01:37:37.159> so<01:37:37.320> here<01:37:37.440> is<01:37:37.520> is<01:37:37.679> for<01:37:37.840> Skylar<01:37:38.239> but<01:37:38.440> to

01:37:39.149 --> 01:37:39.159 align:start position:0%
you're so here is is for Skylar but to
 

01:37:39.159 --> 01:37:40.629 align:start position:0%
you're so here is is for Skylar but to
just<01:37:39.360> have<01:37:39.560> like<01:37:39.679> a<01:37:39.840> presentation<01:37:40.360> from

01:37:40.629 --> 01:37:40.639 align:start position:0%
just have like a presentation from
 

01:37:40.639 --> 01:37:42.870 align:start position:0%
just have like a presentation from
utilities<01:37:41.159> or<01:37:41.320> the<01:37:41.440> co-ops<01:37:41.960> or<01:37:42.080> the<01:37:42.199> munis<01:37:42.679> or

01:37:42.870 --> 01:37:42.880 align:start position:0%
utilities or the co-ops or the munis or
 

01:37:42.880 --> 01:37:44.870 align:start position:0%
utilities or the co-ops or the munis or
somebody<01:37:43.320> to<01:37:44.000> just<01:37:44.239> come<01:37:44.400> in<01:37:44.520> and<01:37:44.639> give<01:37:44.760> us

01:37:44.870 --> 01:37:44.880 align:start position:0%
somebody to just come in and give us
 

01:37:44.880 --> 01:37:48.390 align:start position:0%
somebody to just come in and give us
their<01:37:45.080> perspective<01:37:45.840> on<01:37:46.840> um<01:37:47.239> all<01:37:47.440> these<01:37:47.679> issues

01:37:48.390 --> 01:37:48.400 align:start position:0%
their perspective on um all these issues
 

01:37:48.400 --> 01:37:53.550 align:start position:0%
their perspective on um all these issues
just<01:37:48.560> so<01:37:48.840> open<01:37:49.199> sort<01:37:49.920> of<01:37:50.920> come<01:37:51.239> give<01:37:51.320> us<01:37:51.440> your

01:37:53.550 --> 01:37:53.560 align:start position:0%
just so open sort of come give us your
 

01:37:53.560 --> 01:37:58.510 align:start position:0%
just so open sort of come give us your
view<01:37:54.560> um<01:37:55.080> I'd<01:37:56.080> suggest<01:37:57.000> that<01:37:57.840> the<01:37:58.080> authority

01:37:58.510 --> 01:37:58.520 align:start position:0%
view um I'd suggest that the authority
 

01:37:58.520 --> 01:38:00.910 align:start position:0%
view um I'd suggest that the authority
might<01:37:58.679> want<01:37:58.800> to<01:37:58.960> hear<01:37:59.360> about<01:37:59.760> our<01:38:00.119> battery<01:38:00.679> our

01:38:00.910 --> 01:38:00.920 align:start position:0%
might want to hear about our battery our
 

01:38:00.920 --> 01:38:03.350 align:start position:0%
might want to hear about our battery our
new<01:38:01.400> storage<01:38:02.000> pilot<01:38:02.560> that<01:38:02.679> was<01:38:02.880> recently

01:38:03.350 --> 01:38:03.360 align:start position:0%
new storage pilot that was recently
 

01:38:03.360 --> 01:38:06.390 align:start position:0%
new storage pilot that was recently
announced<01:38:04.040> because<01:38:04.320> we<01:38:04.480> are<01:38:05.000> piloting<01:38:06.000> a<01:38:06.119> few

01:38:06.390 --> 01:38:06.400 align:start position:0%
announced because we are piloting a few
 

01:38:06.400 --> 01:38:08.750 align:start position:0%
announced because we are piloting a few
different<01:38:06.760> technologies<01:38:07.679> that<01:38:07.800> are<01:38:08.080> longer

01:38:08.750 --> 01:38:08.760 align:start position:0%
different technologies that are longer
 

01:38:08.760 --> 01:38:12.070 align:start position:0%
different technologies that are longer
duration<01:38:09.760> storage<01:38:10.400> technologies

01:38:12.070 --> 01:38:12.080 align:start position:0%
duration storage technologies
 

01:38:12.080 --> 01:38:14.109 align:start position:0%
duration storage technologies
that<01:38:13.080> which<01:38:13.199> is<01:38:13.400> different<01:38:13.800> different

01:38:14.109 --> 01:38:14.119 align:start position:0%
that which is different different
 

01:38:14.119 --> 01:38:15.510 align:start position:0%
that which is different different
Technologies<01:38:14.719> if<01:38:14.840> you<01:38:14.920> all<01:38:15.040> want<01:38:15.199> to<01:38:15.320> hear

01:38:15.510 --> 01:38:15.520 align:start position:0%
Technologies if you all want to hear
 

01:38:15.520 --> 01:38:17.750 align:start position:0%
Technologies if you all want to hear
about<01:38:15.719> that<01:38:15.880> we<01:38:15.960> could<01:38:16.119> get<01:38:16.440> our<01:38:17.440> subject

01:38:17.750 --> 01:38:17.760 align:start position:0%
about that we could get our subject
 

01:38:17.760 --> 01:38:19.310 align:start position:0%
about that we could get our subject
matter<01:38:18.080> experts<01:38:18.560> together<01:38:18.760> to<01:38:18.920> talk<01:38:19.080> about

01:38:19.310 --> 01:38:19.320 align:start position:0%
matter experts together to talk about
 

01:38:19.320 --> 01:38:22.189 align:start position:0%
matter experts together to talk about
that<01:38:19.560> topic<01:38:20.119> specifically

01:38:22.189 --> 01:38:22.199 align:start position:0%
that topic specifically
 

01:38:22.199 --> 01:38:23.229 align:start position:0%
that topic specifically
that's<01:38:22.400> the

01:38:23.229 --> 01:38:23.239 align:start position:0%
that's the
 

01:38:23.239 --> 01:38:26.790 align:start position:0%
that's the
long<01:38:24.239> oh<01:38:24.360> I'm<01:38:24.599> sorry<01:38:25.599> oh<01:38:25.800> I<01:38:25.880> was<01:38:26.000> gonna<01:38:26.239> say<01:38:26.480> I<01:38:26.679> I

01:38:26.790 --> 01:38:26.800 align:start position:0%
long oh I'm sorry oh I was gonna say I I
 

01:38:26.800 --> 01:38:29.350 align:start position:0%
long oh I'm sorry oh I was gonna say I I
like<01:38:27.080> that<01:38:27.280> idea<01:38:27.760> I<01:38:27.880> saw<01:38:28.239> the<01:38:28.679> announcement<01:38:29.199> of

01:38:29.350 --> 01:38:29.360 align:start position:0%
like that idea I saw the announcement of
 

01:38:29.360 --> 01:38:31.629 align:start position:0%
like that idea I saw the announcement of
those<01:38:29.639> pilots<01:38:30.040> and<01:38:30.199> that's<01:38:30.400> really<01:38:30.719> exciting

01:38:31.629 --> 01:38:31.639 align:start position:0%
those pilots and that's really exciting
 

01:38:31.639 --> 01:38:33.310 align:start position:0%
those pilots and that's really exciting
maybe<01:38:31.960> in<01:38:32.159> conjunction<01:38:32.639> to<01:38:32.880> that<01:38:33.040> we<01:38:33.119> could

01:38:33.310 --> 01:38:33.320 align:start position:0%
maybe in conjunction to that we could
 

01:38:33.320 --> 01:38:36.390 align:start position:0%
maybe in conjunction to that we could
also<01:38:33.760> have<01:38:34.599> um<01:38:34.880> somebody<01:38:35.239> who<01:38:35.360> can<01:38:35.560> speak<01:38:35.840> to

01:38:36.390 --> 01:38:36.400 align:start position:0%
also have um somebody who can speak to
 

01:38:36.400 --> 01:38:41.149 align:start position:0%
also have um somebody who can speak to
kind<01:38:36.560> of<01:38:37.520> the<01:38:37.840> the<01:38:38.000> current<01:38:38.360> grid<01:38:38.800> scale<01:38:40.159> um

01:38:41.149 --> 01:38:41.159 align:start position:0%
kind of the the current grid scale um
 

01:38:41.159 --> 01:38:44.990 align:start position:0%
kind of the the current grid scale um
solar<01:38:41.599> and<01:38:42.159> storage<01:38:43.400> deployments<01:38:44.400> of<01:38:44.880> that

01:38:44.990 --> 01:38:45.000 align:start position:0%
solar and storage deployments of that
 

01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:47.910 align:start position:0%
solar and storage deployments of that
are<01:38:45.239> happening<01:38:45.599> in<01:38:45.800> Dominion's

01:38:47.910 --> 01:38:47.920 align:start position:0%
are happening in Dominion's
 

01:38:47.920 --> 01:38:50.270 align:start position:0%
are happening in Dominion's
territory<01:38:48.920> and<01:38:49.320> and<01:38:49.440> Skylar<01:38:49.840> if<01:38:49.960> we<01:38:50.080> haven't

01:38:50.270 --> 01:38:50.280 align:start position:0%
territory and and Skylar if we haven't
 

01:38:50.280 --> 01:38:51.629 align:start position:0%
territory and and Skylar if we haven't
talked<01:38:50.520> to<01:38:50.599> them<01:38:50.760> maybe<01:38:50.920> it's<01:38:51.159> worth<01:38:51.360> inviting

01:38:51.629 --> 01:38:51.639 align:start position:0%
talked to them maybe it's worth inviting
 

01:38:51.639 --> 01:38:54.270 align:start position:0%
talked to them maybe it's worth inviting
Sam<01:38:52.080> brumberg<01:38:53.080> from<01:38:53.280> the<01:38:53.400> co-ops<01:38:53.840> to<01:38:53.960> give<01:38:54.119> us

01:38:54.270 --> 01:38:54.280 align:start position:0%
Sam brumberg from the co-ops to give us
 

01:38:54.280 --> 01:38:56.910 align:start position:0%
Sam brumberg from the co-ops to give us
a<01:38:54.920> solar<01:38:55.320> and<01:38:55.719> energy<01:38:56.040> storage<01:38:56.360> and<01:38:56.520> Co-op

01:38:56.910 --> 01:38:56.920 align:start position:0%
a solar and energy storage and Co-op
 

01:38:56.920 --> 01:38:58.109 align:start position:0%
a solar and energy storage and Co-op
territory

01:38:58.109 --> 01:38:58.119 align:start position:0%
territory
 

01:38:58.119 --> 01:39:00.470 align:start position:0%
territory
update<01:38:59.119> and<01:38:59.239> he's<01:38:59.440> volunteered<01:39:00.000> several

01:39:00.470 --> 01:39:00.480 align:start position:0%
update and he's volunteered several
 

01:39:00.480 --> 01:39:03.950 align:start position:0%
update and he's volunteered several
times<01:39:01.480> just<01:39:01.760> his<01:39:01.920> schedule<01:39:02.320> has<01:39:02.480> never

01:39:03.950 --> 01:39:03.960 align:start position:0%
times just his schedule has never
 

01:39:03.960 --> 01:39:06.390 align:start position:0%
times just his schedule has never
worked<01:39:04.960> Sam<01:39:05.239> would<01:39:05.400> be<01:39:05.560> happy<01:39:05.760> to<01:39:05.880> do<01:39:06.040> that<01:39:06.239> I'm

01:39:06.390 --> 01:39:06.400 align:start position:0%
worked Sam would be happy to do that I'm
 

01:39:06.400 --> 01:39:08.750 align:start position:0%
worked Sam would be happy to do that I'm
sure<01:39:07.239> with

01:39:08.750 --> 01:39:08.760 align:start position:0%
sure with
 

01:39:08.760 --> 01:39:13.669 align:start position:0%
sure with
appco<01:39:09.760> yeah<01:39:10.000> yeah<01:39:11.000> yeah<01:39:11.480> everybody<01:39:12.480> do<01:39:13.040> appco

01:39:13.669 --> 01:39:13.679 align:start position:0%
appco yeah yeah yeah everybody do appco
 

01:39:13.679 --> 01:39:14.990 align:start position:0%
appco yeah yeah yeah everybody do appco
co-ops<01:39:14.159> I<01:39:14.239> mean<01:39:14.560> I<01:39:14.599> don't<01:39:14.679> know<01:39:14.840> we<01:39:14.920> can

01:39:14.990 --> 01:39:15.000 align:start position:0%
co-ops I mean I don't know we can
 

01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:16.990 align:start position:0%
co-ops I mean I don't know we can
squeeze<01:39:15.239> them<01:39:15.320> all<01:39:15.440> into<01:39:15.639> one<01:39:15.840> day<01:39:16.280> but<01:39:16.920> I

01:39:16.990 --> 01:39:17.000 align:start position:0%
squeeze them all into one day but I
 

01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:18.189 align:start position:0%
squeeze them all into one day but I
don't<01:39:17.119> know<01:39:17.239> if<01:39:17.360> someone<01:39:17.599> on<01:39:17.760> behalf<01:39:18.000> of<01:39:18.119> the

01:39:18.189 --> 01:39:18.199 align:start position:0%
don't know if someone on behalf of the
 

01:39:18.199 --> 01:39:20.350 align:start position:0%
don't know if someone on behalf of the
municipals<01:39:18.760> wants<01:39:19.000> to<01:39:19.119> talk<01:39:19.360> about<01:39:20.159> what's

01:39:20.350 --> 01:39:20.360 align:start position:0%
municipals wants to talk about what's
 

01:39:20.360 --> 01:39:23.790 align:start position:0%
municipals wants to talk about what's
going<01:39:20.560> on<01:39:20.679> in<01:39:20.800> their

01:39:23.790 --> 01:39:23.800 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:39:23.800 --> 01:39:26.149 align:start position:0%
 
territory<01:39:24.800> it<01:39:24.920> would<01:39:25.080> be<01:39:25.199> a<01:39:25.360> cool<01:39:25.639> idea<01:39:25.880> to

01:39:26.149 --> 01:39:26.159 align:start position:0%
territory it would be a cool idea to
 

01:39:26.159 --> 01:39:27.709 align:start position:0%
territory it would be a cool idea to
have<01:39:26.560> an

01:39:27.709 --> 01:39:27.719 align:start position:0%
have an
 

01:39:27.719 --> 01:39:32.990 align:start position:0%
have an
extended<01:39:28.880> um<01:39:30.239> workshop<01:39:31.239> with<01:39:31.880> as<01:39:32.040> many<01:39:32.520> co-ops

01:39:32.990 --> 01:39:33.000 align:start position:0%
extended um workshop with as many co-ops
 

01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:36.070 align:start position:0%
extended um workshop with as many co-ops
and<01:39:33.159> munis<01:39:33.840> as<01:39:34.040> we<01:39:34.760> are<01:39:34.960> willing<01:39:35.239> to<01:39:35.400> get

01:39:36.070 --> 01:39:36.080 align:start position:0%
and munis as we are willing to get
 

01:39:36.080 --> 01:39:39.070 align:start position:0%
and munis as we are willing to get
together<01:39:37.080> as<01:39:37.199> are<01:39:37.360> willing<01:39:37.639> to<01:39:37.920> attend<01:39:38.440> to

01:39:39.070 --> 01:39:39.080 align:start position:0%
together as are willing to attend to
 

01:39:39.080 --> 01:39:41.229 align:start position:0%
together as are willing to attend to
talk<01:39:39.360> about<01:39:39.639> solar<01:39:40.000> and<01:39:40.199> storage<01:39:41.080> and

01:39:41.229 --> 01:39:41.239 align:start position:0%
talk about solar and storage and
 

01:39:41.239 --> 01:39:45.629 align:start position:0%
talk about solar and storage and
exchange

01:39:45.629 --> 01:39:45.639 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:39:45.639 --> 01:39:50.470 align:start position:0%
 
ideas<01:39:46.639> and<01:39:46.840> EV<01:39:47.599> I<01:39:47.679> think<01:39:47.920> EV<01:39:48.360> is<01:39:48.880> the<01:39:49.880> snowball

01:39:50.470 --> 01:39:50.480 align:start position:0%
ideas and EV I think EV is the snowball
 

01:39:50.480 --> 01:39:52.229 align:start position:0%
ideas and EV I think EV is the snowball
coming<01:39:50.679> down<01:39:50.800> the<01:39:50.880> m

01:39:52.229 --> 01:39:52.239 align:start position:0%
coming down the m
 

01:39:52.239 --> 01:39:55.589 align:start position:0%
coming down the m
um<01:39:52.560> our<01:39:52.840> discussions<01:39:53.560> with<01:39:54.560> Public<01:39:54.960> Power

01:39:55.589 --> 01:39:55.599 align:start position:0%
um our discussions with Public Power
 

01:39:55.599 --> 01:39:58.030 align:start position:0%
um our discussions with Public Power
show<01:39:56.360> it's<01:39:56.719> the<01:39:56.960> it's<01:39:57.080> a<01:39:57.239> very<01:39:57.440> big<01:39:57.639> unknown

01:39:58.030 --> 01:39:58.040 align:start position:0%
show it's the it's a very big unknown
 

01:39:58.040 --> 01:40:01.589 align:start position:0%
show it's the it's a very big unknown
for

01:40:01.589 --> 01:40:01.599 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:40:01.599 --> 01:40:04.669 align:start position:0%
 
them<01:40:02.599> excellent

01:40:04.669 --> 01:40:04.679 align:start position:0%
them excellent
 

01:40:04.679 --> 01:40:07.990 align:start position:0%
them excellent
okay<01:40:05.679> thank<01:40:05.920> you<01:40:06.520> I've<01:40:06.679> done<01:40:07.000> my<01:40:07.560> my<01:40:07.719> best<01:40:07.880> to

01:40:07.990 --> 01:40:08.000 align:start position:0%
okay thank you I've done my my best to
 

01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:11.109 align:start position:0%
okay thank you I've done my my best to
jot<01:40:08.360> these<01:40:08.599> down<01:40:08.880> and<01:40:09.040> then<01:40:09.719> Ken<01:40:10.280> when<01:40:10.480> we<01:40:10.920> make

01:40:11.109 --> 01:40:11.119 align:start position:0%
jot these down and then Ken when we make
 

01:40:11.119 --> 01:40:13.070 align:start position:0%
jot these down and then Ken when we make
the<01:40:11.280> minutes<01:40:11.599> for<01:40:11.840> this<01:40:12.000> let's<01:40:12.199> try<01:40:12.400> to<01:40:12.679> spell

01:40:13.070 --> 01:40:13.080 align:start position:0%
the minutes for this let's try to spell
 

01:40:13.080 --> 01:40:17.470 align:start position:0%
the minutes for this let's try to spell
these<01:40:13.280> out<01:40:13.679> as<01:40:14.040> a<01:40:14.560> discreet<01:40:15.480> topic<01:40:16.480> topics<01:40:16.960> for

01:40:17.470 --> 01:40:17.480 align:start position:0%
these out as a discreet topic topics for
 

01:40:17.480 --> 01:40:19.030 align:start position:0%
these out as a discreet topic topics for
for

01:40:19.030 --> 01:40:19.040 align:start position:0%
for
 

01:40:19.040 --> 01:40:21.589 align:start position:0%
for
meetings<01:40:20.040> do<01:40:20.400> demand<01:40:20.719> resp<01:40:21.000> response

01:40:21.589 --> 01:40:21.599 align:start position:0%
meetings do demand resp response
 

01:40:21.599 --> 01:40:23.830 align:start position:0%
meetings do demand resp response
technology<01:40:22.239> and<01:40:22.440> solution<01:40:22.920> providers<01:40:23.480> fall

01:40:23.830 --> 01:40:23.840 align:start position:0%
technology and solution providers fall
 

01:40:23.840 --> 01:40:26.109 align:start position:0%
technology and solution providers fall
under<01:40:24.080> our

01:40:26.109 --> 01:40:26.119 align:start position:0%
under our
 

01:40:26.119 --> 01:40:29.669 align:start position:0%
under our
purview<01:40:27.119> like<01:40:27.440> vehicle<01:40:27.800> to<01:40:28.000> Grid

01:40:29.669 --> 01:40:29.679 align:start position:0%
purview like vehicle to Grid
 

01:40:29.679 --> 01:40:35.709 align:start position:0%
purview like vehicle to Grid
or<01:40:30.679> residential<01:40:31.239> storage<01:40:31.920> things<01:40:32.159> like

01:40:35.709 --> 01:40:35.719 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:40:35.719 --> 01:40:39.910 align:start position:0%
 
that<01:40:36.960> so<01:40:37.960> I<01:40:38.080> think<01:40:38.880> the<01:40:39.040> short<01:40:39.360> answer<01:40:39.679> let<01:40:39.800> me

01:40:39.910 --> 01:40:39.920 align:start position:0%
that so I think the short answer let me
 

01:40:39.920 --> 01:40:41.830 align:start position:0%
that so I think the short answer let me
take<01:40:40.040> a<01:40:40.199> stab<01:40:40.520> at<01:40:40.719> that<01:40:40.880> and<01:40:41.080> then<01:40:41.280> we<01:40:41.400> can<01:40:41.760> we

01:40:41.830 --> 01:40:41.840 align:start position:0%
take a stab at that and then we can we
 

01:40:41.840 --> 01:40:45.390 align:start position:0%
take a stab at that and then we can we
can<01:40:42.080> discuss<01:40:42.920> how<01:40:43.199> accurate<01:40:43.599> this<01:40:44.080> is<01:40:45.080> so<01:40:45.280> when

01:40:45.390 --> 01:40:45.400 align:start position:0%
can discuss how accurate this is so when
 

01:40:45.400 --> 01:40:47.430 align:start position:0%
can discuss how accurate this is so when
we<01:40:45.560> talk<01:40:45.800> about<01:40:46.080> demand<01:40:46.560> response<01:40:47.119> we're

01:40:47.430 --> 01:40:47.440 align:start position:0%
we talk about demand response we're
 

01:40:47.440 --> 01:40:50.430 align:start position:0%
we talk about demand response we're
typically<01:40:48.000> talking<01:40:48.360> about<01:40:48.760> load<01:40:49.639> type<01:40:50.239> of

01:40:50.430 --> 01:40:50.440 align:start position:0%
typically talking about load type of
 

01:40:50.440 --> 01:40:53.910 align:start position:0%
typically talking about load type of
Technology<01:40:50.880> IES<01:40:51.280> demand<01:40:51.960> response<01:40:52.679> right<01:40:53.000> so

01:40:53.910 --> 01:40:53.920 align:start position:0%
Technology IES demand response right so
 

01:40:53.920 --> 01:40:55.470 align:start position:0%
Technology IES demand response right so
the<01:40:54.119> question<01:40:54.440> then<01:40:54.639> becomes<01:40:55.040> when<01:40:55.159> you

01:40:55.470 --> 01:40:55.480 align:start position:0%
the question then becomes when you
 

01:40:55.480 --> 01:40:57.950 align:start position:0%
the question then becomes when you
couple<01:40:55.840> that<01:40:56.000> with<01:40:56.119> the<01:40:56.560> generation<01:40:57.560> and<01:40:57.840> and

01:40:57.950 --> 01:40:57.960 align:start position:0%
couple that with the generation and and
 

01:40:57.960 --> 01:41:00.030 align:start position:0%
couple that with the generation and and
you<01:40:58.080> mentioned<01:40:58.520> EV<01:40:59.080> and<01:40:59.239> you<01:40:59.360> mentioned<01:40:59.920> you

01:41:00.030 --> 01:41:00.040 align:start position:0%
you mentioned EV and you mentioned you
 

01:41:00.040 --> 01:41:02.430 align:start position:0%
you mentioned EV and you mentioned you
know<01:41:00.280> maybe<01:41:00.639> residential<01:41:01.280> type<01:41:01.440> of<01:41:01.599> storage

01:41:02.430 --> 01:41:02.440 align:start position:0%
know maybe residential type of storage
 

01:41:02.440 --> 01:41:05.109 align:start position:0%
know maybe residential type of storage
we<01:41:02.599> now<01:41:02.800> have<01:41:02.960> a<01:41:03.199> dispatchable<01:41:04.040> resource<01:41:04.840> that

01:41:05.109 --> 01:41:05.119 align:start position:0%
we now have a dispatchable resource that
 

01:41:05.119 --> 01:41:07.669 align:start position:0%
we now have a dispatchable resource that
can<01:41:05.520> actually<01:41:06.000> act<01:41:06.360> as<01:41:06.599> that<01:41:06.920> generator

01:41:07.669 --> 01:41:07.679 align:start position:0%
can actually act as that generator
 

01:41:07.679 --> 01:41:11.390 align:start position:0%
can actually act as that generator
behind<01:41:08.119> the<01:41:08.280> meter<01:41:08.840> to<01:41:09.599> provide<01:41:10.599> equivalently

01:41:11.390 --> 01:41:11.400 align:start position:0%
behind the meter to provide equivalently
 

01:41:11.400 --> 01:41:13.750 align:start position:0%
behind the meter to provide equivalently
you<01:41:11.520> know<01:41:11.719> to<01:41:12.040> to<01:41:12.400> reduce<01:41:12.840> load<01:41:13.159> so<01:41:13.280> I<01:41:13.440> get<01:41:13.599> the

01:41:13.750 --> 01:41:13.760 align:start position:0%
you know to to reduce load so I get the
 

01:41:13.760 --> 01:41:16.390 align:start position:0%
you know to to reduce load so I get the
demand<01:41:14.360> response<01:41:15.360> component<01:41:15.880> but<01:41:16.000> I<01:41:16.119> also

01:41:16.390 --> 01:41:16.400 align:start position:0%
demand response component but I also
 

01:41:16.400 --> 01:41:19.189 align:start position:0%
demand response component but I also
think<01:41:16.639> these<01:41:16.800> are<01:41:17.080> behind<01:41:17.360> the<01:41:17.560> me<01:41:18.080> meter<01:41:18.440> de

01:41:19.189 --> 01:41:19.199 align:start position:0%
think these are behind the me meter de
 

01:41:19.199 --> 01:41:21.430 align:start position:0%
think these are behind the me meter de
components<01:41:19.760> and<01:41:19.960> your<01:41:20.280> you're<01:41:20.480> exact<01:41:21.199> right

01:41:21.430 --> 01:41:21.440 align:start position:0%
components and your you're exact right
 

01:41:21.440 --> 01:41:25.350 align:start position:0%
components and your you're exact right
the<01:41:21.679> ev2<01:41:22.679> Grid<01:41:23.400> or<01:41:23.840> or<01:41:24.320> of<01:41:24.560> that<01:41:24.840> nature<01:41:25.239> where

01:41:25.350 --> 01:41:25.360 align:start position:0%
the ev2 Grid or or of that nature where
 

01:41:25.360 --> 01:41:27.790 align:start position:0%
the ev2 Grid or or of that nature where
we<01:41:25.480> have<01:41:25.599> rolling<01:41:26.000> storage<01:41:26.920> that<01:41:27.239> potentially

01:41:27.790 --> 01:41:27.800 align:start position:0%
we have rolling storage that potentially
 

01:41:27.800 --> 01:41:30.390 align:start position:0%
we have rolling storage that potentially
could<01:41:28.400> could<01:41:28.599> be<01:41:28.960> putting<01:41:29.280> energy<01:41:29.639> on<01:41:30.159> on<01:41:30.280> the

01:41:30.390 --> 01:41:30.400 align:start position:0%
could could be putting energy on on the
 

01:41:30.400 --> 01:41:32.990 align:start position:0%
could could be putting energy on on the
grid<01:41:30.760> I<01:41:30.880> do<01:41:31.199> think<01:41:31.800> is<01:41:31.960> under<01:41:32.320> the<01:41:32.599> energy

01:41:32.990 --> 01:41:33.000 align:start position:0%
grid I do think is under the energy
 

01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.510 align:start position:0%
grid I do think is under the energy
storage<01:41:33.719> component<01:41:34.280> bucket<01:41:34.760> of<01:41:34.920> our<01:41:35.320> our

01:41:35.510 --> 01:41:35.520 align:start position:0%
storage component bucket of our our
 

01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:37.149 align:start position:0%
storage component bucket of our our
Charter<01:41:35.960> and<01:41:36.159> where<01:41:36.320> we<01:41:36.440> are<01:41:36.639> because<01:41:36.800> it<01:41:36.920> is

01:41:37.149 --> 01:41:37.159 align:start position:0%
Charter and where we are because it is
 

01:41:37.159 --> 01:41:39.189 align:start position:0%
Charter and where we are because it is
storage<01:41:38.159> just<01:41:38.440> because<01:41:38.679> it's<01:41:38.840> got<01:41:39.000> four

01:41:39.189 --> 01:41:39.199 align:start position:0%
storage just because it's got four
 

01:41:39.199 --> 01:41:41.390 align:start position:0%
storage just because it's got four
wheels<01:41:39.560> doesn't<01:41:40.280> take<01:41:40.480> it<01:41:40.599> out<01:41:40.760> of<01:41:40.920> the<01:41:41.159> out<01:41:41.280> of

01:41:41.390 --> 01:41:41.400 align:start position:0%
wheels doesn't take it out of the out of
 

01:41:41.400 --> 01:41:42.030 align:start position:0%
wheels doesn't take it out of the out of
the

01:41:42.030 --> 01:41:42.040 align:start position:0%
the
 

01:41:42.040 --> 01:41:45.669 align:start position:0%
the
contention<01:41:43.040> I<01:41:43.159> think<01:41:44.119> Tesla<01:41:44.560> sitting<01:41:44.880> in<01:41:45.040> our

01:41:45.669 --> 01:41:45.679 align:start position:0%
contention I think Tesla sitting in our
 

01:41:45.679 --> 01:41:48.790 align:start position:0%
contention I think Tesla sitting in our
garage<01:41:46.679> uh<01:41:46.960> absolutely<01:41:47.840> is<01:41:48.159> part<01:41:48.400> of<01:41:48.599> that

01:41:48.790 --> 01:41:48.800 align:start position:0%
garage uh absolutely is part of that
 

01:41:48.800 --> 01:41:50.390 align:start position:0%
garage uh absolutely is part of that
discussion<01:41:49.320> whether<01:41:49.480> it's<01:41:49.679> behind<01:41:49.960> the<01:41:50.080> meter

01:41:50.390 --> 01:41:50.400 align:start position:0%
discussion whether it's behind the meter
 

01:41:50.400 --> 01:41:53.669 align:start position:0%
discussion whether it's behind the meter
or<01:41:50.560> above<01:41:50.920> the<01:41:51.000> meter<01:41:51.360> utility<01:41:51.840> scale<01:41:52.480> is<01:41:52.800> not

01:41:53.669 --> 01:41:53.679 align:start position:0%
or above the meter utility scale is not
 

01:41:53.679 --> 01:41:55.470 align:start position:0%
or above the meter utility scale is not
a<01:41:53.840> distinguishable<01:41:54.599> factor<01:41:55.080> and<01:41:55.199> the

01:41:55.470 --> 01:41:55.480 align:start position:0%
a distinguishable factor and the
 

01:41:55.480 --> 01:41:58.070 align:start position:0%
a distinguishable factor and the
aggregations<01:41:56.360> of<01:41:56.599> these<01:41:56.880> devices<01:41:57.599> will<01:41:57.800> move

01:41:58.070 --> 01:41:58.080 align:start position:0%
aggregations of these devices will move
 

01:41:58.080 --> 01:42:01.030 align:start position:0%
aggregations of these devices will move
the<01:41:58.199> needle<01:41:58.880> for<01:41:59.080> the<01:41:59.199> local<01:41:59.599> utility<01:42:00.599> as<01:42:00.760> well

01:42:01.030 --> 01:42:01.040 align:start position:0%
the needle for the local utility as well
 

01:42:01.040 --> 01:42:03.870 align:start position:0%
the needle for the local utility as well
as<01:42:01.239> for<01:42:01.560> the<01:42:01.760> the<01:42:01.920> transmission<01:42:02.599> utility<01:42:03.599> so

01:42:03.870 --> 01:42:03.880 align:start position:0%
as for the the transmission utility so
 

01:42:03.880 --> 01:42:06.310 align:start position:0%
as for the the transmission utility so
in<01:42:04.159> aggregate<01:42:05.119> so<01:42:05.280> I<01:42:05.400> do<01:42:05.599> think<01:42:05.840> it<01:42:06.040> it<01:42:06.159> is

01:42:06.310 --> 01:42:06.320 align:start position:0%
in aggregate so I do think it it is
 

01:42:06.320 --> 01:42:08.950 align:start position:0%
in aggregate so I do think it it is
under<01:42:06.560> our<01:42:07.119> umbrella<01:42:07.800> to<01:42:07.960> be<01:42:08.239> very<01:42:08.520> much

01:42:08.950 --> 01:42:08.960 align:start position:0%
under our umbrella to be very much
 

01:42:08.960 --> 01:42:10.950 align:start position:0%
under our umbrella to be very much
cognizant<01:42:09.520> of<01:42:09.679> them<01:42:09.920> I<01:42:10.000> don't<01:42:10.199> know<01:42:10.400> the<01:42:10.599> role

01:42:10.950 --> 01:42:10.960 align:start position:0%
cognizant of them I don't know the role
 

01:42:10.960 --> 01:42:13.109 align:start position:0%
cognizant of them I don't know the role
due<01:42:11.119> to<01:42:11.280> the<01:42:11.599> penetrations<01:42:12.599> and<01:42:12.760> where<01:42:12.920> the

01:42:13.109 --> 01:42:13.119 align:start position:0%
due to the penetrations and where the
 

01:42:13.119 --> 01:42:16.270 align:start position:0%
due to the penetrations and where the
technology<01:42:13.679> lies<01:42:13.920> in<01:42:14.080> the<01:42:14.440> in<01:42:14.599> the<01:42:15.320> pipeline

01:42:16.270 --> 01:42:16.280 align:start position:0%
technology lies in the in the pipeline
 

01:42:16.280 --> 01:42:19.229 align:start position:0%
technology lies in the in the pipeline
if<01:42:16.480> it's<01:42:16.760> our<01:42:17.119> Focus<01:42:17.760> but<01:42:17.960> I<01:42:18.119> think<01:42:18.360> it's<01:42:18.840> a

01:42:19.229 --> 01:42:19.239 align:start position:0%
if it's our Focus but I think it's a
 

01:42:19.239 --> 01:42:22.270 align:start position:0%
if it's our Focus but I think it's a
discussion<01:42:20.040> piece<01:42:20.320> in<01:42:20.480> our<01:42:20.880> overall

01:42:22.270 --> 01:42:22.280 align:start position:0%
discussion piece in our overall
 

01:42:22.280 --> 01:42:24.589 align:start position:0%
discussion piece in our overall
purview<01:42:23.280> I<01:42:23.360> don't<01:42:23.520> know<01:42:23.800> how<01:42:24.159> the<01:42:24.400> other

01:42:24.589 --> 01:42:24.599 align:start position:0%
purview I don't know how the other
 

01:42:24.599 --> 01:42:32.030 align:start position:0%
purview I don't know how the other
members<01:42:25.119> feel<01:42:25.440> about<01:42:25.719> that

01:42:32.030 --> 01:42:32.040 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:42:32.040 --> 01:42:35.310 align:start position:0%
 
characterization<01:42:33.040> Paul<01:42:33.239> I<01:42:33.320> know<01:42:34.119> L<01:42:34.440> about<01:42:34.679> it

01:42:35.310 --> 01:42:35.320 align:start position:0%
characterization Paul I know L about it
 

01:42:35.320 --> 01:42:37.390 align:start position:0%
characterization Paul I know L about it
um<01:42:35.840> Robert<01:42:36.119> if<01:42:36.199> you've<01:42:36.400> got<01:42:36.560> ideas<01:42:36.960> for

01:42:37.390 --> 01:42:37.400 align:start position:0%
um Robert if you've got ideas for
 

01:42:37.400 --> 01:42:39.830 align:start position:0%
um Robert if you've got ideas for
presentations<01:42:38.159> or<01:42:39.159> something<01:42:39.440> that<01:42:39.560> we<01:42:39.639> could

01:42:39.830 --> 01:42:39.840 align:start position:0%
presentations or something that we could
 

01:42:39.840 --> 01:42:43.149 align:start position:0%
presentations or something that we could
dig<01:42:40.080> into<01:42:40.440> there<01:42:40.920> we<01:42:41.119> all<01:42:41.520> yours<01:42:42.520> yeah<01:42:42.920> yeah<01:42:43.080> I

01:42:43.149 --> 01:42:43.159 align:start position:0%
dig into there we all yours yeah yeah I
 

01:42:43.159 --> 01:42:45.990 align:start position:0%
dig into there we all yours yeah yeah I
mean<01:42:43.360> some<01:42:43.520> of<01:42:43.639> our<01:42:43.920> clients<01:42:44.920> work<01:42:45.199> in<01:42:45.560> work<01:42:45.760> in

01:42:45.990 --> 01:42:46.000 align:start position:0%
mean some of our clients work in work in
 

01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:47.910 align:start position:0%
mean some of our clients work in work in
those<01:42:46.199> sectors<01:42:47.080> and<01:42:47.320> I'm<01:42:47.440> sure<01:42:47.639> they<01:42:47.760> would

01:42:47.910 --> 01:42:47.920 align:start position:0%
those sectors and I'm sure they would
 

01:42:47.920 --> 01:42:50.310 align:start position:0%
those sectors and I'm sure they would
welcome<01:42:48.239> the<01:42:48.400> opportunity<01:42:48.960> to<01:42:49.679> to<01:42:49.880> speak<01:42:50.159> with

01:42:50.310 --> 01:42:50.320 align:start position:0%
welcome the opportunity to to speak with
 

01:42:50.320 --> 01:42:51.990 align:start position:0%
welcome the opportunity to to speak with
you<01:42:50.480> all<01:42:51.040> with<01:42:51.239> us

01:42:51.990 --> 01:42:52.000 align:start position:0%
you all with us
 

01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:55.430 align:start position:0%
you all with us
all<01:42:53.000> yeah<01:42:53.119> you're<01:42:53.280> part<01:42:53.440> of<01:42:53.520> it<01:42:53.719> now

01:42:55.430 --> 01:42:55.440 align:start position:0%
all yeah you're part of it now
 

01:42:55.440 --> 01:42:58.870 align:start position:0%
all yeah you're part of it now
too<01:42:56.440> there's<01:42:56.599> an<01:42:56.800> Us<01:42:57.040> in

01:42:58.870 --> 01:42:58.880 align:start position:0%
too there's an Us in
 

01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:01.510 align:start position:0%
too there's an Us in
there<01:42:59.880> didn't<01:43:00.080> change<01:43:00.280> your<01:43:00.440> mind<01:43:00.679> did<01:43:00.800> it

01:43:01.510 --> 01:43:01.520 align:start position:0%
there didn't change your mind did it
 

01:43:01.520 --> 01:43:04.470 align:start position:0%
there didn't change your mind did it
Robert<01:43:02.520> sorry<01:43:03.520> this<01:43:03.639> meeting<01:43:03.960> didn't<01:43:04.199> change

01:43:04.470 --> 01:43:04.480 align:start position:0%
Robert sorry this meeting didn't change
 

01:43:04.480 --> 01:43:08.310 align:start position:0%
Robert sorry this meeting didn't change
your<01:43:04.679> mind<01:43:05.159> did<01:43:05.320> it<01:43:05.960> no<01:43:06.239> no<01:43:06.400> I'm<01:43:06.520> still

01:43:08.310 --> 01:43:08.320 align:start position:0%
your mind did it no no I'm still
 

01:43:08.320 --> 01:43:11.310 align:start position:0%
your mind did it no no I'm still
in<01:43:09.320> the<01:43:09.520> sausage<01:43:09.960> making<01:43:10.360> at<01:43:10.560> the<01:43:10.679> at<01:43:10.800> its

01:43:11.310 --> 01:43:11.320 align:start position:0%
in the sausage making at the at its
 

01:43:11.320 --> 01:43:13.910 align:start position:0%
in the sausage making at the at its
finest<01:43:12.320> we<01:43:12.520> got<01:43:12.679> to<01:43:12.800> see<01:43:13.000> it<01:43:13.199> it'll<01:43:13.440> be<01:43:13.599> posted

01:43:13.910 --> 01:43:13.920 align:start position:0%
finest we got to see it it'll be posted
 

01:43:13.920 --> 01:43:15.629 align:start position:0%
finest we got to see it it'll be posted
on<01:43:14.080> YouTube

01:43:15.629 --> 01:43:15.639 align:start position:0%
on YouTube
 

01:43:15.639 --> 01:43:19.669 align:start position:0%
on YouTube
later<01:43:16.639> no<01:43:16.880> it<01:43:17.040> won't<01:43:17.840> or<01:43:18.000> maybe<01:43:18.199> it<01:43:18.320> will

01:43:19.669 --> 01:43:19.679 align:start position:0%
later no it won't or maybe it will
 

01:43:19.679 --> 01:43:22.390 align:start position:0%
later no it won't or maybe it will
be<01:43:20.920> I<01:43:21.000> believe<01:43:21.199> a<01:43:21.320> few<01:43:21.480> members<01:43:21.760> of<01:43:21.880> the<01:43:22.000> public

01:43:22.390 --> 01:43:22.400 align:start position:0%
be I believe a few members of the public
 

01:43:22.400 --> 01:43:25.709 align:start position:0%
be I believe a few members of the public
here<01:43:22.920> U<01:43:23.320> will<01:43:24.239> give<01:43:24.440> a<01:43:24.800> brief<01:43:25.080> opportunity<01:43:25.599> as

01:43:25.709 --> 01:43:25.719 align:start position:0%
here U will give a brief opportunity as
 

01:43:25.719 --> 01:43:27.870 align:start position:0%
here U will give a brief opportunity as
we<01:43:25.880> always<01:43:26.119> do<01:43:26.400> encourage<01:43:26.880> folks<01:43:27.159> to<01:43:27.440> share

01:43:27.870 --> 01:43:27.880 align:start position:0%
we always do encourage folks to share
 

01:43:27.880 --> 01:43:30.589 align:start position:0%
we always do encourage folks to share
public<01:43:28.159> comment<01:43:28.599> with<01:43:28.920> the<01:43:29.400> authority<01:43:30.400> uh<01:43:30.520> is

01:43:30.589 --> 01:43:30.599 align:start position:0%
public comment with the authority uh is
 

01:43:30.599 --> 01:43:33.189 align:start position:0%
public comment with the authority uh is
there<01:43:30.840> anybody<01:43:31.840> online<01:43:32.400> who<01:43:32.520> would<01:43:32.719> like<01:43:32.880> to

01:43:33.189 --> 01:43:33.199 align:start position:0%
there anybody online who would like to
 

01:43:33.199 --> 01:43:35.149 align:start position:0%
there anybody online who would like to
share<01:43:33.480> any

01:43:35.149 --> 01:43:35.159 align:start position:0%
share any
 

01:43:35.159 --> 01:43:42.270 align:start position:0%
share any
perspectives<01:43:36.159> with<01:43:36.320> the<01:43:36.440> authority<01:43:36.840> at<01:43:36.960> this

01:43:42.270 --> 01:43:42.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:43:42.280 --> 01:43:44.830 align:start position:0%
 
time<01:43:43.280> well<01:43:43.440> Chris<01:43:43.679> and<01:43:43.840> Abigail<01:43:44.320> if<01:43:44.400> you<01:43:44.520> join

01:43:44.830 --> 01:43:44.840 align:start position:0%
time well Chris and Abigail if you join
 

01:43:44.840 --> 01:43:47.229 align:start position:0%
time well Chris and Abigail if you join
next<01:43:45.040> time<01:43:45.199> I'm<01:43:45.280> going<01:43:45.400> to<01:43:45.520> call<01:43:45.679> on<01:43:45.840> You<01:43:46.040> by<01:43:46.800> to

01:43:47.229 --> 01:43:47.239 align:start position:0%
next time I'm going to call on You by to
 

01:43:47.239 --> 01:43:51.430 align:start position:0%
next time I'm going to call on You by to
share<01:43:47.520> some<01:43:47.840> comments<01:43:48.480> but<01:43:49.679> um<01:43:50.719> are<01:43:50.880> there<01:43:51.119> any

01:43:51.430 --> 01:43:51.440 align:start position:0%
share some comments but um are there any
 

01:43:51.440 --> 01:43:56.070 align:start position:0%
share some comments but um are there any
other<01:43:52.199> uh<01:43:53.199> items<01:43:53.560> to<01:43:53.800> address

01:43:56.070 --> 01:43:56.080 align:start position:0%
other uh items to address
 

01:43:56.080 --> 01:43:58.310 align:start position:0%
other uh items to address
today<01:43:57.080> now<01:43:57.239> let<01:43:57.320> me<01:43:57.480> just<01:43:57.560> say<01:43:57.920> the<01:43:58.119> next

01:43:58.310 --> 01:43:58.320 align:start position:0%
today now let me just say the next
 

01:43:58.320 --> 01:44:01.270 align:start position:0%
today now let me just say the next
meeting<01:43:58.719> is<01:43:59.119> January<01:43:59.560> 9th<01:44:00.000> not<01:44:00.199> the

01:44:01.270 --> 01:44:01.280 align:start position:0%
meeting is January 9th not the
 

01:44:01.280 --> 01:44:04.550 align:start position:0%
meeting is January 9th not the
10th<01:44:02.280> thank<01:44:02.400> you<01:44:02.719> it's<01:44:02.880> the<01:44:03.000> start<01:44:03.199> of<01:44:03.320> the

01:44:04.550 --> 01:44:04.560 align:start position:0%
10th thank you it's the start of the
 

01:44:04.560 --> 01:44:07.870 align:start position:0%
10th thank you it's the start of the
ga<01:44:05.560> yeah<01:44:05.880> thank<01:44:06.080> you<01:44:06.360> and<01:44:07.199> appreciate<01:44:07.719> that

01:44:07.870 --> 01:44:07.880 align:start position:0%
ga yeah thank you and appreciate that
 

01:44:07.880 --> 01:44:11.629 align:start position:0%
ga yeah thank you and appreciate that
reminder<01:44:08.560> and<01:44:09.000> I<01:44:09.840> uh<01:44:10.840> as<01:44:11.040> mentioned<01:44:11.440> last

01:44:11.629 --> 01:44:11.639 align:start position:0%
reminder and I uh as mentioned last
 

01:44:11.639 --> 01:44:12.990 align:start position:0%
reminder and I uh as mentioned last
meeting<01:44:12.040> have<01:44:12.199> been<01:44:12.320> in<01:44:12.480> contact<01:44:12.800> with<01:44:12.920> the

01:44:12.990 --> 01:44:13.000 align:start position:0%
meeting have been in contact with the
 

01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:15.709 align:start position:0%
meeting have been in contact with the
clerk<01:44:13.280> of<01:44:13.400> the<01:44:13.560> house<01:44:14.199> and<01:44:14.880> I<01:44:15.040> believe<01:44:15.440> next

01:44:15.709 --> 01:44:15.719 align:start position:0%
clerk of the house and I believe next
 

01:44:15.719 --> 01:44:18.510 align:start position:0%
clerk of the house and I believe next
week<01:44:16.119> they<01:44:16.199> will<01:44:16.440> open<01:44:16.719> up<01:44:16.880> the<01:44:17.080> system<01:44:17.480> for<01:44:17.760> us

01:44:18.510 --> 01:44:18.520 align:start position:0%
week they will open up the system for us
 

01:44:18.520 --> 01:44:21.950 align:start position:0%
week they will open up the system for us
booking<01:44:19.599> and<01:44:20.880> building<01:44:21.119> and<01:44:21.239> the<01:44:21.400> new

01:44:21.950 --> 01:44:21.960 align:start position:0%
booking and building and the new
 

01:44:21.960 --> 01:44:24.950 align:start position:0%
booking and building and the new
Assembly<01:44:22.400> Building<01:44:23.119> for<01:44:24.080> uh<01:44:24.199> future<01:44:24.560> meetings

01:44:24.950 --> 01:44:24.960 align:start position:0%
Assembly Building for uh future meetings
 

01:44:24.960 --> 01:44:27.070 align:start position:0%
Assembly Building for uh future meetings
with<01:44:25.159> all<01:44:25.280> of<01:44:25.480> their<01:44:26.000> technology

01:44:27.070 --> 01:44:27.080 align:start position:0%
with all of their technology
 

01:44:27.080 --> 01:44:31.510 align:start position:0%
with all of their technology
capabilities<01:44:28.080> um<01:44:28.920> easy<01:44:29.920> easy<01:44:30.280> parking<01:44:31.000> and<01:44:31.360> uh

01:44:31.510 --> 01:44:31.520 align:start position:0%
capabilities um easy easy parking and uh
 

01:44:31.520 --> 01:44:33.350 align:start position:0%
capabilities um easy easy parking and uh
and<01:44:31.639> a<01:44:31.760> nice<01:44:31.960> meeting<01:44:32.280> room<01:44:32.480> for<01:44:32.719> everyone<01:44:33.119> so

01:44:33.350 --> 01:44:33.360 align:start position:0%
and a nice meeting room for everyone so
 

01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:36.229 align:start position:0%
and a nice meeting room for everyone so
that's<01:44:33.520> the<01:44:33.679> tentative<01:44:34.360> location<01:44:35.239> for<01:44:36.080> the

01:44:36.229 --> 01:44:36.239 align:start position:0%
that's the tentative location for the
 

01:44:36.239 --> 01:44:37.990 align:start position:0%
that's the tentative location for the
meeting<01:44:36.679> on<01:44:36.800> the<01:44:36.960> night<01:44:37.320> if<01:44:37.400> they're<01:44:37.560> not<01:44:37.760> too

01:44:37.990 --> 01:44:38.000 align:start position:0%
meeting on the night if they're not too
 

01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:39.950 align:start position:0%
meeting on the night if they're not too
busy<01:44:38.400> preparing<01:44:38.800> for<01:44:39.000> the<01:44:39.440> session<01:44:39.679> in<01:44:39.800> their

01:44:39.950 --> 01:44:39.960 align:start position:0%
busy preparing for the session in their
 

01:44:39.960 --> 01:44:43.030 align:start position:0%
busy preparing for the session in their
new<01:44:40.199> Office<01:44:40.560> Buildings<01:44:41.560> but<01:44:41.840> uh<01:44:42.040> we'll<01:44:42.800> let

01:44:43.030 --> 01:44:43.040 align:start position:0%
new Office Buildings but uh we'll let
 

01:44:43.040 --> 01:44:45.350 align:start position:0%
new Office Buildings but uh we'll let
you<01:44:43.239> all<01:44:43.400> know<01:44:43.639> as<01:44:43.760> soon<01:44:43.960> as<01:44:44.239> possible<01:44:44.760> and

01:44:45.350 --> 01:44:45.360 align:start position:0%
you all know as soon as possible and
 

01:44:45.360 --> 01:44:48.950 align:start position:0%
you all know as soon as possible and
Robert<01:44:45.679> we<01:44:45.960> have<01:44:46.320> meetings<01:44:46.760> set<01:44:47.239> quarterly<01:44:48.199> in

01:44:48.950 --> 01:44:48.960 align:start position:0%
Robert we have meetings set quarterly in
 

01:44:48.960 --> 01:44:51.270 align:start position:0%
Robert we have meetings set quarterly in
2024<01:44:49.960> uh<01:44:50.040> if<01:44:50.199> those<01:44:50.360> AR<01:44:50.560> AR<01:44:50.719> already<01:44:50.920> on<01:44:51.080> your

01:44:51.270 --> 01:44:51.280 align:start position:0%
2024 uh if those AR AR already on your
 

01:44:51.280 --> 01:44:54.070 align:start position:0%
2024 uh if those AR AR already on your
calendar<01:44:52.239> um<01:44:52.800> Ken<01:44:53.119> will<01:44:53.400> share<01:44:53.719> those<01:44:53.960> with

01:44:54.070 --> 01:44:54.080 align:start position:0%
calendar um Ken will share those with
 

01:44:54.080 --> 01:44:56.910 align:start position:0%
calendar um Ken will share those with
you<01:44:54.320> just<01:44:54.760> so<01:44:55.760> um<01:44:56.080> you<01:44:56.199> can<01:44:56.480> you<01:44:56.679> need<01:44:56.800> to

01:44:56.910 --> 01:44:56.920 align:start position:0%
you just so um you can you need to
 

01:44:56.920 --> 01:44:58.669 align:start position:0%
you just so um you can you need to
forward<01:44:57.239> those<01:44:57.400> to<01:44:57.560> you<01:44:58.280> yeah<01:44:58.440> I<01:44:58.520> would

01:44:58.669 --> 01:44:58.679 align:start position:0%
forward those to you yeah I would
 

01:44:58.679 --> 01:45:00.030 align:start position:0%
forward those to you yeah I would
appreciate<01:44:59.159> that<01:44:59.360> thank

01:45:00.030 --> 01:45:00.040 align:start position:0%
appreciate that thank
 

01:45:00.040 --> 01:45:01.629 align:start position:0%
appreciate that thank
you

01:45:01.629 --> 01:45:01.639 align:start position:0%
you
 

01:45:01.639 --> 01:45:04.149 align:start position:0%
you
perfect<01:45:02.639> um<01:45:02.960> thank<01:45:03.119> you<01:45:03.320> everybody<01:45:03.840> huge

01:45:04.149 --> 01:45:04.159 align:start position:0%
perfect um thank you everybody huge
 

01:45:04.159 --> 01:45:06.070 align:start position:0%
perfect um thank you everybody huge
congrats<01:45:04.520> on<01:45:04.719> taking<01:45:04.960> this<01:45:05.239> important<01:45:05.719> step

01:45:06.070 --> 01:45:06.080 align:start position:0%
congrats on taking this important step
 

01:45:06.080 --> 01:45:08.990 align:start position:0%
congrats on taking this important step
forward<01:45:07.080> Ken<01:45:07.320> will<01:45:07.480> share<01:45:07.719> a<01:45:08.040> final<01:45:08.400> draft<01:45:08.880> and

01:45:08.990 --> 01:45:09.000 align:start position:0%
forward Ken will share a final draft and
 

01:45:09.000 --> 01:45:11.669 align:start position:0%
forward Ken will share a final draft and
a<01:45:09.199> PDF<01:45:09.560> form<01:45:09.920> with<01:45:10.119> folks<01:45:10.480> today<01:45:11.119> make<01:45:11.360> any

01:45:11.669 --> 01:45:11.679 align:start position:0%
a PDF form with folks today make any
 

01:45:11.679 --> 01:45:13.950 align:start position:0%
a PDF form with folks today make any
formatting<01:45:12.239> changes<01:45:13.159> and<01:45:13.320> then<01:45:13.599> get<01:45:13.800> this

01:45:13.950 --> 01:45:13.960 align:start position:0%
formatting changes and then get this
 

01:45:13.960 --> 01:45:15.669 align:start position:0%
formatting changes and then get this
shipped<01:45:14.320> off<01:45:14.920> uh<01:45:15.000> to<01:45:15.159> the<01:45:15.239> folks<01:45:15.480> at<01:45:15.599> the

01:45:15.669 --> 01:45:15.679 align:start position:0%
shipped off uh to the folks at the
 

01:45:15.679 --> 01:45:18.990 align:start position:0%
shipped off uh to the folks at the
energy<01:45:16.080> department<01:45:16.599> and<01:45:16.880> then<01:45:17.880> um<01:45:18.360> the<01:45:18.679> final

01:45:18.990 --> 01:45:19.000 align:start position:0%
energy department and then um the final
 

01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:21.149 align:start position:0%
energy department and then um the final
recipients<01:45:19.800> report

01:45:21.149 --> 01:45:21.159 align:start position:0%
recipients report
 

01:45:21.159 --> 01:45:22.550 align:start position:0%
recipients report
if<01:45:21.280> there's<01:45:21.560> nothing<01:45:21.800> else<01:45:21.960> to<01:45:22.119> add<01:45:22.320> i'

01:45:22.550 --> 01:45:22.560 align:start position:0%
if there's nothing else to add i'
 

01:45:22.560 --> 01:45:24.910 align:start position:0%
if there's nothing else to add i'
entertain<01:45:22.960> a<01:45:23.119> motion<01:45:23.440> to<01:45:23.679> adjourn<01:45:24.320> until

01:45:24.910 --> 01:45:24.920 align:start position:0%
entertain a motion to adjourn until
 

01:45:24.920 --> 01:45:26.149 align:start position:0%
entertain a motion to adjourn until
before<01:45:25.119> you<01:45:25.440> before<01:45:25.639> you<01:45:25.719> do<01:45:25.920> I'm<01:45:26.000> going<01:45:26.080> to

01:45:26.149 --> 01:45:26.159 align:start position:0%
before you before you do I'm going to
 

01:45:26.159 --> 01:45:29.550 align:start position:0%
before you before you do I'm going to
send<01:45:26.360> the<01:45:26.520> final<01:45:26.880> copy<01:45:27.159> out<01:45:27.400> but<01:45:28.280> when<01:45:29.280> I<01:45:29.440> give

01:45:29.550 --> 01:45:29.560 align:start position:0%
send the final copy out but when I give
 

01:45:29.560 --> 01:45:31.950 align:start position:0%
send the final copy out but when I give
you<01:45:29.679> till<01:45:30.159> what<01:45:30.639> tomorrow<01:45:31.119> close<01:45:31.400> of<01:45:31.599> business

01:45:31.950 --> 01:45:31.960 align:start position:0%
you till what tomorrow close of business
 

01:45:31.960 --> 01:45:35.430 align:start position:0%
you till what tomorrow close of business
to<01:45:32.119> get<01:45:32.280> me<01:45:32.520> any<01:45:33.520> things<01:45:33.719> you<01:45:33.840> see<01:45:34.040> in<01:45:34.320> there<01:45:35.320> is

01:45:35.430 --> 01:45:35.440 align:start position:0%
to get me any things you see in there is
 

01:45:35.440 --> 01:45:40.109 align:start position:0%
to get me any things you see in there is
that<01:45:35.719> enough<01:45:36.960> yeah

01:45:40.109 --> 01:45:40.119 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:45:40.119 --> 01:45:43.470 align:start position:0%
 
yes<01:45:41.119> would<01:45:41.320> entertain<01:45:41.719> a<01:45:41.840> motion<01:45:42.080> to<01:45:42.480> adjourn

01:45:43.470 --> 01:45:43.480 align:start position:0%
yes would entertain a motion to adjourn
 

01:45:43.480 --> 01:45:46.430 align:start position:0%
yes would entertain a motion to adjourn
until<01:45:44.560> January<01:45:45.560> so

01:45:46.430 --> 01:45:46.440 align:start position:0%
until January so
 

01:45:46.440 --> 01:45:48.589 align:start position:0%
until January so
move

01:45:48.589 --> 01:45:48.599 align:start position:0%
move
 

01:45:48.599 --> 01:45:54.750 align:start position:0%
move
second<01:45:49.599> please<01:45:49.840> say<01:45:50.080> I

01:45:54.750 --> 01:45:54.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:45:54.760 --> 01:45:58.790 align:start position:0%
 
hi<01:45:55.760> thank<01:45:55.920> you<01:45:56.760> thanks<01:45:57.360> everyone<01:45:58.360> thanks

01:45:58.790 --> 01:45:58.800 align:start position:0%
hi thank you thanks everyone thanks
 

01:45:58.800 --> 01:46:08.669 align:start position:0%
hi thank you thanks everyone thanks
everyone

01:46:08.669 --> 01:46:08.679 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:46:08.679 --> 01:46:19.390 align:start position:0%
 
safe<01:46:09.679> I<01:46:09.760> can

01:46:19.390 --> 01:46:19.400 align:start position:0%
 
 

01:46:19.400 --> 01:46:22.400 align:start position:0%
 
my